Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Donald G Currie Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$55k
Granted FY2025still arriving
6
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$15k
Largest
01What it funds
0196% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Housing & Shelter$74kHuman Services$73kPublic Safety & Disaster$66kEducation$62kYouth Development$62kCrime & Legal$52kEmployment$50kFood & Nutrition$20kOther$0
02FY2025 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k2 grants · $10k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $45k
$10,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$1.6M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
RICHLAND POLICE FOUNDATION$15,000
ELIJAH FAMILY HOMES$10,000
NORTH FRANKLIN HERITAGE MUSEUM$10,000
SAN AUGUSTINE CARE SHARE$10,000
MY FRIENDS PLACE$5,000
MID COLUMBIA MEALS ON WHEELS$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY24–25, $25k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%SAFE HARBOR CRISIS: $20k → 11%MID COLUMBIA MEALS ON WHEELS: $5k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

26%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$132k · 3 repeat orgs$371k to everyone else

3 repeat relationships: 0 still active in FY2025, 3 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

3
13

Total granted

$132k
$316k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

0%
0%

Still filing today

33%
38%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 0% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $55k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesYouth DevelopmentEmploymentEducationHealthHousing & ShelterOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • BB
    Big Bro Joe Foundation
    2× · 2023–2024 · $62k · 48% of their budget
  • RP
    RICHLAND POLICE DEPARTMENT FOUNDATION
    2× · 2018–2022 · $37k
  • MP
    MOS PLACE
    4× · 2020–2024 · $33k

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2019 · $59k
  • GC
    Grace Collectivegraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $50k · revenue +151%
  • EL
    ELKS LODGE 2710
    one grant, 2017 · $50k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Survivors Resources Inc Dba Safe Haven Inc of Pike County

Provide counseling, crisis intervention, 24 hour crisis hotline, advocacy, safe housing and supportive services to victims of sexual assault and domestic violence.

—
2
S a F E Shelter

We are committed to helping victims of sexual assault and abuse and domestic assault and abuse through advocacy support and education. We provide emergency shelter to domestic assault victims. We Also are committed to educating the public…

—
3
Saving Grace

Saving grace offers safety, hope, and healing to survivors of intimiate partner violence and sexual assault and engages central oregon to build life free from violence.

Human Services
4
Safehouse Crisis Center Inc

To provide shelter and advocacy services to victims of domestic violence, sexual assault, and stalking in the 11 counties of southeast kansas.

Human Services
5
Lorain County Safe Harbor Corp

The organization provides a comprehensive range of family focused services for lorain county, ohio victims of domestic violence. we endeavor to be a part of collaborative community

Human Services
6
Southside Survivor Response Center Inc

Provide crisis intervention, advocacy, safety services, and education to empower people affected by sexual assault, domestic violence and various crisis situations through community collaboration.

—
7
Sarahs House

Provide temporary housing and support assistance to pregnant women in need

Human Services
8
Safe Harbor Crisis Center

Safe harbor, a non-profit organization, provides shelter, supportiveservices and advocacy to survivors of domestic violence and sexual assault, as well as education, awareness and resources to our community. our vision is to empower…

Human Services
9
Safety Shelter of St Johns County Inc

The mission of the organization is to offer protection and quality services for victims of domestic and sexual abuse and their minor children in st. johns county, florida through the establishment and operation of a temporary shelter and…

Housing & Shelter
10
San Francisco Safehouse

The organization works in concert with San Francisco Network Ministries Housing Corporation to provide transitional housing, supportive services, and aftercare to aid and support homeless women who have been commercially sexually exploited…

Human Services
11
Nashville Safe Haven Family Shelter Inc

Lead our community's efforts to house, support, empower and advocate for families experiencing homelessness.

Housing & Shelter
12
Safe Embrace

Safe Embrace is committed to ending the cycle of domestic and sexual violence with innovative prevention and intervention services. We help victims of domestic abuse, sexual assault, and human trafficking become survivors by providing…

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Support Advocacy and Resource Center; the most unlike its peers is Big Bro Joe Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 22 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
3/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Individual grant recipient: $58,816 · OtherIndividual grant recipientELKS LODGE 2710: $50,000 · OtherELKS LODGE 2710RICHLAND POLICE DEPARTMENT FOUNDATION: $37,000 · OtherRICHLAND POLICE DEPARTMENT FOUNDATIONMOS PLACE: $32,500 · OtherMOS PLACEJEFFERSON ELEMENTARY PTA: $30,000 · OtherJEFFERSON ELEMENTARY PTAIndividual grant recipient: $25,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientSALVATION ARMY TRI-CITIES: $20,000 · OtherSALVATION ARMY TRI-CITIESRICHLAND POLICE FOUNDATION: $15,000 · Other+6 more: $32,500 · Other+6 moreBig Bro Joe Foundation: $62,000 · Youth DevelopmentBig Bro Joe F…Grace Collective: $50,000 · EmploymentGrace Colle…ORCHARD ELEMENTARY PARENT TEACHER ORGANIZATION: $30,000 · EducationSAFE HARBOR CRISIS NURSERY: $20,000 · Human ServicesSENIOR LIFE RESOURCES NORTHWEST: $5,000 · Human ServicesSUPPORT ADVOCACY AND RESOURCE CENTER: $15,000 · HealthELIJAH FAMILY HOMES: $10,000 · Housing & ShelterNORTH FRANKLIN HERITAGE MUSEUM: $10,000 · Arts & Culture
Other$300,816Youth Development$62,000Employment$50,000Education$30,000Human Services$25,000Health$15,000Housing & Shelter$10,000Arts & Culture$10,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetBig Bro Joe Foundation: $62,000 over 2y, 48% of budgetSAFE HARBOR CRISIS NURSERY: $20,000 over 1y, 2.0% of budgetSUPPORT ADVOCACY AND RESOURCE CENTER: $15,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Big Bro Joe Foundation ↗
  • Who funds Grace Collective ↗
  • Who funds ORCHARD ELEMENTARY PARENT TEACHER ORGANIZATION ↗
  • Who funds SAFE HARBOR CRISIS NURSERY ↗
  • Who funds SUPPORT ADVOCACY AND RESOURCE CENTER ↗
  • Who funds ELIJAH FAMILY HOMES ↗
  • Who funds NORTH FRANKLIN HERITAGE MUSEUM ↗
  • Who funds SAN AUGUSTINE CARE & SHARE INC ↗
  • Who funds SENIOR LIFE RESOURCES NORTHWEST ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

3 Rivers Community FoundationWA20× affinity7 shared granteesties to 6 of 6Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: 3 Rivers Community Foundation · United Way of Benton & Franklin Counties · Women Helping Women Fund Tri-Cities · Numerica Credit Union · Lamb Weston Charitable Foundation · Columbus Foundation · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Donald G Currie Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Donald G Currie Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24
no gov · 00%3%13%28%50%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–24
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to The Donald G Currie Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to The Donald G Currie Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 22 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Donald G Currie’s filings →

    More from the funding graph