Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

The Drury Family Charitable Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$840k
Granted FY2025still arriving
10
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$200k
Largest
01What you fund
0195% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20202025.

Health$1.3MEducation$840kReligion$702kInternational$180kHuman Services$150kHousing & Shelter$150kSocial Science$150kPublic Safety & Disaster$100kOther$0
02FY2025 · 10 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k2 grants · $40k
  • $50k–250k8 grants · $800k
$100,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$14M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SSM HEALTH CARDINAL GLENNON CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION$200,000
Individual grant recipient$100,000
FOCUS$100,000
RURAL PARISH CLINIC$100,000
ST VINCENT DEPAUL CATHOLIC CHURCH$100,000
NOTRE DAME HIGH SCHOOL$100,000
JOHN HENRY NEWMAN CENTER$50,000
VISION FOR THE POOR$50,000
STS PETER AND PAUL CATHOLIC CHURCH$20,000
OPPORTUNITY INTERNATIONAL$20,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY22–24, $150k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%FAMILY FORWARD: $50k → 11%FAMILY FORWARD: $50k → 11%FAMILY FORWARD: $50k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

04

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 16% of The Drury Family Charitable Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another. Read by recipient address, 85% of the giving stays in MO; read by stated purpose it is 78% — less of the work is directed home than the recipients' locations suggest.

The Drury Family Charitable Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 2.5% directed abroad (not shown)

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

77%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$3.1M · 16 repeat orgs$932k to everyone else

16 repeat relationships — 9 still active in FY2025, 7 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

16
11

Total granted

$3.1M
$912k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

-1%
+41%

Still filing today

44%
45%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 98% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $20k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthInternationalEducationEnvironmentReligionPublic BenefitOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SL
    ST LOUIS UNIVERSITY
    3× · 2020–2022 · $300k · revenue +18%
  • HH
    HARRIS HOUSE FOUNDATION
    3× · 2020–2022 · $150k · revenue +34%
  • VETERANS COMMUNITY PROJECT
    2× · 2022–2023 · $150k · revenue +14%

Funded once

  • VF
    VITAE FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2023 · $150k · revenue -17%
  • IC
    IMMACULATE CONCEPTION CATHOLIC CHURCH
    one grant, 2023 · $150k
  • MO
    MOTHER OF GOOD COUNSEL HOME
    one grant, 2023 · $100k · revenue -3%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Little Sisters of the Poor Chicago St Mary's Home

The little sisters of the poor operate st. mary's home, which provides nursing and residential care for the needy elderly. the home is part of the international congregation of the little sisters of the poor, which was founded in france in…

2
Villa St Francis Catholic Care Center Inc

Villa st francis, a catholic, non-profit skilled nursing facility sponsored by the archdiocese of kansas city in olathe, provides dementia care, skilled nursing, respite, and hospice.

Housing & Shelter
3
Teresian House Nursing Home Co Inc

The mission of Teresian House Nursing Home is to provide care and services to the community in conformance with the theology, philosophy, teachings, and doctrines of the Roman Catholic Church, respecting and building on the mission,…

Health
4
Villa Mary Immaculate

We, st. peter's health partners and trinity health, serve together in the spirit of the gospel as a compassionate and transforming healing presence within our communities. villa mary immaculate is a member of st. peter's health partners…

Health
5
Catholic Charities of Kansas City - St Joseph Inc

Helping people move to a better life through hope-filled care, services, and advocacy; calling all those of goodwill to join us

Human Services
6
Mercy Health

Mercy Health will provide assistance, support and direction to all of the health care institutions and activities operated and maintained by its Subsidiaries. The mission of Mercy Health in performing these activities shall be to provide a…

7
Catholic Charities of the Diocese of St Cloud

At Catholic Charities, we focus our efforts around three core pillars: Food Access, Mental Health and Housing. Guided by our mission - to serve and enhance human dignity for all people - we provide essential services and foster a sense of…

Human Services
8
Avila University

Avila university, a catholic university sponsored by saint joseph educational ministries, a ministerial public juridic person of the catholic church (sjem), is a values-based community of learning providing liberal arts, professional,…

Education
9
St Patrick Partnership Center

To transform lives through sustainable housing, employment and healthcare, following the compassion of jesus.

10
Little Sisters of the Poor Palatine St Josephs Home for the Elderly

The little sisters of the poor operate st. joseph's home, which provides nursing and residential care for the needy elderly. the home is part of the international congregation of the little sisters of the poor, which was founded in france…

Human Services
11
Christian Care Retirement Apartments Inc

Through christian love and excellence, we are dedicated to providing a fulfilling lifestyle and promoting independence to those we serve

12
Christian Care Surprise Inc

Through christian love and excellence, we are dedicated to providing a fulfilling lifestyle and promoting independence to those we serve.

Housing & Shelter

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Opportunity International Inc D/B/a Opportunity International-Us and the most unlike its peers is Vision for the Poor. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

05the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 28 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
12/12
Grantees still filing
6/12
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

RURAL PARISH CLINIC — $500,000 · OtherRURAL PARISH CLINICSSM HEALTH CARDINAL GLENNON CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION — $425,000 · OtherSSM HEALTH CARDINAL GLENNON CHILDREN'S FOUNDATIONFELLOWSHIP OF CATHOLIC UNIVERSITY STUDENTS — $300,000 · OtherFELLOWSHIP OF CATHOLIC UNIVERSITY STUDENTSNOTRE DAME HIGH SCHOOL — $230,000 · OtherNOTRE DAME HIGH SCHOOLSAINT VINCENT DE PAUL PARISH — $200,000 · OtherSAINT VINCENT DE PAUL PARISHIndividual grant recipient — $200,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientHARRIS HOUSE FOUNDATION — $150,000 · OtherJOHN HENRY NEWMAN CENTER — $150,000 · OtherVITAE FOUNDATION — $150,000 · OtherIMMACULATE CONCEPTION CATHOLIC CHURCH — $150,000 · OtherCATHEDRAL BASILICA ST LOUIS — $100,000 · OtherOUR LADY OF THE PILLAR — $100,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient — $100,000 · Other+6 more — $212,000 · Other+6 moreST LOUIS UNIVERSITY — $300,000 · EducationVISION FOR THE POOR — $100,000 · InternationalOPPORTUNITY INTERNATIONAL INC D/B/A OPPORTUNITY INTERNATIONAL-US — $80,000 · InternationalVETERANS COMMUNITY PROJECT — $150,000 · Public BenefitCHILDREN'S HOME SOCIETY OF MISSOURI — $150,000 · Human ServicesMOTHER OF GOOD COUNSEL HOME — $100,000 · HealthCarmelite Sisters of the Divine Heart of Jesus — $50,000 · HealthETERNAL WORD TELEVISION NETWORK INC — $100,000 · ReligionMISSOURI BOTANICAL GARDEN BOARD OF TRUSTEES — $50,000 · Environment
Other$2,967,000Education$300,000International$180,000Public Benefit$150,000Human Services$150,000Health$150,000Religion$100,000Environment$50,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetRURAL PARISH CLINIC — $500,000 over 5y, 24% of budgetST LOUIS UNIVERSITY — $300,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetHARRIS HOUSE FOUNDATION — $150,000 over 3y, 0.6% of budgetVETERANS COMMUNITY PROJECT — $150,000 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetCHILDREN'S HOME SOCIETY OF MISSOURI — $150,000 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetVITAE FOUNDATION — $150,000 over 1y, 3.8% of budgetMOTHER OF GOOD COUNSEL HOME — $100,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetVISION FOR THE POOR — $100,000 over 2y, 13% of budgetETERNAL WORD TELEVISION NETWORK INC — $100,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetOPPORTUNITY INTERNATIONAL INC D/B/A OPPORTUNITY INTERNATIONAL-US — $80,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetMISSOURI BOTANICAL GARDEN BOARD OF TRUSTEES — $50,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCarmelite Sisters of the Divine Heart of Jesus — $50,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds RURAL PARISH CLINIC
  • Who funds ST LOUIS UNIVERSITY
  • Who funds HARRIS HOUSE FOUNDATION
  • Who funds VETERANS COMMUNITY PROJECT
  • Who funds CHILDREN'S HOME SOCIETY OF MISSOURI
  • Who funds VITAE FOUNDATION
  • Who funds MOTHER OF GOOD COUNSEL HOME
  • Who funds VISION FOR THE POOR
  • Who funds ETERNAL WORD TELEVISION NETWORK INC
  • Who funds OPPORTUNITY INTERNATIONAL INC D/B/A OPPORTUNITY INTERNATIONAL-US
  • Who funds MISSOURI BOTANICAL GARDEN BOARD OF TRUSTEES
  • Who funds Carmelite Sisters of the Divine Heart of Jesus

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Roman Catholic Foundation of Eastern MissouriMO17.8× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Roman Catholic Foundation of Eastern Missouri · St Louis Community Foundation Inc · Vincent E and Mary Judith Shaw Family Foundation · Ross Family Foundation · Renaissance Charitable Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Endowment Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · American Online Giving Foundation Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The Drury Family Charitable Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%2%6%14%25%your share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to The Drury Family Charitable Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to The Drury Family Charitable Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 28 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph