Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Dr Hs & Florence Wang Family Charity Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$4k
Granted FY2025still arriving
12
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$2k
Largest
01What it funds
0190% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Arts & Culture$9kEducation$3kHealth$3kReligion$2kPublic Safety & Disaster$1kFood & Nutrition$1kPhilanthropy$850Human Services$550Other$0
02FY2025 · 12 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$85
Median grant
2
States reached
$55k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
NTUADF$2,000
BUTLER INSTITUTE OF AMERICAN ART$1,000
UNITED WAY OF MAHONING VALLEY$200
CHINESE ASSOCIATION OF GREATER YOUNGSTOWN AREA$100
NEOMED FOUNDATION$100
PBS WESTERN RESERVE$85
MAHONING VALLEY HISTORICAL SOCIETY$75
FRIENDS OF THE RICH CENTER$50
MAHONING VALLEY MEDICAL SOCIETY$50
SALEM HIGH SCHOOL ALUMNI ASSOC$50
ANIMAL CHARITY OF OHIO$50
ST BENEDICT FUND$50
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–20, $50) land where the poverty rate runs at 19%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%YWCA MAHONING VALLEY: $50 → 19%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

73%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$21k · 15 repeat orgs$8k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +91% since the first grant, against -4% for those funded once.

15 repeat relationships: 5 still active in FY2025, 10 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

15
36

Total granted

$21k
$7k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+91%
-4%

Still filing today

40%
17%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 86% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $550 went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CultureHealthHousing & ShelterHuman ServicesAnimalsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • BI
    BUTLER INSTITUTE OF AMERICAN ART
    4× · 2022–2025 · $6k · revenue +1%
  • YS
    YOUNGSTOWN SYMPHONY SOCIETY
    2× · 2020–2023 · $2k · revenue +106%
  • MV
    MAHONING VALLEY HISTORICAL SOCIETY
    5× · 2020–2025 · $450 · revenue +91%

Funded once

  • AR
    AMERICAN RED CROSS
    one grant, 2021 · $1k
  • AF
    AAO FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2021 · $1k
  • SH
    SECOND HARVEST FOOD BANK
    one grant, 2023 · $1k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Wayne County Historical Society of Ohio

The wayne county historical society is dedicated to collecting, preserving, and interpreting the history of wayne county.

—
2
John Paulding Historical Society Inc

Preserve historical items in paulding county, ohio

—
3
Middleburg Heights Historical Society

Non profit historical society

Arts & Culture
4
Pioneer & Historical Society of Muskingum County Ohio

The pioneer and historical society of muskingum county believes that an understanding and appreciation of our historic heritage is essential to maintaining a unique and meaningful identity as a community. the mission of the society is to…

Arts & Culture
5
Mahoning Valley Historical Society Foundation

The purpose of the mahoning valley historical society foundation is to carry out the charitable activities of the community foundation of the mahoning valley related to or in promotion of the mahoning valley historical society, including…

Philanthropy
6
The Harmon Museum

To preserve and present the history of warren county and southwest ohio.

Arts & Culture
7
Smithville Community Historical Society Inc

To collect and preserve any and all historic materials books artifacts machinery etc.

Arts & Culture
8
Middletown Historical Society

To provide a repository for historical artifacts for middletown, ohio and to make these available for the membership and the general public

—
9
Venango Museum of Art Science and Industry

The museum operates numerous educational and cultural exhibits, workshops and programs dealing with art, science and industry which are available to the general public

Arts & Culture
10
Granville Ohio Historical Society

The Granville Historical Society acquires, preserves, and shares Granvilles past with residents and visitors to inspire curiosity about, instill knowledge of, and foster a commitment to our history.

—
11
Ohio Manufacturers' Association

To serve and promote the interests of ohio manufacturers.

—
12
Cleveland Museum of Art

The mission of the cleveland museum of art (cma) is to fulfill its dual roles as one of the world's most distinguished comprehensive art museums and as one of northeastern ohio's principal civic and cultural institutions. the museum,…

Arts & Culture
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Mahoning Valley Historical Society; the most unlike its peers is Melina Michelle Edenfield Foundatio. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

15 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 15 of the 58 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
14/15
Grantees still filing
8/15
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

NTUADF: $5,250 · OtherNTUADFYSU FOUNDATION: $2,840 · OtherYSU FOUNDATIONNEO MEDICAL UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $1,450 · OtherNEO MEDICAL UNIVERSITY FOUNDATIONAMERICAN RED CROSS: $1,000 · OtherAAO FOUNDATION: $1,000 · OtherSECOND HARVEST FOOD BANK: $1,000 · OtherTRUSTEES CIRCLE: $1,000 · Other+40 more: $6,140 · Other+40 moreBUTLER INSTITUTE OF AMERICAN ART: $6,000 · Arts & CultureBUTLER INSTITUTE OF AMERICAN ARTYOUNGSTOWN SYMPHONY SOCIETY: $2,000 · Arts & CultureYOUNGSTOWN SYMPHONY SOCIETYNORTHEASTERN EDUCATIONAL TELEVISION OF OHIO INC: $455 · Arts & CultureMAHONING VALLEY HISTORICAL SOCIETY: $450 · Arts & Culture+2 more: $210 · Arts & CultureMELINA MICHELLE EDENFIELD FOUNDATIO: $50 · HealthAmerican Heart Association Inc: $25 · HealthANIMAL CHARITY OF OHIO INC: $50 · AnimalsRESCUE MISSION OF MAHONING VALLEY: $50 · Housing & ShelterYWCA MAHONING VALLEY: $50 · Human Services
Other$19,680Arts & Culture$9,115Health$75Animals$50Housing & Shelter$50Human Services$50

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetBUTLER INSTITUTE OF AMERICAN ART: $6,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetYOUNGSTOWN SYMPHONY SOCIETY: $2,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetNORTHEASTERN EDUCATIONAL TELEVISION OF OHIO INC: $455 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetMAHONING VALLEY HISTORICAL SOCIETY: $450 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetMETROPOLITAN MUSEUM OF ART: $175 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBEATITUDE HOUSE INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetRESCUE MISSION OF MAHONING VALLEY: $50 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBUCKEYE STATE SHERIFFS' ASSOCIATION: $50 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMELINA MICHELLE EDENFIELD FOUNDATIO: $50 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetYWCA MAHONING VALLEY: $50 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFRATERNAL ORDER OF POLICE OF OHIO INC: $40 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCANFIELD HERITAGE FOUNDATION: $35 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc: $25 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds BUTLER INSTITUTE OF AMERICAN ART ↗
  • Who funds YOUNGSTOWN SYMPHONY SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds NORTHEASTERN EDUCATIONAL TELEVISION OF OHIO INC ↗
  • Who funds MAHONING VALLEY HISTORICAL SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds METROPOLITAN MUSEUM OF ART ↗
  • Who funds BEATITUDE HOUSE INC ↗
  • Who funds ANIMAL CHARITY OF OHIO INC ↗
  • Who funds RESCUE MISSION OF MAHONING VALLEY ↗
  • Who funds BUCKEYE STATE SHERIFFS' ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds MELINA MICHELLE EDENFIELD FOUNDATIO ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Premier Bank FoundationOH23.6× affinity9 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Premier Bank Foundation · Youngstown Fdn General · Community Foundation of the Mahoning Valley · William B Pollock II & Kathryn Challis · John D Finnegan Fdn · Fibushendricks Family Foundation · The Raymond John Wean Foundation · E M Barr Tw Charitable Trust · Senator Maurice & Florence Lipscher Char · R and M Foundation · Walter E & Caroline H Watson Trust · The Wm M & a Cafaro Family Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Dr Hs & Florence Wang Family Charity Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Dr Hs & Florence Wang Family Charity Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 58 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Dr Hs & Florence Wang Family Charity’s filings →

    More from the funding graph