Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Edelstein Family Foundation

$1k
Granted FY2020
6
Grants FY2020
1
States reached
$930
Largest
01What it funds
0187% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2020.

Religion$39kInternational$10kEducation$3kHuman Services$2kArts & Culture$935Health$200Public Safety & Disaster$50Other$0
02FY2020 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$108
Median grant
1
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CONGREGATION YAGDIL TORAH$930
TALMUD TORAH SIACH YITZCHAK$180
CONGREGATION KEHILATH JESHURUN$108
AMERICAN FRIENDS OF DAF$72
CHAI LIFELINE$50
HATZOLAH OF EAST SIDE$36
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–17, $2k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%MATAN: $1k → 14%MATAN: $1k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

49%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$26k · 14 repeat orgs$27k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +99% since the first grant, against +39% for those funded once.

14 repeat relationships: 4 still active in FY2020, 10 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2020 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

14
22

Total granted

$26k
$26k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+99%
+39%

Still filing today

29%
32%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2020, 91% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $122 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20
HealthEducationArts & CultureHuman ServicesReligionInternationalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AF
    AM FR OF TORAH CENTER - CRACOW PODG
    3× · 2017–2019 · $11k
  • AF
    AM FR OF TORAH CENTER - CRACOW PODGORETZ
    3× · 2017–2019 · $4k
  • CK
    CONGREGATION KEHILATH JESHURUN
    3× · 2018–2020 · $4k

Funded once

  • AF
    AM FRIENDS OF NETIV ARYEH
    one grant, 2018 · $10k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2017 · $4k
  • YU
    YESHIVA UNIVERSITYgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $3k · revenue +39%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
University of Judaism Foundation
—
2
Yeshiva Ohr Yisroel
Philanthropy
3
Sherit Isroel
—
4
Eastern European Jewish Heritage Foundation
Philanthropy
5
Rabbi Isaac Elchanan Theological Seminary

To prepare students for the rabbinate and to issue the traditional certificate of ordination in connection therewith. the seminary is authorized to confer the degree of master of hebrew literature (m.h.l.), doctor of hebrew literature…

Education
6
Zichron Avrohom Yosef
Philanthropy
7
Bnei Moshe
Philanthropy
8
Torah Temimah Jerusalem

The school trains advanced talmudic scholars, enabling them to become high level teachers and religious leaders in israel and the united states using specific methodology combining traditional talmudic study with innovative learning…

Education
9
American Friends of Yeshiva Aish Hatorah
—
10
Tamim Academies
Philanthropy
11
Bar Ilan University in Israel Inc

Biu produces students who excel in the sciences, humanities, law, engineering, business & the arts.

—
12
Keren Yaakov Ben Menachen Tzvi Foundation
Philanthropy
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Matan Inc; the most unlike its peers is Blood Cancer United Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 14 of the 40 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
14/14
Grantees still filing
10/14
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

AM FR OF TORAH CENTER - CRACOW PODG: $10,800 · OtherAM FR OF TORAH CENTER - CRACOW PODGAM FRIENDS OF NETIV ARYEH: $10,000 · OtherAM FRIENDS OF NETIV ARYEHAM FR OF TORAH CENTER - CRACOW PODGORETZ: $4,100 · OtherAM FR OF TORAH CENTER - CRACOW PODGORETZCONGREGATION KEHILATH JESHURUN: $3,876 · OtherCONGREGATION KEHILATH JESHURUNIndividual grant recipient: $3,600 · OtherIndividual grant recipientCONGREGATION SHEARITH ISRAEL: $2,755 · OtherCONGREGATION SHEARITH ISRAELCONGREGATION YAGDIL TORAH: $1,680 · Other+20 more: $8,747 · Other+20 morePEF ISRAEL ENDOWMENT FUNDS INC: $9,400 · PhilanthropyPEF ISRAEL ENDOWMEN…AMERICAN FRIENDS OF MATAN INC: $1,000 · PhilanthropyAMERICAN FRIENDS OF…YESHIVA UNIVERSITY: $2,500 · EducationBNOS BAIS YAAKOV OF FAR ROCKAWAY: $325 · EducationMATAN INC: $2,000 · Human ServicesMuseum of Modern Art: $370 · Arts & CultureTHE JEWISH MUSEUM: $365 · Arts & CultureJEWISH NATIONAL FUND (KEREN KAYEMETH LEISRAEL) INC: $180 · InternationalAMERICAN FRIENDS OF ERETZ HEMDAH: $50 · InternationalBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC: $50 · HealthUpper East Side Hatzolah Inc: $50 · HealthCHAI LIFELINE INC: $50 · HealthNATIONAL JEWISH OUTREACH PROGRAM IN: $100 · Religion
Other$45,558Philanthropy$10,400Education$2,825Human Services$2,000Arts & Culture$735International$230Health$150Religion$100

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetPEF ISRAEL ENDOWMENT FUNDS INC: $9,400 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetYESHIVA UNIVERSITY: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMATAN INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF MATAN INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMuseum of Modern Art: $370 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE JEWISH MUSEUM: $365 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetBNOS BAIS YAAKOV OF FAR ROCKAWAY: $325 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetJEWISH NATIONAL FUND (KEREN KAYEMETH LEISRAEL) INC: $180 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL JEWISH OUTREACH PROGRAM IN: $100 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC: $50 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUpper East Side Hatzolah Inc: $50 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHAI LIFELINE INC: $50 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetKOLLEL OF GREATER BOSTON INC: $50 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds PEF ISRAEL ENDOWMENT FUNDS INC ↗
  • Who funds YESHIVA UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds MATAN INC ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF MATAN INC ↗
  • Who funds Museum of Modern Art ↗
  • Who funds THE JEWISH MUSEUM ↗
  • Who funds BNOS BAIS YAAKOV OF FAR ROCKAWAY ↗
  • Who funds JEWISH NATIONAL FUND (KEREN KAYEMETH LEISRAEL) INC ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL JEWISH OUTREACH PROGRAM IN ↗
  • Who funds BLOOD CANCER UNITED INC ↗
  • Who funds Upper East Side Hatzolah Inc ↗
  • Who funds CHAI LIFELINE INC ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF ERETZ HEMDAH ↗
  • Who funds KOLLEL OF GREATER BOSTON INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Jewish Communal FundNY24× affinity11 shared granteesties to 9 of 9Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Jewish Communal Fund · The Ojc Fund · F G Foundation · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Edelstein Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Edelstein Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →median 4%
  • Kollel of Greater Boston Inc: 4% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Edelstein Family Foundation?

Find your warmest path to The Edelstein Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 40 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2020, released 2020. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2024) is on record but names no grant recipient in the published copy, so the figures above are from FY2020, the most recent year this funder’s grantee list reached the public record.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Edelstein Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph