Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

The Dorothy & Murray Feiss Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$1.5M
Granted FY2025still arriving
11
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$1.5M
Largest
01What you fund
0197% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20202025.

Philanthropy$1.5MHealth$282kInternational$110kHousing & Shelter$31kReligion$24kHuman Services$14kArts & Culture$11kCivil Rights$9kOther$0
02FY2025 · 11 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k8 grants · $16k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $68k
  • $250k+1 grant · $1.5M
$1,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
THE DOROTHY AND MURRAY FEISS FAMILY FUND (DAF)$1,451,810
FIDF$49,650
THE ISRAEL CANCER RESEARCH FUND$18,000
DYSTONIA MEDICAL REASEARCH FUND$7,500
CHABAD OF BEDFORD$5,500
COMMUNITY SYNAGOGUE OF RYE$1,000
SELF HELP COMMUNITY SERVICE$500
CITY OF HOPE$500
AMERICAN LUNG ASSOCIATION$500
ALZHEIMERS ASSOC ALZHEIMER$300
TEMPLE BETH EL$120
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY21–25, $14k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 92% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%STEPHANIE'S HOUSE: $100 → 6%CHIMES INC: $2k → 19%SUNRISE DAY CAMPS ASOCIATION: $1k → 6%SELFHELP COMMUNITY SERVICES INC: $5k → 17%GOODFOUNDATION: $3k → 17%GOODFOUNDATION: $2k → 17%SELF HELP COMMUNITY SERVICE: $500 → 17%SELF HELP COMMUNITY SERVICE: $500 → 17%INCLUDE NYC: $500 → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

IL
NY
PA
NJ
CT
CA
KY
MD
AZ
DC
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

21%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$427k · 11 repeat orgs$1.6M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +19% since the first grant, against +8% for the ones you funded once.

11 repeat relationships — 5 still active in FY2025, 6 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

11
35

Total granted

$427k
$102k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+19%
+8%

Still filing today

82%
51%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 5% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1.5M went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesHealthArts & CulturePhilanthropyReligionInternationalOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • IC
    ISRAEL CANCER RESEARCH FUND INC
    6× · 2020–2025 · $144k · revenue +92%
  • DM
    DYSTONIA MEDICAL RESEARCH FOUNDATION
    4× · 2020–2023 · $120k · revenue +28%
  • FRIENDS OF THE ISRAEL DEFENSE FORCES
    4× · 2021–2025 · $110k · revenue +113%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2024 · $25k
  • TN
    THE NATAN FUND
    one grant, 2022 · $10k
  • ND
    NEW DESTINY HOUSING CORPORATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $10k · revenue +182%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Jewish Museum

The mission of the jewish museum is to collect, preserve, exhibit and interpret art and jewish culture. see schedule o for more information.

Arts & Culture
2
Jewish Community Relations Council of New York

Jcrc-ny builds relationships to advance the values, interests and security of the new york jewish community and to create a more interconnected new york for all.

Civil Rights
3
New York University

Nyu is a private university with approximately 60,000 matriculating students in 20 schools and institutes. nyu's primary missions are education, research and scholarship, and patient care.

Education
4
New York Genome Center Inc

Operate a state-of-the-art, world-class genomic research center that creates and uses advanced genomics to understand the genetic basis of disease. for more information, see schedule o.

Health
5
Museum of Jewish Heritage a Living Memorial to the Holocaust

The museum of jewish heritage - a living memorial to the holocaust is new york's contribution to the global responsibility to never forget. see schedule o for additional information.

Arts & Culture
6
Jewish Board of Family & Children's Services Inc

To empower new yorkers, providing integrated mental health and social services with compassion and expertise.

Human Services
7
Us Middle East Project Inc

The organization's mission is to engage in non partisan analysis of u.s. foreign policy in the middle east, with special emphasis on the middle east peace process, and to present policymakers in the united states, in the region and in the…

International
8
Institute for Advanced Study - Louis Bamberger & Mrs Felix Fuld Foundation

The institute for advanced study (the institute) is one of the world's leading centers for theoretical research and intellectual inquiry. see schedule o.

Science & Tech
9
American Jewish Committee

AJC's mission is to enhance the wellbeing of the Jewish people and Israel, and to advance human rights and democratic values in the United States and around the world. In pursuit of this mission, AJC advances democratic principles, fights…

Civil Rights
10
Jewish Home Lifecare Manhattan

Jewish home lifecare (d/b/a the new jewish home, manhattan), is a not-for-profit organization committed to transforming eldercare for new yorkers so they can live meaningful lives in the place they call home.

Health
11
Bar Ilan University in Israel Inc

Biu produces students who excel in the sciences, humanities, law, engineering, business & the arts.

12
The Lieber Institute Inc

The mission of the institute is to translate basic genetic and molecular mechanisms of schizophrenia and related developmental brain disorders into clinical advances that change the lives of affected individuals. it is catalyzing a new…

Health

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is New Destiny Housing Corporation and the most unlike its peers is Stephanies House Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyJewish Community FederationsCommunity Arts OrganizationsSubstance Abuse TreatmentVeteran Support ServicesCancer Support Organizations
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 35 years old; the field is 14. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number24%0%<5yr15%3%5–10yr20%17%10–20yr17%31%20–35yr11%31%35–55yr13%19%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value24%0%<5yr15%0%5–10yr20%3%10–20yr17%10%20–35yr11%86%35–55yr13%2%55yr+

The field is 24% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 14% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/37
the rest of the field
14%
26,003/186,941

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

30 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 30 of the 53 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
29/30
Grantees still filing
19/30
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

THE DOROTHY AND MURRAY FEISS FAMILY FUND (DAF) — $1,451,810 · OtherTHE DOROTHY AND MURRAY FEISS FAMILY FUND (DAF)ISRAEL CANCER RESEARCH FUND INC — $143,585 · OtherISRAEL CANCER RESEARCH FUND INC+32 more — $124,876 · Other+32 moreDYSTONIA MEDICAL RESEARCH FOUNDATION — $119,601 · Health+4 more — $3,275 · HealthFRIENDS OF THE ISRAEL DEFENSE FORCES — $110,282 · InternationalSELFHELP COMMUNITY SERVICES INC — $5,750 · Human ServicesGOOD PLUS FOUNDATION INC — $5,000 · Human ServicesTHE CHIMES INC — $2,000 · Human ServicesSUNRISE DAY CAMPS ASSOCIATION INC — $1,100 · Human ServicesRESOURCES FOR CHILDREN WITH SPECIAL NEEDS INC — $500 · Human Services+1 more — $100 · Human ServicesTHE RIDGEFIELD PLAYHOUSE FOR MOVIES AND THE PERFORMING ARTS INC — $8,000 · Arts & CultureThe United States Holocaust Memorial Museum — $2,000 · Arts & CultureSCHOOL NEWS NATIONWIDE INC — $1,000 · Arts & CultureNEW DESTINY HOUSING CORPORATION — $10,000 · Housing & ShelterUNITED JEWISH APPEAL-FEDERATION OF JEWISH PHILANTHROPIES OF NEW YORK INC — $5,000 · PhilanthropyTHE NEW YORK COMMUNITY TRUST — $1,500 · PhilanthropyIbis Charities Foundation Inc — $1,000 · Philanthropy
Other$1,720,271Health$122,876International$110,282Human Services$14,450Arts & Culture$11,000Housing & Shelter$10,000Philanthropy$7,500

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetISRAEL CANCER RESEARCH FUND INC — $143,585 over 6y, 0.8% of budgetDYSTONIA MEDICAL RESEARCH FOUNDATION — $119,601 over 4y, 1.2% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE ISRAEL DEFENSE FORCES — $110,282 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetCOALITION FOR THE HOMELESS INC — $20,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetNEW DESTINY HOUSING CORPORATION — $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE RIDGEFIELD PLAYHOUSE FOR MOVIES AND THE PERFORMING ARTS INC — $8,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE — $6,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION — $6,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetSELFHELP COMMUNITY SERVICES INC — $5,750 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetHILLEL THE FOUNDATION FOR JEWISH CAMPUS LIFE — $5,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGOOD PLUS FOUNDATION INC — $5,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetNEW YORK COMMON PANTRY — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED JEWISH APPEAL-FEDERATION OF JEWISH PHILANTHROPIES OF NEW YORK INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe Louis D Brandeis Center Inc — $2,400 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE CHIMES INC — $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe United States Holocaust Memorial Museum — $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetOLD OAKS FOUNDATION INC — $2,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetTEMPLE EMANU-EL OF LONG BEACH INC — $1,800 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE NEW YORK COMMUNITY TRUST — $1,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS SOCIETY — $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSUNRISE DAY CAMPS ASSOCIATION INC — $1,100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetIbis Charities Foundation Inc — $1,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetSCHOOL NEWS NATIONWIDE INC — $1,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetJBI INTERNATIONAL INC — $775 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE H FOUNDATION — $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetRESOURCES FOR CHILDREN WITH SPECIAL NEEDS INC — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN LUNG ASSOCIATION — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLES DAMES D'ESCOFFIER INTERNATIONAL INC — $456 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSTEPHANIES HOUSE INC — $100 over 1y, 0.2% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Jewish Communal FundNY18.8× affinity9 shared granteesties to 10 of 10Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Jewish Communal Fund · National Philanthropic Trust · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Charities Aid Foundation America · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The Dorothy & Murray Feiss Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 1%
  • The Ridgefield Playhouse for Movies and the Performing Arts Inc1% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
10report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Dorothy & Murray Feiss Foundation Inc?

Find your warmest path to The Dorothy & Murray Feiss Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 53 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph