Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Doole Family Charitable Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$17k
Granted FY2025still arriving
8
Grants FY2025still arriving
5
States reached
$4k
Largest
01What it funds
0195% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Crime & Legal$30kFood & Nutrition$24kYouth Development$18kArts & Culture$12kReligion$5kHuman Services$3kRecreation & Sports$3kHealth$1kOther$0
02FY2025 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$2,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$109k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
FRIENDS OF PIONEER PARK$4,200
LA JOLLA PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH$4,000
WASHINGTON PRINT FOUNDATION$3,500
Individual grant recipient$2,000
MIRACLE BABIES$1,000
UNIVERSITY OF CUMBERLANDS$1,000
MEMPHIS CHILD ADVOCACY CENTER$500
LIBERTAS SCHOOL$500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY23–25, $4k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%MIRACLE BABIES: $2k → 11%MIRACLE BABIES: $1k → 11%MIRACLE BABIES: $1k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

90%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$104k · 8 repeat orgs$11k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue -11% since the first grant, against -34% for those funded once.

8 repeat relationships: 5 still active in FY2025, 3 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

8
9

Total granted

$104k
$8k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

-11%
-34%

Still filing today

50%
56%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 79% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $4k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Crime & LegalArts & CultureHuman ServicesEducationHealthEnvironmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MEMPHIS CHILD ADVOCACY CENTER
    8× · 2017–2025 · $31k · revenue +52%
  • FO
    FRIENDS OF PIONEER PARK
    9× · 2017–2025 · $27k
  • SD
    San Diego-Imperial Council Boy Scouts of America
    5× · 2017–2024 · $18k · revenue -36%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2017 · $2k
  • PH
    PATRICK HENRY HIGH SCHOOL
    one grant, 2018 · $1k
  • TT
    THE THIRST PROJECT
    one grant, 2021 · $1k · revenue -40%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Special Equestrians Inc

To provide therapeautic benefits to handicapped citizens through a horseback riding program.

Health
2
Great Results Equine Assisted Therapies
Health
3
Therapeutic Riding Institute Inc

To improve the lives and health of children and adults in southwest Ohio with special physical, cognitive, social and psychological needs through equine assisted services and therapies. TRI partners extensively with community organizations…

—
4
Therapeutic Riding of Tucson Inc

Empowering individuals with diverse abilities to reach their full potential through equine-assisted services since 1974.

Recreation & Sports
5
Hope Reins

Hope reins' vision is to inspire true hope and real healing for every child. at our ranch, we pair children and teens experiencing trauma with a rescued horse and mentor to find hope and healing. the free-of-charge individual and group…

Health
6
Grace Reins

To educate and well being for children

Youth Development
7
Blue Sky Therapeutic Riding and Respite

To provide a safe happy and healthy therapeutic community that works to empower and propel our special needs citizens and their families to their fullest potential. We serve our valued clients by providing therapeutic horseback riding…

Human Services
8
The District of Columbia Children's Advocacy Center

Safe shores provides survivor-centered intervention, hope and healing for children and families affected by abuse, trauma and violence in the district of columbia, and works to prevent and end child abuse and neglect through promising…

Crime & Legal
9
Healing Reins Equine Assisted Services Inc

"to heal with horses" by offering nationally accredited, affordable, horse-centered therapies and experiences that bring strength, independence, confidence and joy to central oregonians of all ages and abilities.

Health
10
Bravehearts Therapeutic Riding and Educational Center

Bravehearts brings hope, joy and unlimited possibilities through the healing power of the horse.

Human Services
11
Little Bit Therapeutic Riding Center

Little bit therapeutic riding center is a community where horses transform the bodies, minds and spirits of people with disabilities.

Recreation & Sports
12
Hidden Acres Therapeutic Riding Center Inc

To improve the minds, bodies and spirits of children and adults with special needs through the benefits of therapeutic riding and equine assisted activities.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Southern Reins Center for Equine Therapy; the most unlike its peers is Rural Resources. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 20 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/10
Grantees still filing
2/10
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

FRIENDS OF PIONEER PARK: $27,400 · OtherFRIENDS OF PIONEER PARKSan Diego-Imperial Council Boy Scouts of America: $17,500 · OtherSan Diego-Imperial Council Boy Scouts of AmericaWASHINGTON PRINT FOUNDATION: $9,500 · OtherWASHINGTON PRINT FOUNDATIONLA JOLLA PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH: $9,000 · OtherLA JOLLA PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH+10 more: $10,500 · Other+10 moreMEMPHIS CHILD ADVOCACY CENTER: $30,500 · Crime & LegalMEMPHIS CHILD ADVOCACY CENTERNEW BALLET ENSEMBLE INC: $5,100 · Arts & CultureMIRACLE BABIES: $3,564 · Human ServicesTHE THIRST PROJECT: $1,000 · InternationalSOUTHERN REINS CENTER FOR EQUINE THERAPY: $750 · HealthNEW VOCATIONS RACEHORSE ADOPTION: $500 · Animals
Other$73,900Crime & Legal$30,500Arts & Culture$5,100Human Services$3,564International$1,000Health$750Animals$500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetMEMPHIS CHILD ADVOCACY CENTER: $30,500 over 8y, 0.3% of budgetSan Diego-Imperial Council Boy Scouts of America: $17,500 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetMIRACLE BABIES: $3,564 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetTHE THIRST PROJECT: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSOUTHERN REINS CENTER FOR EQUINE THERAPY: $750 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetNEW VOCATIONS RACEHORSE ADOPTION: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetRural Resources: $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetHEALING STRIDES OF VIRGINIA: $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetLIBERTAS SCHOOL OF MEMPHIS: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds MEMPHIS CHILD ADVOCACY CENTER ↗
  • Who funds San Diego-Imperial Council Boy Scouts of America ↗
  • Who funds NEW BALLET ENSEMBLE INC ↗
  • Who funds MIRACLE BABIES ↗
  • Who funds THE THIRST PROJECT ↗
  • Who funds SOUTHERN REINS CENTER FOR EQUINE THERAPY ↗
  • Who funds NEW VOCATIONS RACEHORSE ADOPTION ↗
  • Who funds Rural Resources ↗
  • Who funds HEALING STRIDES OF VIRGINIA ↗
  • Who funds LIBERTAS SCHOOL OF MEMPHIS ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Pfizer Foundation IncNY9.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 7 of 7Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Pfizer Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Network for Good · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Doole Family Charitable Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Doole Family Charitable Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 20 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Doole Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph