Skip to content
The E Ike Eshaghian Foundation Inc at a glance

· Private foundation

The E Ike Eshaghian Foundation Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$271k
Granted FY2024still arriving
16
Grants FY2024still arriving
3
States reached
$100k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Philanthropy$420kInternational$399kPublic Benefit$157kArts & Culture$107kReligion$65kAnimals$50kRecreation & Sports$35kHuman Services$34kOther$0
02FY2024 · 16 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k9 grants · $33k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $89k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $150k
$7,500
Median grant
3
States reached
$9.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
JP MORGAN DONOR-ADVISED FUND$100,000
INTERNATIONAL CRISIS GROUP$50,000
KIDZENSHIP INC$25,000
WORLD TRADE CENTER PERFORMING ARTS$21,000
Individual grant recipient$20,200
AMERICA'S FUTURE INC$12,500
REELABILITIES INTERNATIONAL$10,000
NY COMMUNITY FRIDGE CORP$7,500
VOTEAMERICA$7,500
DANANG FOUNDATION CORP$5,000
Individual grant recipient$5,000
CONSORTIUM FOR SUSTAINABLE URBANIZA$3,125
THE GO PROJECT INC$1,500
LOWER EASTSIDE GIRLS CLUB$1,000
Individual grant recipient$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY22–24, $47k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 79% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%UPLIFT AFGHANISTAN FUND: $10k → 10%KIDZENSHIP INC: $25k → 14%KIDIZENSHIP INC: $5k → 14%KIDIZENSHIP INC: $4k → 14%KIDIZENSHIP INC: $4k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

44%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$574k · 11 repeat orgs$739k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +52% since the first grant, against +24% for those funded once.

11 repeat relationships: 2 still active in FY2024, 9 since wound down; 14 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

11
22

Total granted

$574k
$543k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+52%
+24%

Still filing today

82%
59%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 28% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $196k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
InternationalArts & CultureRecreation & SportsHuman ServicesHealthAnimalsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • IC
    INTERNATIONAL CRISIS GROUP
    5× · 2018–2024 · $150k · revenue +36%
  • HI
    HIAS INC
    4× · 2017–2020 · $143k · revenue +122%
  • AR
    ANIMAL RECOVERY MISSION INC
    2× · 2018–2019 · $50k · revenue +8%

Funded once

  • MS
    MORGAN STANLEY GLOBBAL IMPACT FUND
    one grant, 2020 · $320k
  • AF
    ALLIANCE FOR OPEN SOCIETY
    one grant, 2021 · $100k
  • SO
    SPECIAL OLYMPICS INCgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $30k · revenue +48%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Jewish Museum

The mission of the jewish museum is to collect, preserve, exhibit and interpret art and jewish culture. see schedule o for more information.

Arts & Culture
2
Us Middle East Project Inc

The organization's mission is to engage in non partisan analysis of u.s. foreign policy in the middle east, with special emphasis on the middle east peace process, and to present policymakers in the united states, in the region and in the…

International
3
Museum of Jewish Heritage a Living Memorial to the Holocaust

The museum of jewish heritage - a living memorial to the holocaust is new york's contribution to the global responsibility to never forget. see schedule o for additional information.

Arts & Culture
4
Weizmann Institute of Science

The weizmann institute of science, located in rehovot, israel, is one of the worlds top-ranking, multidisciplinary research institutions. at any one time, several thousand scientists, staff and students are involved in hundreds of research…

Science & Tech
5
New York Genome Center Inc

Operate a state-of-the-art, world-class genomic research center that creates and uses advanced genomics to understand the genetic basis of disease. for more information, see schedule o.

Health
6
Observer Research Foundation America

Organization mission the observer research foundation america orf america is an independent, non-partisan, and nonprofit organization in washington dc dedicated to addressing policy challenges facing the united states, india, and their…

International
7
Peter G Peterson Institute for International Economics

The peterson institute for international economics (piie) is an independent nonprofit, nonpartisan research organization dedicated to strengthening prosperity and human welfare in the global economy through expert analysis and practical…

Social Science
8
Kadist Collection Manager Inc
Arts & Culture
9
Institute for Eastwest Studies Inc

Eastwest institute (ewi) works to reduce international conflict, addressing seemingly intractable problems that threaten world security and stability. (continued on schedule o)

—
10
The Neue Galerie New York
Arts & Culture
11
National Committee On United States -China Relations Inc

Organization's mission: the national committee on united states-china relations fosters communication and exchange between the united states and china in support of productive bilateral relations and u.s. national interests. the national…

International
12
Museum of Modern Art

The Museum of Modern Art is a private, non-profit institution chartered by the State of New York Department of Education in 1929 to foster public awareness of modern and contemporary art. (Continued in Schedule O)

Arts & Culture
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Hias Inc; the most unlike its peers is American Museum of Natural History. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

29 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 29 of the 47 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
29/29
Grantees still filing
19/29
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

MORGAN STANLEY GLOBBAL IMPACT FUND: $320,000 · OtherMORGAN STANLEY GLOBBAL IMPACT FUNDJP MORGAN DONOR-ADVISED FUND: $100,000 · OtherJP MORGAN DONOR-ADVISED FUNDALLIANCE FOR OPEN SOCIETY: $100,000 · OtherALLIANCE FOR OPEN SOCIETYAMNON NETZER CENTER: $65,000 · OtherAMNON NETZER CENTERHH DALAI LAMA LIBRARY & MUSEUM: $26,600 · Other+22 more: $113,525 · Other+22 moreINTERNATIONAL CRISIS GROUP: $150,000 · InternationalINTERNATIONAL CRISIS GROUPHIAS INC: $143,300 · InternationalHIAS INCESCALA INITIATIVE INC: $40,000 · InternationalESCALA INITIATIVE INC+3 more: $22,000 · International+3 moreKIMIA FOUNDATION: $48,600 · Arts & CultureWORLD TRADE CENTER PERFORMING ARTS CENTER INC: $21,000 · Arts & CultureREELABILITIES INTERNATIONAL INC: $10,000 · Arts & CultureAMERICAN FRIENDS OF BEIT HATFUTSOT D/B/A AMERICAN FRIENDS OF ANU-MUSEUM: $4,000 · Arts & Culture+2 more: $3,500 · Arts & CultureANIMAL RECOVERY MISSION INC: $50,000 · AnimalsKIDIZENSHIP INC: $37,000 · Human ServicesUplift Afghanistan Fund: $10,000 · Human ServicesSPECIAL OLYMPICS INC: $30,000 · Recreation & SportsUNTERMYER GARDENS CONSERVANCY INC: $4,250 · Recreation & SportsCAMP GAN ISRAEL NORTHEAST INC: $3,500 · Recreation & Sports+1 more: $1,000 · Recreation & SportsMONTEFIORE MEDICAL CENTER: $10,000 · Health
Other$725,125International$355,300Arts & Culture$87,100Animals$50,000Human Services$47,000Recreation & Sports$38,750Health$10,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetINTERNATIONAL CRISIS GROUP: $150,000 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetHIAS INC: $143,300 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetANIMAL RECOVERY MISSION INC: $50,000 over 2y, 1.1% of budgetKIMIA FOUNDATION: $48,600 over 2y, 53% of budgetESCALA INITIATIVE INC: $40,000 over 2y, 3.8% of budgetKIDIZENSHIP INC: $37,000 over 3y, 20% of budgetSPECIAL OLYMPICS INC: $30,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWORLD TRADE CENTER PERFORMING ARTS CENTER INC: $21,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE HOPE FOUNDATION USA: $10,000 over 1y, 24% of budgetUplift Afghanistan Fund: $10,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetMONTEFIORE MEDICAL CENTER: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetREELABILITIES INTERNATIONAL INC: $10,000 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetNY COMMUNITY FRIDGE CORP: $7,500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetThe American Jewish Joint Distribution Committee Inc: $7,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGREENWICH HOUSE INC: $7,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE ASIA SOCIETY: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDANANG FOUNDATION CORP: $5,000 over 1y, 2.3% of budgetOCEANA INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUNTERMYER GARDENS CONSERVANCY INC: $4,250 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF BEIT HATFUTSOT D/B/A AMERICAN FRIENDS OF ANU-MUSEUM: $4,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetCAMP GAN ISRAEL NORTHEAST INC: $3,500 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetNEW ALTERNATIVES FOR CHILDREN INC: $2,700 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetToo Young to Wed Inc: $2,500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetMARIAN AND EDWARD MACDOWELL INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE GO PROJECT INC: $1,500 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetTHE LOWER EAST SIDE GIRLS CLUB OF NEW YORK INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNEIGHBORS FOR REFUGEES INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetWASHINGTON SQUARE PARK CONSERVANCY INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetAmerican Museum of Natural History: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Goldman Sachs Cha…Jewish Communal FundThe Ford FoundationSelect Equity Group F…Gs Donor Advised Phil…Morgan Stanley Global…National Philanthropi…The Ayco Charitable F…Raymond James Charita…Vanguard Charitable E…Jpmorgan Chase Founda…The Pfizer Foundation…
The Goldman Sachs Charitable Gift FundNY17.7× affinity7 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Goldman Sachs Charitable Gift Fund · Jewish Communal Fund · The Ford Foundation · Select Equity Group Foundation · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · The Ayco Charitable Foundation · Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · The Pfizer Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The E Ike Eshaghian Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The E Ike Eshaghian Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%3%10%23%40%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 88%
  • Hias Inc: 88% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 47 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on E Ike Eshaghian’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home