Skip to content
The Doll Family Foundation at a glance

· Private foundation

The Doll Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$225k
Granted FY2025still arriving
23
Grants FY2025still arriving
6
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
0198% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Health$274kHuman Services$219kEnvironment$209kHousing & Shelter$151kCivil Rights$99kPhilanthropy$98kEmployment$88kYouth Development$46kOther$0
02FY2025 · 23 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k2 grants · $15k
  • $10k–50k21 grants · $210k
$10,000
Median grant
6
States reached
$3.5M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
RESOURCE MEDIA$10,000
BLUE MOUNTAIN CLINIC$10,000
LUTHERAN METROPOLITAN MINISTRY$10,000
HAVEN$10,000
GIVING TUCSON (UNITED WAY OF TUCSON AND SOUTHERN ARIZONA)$10,000
BRIDGERCARE$10,000
FRONT AND CENTERED$10,000
RAPHAEL HOUSE OF PORTLAND$10,000
ADELANTE MUJERES$10,000
HEALTHY LAKEWOOD FOUNDATION$10,000
OREGON ENVIRONMENTAL COUNCIL$10,000
LEGAL WORKS INC$10,000
NA'AH ILLAHEE FUND$10,000
THE HARBOR$10,000
BIRTHING BEAUTIFUL COMMUNITIES$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $191k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 39% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%HAVEN: $10k → 12%ADELANTE MUJERES: $10k → 8%HAVEN: $10k → 12%ADELANTE MUJERES: $10k → 8%FAMILY PROMISE OF GALLATIN VALLEY: $10k → 10%FAMILY PROMISE OF GALLATIN VALLEY: $10k → 10%FAMILY PROMISE OF GALLATIN VALLEY: $10k → 10%ADELANTE MUJERES: $15k → 8%ADELANTE MUJERES: $10k → 8%ADELANTE MUJERES: $7k → 8%LATINO COMMUNITY FUND OF WASHINGTON STATE: $15k → 9%ADELANTE MUJERES: $7k → 8%LATINO COMMUNITY FUND OF WASHINGTON STATE: $7k → 9%ADELANTE MUJERES: $5k → 8%RAPHAEL HOUSE OF PORTLAND: $10k → 12%RAPHAEL HOUSE OF PORTLAND: $10k → 12%RAPHAEL HOUSE OF PORTLAND: $10k → 12%RAPHAEL HOUSE OF PORTLAND: $10k → 12%SOURCE CLEVELAND: $10k → 17%MERRICK HOUSE: $5k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
MT
NY
OR
OH
PA
CA
MO
WV
VA
AZ
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

79%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.1M · 36 repeat orgs$298k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +23% since the first grant, against -5% for those funded once.

36 repeat relationships: 14 still active in FY2025, 22 since wound down; 9 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

36
23

Total granted

$1.1M
$210k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+23%
-5%

Still filing today

75%
61%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 61% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $88k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthHuman ServicesEnvironmentPhilanthropyEducationHousing & ShelterOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • OT
    Oregon Tradeswomen Inc
    7× · 2017–2025 · $68k · revenue +87%
  • ADELANTE MUJERES
    7× · 2017–2025 · $64k · revenue +223%
  • ROSE HAVEN CIC
    5× · 2019–2024 · $51k · revenue +303%

Funded once

  • ML
    METROPOLITAN LUTHERAN MINISTRYgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $15k · revenue +107%
  • OW
    Ohio Womens Alliance
    one grant, 2022 · $15k · revenue -12%
  • I
    IDEASTREAM
    one grant, 2018 · $15k · revenue +22%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Pro-Choice Washington

To protect and promote every persons right to access the full range of reproductive healthcare choices in Washington State, including safe and legal abortion, through education, advocacy, lobbying and coalition-building

—
2
The Women's Clinic of Columbus

Women's health clinic focusing on helping at-risk parents deal with issues related to prenancy and parenting.

Health
3
Options Pregnancy Resource Centers Inc

Empowering life-affirming decisions

Health
4
Planned Parenthood of Metropolitan Washington Dc Inc

Ppmw provides high-quality, compassionate healthcare, including reproductive care; promote sexual health; and advocate for reproductive rights and health equity for all.

Health
5
Central Ohio Workers Center Inc

The Central Ohio Worker Center is a non-profit organization that educates, empowers, and advocates for and with low-wage and immigrant workers in Central Ohio.

Civil Rights
6
Women Winning

To encourage, promote, support, and elect pro-choice women of all political parties to all levels of public office in minnesota.

Public Benefit
7
Boulder Valley Women's Health Center Inc

Our mission is to provide high quality and equitable reproductive and sexual health services, abortion, and education to all people, regardless of any barriers to healthcare that they may face.

—
8
The Birth Center

The birth center dba lifecycle wellness and birth center is an independent non-profit organization and free-standing, out-of-hospital birth center. our team of midwives and nurse-practitioners provide empowering gynecology and…

—
9
Global Cleveland

Global cleveland is dedicated to growing northeast ohio's economy by welcoming and connecting international people to opportunities and fostering a more inviting community for those seeking a place to call home.

Human Services
10
Planned Parenthood of Greater Washington and North Idaho

To provide exceptional reproductive and complementary health care services, honest education, and advocacy for all.

Health
11
Ohio United Way

To strengthen the capacity of United Ways across Ohio and to advance the common good for Ohioans.

Philanthropy
12
League of Our Own Washington

A league of our own is dedicated to finding talented women to run for office and provide them the tools, resources, training, and mentorship to be successful candidates and effective leaders.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Family Promise of Greater Cleveland; the most unlike its peers is Hathaway Brown School. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

50 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 50 of the 69 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
13
Early backer (in before they grew)
48/50
Grantees still filing
24/50
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

BRIDGERCARE: $47,000 · OtherBRIDGERCAREPRO-CHOICE OREGON FOUNDATION: $44,000 · OtherPRO-CHOICE OREGON FOUNDATIONFAMILY PROMISE OF GREATER CLEVELAND: $38,000 · OtherWOMEN'S RECOVERY CENTER: $31,000 · OtherOREGON ENVIRONMENTAL COUNCIL: $30,000 · OtherPRETERM: $26,500 · OtherTHRIVE INC: $26,000 · OtherLUTHERAN METROPOLITAN MINISTRY: $30,984 · OtherNa'ah Illahee Fund: $40,000 · OtherNa'ah Illahee Fund+33 more: $409,861 · Other+33 moreADELANTE MUJERES: $64,000 · Human ServicesADELANTE MUJERE…RAPHAEL HOUSE OF PORTLAND: $40,000 · Human ServicesRAPHAEL HOUSE O…FAMILY PROMISE OF GALLATIN VALLEY INC: $35,000 · Human ServicesFAMILY PROMISE …Latino Community Fund of Washington State: $22,000 · Human ServicesLatino Communit…Healthy Alternatives to Violent Environm: $20,000 · Human ServicesHealthy Alterna…RESOURCE CLEVELAND: $10,000 · Human Services+1 more: $5,000 · Human ServicesOregon Environmental Council: $37,500 · EnvironmentOregon Enviro…Front and Centered: $37,000 · EnvironmentFront and Cen…WOMEN'S VOICES FOR THE EARTH: $37,000 · EnvironmentWOMEN'S VOICE…RESOURCE MEDIA: $35,000 · EnvironmentRESOURCE MEDI…Center for Diversity and the Environment: $25,000 · EnvironmentCenter for Di…PRETERM CLEVELAND INC: $45,000 · HealthPRETERM CLEV…CLEVELAND RAPE CRISIS CENTER: $44,000 · HealthCLEVELAND RA…GLOBAL TO LOCAL HEALTH INITIATIVE: $20,000 · HealthGLOBAL TO LO…PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF THE COLUMBIA WILLAMETTE INC: $15,000 · HealthPLANNED PARE…PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF GREATER OHIO: $10,000 · HealthPLANNED PARE…HEALTHY LAKEWOOD FOUNDATION: $10,000 · HealthHEALTHY LAKE…BLUE MOUNTAIN CLINIC INC: $10,000 · HealthBLUE MOUNTAI…+1 more: $5,000 · HealthROSE HAVEN CIC: $51,000 · Housing & ShelterTHE HAVEN HOME LLC: $20,000 · Housing & ShelterOregon Tradeswomen Inc: $68,000 · EmploymentONE VALLEY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $32,000 · PhilanthropyUNITED WAY OF GREATER CLEVELAND: $10,000 · PhilanthropyMagnified Giving: $8,000 · PhilanthropyCANDID: $3,500 · Philanthropy
Other$723,345Human Services$196,000Environment$171,500Health$159,000Housing & Shelter$71,000Employment$68,000Philanthropy$53,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetOregon Tradeswomen Inc: $68,000 over 7y, 0.7% of budgetADELANTE MUJERES: $64,000 over 7y, 0.4% of budgetROSE HAVEN CIC: $51,000 over 5y, 0.7% of budgetBRIDGERCARE: $47,000 over 5y, 0.4% of budgetPRETERM CLEVELAND INC: $45,000 over 3y, 0.6% of budgetPRO-CHOICE OREGON FOUNDATION: $44,000 over 4y, 2.1% of budgetCLEVELAND RAPE CRISIS CENTER: $44,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetNa'ah Illahee Fund: $40,000 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetRAPHAEL HOUSE OF PORTLAND: $40,000 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetFAMILY PROMISE OF GREATER CLEVELAND: $38,000 over 4y, 0.9% of budgetOregon Environmental Council: $37,500 over 4y, 0.5% of budgetFront and Centered: $37,000 over 4y, 0.5% of budgetWOMEN'S VOICES FOR THE EARTH: $37,000 over 3y, 2.3% of budgetRESOURCE MEDIA: $35,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetFAMILY PROMISE OF GALLATIN VALLEY INC: $35,000 over 4y, 1.5% of budgetONE VALLEY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $32,000 over 3y, 3.0% of budgetWOMEN'S RECOVERY CENTER: $31,000 over 3y, 1.7% of budgetLUTHERAN METROPOLITAN MINISTRY: $30,984 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetTHRIVE INC: $26,000 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetCenter for Diversity and the Environment: $25,000 over 2y, 1.9% of budgetLatino Community Fund of Washington State: $22,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetABORTION FORWARD: $20,000 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetGLOBAL TO LOCAL HEALTH INITIATIVE: $20,000 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetUNITED LABOR AGENCY INC: $20,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetLEGAL WORKS INC: $20,000 over 2y, 2.6% of budgetHealthy Alternatives to Violent Environm: $20,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetJOURNEY CENTER FOR SAFETY AND HEALING: $20,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetTHE HAVEN HOME LLC: $20,000 over 2y, 1.1% of budgetMETROPOLITAN LUTHERAN MINISTRY: $15,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetOhio Womens Alliance: $15,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetIDEASTREAM: $15,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetPLANNED PARENTHOOD OF THE COLUMBIA WILLAMETTE INC: $15,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHATHAWAY BROWN SCHOOL: $12,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBUILDING HOPE IN THE CITY: $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetONE MONTANA: $10,000 over 1y, 2.7% of budgetPLANNED PARENTHOOD OF GREATER OHIO: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHEALTHY LAKEWOOD FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetRESOURCE CLEVELAND: $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetBIRTHING BEAUTIFUL COMMUNITIES: $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetUNITED WAY OF GREATER CLEVELAND: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBLUE MOUNTAIN CLINIC INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetMagnified Giving: $8,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetCogswell Hall Inc: $7,051 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetPOLICY MATTERS OHIO: $7,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetGREATER CLEVELAND COMMUNITY SHARES: $7,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetMERRICK HOUSE: $5,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetCANDID: $3,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Char and Chuck Fo…The Cleveland Foundat…The George Gund Found…Higley Fund of the Cl…Community West Founda…The Andrews FoundationThe Reinberger Founda…Healthcomp FoundationThe Abington Foundati…Murphy Family Foundat…Mt Sinai Health Care …Woodruff Foundation
The Char and Chuck Fowler Family FoundationOH36.1× affinity15 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Char and Chuck Fowler Family Foundation · The Cleveland Foundation · The George Gund Foundation · Higley Fund of the Cleveland Foundation · Community West Foundation · The Andrews Foundation · The Reinberger Foundation · Healthcomp Foundation · The Abington Foundation · Murphy Family Foundation · Mt Sinai Health Care Foundation · Woodruff Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Doll Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Doll Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 30%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →median 10%
  • Oregon Tradeswomen Inc: 46% of income from government
  • Adelante Mujeres: 31% of income from government
  • Raphael House of Portland: 10% of income from government
  • Planned Parenthood of the Columbia Willamette Inc: 7% of income from government
  • Womens Foundation of Oregon: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
3get no government money at all
14report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Doll Family Foundation?

Find your warmest path to The Doll Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 69 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Doll Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home