Skip to content
The E-Boys Club at a glance

· Private foundation

The E-Boys Club

Its FY2018 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$10k
Granted FY2018
18
Grants FY2018
6
States reached
$1k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
0184% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2018.

International$8kYouth Development$6kEducation$5kPhilanthropy$5kEnvironment$4kHealth$4kRecreation & Sports$2kScience & Tech$2kOther$0
02FY2018 · 18 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$500
Median grant
6
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Climate Solutions$1,396
Individual grant recipient$1,100
Pushing Boundaries$1,000
MI Baseball Boosters club$1,000
Young life$1,000
Environmental Protection Network$500
Boys Girls Club of King County$500
MI Schools Foundation$500
Union of Concerned Scientists$500
Kiran Anjali Project$380
Treehouse$300
SSP Project Pilgrimage$258
Path from Poverty$250
AM Cancer Society$250
Individual grant recipient$250
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–17, $500) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%American Red Cross: $500 → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

NH
WA
MA
OR
IA
AZ
DC
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

22%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$9k · 7 repeat orgs$34k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +59% since the first grant, against +46% for those funded once.

7 repeat relationships: 7 still active in FY2018, 0 since wound down; 11 grantees were first funded in FY2018 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

7
25

Total granted

$9k
$27k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+59%
+46%

Still filing today

57%
40%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2018, 27% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $7k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18
InternationalHealthEnvironmentYouth DevelopmentHuman ServicesPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • YL
    YOUNG LIFE
    2× · 2017–2018 · $3k · revenue +59%
  • THE UNION OF CONCERNED SCIENTISTS INC
    2× · 2017–2018 · $2k · revenue +12%
  • KA
    Kiran Anjali Project
    2× · 2017–2018 · $880 · revenue +10%

Funded once

  • GP
    GLOBAL PARTNERSHIPSgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $7k · revenue +116%
  • SV
    SOCIAL VENTURE PARTNERS
    one grant, 2017 · $5k · revenue -66%
  • UO
    Univ of Washington Office of Develo
    one grant, 2017 · $3k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Friends of the Earth

Friends of the earth strives for a more healthy and just world by defendng the environment and human health while advancing social and economic justice by conducting research and education, transforming the economy so it protects the…

Environment
2
Waterorg

Water.org's goal is to bring safe water and sanitation to the world through access to small, affordable loans.

International
3
Partnersglobal

Partnersglobal (partners) works through a global network to support local leaders and create partnerships that transform conflict, strengthen democratic institutions, and achieve sustainable development.

International
4
Watttime Corporation

To raise awareness about the potential to reduce environmental harm by shifting electricity use to particular times; to encourage the development and spread of common protocols for this practice.

Science & Tech
5
The Climate Group Inc

Climate group advances climate action by mobilizing business and government leadership to drive systemic decarbonization across energy, transport, and industry, while engaging the public through large-scale convenings and global platforms.…

Environment
6
Partnership for Public Service Inc

Making our government work better is a daunting task, and we are a small organization seeking to transform a government that employs millions of civilians and manages trillions of dollars in taxpayer revenue needed to protect public…

Employment
7
The Water Research Foundation

The purpose of the water research foundation (wrf) is a definitive research organization to advance the science of all things water to better meet the evolving needs of its subscribers and the water sector. to engage exclusively in…

Environment
8
World Resources Institute

Wri is committed to creating change that improves people's lives and ensures the natural world can thrive. (see schedule o)wri's bold vision requires a formula for success we call "count it. change it. scale it.":- count it: our work is…

International
9
Open Government Partnership Secretariat

To secure concrete commitments from governments to their citizenry to promote transparency, empower citizens, fight corruption and harness new technologies to strengthen citizen centered governance.

International
10
Cdp North America Inc

Cdp north america, inc. 's ("cdp-na") vision for the future is a thriving economy that works for people and planet in the long term. we focus investors and companies on taking urgent action to build a truly sustainable economy by measuring…

Environment
11
International Budget Partnership

Ibp works with civil society, governments, international institutions and the private sector to bring about a world in which empowered citizens participate in open, inclusive public budgeting processes to shape policies and practices that…

International
12
Coalition for Green Capital D/B/a American Green Bank Consortium

Cgc operates as a nonprofit financial institution that invests directly and through partners to transform financial markets by using public and private investing to accelerate the deployment of projects that strengthen the grid, reduce…

Environment
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Global Partnerships; the most unlike its peers is Environmental Protection Network. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

20 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 20 of the 43 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
18/20
Grantees still filing
17/20
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Univ of Washington Office of Develo: $3,100 · OtherUniv of Washington Office of DeveloFRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTER: $1,850 · OtherFRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTERMercer Island Boys Basketball B Clu: $1,750 · OtherMercer Island Boys Basketball B CluIndividual grant recipient: $1,500 · OtherIndividual grant recipientCLIMATE SOLUTIONS: $1,396 · OtherCLIMATE SOLUTIONSFriends of Dartmouth Football: $1,287 · OtherFriends of Dartmouth FootballMercer Island School Founation: $1,100 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $1,100 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $1,000 · OtherPUSHING BOUNDARIES: $1,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $1,000 · OtherMI Baseball Boosters club: $1,000 · Other+15 more: $3,943 · Other+15 moreGLOBAL PARTNERSHIPS: $7,000 · HealthGLOBAL PARTNERSHIPSFRIENDS OF YOUTH: $500 · HealthFRIENDS OF YOUTHALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC: $500 · HealthALZHEIMER'S DISEASE …SOCIAL VENTURE PARTNERS: $5,000 · PhilanthropySOCIAL VENTU…YOUNG LIFE: $3,000 · Youth DevelopmentYOUNG LIF…TREEHOUSE: $800 · Youth DevelopmentTREEHOUSETHE UNION OF CONCERNED SCIENTISTS INC: $1,500 · InternationalKiran Anjali Project: $880 · InternationalWOMEN'S ENTERPRISES INTERNATIONAL DBA PATH FROM POVERTY: $250 · InternationalFAITH IN PRACTICE: $250 · InternationalENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE FUND INCORPORATED: $1,500 · EnvironmentENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION NETWORK: $500 · EnvironmentOUR CHILDREN'S TRUST: $250 · EnvironmentAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $500 · Human ServicesMARY'S PLACE SEATTLE: $50 · Human ServicesCornell University: $250 · Education
Other$21,026Health$8,000Philanthropy$5,000Youth Development$3,800International$2,880Environment$2,250Human Services$550Education$250

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetGLOBAL PARTNERSHIPS: $7,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSOCIAL VENTURE PARTNERS: $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetYOUNG LIFE: $3,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTER: $1,850 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE UNION OF CONCERNED SCIENTISTS INC: $1,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE FUND INCORPORATED: $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCLIMATE SOLUTIONS: $1,396 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetPUSHING BOUNDARIES: $1,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetKiran Anjali Project: $880 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetTREEHOUSE: $800 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION NETWORK: $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetFRIENDS OF YOUTH: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWOMEN'S ENTERPRISES INTERNATIONAL DBA PATH FROM POVERTY: $250 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCRYOUT: $250 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetOUR CHILDREN'S TRUST: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCornell University: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFAITH IN PRACTICE: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMARY'S PLACE SEATTLE: $50 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

ImpactassetsincGs Donor Advised Phil…National Philanthropi…Vanguard Charitable E…American Online Givin…Donor Advised Charita…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
ImpactassetsincMD12.5× affinity4 shared granteesties to 7 of 7Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Impactassetsinc · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The E-Boys Club funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The E-Boys Club. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    2get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 43 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2018, released 2018. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on E-Boys Club’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home