Skip to content
The Dugald W Hudson Charitable Trst Nancy Reeves Mansfield at a glance

· Private foundation

The Dugald W Hudson Charitable Trst Nancy Reeves Mansfield

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$100k
Granted FY2025still arriving
11
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$20k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
0193% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2025.

Education$414kReligion$122kPhilanthropy$106kArts & Culture$47kHealth$32kHousing & Shelter$5kOther$0
02FY2025 · 11 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k6 grants · $30k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $71k
$9,339
Median grant
3
States reached
$1.8M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
GEORGIA STATE UNIVERSITY$20,000
TRINITY PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH$13,000
HISTORIC OAKLAND FOUNDATION$12,500
CHRISTCHURCH SCHOOL$12,500
SMITH COLLEGE$12,500
11 OTHER CHARITIES$9,339
Individual grant recipient$7,500
DECORATIVE ARTS TRUST$6,000
PLANNED PARENTHOOD$5,000
TRINITY EARLY LEARNING CENTER MILES$1,500
THE GEORGIA TRUST$250
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY18–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 94% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%SMITH COLLEGE: $13k → 12%DECORATIVE ARTS TRUST: $20k → 10%GEORGIAN CHAMBER PLAYERS: $8k → 8%COLUMBIA THEOLOGICAL SEMINARY: $6k → 14%CHRISTCHURCH: $15k → 14%SMITH COLLEGE: $10k → 12%DECORATIVE ARTS TRUST: $6k → 10%CHRISTCHURCH SCHOOL: $15k → 14%SMITH COLLEGE: $8k → 12%DECORATIVE ARTS TRUST: $6k → 10%CHRISTCHURCH SCHOOL: $15k → 14%CHRISTCHURCH SCHOOL: $13k → 14%HISTORIC OAKLAND FOUNDATION: $13k → 13%CHRISTCHURCH SCHOOL: $13k → 14%TRINITY PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH: $21k → 13%CHRISTCHURCH SCHOOL: $6k → 14%TRINITY PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH: $20k → 13%TRINITY PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH: $19k → 13%TRINITY PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH: $15k → 13%TRINITY PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH: $13k → 13%THE WESTMINSTER SCHOOLS: $10k → 13%TRINITY PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH: $6k → 13%TRINITY PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH: $5k → 13%THE WESTMINSTER SCHOOLS: $5k → 13%ATLANTA GIRLS SCHOOL: $39k → 13%GEORGIA STATE UNIVERSITY: $39k → 13%ATLANTA GIRLS SCHOOL: $29k → 13%GEORGIA STATE UNIVERSITY: $25k → 13%GEORGIA STATE UNIVERSITY: $23k → 13%ATLANTA GIRLS SCHOOL: $22k → 13%21 OTHER CHARITIES: $21k → 13%GEORGIA STATE UNIVERSITY: $20k → 13%GEORGIA STATE UNIVERSITY: $17k → 13%GEORGIA STATE UNIVERSITY: $17k → 13%ATLANTA GIRLS SCHOOL: $15k → 13%ATLANTA GIRLS SCHOOL: $15k → 13%19 OTHER CHARITIES: $14k → 13%22 OTHER CHARITIES: $12k → 13%24 OTHER CHARITIES: $12k → 13%24 OTHER CHARITIES: $11k → 13%ATLANTA GIRLS SCHOOL: $11k → 13%GEORGIA STATE UNIVERSITY: $11k → 13%ATLANTA GIRLS SCHOOL: $10k → 13%11 OTHER CHARITIES: $10k → 13%11 OTHER CHARITIES: $9k → 13%GEORGIA STATE UNIVERSITY: $9k → 13%15 OTHER CHARITIES: $9k → 13%PLANNED PARENTHOOD: $6k → 13%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

90%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$685k · 15 repeat orgs$75k to everyone else

15 repeat relationships: 10 still active in FY2025, 5 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

15
6

Total granted

$685k
$62k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

-5%
0%

Still filing today

27%
33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 88% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $13k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • GS
    GEORGIA STATE UNIVERSITY
    8× · 2018–2025 · $161k
  • TA
    THE ATLANTA GIRLS' SCHOOL INC
    7× · 2018–2024 · $141k · revenue -99%
  • TP
    TRINITY PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH
    8× · 2018–2025 · $103k

Funded once

  • 2O
    21 OTHER CHARITIES
    one grant, 2021 · $21k
  • 1O
    19 OTHER CHARITIES
    one grant, 2020 · $14k
  • 2O
    22 OTHER CHARITIES
    one grant, 2022 · $12k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field
04the grantee network

7 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 7 of the 22 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
7/7
Grantees still filing
2/7
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

GEORGIA STATE UNIVERSITY: $160,850 · OtherGEORGIA STATE UNIVERSITYTHE ATLANTA GIRLS' SCHOOL INC: $140,800 · OtherTHE ATLANTA GIRLS' SCHOOL INCTRINITY PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH: $103,350 · OtherTRINITY PRESBYTERIAN CHURCHCHRISTCHURCH SCHOOL: $61,250 · OtherCHRISTCHURCH SCHOOLPLANNED PARENTHOOD: $31,500 · OtherCHRISTCHURCH: $23,500 · Other24 OTHER CHARITIES: $22,894 · Other+11 more: $132,762 · Other+11 moreTHE TRUSTEES OF THE SMITH COLLEGE: $30,000 · EducationThe Westminster Schools Inc: $17,902 · Education+1 more: $1,000 · EducationTHE DECORATIVE ARTS TRUST: $33,969 · Arts & Culture
Other$676,906Education$48,902Arts & Culture$33,969

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE ATLANTA GIRLS' SCHOOL INC: $140,800 over 7y, 0.5% of budgetTHE DECORATIVE ARTS TRUST: $33,969 over 4y, 0.5% of budgetTHE TRUSTEES OF THE SMITH COLLEGE: $30,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetThe Westminster Schools Inc: $17,902 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetChristian City Inc: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE INSTITUTE OF CLASSICAL ARCHITECTURE AND ART INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE ATLANTA GIRLS' SCHOOL INC ↗
  • Who funds THE DECORATIVE ARTS TRUST ↗
  • Who funds THE TRUSTEES OF THE SMITH COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds The Westminster Schools Inc ↗
  • Who funds Historic Oakland Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds Christian City Inc ↗
  • Who funds THE INSTITUTE OF CLASSICAL ARCHITECTURE AND ART INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Community Foundat…National Philanthropi…American Endowment Fo…Vanguard Charitable E…Morgan Stanley Global…Donor Advised Charita…American Online Givin…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
The Community Foundation for Greater Atlanta IncGA13.1× affinity4 shared granteesties to 8 of 8Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Community Foundation for Greater Atlanta Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · American Endowment Foundation · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Dugald W Hudson Charitable Trst Nancy Reeves Mansfield funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Dugald W Hudson Charitable Trst Nancy Reeves Mansfield. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →median 1%
  • The Trustees of the Smith College: 1% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 22 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Dugald W Hudson Charitable Trst Nancy Reeves Mansfield’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home