Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Edward S Gordon Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$93k
Granted FY2023
9
Grants FY2023
2
States reached
$40k
Largest

Read this first · the figures below need context

97% of The Edward S Gordon Foundation’s FY2025 grant dollars went to Jewish Communal Fund, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2025 names 9 organizations directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it. Everything below is therefore FY2023, the last year The Edward S Gordon Foundation named its own grantees at scale: 5 organizations, $93k. It is dated, not current.

Organizations named directly on the return

8
’17
6
’18
7
’19
9
’20
6
’21
7
’22
5
’23
3
’24
9
’25

Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.

01What it funds
0178% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Religion$191kEducation$149kInternational$79kHealth$75kHuman Services$23kPhilanthropy$13kYouth Development$6kArts & Culture$5kOther$0
02FY2023 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2023

  • Under $10k5 grants · $13k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $80k
$5,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$141k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Friends of the Israel Defense Forces$40,000
YOUNG ISRAEL OF HARRISON$20,000
Duvdevan Foundation$10,000
Individual grant recipient$10,000
NJOP$5,000
Gilda's Club Westchester$4,750
Mesivta Yeshiva R Chaim Berlin$1,000
Alzheimer's Disease Research$1,000
The Good Dog Foundation$900
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–24, $63k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%The Good Dog Foundation: $2k → 11%The Good Dog Foundation: $900 → 11%guiding eyes for the blind: $25k → 9%guiding eyes for the blind: $25k → 9%guiding eyes for the blind: $10k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

NH
NY
NJ
NE
MD
DE
SC
DC
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

87%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$686k · 20 repeat orgs$102k to everyone else

20 repeat relationships: 9 still active in FY2023, 11 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2023 (too recent to call). Read against FY2023, the last year this funder named its own grantees directly; its giving has since run through a sponsor, which reports no donor behind each grant.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

20
17

Total granted

$686k
$72k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

-4%
+33%

Still filing today

50%
24%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 73% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $29k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
InternationalHealthPhilanthropyHuman ServicesReligionRecreation & SportsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • UNIVERSITY OF DELAWARE
    4× · 2018–2021 · $138k · revenue +29%
  • FRIENDS OF THE ISRAEL DEFENSE FORCES
    7× · 2017–2025 · $98k · revenue +53%
  • GE
    GUIDING EYES FOR THE BLIND INC
    3× · 2020–2022 · $60k · revenue +66%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2020 · $20k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2020 · $15k
  • TM
    Tenement Museum
    one grant, 2019 · $5k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Jewish Agency for Israel

The jewish agency binds jews across ideologies and civilizations together in a worldwide jewish family with israel at its center. it provides the global framework for aliyah, ensures global jewish safety, strengthens jewish identity and…

—
2
Weizmann Institute of Science

The weizmann institute of science, located in rehovot, israel, is one of the worlds top-ranking, multidisciplinary research institutions. at any one time, several thousand scientists, staff and students are involved in hundreds of research…

Science & Tech
3
University of Judaism Foundation
—
4
Jewish Community Relations Council of New York

Jcrc-ny builds relationships to advance the values, interests and security of the new york jewish community and to create a more interconnected new york for all.

Civil Rights
5
American Friends of Bar-Ilan University

We fundraise in the u.s. to support, and raise awareness of, bar-ilan university in israel.

Education
6
Albert Einstein College of Medicine

Committed to exceptional healthcare quality for all and actively engaged with our community, einstein drives scientific discovery and educates compassionate leaders in health and science.

Education
7
American Friends of Hebrew University Inc

Support the hebrew univ. of jerusalem, israel's foremost center of higher edu. & research.

International
8
The Haron Dahan Fund for Bar-Ilan University in Israel

The fund's primary exempt mission is to solicit grants and contributions to support the educational mission of the bar-ilan university's azrieli faculty of medicine in the galilee.

Education
9
Neurology Associates of Stony Brook University Faculty Practice Corp

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
10
Friends of United Hatzalah Inc

Friends of united hatzalah, inc .(fouh) raises and provides funding to not-for-profit organizations that provide medical and trauma-related first responder services in israel and around the world. fouh focuses the majority of its support…

Arts & Culture
11
The Israel Institute Inc

The israel institute, inc. (the institute) enhances knowledge about modern israel by ensuring that more students have access to courses about israel during their time on campus.

International
12
American Friends of Rabbinical College Netiv Hadaat Inc

To support, benefit, and assist yeshivat netiv hadaat- jerusalem

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Jewish Communal Fund; the most unlike its peers is The Sallie Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

21 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 21 of the 47 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
21/21
Grantees still filing
13/21
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

JEWISH COMMUNAL FUND: $3,199,381 · PhilanthropyJEWISH COMMUNAL FUND+4 more: $33,510 · PhilanthropyNATIONAL COUNCIL OF YOUNG ISRAEL: $170,000 · OtherNATIONAL COUNCI…UNIVERSITY OF DELAWARE: $137,500 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF D…GUIDING EYES: $45,000 · OtherGUIDING EYESIndividual grant recipient: $41,000 · OtherIndividual gran…Individual grant recipient: $30,000 · OtherIndividual gran…Individual grant recipient: $20,000 · Other+26 more: $100,100 · Other+26 moreFRIENDS OF THE ISRAEL DEFENSE FORCES: $98,100 · InternationalISRAEL EMERGENCY ALLIANCE: $10,000 · International+1 more: $1,000 · InternationalGUIDING EYES FOR THE BLIND INC: $60,000 · Human ServicesTHE GOOD DOG FOUNDATION INC: $2,800 · Human ServicesNATIONAL JEWISH OUTREACH PROGRAM IN: $40,000 · ReligionCANCER SUPPORT COMMUNITY GREATER NY & CT INC: $5,750 · HealthAMERICAN FRIENDS OF SHEBA MEDICAL CENTER INC: $1,000 · HealthWinifred Masterson Burke Medical Research: $1,000 · HealthRAMAPO FOR CHILDREN INC: $6,000 · Recreation & Sports
Philanthropy$3,232,891Other$543,600International$109,100Human Services$62,800Religion$40,000Health$7,750Recreation & Sports$6,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetJEWISH COMMUNAL FUND: $3,199,381 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF DELAWARE: $137,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE ISRAEL DEFENSE FORCES: $98,100 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetGUIDING EYES FOR THE BLIND INC: $60,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetNATIONAL JEWISH OUTREACH PROGRAM IN: $40,000 over 8y, 0.4% of budgetHARRISON VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT: $10,000 over 1y, 11% of budgetUNITED JEWISH APPEAL-FEDERATION OF JEWISH PHILANTHROPIES OF NEW YORK INC: $8,100 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetRAMAPO FOR CHILDREN INC: $6,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetCANCER SUPPORT COMMUNITY GREATER NY & CT INC: $5,750 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetNew England College: $4,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetDANNY & RONS RESCUE: $3,100 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetAVENUES FOR JUSTICE INC: $3,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetTHE GOOD DOG FOUNDATION INC: $2,800 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetTHE SALLIE FOUNDATION INC: $2,500 over 2y, 2.5% of budgetWinifred Masterson Burke Medical Research: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJERUSALEM FOUNDATION INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds JEWISH COMMUNAL FUND ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF DELAWARE ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF THE ISRAEL DEFENSE FORCES ↗
  • Who funds GUIDING EYES FOR THE BLIND INC ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL JEWISH OUTREACH PROGRAM IN ↗
  • Who funds PEF ISRAEL ENDOWMENT FUNDS INC ↗
  • Who funds HARRISON VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT ↗
  • Who funds ISRAEL EMERGENCY ALLIANCE ↗
  • Who funds UNITED JEWISH APPEAL-FEDERATION OF JEWISH PHILANTHROPIES OF NEW YORK INC ↗
  • Who funds RAMAPO FOR CHILDREN INC ↗
  • Who funds CANCER SUPPORT COMMUNITY GREATER NY & CT INC ↗
  • Who funds New England College ↗
  • Who funds DANNY & RONS RESCUE ↗
  • Who funds AVENUES FOR JUSTICE INC ↗
  • Who funds THE GOOD DOG FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds THE SALLIE FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds GVNGorg ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF SHEBA MEDICAL CENTER INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Jewish Communal FundNY15.5× affinity6 shared granteesties to 8 of 8Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Jewish Communal Fund · National Philanthropic Trust · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Edward S Gordon Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Edward S Gordon Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%8%15%22%30%share of the org’s income from government →median 30%
  • University of Delaware: 30% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–30%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Edward S Gordon Foundation?

Find your warmest path to The Edward S Gordon Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 47 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2023, released 2023. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Edward S Gordon’s filings →

More from the funding graph