Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Ehney Addison Camp Jr and Mildred Fletcher Tillman Camp Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$41k
Granted FY2024still arriving
7
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$25k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Philanthropy$175kArts & Culture$147kEducation$109kReligion$20kHealth$14kHuman Services$5kRecreation & Sports$1k
02FY2024 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k6 grants · $16k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $25k
$2,500
Median grant
1
States reached
$601k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UNITED WAY OF CENTRAL ALABAMA$25,000
BIRMINGHAM HISTORICAL SOCIETY$5,000
BENEDICTINE SISTERS OF CULLMAN ALABAMA$5,000
ALABAMA ARCHIVES AND HISTORY FOUNDATION$2,500
INDIAN SPRINGS SCHOOL$1,000
QUARTERBACKING CHILDREN'S HEALTH FOUNDATION$1,000
BIRMINGHAM MUSEUM OF ART$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 88% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 13%INDIAN SPRINGS SCHOOL: $51k → 7%BENEDICTINE SISTERS OF CULLMAN ALABAMA: $5k → 16%BIRMINGHAM HISTORICAL SOCIETY: $103k → 16%UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA: $15k → 17%ALABAMA ARCHIVES AND HISTORY FOUNDATION: $3k → 18%INDIAN SPRINGS SCHOOL: $1k → 7%BENEDICTINE SISTERS OF CULLMAN ALABAMA: $5k → 16%UNITED WAY OF CENTRAL ALABAMA: $25k → 16%UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA: $10k → 17%INDIAN SPRINGS SCHOOL: $1k → 7%THE BENEDICTINE SISTERS OF CULLMAN AL: $5k → 16%UNITED WAY OF CENTRAL ALABAMA: $25k → 16%UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA: $9k → 17%INDIAN SPRINGS SCHOOL: $1k → 7%BENEDICTINE SISTERS OF CULLMAN ALABAMA: $1k → 16%UNITED WAY OF CENTRAL ALABAMA: $25k → 16%UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA: $5k → 17%INDIAN SPRINGS SCHOOL: $1k → 7%THE BENEDICTINE SISTERS OF CULLMAN AL: $1k → 16%UNITED WAY OF CENTRAL ALABAMA: $10k → 16%THE BENEDICTINE SISTERS OF CULLMAN AL: $1k → 16%UNITED WAY OF CENTRAL ALABAMA: $10k → 16%THE BENEDICTINE SISTERS OF CULLMAN AL: $1k → 16%UNITED WAY OF CENTRAL ALABAMA: $10k → 16%THE BENEDICTINE SISTERS OF CULLMAN AL: $1k → 16%UNITED WAY OF CENTRAL ALABAMA: $10k → 16%UNITED WAY OF CENTRAL ALABAMA: $10k → 16%BIRMINGHAM HISTORICAL SOCIETY: $5k → 16%BIRMINGHAM HISTORICAL SOCIETY: $3k → 16%BIRMINGHAM HISTORICAL SOCIETY: $3k → 16%BIRMINGHAM HISTORICAL SOCIETY: $1k → 16%BIRMINGHAM HISTORICAL SOCIETY: $1k → 16%BIRMINGHAM HISTORICAL SOCIETY: $1k → 16%BIRMINGHAM HISTORICAL SOCIETY: $1k → 16%THE SALAVATION ARMY: $5k → 16%HIGHLANDS SCHOOL: $15k → 16%HIGHLANDS SCHOOL: $5k → 16%HIGHLANDS SCHOOL: $5k → 16%BIRMINGHAM KIWANIS FOUNDATION: $25k → 16%BIRMINGHAM KIWANIS FOUNDATION: $15k → 16%BIRMINGHAM KIWANIS FOUNDATION: $5k → 16%BIRMINGHAM KIWANIS FOUNDATION: $5k → 16%QUARTERBACKING CHILDREN'S HEALTH FOUNDATION: $3k → 16%QUARTERBACKING CHILDREN'S HEALTH FOUNDATION: $3k → 16%CRIPPLED CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION: $2k → 16%QUARTERBACKING CHILDREN'S HEALTH FOUNDATION: $2k → 16%CRIPPLED CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION: $2k → 16%CRIPPLED CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION: $2k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$461k · 11 repeat orgs$10k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +99% since the first grant, against -30% for those funded once.

11 repeat relationships: 6 still active in FY2024, 5 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

11
3

Total granted

$461k
$7k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+99%
-30%

Still filing today

55%
67%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 94% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $3k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
PhilanthropyArts & CultureEducationCommunity ImprovementOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • UNITED WAY OF CENTRAL ALABAMA INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $125k · revenue +74%
  • BH
    Birmingham Historical Society
    8× · 2017–2024 · $117k · revenue +99%
  • IS
    INDIAN SPRINGS SCHOOL
    5× · 2020–2024 · $55k · revenue +201%

Funded once

  • TS
    THE SALAVATION ARMY
    one grant, 2017 · $5k
  • RM
    RED MOUNTAIN PARK FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2017 · $1k · revenue -66%
  • TM
    THE MOUNTAIN BROOK LIBRARY FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2017 · $1k · revenue -30%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The University Foundation

The university foundation is organized to assist and aid the board of trustees of the university of alabama in fulfilling its educational, research, and public service programs and activities.

—
2
Alabama a&M University Foundation

The Alabama A&M University Foundation was established to receive, hold, invest, manage, use, and administer property of all kinds, whether given absolutely or in trust, for the benefit of Alabama A&M University and its educational,…

—
3
University of North Alabama Foundation

To support the university of north alabama in its educational endeavors.

Education
4
The Medical Foundation of Alabama

To further the image of medicine through financial support for health education programs and projects

—
5
Alabama State Parks Foundation

The alabama state parks foundation was formed in 2018 to raise dollars to supplement state funding of the alabama state parks. the foundation is led by a board of directors who seek to mobilize a statewide network of citizen…

Environment
6
Birmingham Museum of Art Endowment Trust

Purpose is to use income produced by the trust to support the operations of bma at the direction of the directors.

Arts & Culture
7
Uab Educational Foundation

To support the university of alabama at birmingham in its scientific and educational mission, including managing and disbursing funds, acquiring real property, and providing operational flexibility.

Education
8
Cahaba Foundation Inc

Preserve the site of Cahaba, Alabama

Community Improvement
9
Alabama Forestry Foundation

The alabama forestry association works to promote good stewardship of our renewable forest resources for the benefit of society, our members, and the forest products industry.

Environment
10
Alabama High School of Mathematics and Science Foundation

Provide facilities and support for the alabama high school of mathematics and science

Education
11
Mountain Brook City Schools Foundation

The mission of the Foundation is to mobilize community support and resources for the academic improvement of the Mountain Brook City School System through technological improvement, library enhancement, and professional development.

Education
12
Alabama School of Fine Arts Foundation

The foundation's purpose is to sponsor and encourage the efforts of the alabama school of fine arts. the school is the beneficiary of all gifts and charitable disbursements, and qualifies for such due to its not for profit status.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Indian Springs School; the most unlike its peers is Red Mountain Park Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 15 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
5/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

UNITED WAY OF CENTRAL ALABAMA INC: $125,000 · PhilanthropyUNITED WAY OF CENTRAL ALABAMA INCQuarterbacking Children's Health Foundation: $14,000 · PhilanthropyQuarterbacking Children's Health …Birmingham Historical Society: $116,500 · Arts & CultureBirmingham Historical Societ…+1 more: $2,500 · Arts & CultureUNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA: $39,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF ALABAMAHIGHLANDS DAY SCHOOL FOUNDATION: $26,000 · OtherHIGHLANDS DAY SCHOOL FOUN…BENEDICTINE SISTERS OF CULLMAN ALABAMA: $11,000 · OtherBENEDICTINE SISTERS OF CU…THE BENEDICTINE SISTERS OF CULLMAN AL: $9,000 · OtherTHE BENEDICTINE SISTERS O…BIRMINGHAM MUSEUM OF ART: $8,000 · OtherBIRMINGHAM MUSEUM OF ARTUNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA - BIRMINGHAM: $7,500 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA - B…THE SALAVATION ARMY: $5,000 · Other+1 more: $1,000 · OtherINDIAN SPRINGS SCHOOL: $55,000 · EducationINDIAN SPRING…+1 more: $1,000 · EducationBIRMINGHAM KIWANIS FOUNDATION: $50,000 · Community ImprovementBIRMINGHAM K…
Philanthropy$139,000Arts & Culture$119,000Other$106,500Education$56,000Community Improvement$50,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetUNITED WAY OF CENTRAL ALABAMA INC: $125,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetBirmingham Historical Society: $116,500 over 8y, 22% of budgetINDIAN SPRINGS SCHOOL: $55,000 over 5y, 1.5% of budgetBIRMINGHAM KIWANIS FOUNDATION: $50,000 over 4y, 6.0% of budgetHIGHLANDS DAY SCHOOL FOUNDATION: $26,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetQuarterbacking Children's Health Foundation: $14,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetALABAMA ARCHIVES & HISTORY FOUNDATION: $2,500 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetRED MOUNTAIN PARK FOUNDATION: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE MOUNTAIN BROOK LIBRARY FOUNDATION: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds UNITED WAY OF CENTRAL ALABAMA INC ↗
  • Who funds Birmingham Historical Society ↗
  • Who funds INDIAN SPRINGS SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds BIRMINGHAM KIWANIS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds HIGHLANDS DAY SCHOOL FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Quarterbacking Children's Health Foundation ↗
  • Who funds ALABAMA ARCHIVES & HISTORY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds RED MOUNTAIN PARK FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds THE MOUNTAIN BROOK LIBRARY FOUNDATION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Dunn-French FoundationAL15.7× affinity5 shared granteesties to 6 of 6Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Dunn-French Foundation · The Maynard Nexsen Foundation · The Community Foundation of Greater Birmingham · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Ehney Addison Camp Jr and Mildred Fletcher Tillman Camp Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Ehney Addison Camp Jr and Mildred Fletcher Tillman Camp Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%2%6%14%25%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 15 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Ehney Addison Camp Jr and Mildred Fletcher Tillman Camp’s filings →

    More from the funding graph