Skip to content
The Double Eagle Foundation 4191-06-43 at a glance

· Private foundation

The Double Eagle Foundation 4191-06-43

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$568k
Granted FY2025still arriving
90
Grants FY2025still arriving
17
States reached
$73k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
0198% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Education$1.0MCommunity Improvement$300kArts & Culture$196kHealth$134kReligion$110kYouth Development$105kEnvironment$81kRecreation & Sports$59kOther$0
02FY2025 · 90 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k70 grants · $83k
  • $10k–50k18 grants · $357k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $128k
$1,000
Median grant
17
States reached
$6.2M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
The Holton-Arms School$72,500
Shady Side Academy$55,000
Converse College$40,000
Church of the Good Shepherd$35,000
The Lawrenceville School$27,500
George Washington University$26,500
The Neighborhood Academy$26,000
Pittsburgh Promise$25,000
Carnegie Science Center Carnegie$25,000
Carnegie Museums of Pittsburgh$25,000
The Village Green$21,000
Wooster School$20,000
Planned Parenthood of WPA$13,637
Allegheny RiverTrail Park$11,000
The Ellis School$11,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY22–25, $25k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 96% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%Freedom Service Dogs of America: $250 → 8%Freedom Service Dogs of America: $250 → 8%Freedom Service Dogs of America: $250 → 8%Freedom Service Dogs of America: $250 → 8%Vision Cashiers: $3k → 18%Vision Cashiers: $3k → 18%Cashiers Cares: $500 → 18%Second Harvest: $15k → 11%Cashiers Cares: $500 → 18%Second Harvest: $250 → 11%Second Harvest: $250 → 11%Cashiers Cares: $500 → 18%Cashiers Cares: $500 → 18%Fox Families Care: $250 → 11%Fox Families Care: $250 → 11%Fox Families Care: $250 → 11%Fox Families Care: $250 → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

NY
MA
WY
IA
OH
PA
NJ
CT
CA
CO
VA
MD
DE
NC
SC
DC
GA
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

95%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.1M · 88 repeat orgs$111k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +16% since the first grant, against +4% for those funded once.

88 repeat relationships: 82 still active in FY2025, 6 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

88
31

Total granted

$2.1M
$51k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+16%
+4%

Still filing today

75%
61%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 89% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $60k went to new ones.

50%100%’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’22’23’24’25
EducationHealthEnvironmentArts & CultureAnimalsHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TH
    THE HOLTON ARMS SCHOOL
    4× · 2022–2025 · $194k · revenue +13%
  • CONVERSE UNIVERSITY
    4× · 2022–2025 · $150k · revenue +20%
  • SS
    SHADY SIDE ACADEMY
    4× · 2022–2025 · $135k · revenue +19%

Funded once

  • SC
    STEEL CITY SQUASH INCgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $25k · revenue +63%
  • FC
    Fox Chapel Area Land Trustgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $10k · revenue +30% · 62% of their budget
  • BT
    Bath & Tennis Club Historic Building
    one grant, 2023 · $5k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Zoological Society of Pittsburgh

The zoological society of pittsburgh is dedicated to being a leader in, and significant contributor to, the conservation of endangered and threatened species. the society provides an enjoyable family experience that fosters understanding,…

Animals
2
Point Park University

Provides innovative education in a dynamic urban setting. dedicated to academic excellence and community engagement,we prepare students of diverse backgrounds with the knowledge, skill,and experience to lead meaningful lives as informed…

—
3
Wilson College

Wilson college empowers students to be confident and critical thinkers, creative visionaries, effective communicators, honorable leaders, and agents of justice.

Education
4
University of Pittsburgh

The university of pittsburgh, founded in 1787, is one of the oldest institutions of higher education in the united states and one of the nation's top public research universities. for more than two centuries, the university of pittsburgh…

Education
5
The Trustees of Princeton University

Research, education and general - princeton university is a private not-for-profit, non-sectarian institution of higher learning with approximately 5,700 undergraduate and 3,300 graduate students. 2,500 students graduated in the 2024-2025…

Education
6
The Pennsylvania Horticultural Society

Founded in 1827, the pennsylvania horticultural society (phs) uses horticulture to advance the health and well-being of the greater philadelphia region. (continued in sch o)phs's work focuses on four impact priorities: creating healthy…

Environment
7
Gettysburg College

Gettysburg college is a residential, undergraduate college of the liberal arts and sciences.

Education
8
Pennsylvania Academic Library Consortium Inc

To support education and research at college, university, and research libraries.

Education
9
Delaware Valley University

See schedule o.we are inspired by the ideals of our founder who, in 1896, emphasized respect for all people and ideas, who honored knowledge with practice, progress and the common good. our historical commitment to experiential learning…

—
10
Furman University

The primary mission of furman as a liberal arts institution is to provide a distinctive education in fine arts, humanities, social sciences, mathematics and the sciences, as well as selected professional disciplines.

Education
11
Philadelphia Industrial Development Corporation

Pidc plans and implements economic development initiatives (see schedule o) which enhance the competitive environment, generate jobs and produce higher tax ratables throughout philadelphia.

Community Improvement
12
DePauw University

Depauw university develops leaders the world needs through an uncommon commitment to the liberal arts. depauw's diverse and inclusive learning and living experience, distinctive in its rigorous intellectual engagement and its global and…

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Allegheny County Parks Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Wild and Free Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

89 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 89 of the 127 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
8
Early backer (in before they grew)
89/89
Grantees still filing
62/89
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

BABSON COLLEGE: $300,000 · EducationBABSON COLLEGETHE HOLTON ARMS SCHOOL: $193,600 · EducationTHE HOLTON ARMS SCHOOLCONVERSE UNIVERSITY: $150,000 · EducationCONVERSE UNIVERSITYSHADY SIDE ACADEMY: $135,350 · EducationSHADY SIDE ACADEMYBoys & Girls Club of The Plateau Inc: $101,500 · EducationBoys & Girls Club of The Plateau IncTRUSTEES OF THE LAWRENCEVILLE SCHOOL: $97,500 · EducationTRUSTEES OF THE LAWRENCEVILLE SCHOOLST LAWRENCE UNIVERSITY: $87,500 · EducationST LAWRENCE UNIVERSITYTHE ELLIS SCHOOL: $65,000 · EducationThe George Washington University: $61,000 · Education+10 more: $87,950 · Education+10 moreCHURCH OF THE GOOD SHEPHERD INC: $80,750 · OtherCHURCH OF THE GOOD SHEPH…WOOSTER SCHOOL CORPORATION: $80,000 · OtherWOOSTER SCHOOL CORPORATI…Carnegie Science Center Carnegie: $25,000 · OtherCarnegie Science Center …Individual grant recipient: $21,100 · OtherThe Village Green: $21,000 · OtherAllegheny Health Network: $20,000 · OtherBethesda-by-the-Sea: $17,500 · OtherGREATER PITTSBURGH COMMUNITY FOOD BANK: $23,750 · Other+60 more: $177,700 · Other+60 moreCARNEGIE INSTITUTE: $125,100 · Arts & CultureCARNEGIE …HISTORICAL SOCIETY OF WESTERN PENNSYLVANIA: $45,100 · Arts & CultureHISTORICA…SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION: $10,000 · Arts & Culture+5 more: $9,450 · Arts & CulturePLANNED PARENTHOOD OF WESTERN PA INC: $91,674 · HealthPLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC: $8,000 · HealthONE DAY TO REMEMBER INC: $5,500 · Health+9 more: $7,850 · HealthTHE PITTSBURGH PROMISE FOUNDATION: $50,000 · PhilanthropyTHE CINDERELLA WOMENS COMMITTEE: $4,500 · PhilanthropyNATIONAL OUTDOOR LEADERSHIP SCHOOL: $20,000 · EnvironmentWESTERN PENNSYLVANIA CONSERVANCY: $10,000 · EnvironmentHighlands-Cashiers Land Trust Inc: $2,000 · EnvironmentEARTHSHARE: $2,000 · EnvironmentCONSERVATION INTERNATIONAL FOUNDATION: $2,000 · EnvironmentPHIPPS CONSERVATORY AND BOTANICAL GARDENS INC: $2,000 · Environment+5 more: $3,600 · EnvironmentNATIONAL WILDLIFE FEDERATION: $21,000 · AnimalsCenter for Orangutan & Chimpanzee Conservation Inc: $10,000 · AnimalsJANE GOODALL INSTITUTE FOR WILDLIFE RESEARCH EDUCATION AND CONSERVATION: $4,000 · AnimalsHUMANE ANIMAL RESCUE: $2,500 · AnimalsCASHIERS HIGHLANDS HUMANE SOCIETY: $2,000 · AnimalsAnimal Welfare League of Arlington: $1,400 · Animals+1 more: $500 · Animals
Education$1,279,400Other$466,800Arts & Culture$189,650Health$113,024Philanthropy$54,500Environment$41,600Animals$41,400

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetBABSON COLLEGE: $300,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE HOLTON ARMS SCHOOL: $193,600 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetCONVERSE UNIVERSITY: $150,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetSHADY SIDE ACADEMY: $135,350 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetCARNEGIE INSTITUTE: $125,100 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetBoys & Girls Club of The Plateau Inc: $101,500 over 4y, 1.4% of budgetTRUSTEES OF THE LAWRENCEVILLE SCHOOL: $97,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetPLANNED PARENTHOOD OF WESTERN PA INC: $91,674 over 4y, 0.6% of budgetST LAWRENCE UNIVERSITY: $87,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetWOOSTER SCHOOL CORPORATION: $80,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetTHE ELLIS SCHOOL: $65,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetThe George Washington University: $61,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetTHE PITTSBURGH PROMISE FOUNDATION: $50,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetHISTORICAL SOCIETY OF WESTERN PENNSYLVANIA: $45,100 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetTHE NEIGHBORHOOD ACADEMY: $29,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetSTEEL CITY SQUASH INC: $25,000 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetGREATER PITTSBURGH COMMUNITY FOOD BANK: $23,750 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL WILDLIFE FEDERATION: $21,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL OUTDOOR LEADERSHIP SCHOOL: $20,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetSecond Harvest: $15,500 over 3y, 1.8% of budgetAspinwall Riverfront Park Inc: $14,000 over 4y, 0.8% of budgetCARNEGIE LIBRARY OF PITTSBURGH: $12,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetPALM BEACH DAY ACADEMY INC: $10,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetWESTERN PENNSYLVANIA CONSERVANCY: $10,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetSMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION: $10,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetCenter for Orangutan & Chimpanzee Conservation Inc: $10,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetFox Chapel Area Land Trust: $10,000 over 1y, 62% of budgetMANCHESTER BIDWELL CORPORATION: $9,500 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetPLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC: $8,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetONE DAY TO REMEMBER INC: $5,500 over 4y, 0.8% of budgetVISION CASHIERS INC: $5,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetTHE CINDERELLA WOMENS COMMITTEE: $4,500 over 4y, 13% of budgetLITERACY PITTSBURGH: $4,250 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetWQED MULTIMEDIA: $4,200 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetJANE GOODALL INSTITUTE FOR WILDLIFE RESEARCH EDUCATION AND CONSERVATION: $4,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetDian Fossey Gorilla Fund International Inc: $4,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetSummit Charter School: $4,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetGLENVILLE-CASHIERS RESCUE SQUAD INC: $3,500 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetHUMANE ANIMAL RESCUE: $2,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetCURIO THEATRE COMPANY: $2,250 over 4y, 0.8% of budgetCASHIERS HIGHLANDS HUMANE SOCIETY: $2,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetLOGGERHEAD MARINELIFE CENTER INC: $2,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetCASHIERS CARES INC: $2,000 over 4y, 0.5% of budgetALLEGHENY COUNTY PARKS FOUNDATION: $2,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetBUTLER-FREEPORT COMMUNITY TRAIL COUNCIL INC: $2,000 over 4y, 0.8% of budgetHighlands-Cashiers Land Trust Inc: $2,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetEARTHSHARE: $2,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetCONSERVATION INTERNATIONAL FOUNDATION: $2,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds BABSON COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds THE HOLTON ARMS SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds CONVERSE UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds SHADY SIDE ACADEMY ↗
  • Who funds CARNEGIE INSTITUTE ↗
  • Who funds Boys & Girls Club of The Plateau Inc ↗
  • Who funds TRUSTEES OF THE LAWRENCEVILLE SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF WESTERN PA INC ↗
  • Who funds ST LAWRENCE UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds WOOSTER SCHOOL CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds THE ELLIS SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds The George Washington University ↗
  • Who funds THE PITTSBURGH PROMISE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds HISTORICAL SOCIETY OF WESTERN PENNSYLVANIA ↗
  • Who funds THE NEIGHBORHOOD ACADEMY ↗
  • Who funds STEEL CITY SQUASH INC ↗
  • Who funds GREATER PITTSBURGH COMMUNITY FOOD BANK ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL WILDLIFE FEDERATION ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL OUTDOOR LEADERSHIP SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds Second Harvest ↗
  • Who funds Aspinwall Riverfront Park Inc ↗
  • Who funds CARNEGIE LIBRARY OF PITTSBURGH ↗
  • Who funds PALM BEACH DAY ACADEMY INC ↗
  • Who funds WESTERN PENNSYLVANIA CONSERVANCY ↗
  • Who funds SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION ↗
  • Who funds EPISCOPAL RELIEF AND DEVELOPMENT ↗
  • Who funds Center for Orangutan & Chimpanzee Conservation Inc ↗
  • Who funds Fox Chapel Area Land Trust ↗
  • Who funds MANCHESTER BIDWELL CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds PLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Hillman Family Founda…The Burke FoundationThe Burke Family Foun…The Pittsburgh Founda…The Grable FoundationRichard King Mellon F…The Simpson Family Fo…The Heinz EndowmentsEqt FoundationAdams Foundation IncFlorence Mauboules Ch…The Billi Marcus Foun…
Hillman Family FoundationsPA40.6× affinity19 shared granteesties to 9 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Hillman Family Foundations · The Burke Foundation · The Burke Family Foundation · The Pittsburgh Foundation · The Grable Foundation · Richard King Mellon Foundation · The Simpson Family Foundation U/A Dtd 10/19/1999 · The Heinz Endowments · Eqt Foundation · Adams Foundation Inc · Florence Mauboules Charitable Trust · The Billi Marcus Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Double Eagle Foundation 4191-06-43 funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Double Eagle Foundation 4191-06-43. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 60%5%19%42%75%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 3%
  • University of Delaware: 30% of income from government
  • Babson College: 3% of income from government
  • Palm Beach Day Academy Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
6get no government money at all
21report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 127 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Double Eagle Foundation 4191-06-43’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home