How much did THE DOYLE FOUNDATION INC grant in FY2025?

A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 66% of THE DOYLE FOUNDATION INC’s grantee dollars go to organizations outside the IRS cause taxonomy (common for large international and research funders), so a chart would be mostly “unclassified” and misrepresent the portfolio.

02beneath the categories

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Beneath the NTEE codes, this is what the grant descriptions actually say.

…and in their own words, year by year

2019

food

2020

—

2021

—

2022

corporationhoperisefather joe'sjoe's villages

2023

captain rollosrollos kidskids sea

2024

missoulagood

2025

missoula

Words distinctive to each year’s grant purposes (TF-IDF) · event-driven terms in cyan.

03FY2025 · 262 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

Under $10k224 grants · $509k
$10k–50k20 grants · $375k
$50k–250k17 grants · $1.6M
$250k+1 grant · $250k

$2,000

Median grant

States reached

$76M

Total assets

Largest grants

REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CA IRVINE$250,000
WARRIOR FOUNDATION FREEDOM STATION$220,000
KIDWORKS COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORP$200,000
FOUNDATION FOR CHILDREN OF CALIFORNIAS$150,000
MISERICORDIA FOUNDATION$150,000
JR ACHIEVEMENT OF CENTRAL OHIO$100,000
DOMESTIC VIOLENCE AND ABUSE PROTECTION$100,000
CASA YOUTH SHELTER$75,000
CAMP MAK-A-DREAM$75,000
ST IGNATIUS MISSION PARISH$72,190
THERAPEUTIC RIDING CTR HUNTINGTON BEACH$65,000
CAPTAIN ROLLOS KIDS AT SEA$50,025
ST VINCENT DE PAUL SONOMA COUNTY$50,000
JOINT ORGANIZATION FOR INNER CITY NEEDS$50,000
NATIONAL TAY-SACHS & ALLIED DISEASES ASSO$50,000

02The need

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY19–25, $3.7M) land where the poverty rate runs at 11% — the area typically sits at 10%. 70% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge

repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

67%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.

$14M · 462 repeat orgs$7.1M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +84% since the first grant, against +58% for the ones you funded once.

462 repeat relationships — 127 still active in FY2025, 335 since wound down; 104 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

462

1298

Total granted

$14M

$6.7M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+84%

+58%

Still filing today

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 87% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $345k went to new ones.

RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

Human ServicesHealthPhilanthropyEducationReligionRecreation & SportsOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

WF
WARRIOR FOUNDATION-FREEDOM STATION
7× · 2019–2025 · $1.5M · revenue +41%
KC
KIDWORKS COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION
5× · 2021–2025 · $900k · revenue +53%
MISERICORDIA FOUNDATION
4× · 2022–2025 · $600k · revenue +4188%

Funded once

TC
TEEN CHALLENGE OF ACADIANA
one grant, 2020 · $256k · revenue -100%
FJ
FATHER JOE'S VILLAGES
one grant, 2022 · $200k
FF
FOUNDATION FOR THE CHILDREN OF THE CALIFORNIASgraduated
one grant, 2022 · $200k · revenue +134% · 28% of their budget

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

Feeding San Diego

On a mission to connect every person facing hunger with nutritious meals... feeding san diego is on a mission to connect every person facing hunger with nutritious meals by maximizing food rescue. through direct service and community…

Food & Nutrition

Vietnam Veterans of San Diego

Vvsd connects with american veterans to overcome their homelessness and related challenges.

Public Benefit

Transition House

Transition House is dedicated to the solution of family homelessness in the Santa Barbara community. Capable and motivated families with children are offered life tools and respectful, non-sectarian residential services designed to…

Housing & Shelter

Guardianship Services Inc

To provide guardianship and alternative services to individuals who have no family member or friend who is willing, able, or suitable to assist with their needs

Human Services

Access to Independence of San Diego Inc

Access to independence promotes full participation of people with disabilities, to help maintain, sustain, and maximize independence.

—

Partnerships With Industry

Successfully creating win-win partnerships between san diego county businesses and adults with disabilities who want to work

—

Goodwill Industries of Sw Florida Inc

Goodwill industries of southwest florida is committed to serving people with disabilities and disadvantages by offering life-changing opportunities to achieve independence.

Employment

Goodwill Industries of Ventura and Santa

Provides employment skills to challenged individuals, serves the community by helping people with barriers to employment achieve economic independence through training, educating and employment

Human Services

Goodwill Industries of San Diego County

To provide employment and training opportunities to people with disabilities and other barriers to employment.

Employment

United Way of San Diego County

To spark breakthrough community action that elevates every child & family toward a brighter future.

Philanthropy

Usvets - Arizona

The successful transition of u.s. military veterans and their families through the provision of housing, counseling, career development and comprehensive support.

Housing & Shelter

Su Casa - Ending Domestic Violence

To provide shelter, food and healing services for victims of domestic violence and their children. this is done through 24-hour crisis hotline, emergency shelter, transitional shelter, community outreach and education, and walk-in…

—

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Elderhelp of San Diego and the most unlike its peers is Rise Up Industries. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side

Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 27 years old; the field is 14. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

The field is 24% startups (under 5 years old) — 5% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 1% lost their exemption, against 12% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund

1%1/69

the rest of the field

12%

22,289/186,909

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

05the grantee network

68 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.

Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)

Early backer (in before they grew)

64/68

Grantees still filing

50/68

Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Other$14,739,257Human Services$3,655,597Housing & Shelter$934,000Philanthropy$640,510Health$533,570Religion$532,000Education$395,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Orange County Community FoundationCA23.7× affinity11 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Orange County Community Foundation · Sempra Foundation · David C Copley Foundation · Price Philanthropies Foundation · Rancho Santa Fe Foundation · The San Diego Foundation · Inland Empire Community Foundation · The Nordson Corporation Foundation · Walter J & Betty C Zable Foundation · The Cushman Foundation · Henry L Guenther Foundation · The Parker Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organisation THE DOYLE FOUNDATION INC funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024

’20’21’22’23’24

no gov moneyreceives it· size = income

3get no government money at all

0rely on government for over half their income

⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%

typical government reliance, FY20–24

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Through Plinth

Your grantmaking, live and operational

This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: DOMESTIC VIOLENCE AND ABUSE PROTECTION.

Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk

Financial management

insufficient risk

Limited financial data in public filings.

Track record & reputation

medium risk

4 years of Form 990 filings, still active; revenue up 34.4× since.

Legal standing

low risk

US 501(c)(3); EIN 872740988 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.

Governance

Live in Plinth

Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.

Compliance & sanctions

Live in Plinth

OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.

Program capacity

Live in Plinth

Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.

Live · Plinth’s real DD engine

Run the actual assessment on DOMESTIC VIOLENCE AND ABUSE PROTECTION, cold from public data.

Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.

Post-award monitoring · continuous checks

Awaiting reportFinancial stability— Runway not derivable from filings.
On trackSustained operations— Filing through 2025; revenue grew over the period.
WatchReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 98% of their budget — load-bearing; a dependency Plinth would track.
Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.

What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.

Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing

Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro

How do I get to The Doyle Foundation Inc?

Find your warmest path to The Doyle Foundation Inc through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.

Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.

THE DOYLE FOUNDATION INC

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

68 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to The Doyle Foundation Inc?

More from the funding graph

THE DOYLE FOUNDATION INC

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

68 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to The Doyle Foundation Inc?

More from the funding graph