Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Don & Carol Schmidgall Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$32k
Granted FY2025still arriving
9
Grants FY2025still arriving
5
States reached
$6k
Largest
01What it funds
0194% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Religion$115kInternational$97kHuman Services$36kAnimals$23kCommunity Improvement$14kYouth Development$4kEmployment$4kCrime & Legal$3kOther$0
02FY2025 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$3,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$486k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Individual grant recipient$6,000
CRU$6,000
INTERNATIONAL JUSTICE MISSION$4,000
CHARITY WATER$4,000
THE INN BETWEEN OF LONGMONT INC$3,000
USA FOR UNHCR$3,000
CHRISTIAN VETERINARY MISSION$2,500
COMPASSION INTERNATIONAL$2,064
EL COMITE DE LONGMONT$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $35k) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%CHARITY WATER: $5k → 17%CHARITY WATER: $5k → 17%CHARITY WATER: $5k → 17%CHARITY WATER: $4k → 17%CHARITY WATER: $4k → 17%CHARITY WATER: $4k → 17%CHARITY WATER: $4k → 17%CHARITY WATER: $3k → 17%CHARITY WATER: $3k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
IL
NY
MA
OR
IA
PA
CO
AZ
TN
DC
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 9% of The Don & Carol Schmidgall Family Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address.

The Don & Carol Schmidgall Family Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

93%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$296k · 18 repeat orgs$24k to everyone else

18 repeat relationships: 7 still active in FY2025, 11 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

18
7

Total granted

$296k
$20k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+64%
+145%

Still filing today

56%
29%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 87% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $4k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
InternationalHuman ServicesEducationAnimalsHealthFood & NutritionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • IJ
    INTERNATIONAL JUSTICE MISSION
    9× · 2017–2025 · $47k · revenue +82%
  • CHARITY GLOBAL INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $35k · revenue +17%
  • United States Association for UNHCR
    9× · 2017–2025 · $35k · revenue +67%

Funded once

  • CC
    CAMPUS CRUSADE FOR CHRIST
    one grant, 2017 · $10k
  • HB
    HARMONY BIBLE CHURCH
    one grant, 2018 · $7k
  • CO
    COMMUNITY OF CHRIST
    one grant, 2024 · $1k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
International Development Enterprises

See schedule o for a more detailed description of ide's mission statement and achievements.

International
2
International Aids Vaccine Initiative Inc

A nonprofit scientific research organization that develops vaccines and antibodies for hiv, tuberculosis, and emerging infectious diseases.

International
3
Counterpart International Inc

For over 60 years, counterpart international has partnered with communities worldwide to turn local ideas into lasting solutions, connecting local vision with global opportunity. (continued on schedule o)we believe people closest to the…

International
4
Actionaid Usa

Actionaid is an international network building a just, equitable, and sustainable world in solidarity with communities on the frontlines of poverty and injustice. actionaid usa is the u.s. branch of actionaid international, which works in…

Social Science
5
World Hope International Inc

The purpose of world hope international, inc. (whi) includes providing assistance to economically disadvantaged people through long-term social transformation projects, including anti-trafficking protection, clean water, economic…

International
6
International Consortium of Investigative Journalists Inc

International consortium of investigative journalists, inc.'s (icij) mission is to show people how the world really works through stories that rock the world; forcing positive change.

International
7
Devworks International

Devworks international is dedicated to a society where all people enjoy the freedom to pursue their own sustainable development. we contribute to this by strengthening the capacity of local organizations.

Human Services
8
Asociacion Interamericana Para La Defensa Del Ambiente

To strenghten people's ability to guarantee their individual and collective right to a healthy environment, via the development, implementation, and effective enforcement of national and international law.

Crime & Legal
9
Community Partners International

Community partners international works in partnership with local community-based organizations (cbos) in myanmar and along its borders and this is the core of our work. together with local partners, we listen to local voices, build local…

Human Services
10
Upaya Social Ventures

Upaya Social Ventures' mission is to create dignified jobs for people living in extreme poverty by building scalable businesses with investment and consulting support.

International
11
Partnersglobal

Partnersglobal (partners) works through a global network to support local leaders and create partnerships that transform conflict, strengthen democratic institutions, and achieve sustainable development.

International
12
Corus International Inc

TO MANAGE AN INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENT, HEALTH, AND RELIEF FOCUSED FAMILY OF ORGANIZATIONS HELPING PEOPLE AND COMMUNITIES LIFT THEMSELVES OUT OF POVERTY, SUPPORT WELL-BEING OF INDIVIDUALS, FAMILIES AND COMMUNITIES, AND PROVIDE…

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is World Vision Inc; the most unlike its peers is Mediapolis Partners for Progress in. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

16 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 16 of the 28 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
15/16
Grantees still filing
12/16
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CRU: $57,500 · OtherCRUIndividual grant recipient: $26,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientPIONEERS: $20,000 · OtherPIONEERSJAIL MINISTRY FOR JESUS: $17,000 · OtherJAIL MINISTRY FOR JESUSCAMPUS CRUSADE FOR CHRIST: $9,500 · OtherCAMPUS CRUSADE FOR CHRISTHARMONY BIBLE CHURCH: $6,667 · Other+9 more: $10,500 · Other+9 moreINTERNATIONAL JUSTICE MISSION: $47,000 · InternationalINTERNATIONAL JUSTICE MISSIONUnited States Association for UNHCR: $34,500 · InternationalUnited States Association for UNH…WORLD VISION INC: $8,000 · InternationalWORLD VISION INCCompassion International Incorporated: $4,128 · InternationalALLEGRO ORGANIZATIONAL SOLUTIONS INC: $3,600 · InternationalCHARITY GLOBAL INC: $34,700 · Human ServicesCHARITY GLOBA…Casa De Paz: $3,000 · Human ServicesCasa De Paz+1 more: $1,000 · Human ServicesCHRISTIAN VETERINARY MISSION: $22,500 · AnimalsMediapolis Partners for Progress In: $14,400 · EducationYEAR UP INC: $3,500 · EducationTHE INN BETWEEN OF LONGMONT INC: $3,000 · Housing & ShelterRodale Institute: $1,500 · Food & Nutrition
Other$147,167International$97,228Human Services$38,700Animals$22,500Education$17,900Housing & Shelter$3,000Food & Nutrition$1,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetINTERNATIONAL JUSTICE MISSION: $47,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetCHARITY GLOBAL INC: $34,700 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetUnited States Association for UNHCR: $34,500 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetCHRISTIAN VETERINARY MISSION: $22,500 over 9y, 0.3% of budgetMediapolis Partners for Progress In: $14,400 over 5y, 3.1% of budgetWORLD VISION INC: $8,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetYEAR UP INC: $3,500 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetCasa De Paz: $3,000 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetTHE INN BETWEEN OF LONGMONT INC: $3,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetRodale Institute: $1,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetBIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF COLORADO INC: $1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSHAOHANNAHS HOPE INC dba SHOW HOPE: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds INTERNATIONAL JUSTICE MISSION ↗
  • Who funds CHARITY GLOBAL INC ↗
  • Who funds United States Association for UNHCR ↗
  • Who funds CHRISTIAN VETERINARY MISSION ↗
  • Who funds Mediapolis Partners for Progress In ↗
  • Who funds WORLD VISION INC ↗
  • Who funds Compassion International Incorporated ↗
  • Who funds ALLEGRO ORGANIZATIONAL SOLUTIONS INC ↗
  • Who funds YEAR UP INC ↗
  • Who funds Casa De Paz ↗
  • Who funds THE INN BETWEEN OF LONGMONT INC ↗
  • Who funds Rodale Institute ↗
  • Who funds EL COMITE DE LONGMONT ↗
  • Who funds BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF COLORADO INC ↗
  • Who funds SHAOHANNAHS HOPE INC dba SHOW HOPE ↗
  • Who funds ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Colorado Health FoundationCO13.3× affinity4 shared granteesties to 8 of 8Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Colorado Health Foundation · The Denver Foundation · Colorado Gives Foundation · Mile High United Way Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Don & Carol Schmidgall Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Don & Carol Schmidgall Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Year Up Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 28 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Don & Carol Schmidgall Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph