Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Dietrich W Botstiber Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$752k
Granted FY2024still arriving
21
Grants FY2024still arriving
9
States reached
$500k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Education$2.7MPhilanthropy$2.0MAnimals$1.1MArts & Culture$864kInternational$561kHuman Services$33kRecreation & Sports$30kHealth$25kOther$0
02FY2024 · 21 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k11 grants · $59k
  • $10k–50k9 grants · $193k
  • $250k+1 grant · $500k
$9,740
Median grant
9
States reached
$47M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
FIDELITY DONOR ADVISED FUND$500,000
FULBRIGHT$42,000
DELAWARE VALLEY SCIENCE FAIR$35,000
MARTIN LUTHER KING JR MEMORIAL SCHOLARSHIP$35,000
Individual grant recipient$20,000
Individual grant recipient$16,000
Individual grant recipient$13,080
INSTITUT FR DONAUSCHWBISCHE GESCHICHTE UND LANDESKUNDE$11,965
Individual grant recipient$10,000
CENTER FOR INDEPENDENT DOCUMENTARY$10,000
CHARLES UNIVERSITY FACULTY OF ARTS$9,740
Individual grant recipient$7,500
HIDDEN CABINET FILMS$7,000
UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA BERKELEY THE REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CA$7,000
PHILADELPHIA FIRE DEPT HISTORICAL CORP$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

US giving: 88% of grant dollars ($6.5M). The need read here covers only this US portion; the 12% that went abroad ($901k) is mapped below.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–23, $40k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%GLIDE FUND INC: $10k → 10%DOMESTIC ABUSE PROJECT OF DELAWARE COUNTY: $25k → 10%DOMESTIC ABUSE PROJECT OF DELAWARE COUNTY: $3k → 10%DOMESTIC ABUSE PROJECT OF DELAWARE COUNTY: $3k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

VT
NH
WA
MT
ND
MN
IL
WI
MI
NY
MA
OR
NV
IA
IN
OH
PA
NJ
CT
RI
CA
UT
CO
MO
VA
MD
NM
KS
NC
SC
DC
LA
AL
GA
TX
FL

Beyond the US: 12% of all-years giving ($901k)

12 countries, by the recipient’s country on the filing.

grant dollars sentlessmore
Austria$474k · 26 grants
United Kingdom$202k · 9 grants
British Virgin Islands$50k · 1 grant
Germany$42k · 4 grants
Hungary$41k · 2 grants
Czechia$37k · 4 grants
Brazil$25k · 1 grant
Italy$13k · 1 grant
Ireland$8k · 1 grant
Canada$5k · 1 grant
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving. International giving is mapped by the recipient’s country from the same 990 filings; comparable need data isn’t available at that grain.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 29% of The Dietrich W Botstiber Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 40% of the giving stays in PA; by stated purpose, 30%.

The Dietrich W Botstiber Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 24% directed abroad (not shown)
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

68%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$4.0M · 26 repeat orgs$1.9M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +14% since the first grant, against +12% for those funded once.

26 repeat relationships: 6 still active in FY2024, 20 since wound down; 15 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

26
116

Total granted

$4.0M
$1.3M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+14%
+12%

Still filing today

54%
21%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 13% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $657k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
AnimalsEducationArts & CultureHuman ServicesPhilanthropyInternationalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • HW
    Humane World for Animals Inc
    6× · 2017–2022 · $604k · revenue +46%
  • ML
    MARTIN LUTHER KING JR MEMORIAL SCHOLARSHIP COMMITTEE
    8× · 2017–2024 · $206k · revenue +136%
  • WH
    WOMEN'S HUMANE SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $40k · revenue +64%

Funded once

  • COOPERATIVE FOR ASSISTANCE AND RELIEF EVERYWHERE INC
    one grant, 2021 · $70k · revenue +12%
  • RU
    ROSS UNIVERSITY OF VETERINARY MEDICINE
    one grant, 2017 · $50k
  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA BOARD OF TRUSTEES
    one grant, 2017 · $50k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Delaware Valley University

See schedule o.we are inspired by the ideals of our founder who, in 1896, emphasized respect for all people and ideas, who honored knowledge with practice, progress and the common good. our historical commitment to experiential learning…

—
2
University of New Haven

The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…

Education
3
Furman University

The primary mission of furman as a liberal arts institution is to provide a distinctive education in fine arts, humanities, social sciences, mathematics and the sciences, as well as selected professional disciplines.

Education
4
The Trustees of Princeton University

Research, education and general - princeton university is a private not-for-profit, non-sectarian institution of higher learning with approximately 5,700 undergraduate and 3,300 graduate students. 2,500 students graduated in the 2024-2025…

Education
5
Boston Architectural College

The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.

—
6
Manhattanville University

To educate students to be ethical and socially responsible leaders in a global community.

Education
7
Gettysburg College

Gettysburg college is a residential, undergraduate college of the liberal arts and sciences.

Education
8
DePauw University

Depauw university develops leaders the world needs through an uncommon commitment to the liberal arts. depauw's diverse and inclusive learning and living experience, distinctive in its rigorous intellectual engagement and its global and…

Education
9
Wilson College

Wilson college empowers students to be confident and critical thinkers, creative visionaries, effective communicators, honorable leaders, and agents of justice.

Education
10
Lehigh University

The university's goal in the coming decade is to advance learning through the integration of teaching, research and service to others. the core of this goal is to prepare graduates to engage with the world and lead lives of meaning. to do…

Education
11
Trustees of Tufts College

Education and Research

Education
12
President and Trustees of Bates College

Bates is a college of the liberal arts and sciences, and is a coeducational, nonsectarian, residential college with special commitments to academic rigor, and to assuring in all of its efforts the dignity of each individual, and access to…

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Queens College Foundation Inc; the most unlike its peers is Concert Operetta Theater. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

41 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 41 of the 159 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
41/41
Grantees still filing
24/41
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY: $2,076,841 · OtherPENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITYFIDELITY DONOR ADVISED FUND: $500,000 · OtherFIDELITY DONOR ADVISED FUNDIndividual grant recipient: $225,000 · OtherAUSTRIAN-AMERICAN EDUCATIONAL COMMISSION FULBRIGHT COMMISSON: $195,000 · Other+123 more: $1,536,890 · Other+123 moreFIDELITY INVESTMENTS CHARITABLE GIFT FUND: $1,505,737 · Community ImprovementFIDELITY INVESTMENTS CH…Humane World for Animals Inc: $603,553 · AnimalsHumane Wor…WOMEN'S HUMANE SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS INC: $40,000 · AnimalsWOMEN'S HU…THE SCIENCE AND CONSERVATION CENTER INC: $25,000 · Animals+8 more: $29,000 · AnimalsMARTIN LUTHER KING JR MEMORIAL SCHOLARSHIP COMMITTEE: $206,100 · EducationDelaware Valley Science Fairs Inc: $195,000 · EducationTHE STARFISH FOUNDATION INC: $20,000 · EducationHEIGHTS PHILADELPHIA: $17,500 · Education+8 more: $64,156 · EducationCOOPERATIVE FOR ASSISTANCE AND RELIEF EVERYWHERE INC: $69,582 · InternationalUTAH FILM CENTER: $25,000 · Arts & CultureCONCERT OPERETTA THEATER: $15,000 · Arts & CultureTHE CENTER FOR INDEPENDENT DOCUMENTARY INC: $10,000 · Arts & CultureOPERA PHILADELPHIA: $10,000 · Arts & CultureGERMAN AMERICAN HERITAGE CENTER: $7,000 · Arts & CultureDomestic Abuse Project of Delaware County Inc: $30,000 · Human ServicesTHE MARK BOOKMAN FOUNDATION: $10,000 · Human Services
Other$4,533,731Community Improvement$1,505,737Animals$697,553Education$502,756International$69,582Arts & Culture$67,000Human Services$40,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetFIDELITY INVESTMENTS CHARITABLE GIFT FUND: $1,505,737 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetHumane World for Animals Inc: $603,553 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetMARTIN LUTHER KING JR MEMORIAL SCHOLARSHIP COMMITTEE: $206,100 over 8y, 14% of budgetDelaware Valley Science Fairs Inc: $195,000 over 8y, 13% of budgetCOOPERATIVE FOR ASSISTANCE AND RELIEF EVERYWHERE INC: $69,582 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWOMEN'S HUMANE SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS INC: $40,000 over 8y, 0.2% of budgetDomestic Abuse Project of Delaware County Inc: $30,000 over 3y, 1.3% of budgetUTAH FILM CENTER: $25,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetTHE SCIENCE AND CONSERVATION CENTER INC: $25,000 over 1y, 5.0% of budgetPHILADELPHIA FIRE DEPARTMENT HISTORICAL CORPORATION: $22,500 over 8y, 4.0% of budgetTHE STARFISH FOUNDATION INC: $20,000 over 4y, 2.8% of budgetNorthwestern University: $19,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHEIGHTS PHILADELPHIA: $17,500 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetQUEENS COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC: $15,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetThe Research Foundation for The State University of New York: $11,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE MARK BOOKMAN FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 1y, 5.1% of budgetBARD COLLEGE: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBurr Oak 4-H Club - Michigan State: $10,000 over 1y, 14% of budgetUniversity of Notre Dame du Lac: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE CENTER FOR INDEPENDENT DOCUMENTARY INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetOPERA PHILADELPHIA: $10,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF REDLANDS: $8,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSAINT JOSEPH'S UNIVERSITY: $7,750 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetINTERNATIONAL PRIMATE PROTECTION LEAGUE: $7,500 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetCouncil on Foundations Inc: $7,300 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetGERMAN AMERICAN HERITAGE CENTER: $7,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetKALAMAZOO COLLEGE: $6,906 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBRANDYWINE VALLEY SPCA: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetPHILADELPHIA LAWYERS FOR SOCIAL EQUITY: $5,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetChurch Farm School: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetALS UNITED MID-ATLANTIC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE AMERICAN AUSTRIAN FOUNDATION INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetSWARTHMORE COLLEGE: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDAYSTAR US INC: $4,353 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetNew Jersey Schnauzer Rescue Network: $4,000 over 2y, 4.3% of budgetGERDAS EQUINE RESCUE INC: $3,500 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetAlliance for Contraception in Cats & Dogs: $2,500 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetPOCONO WILDLIFE REHABILITATION CENTER: $2,500 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetThe Dorset Equine Rescue Inc: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds FIDELITY INVESTMENTS CHARITABLE GIFT FUND ↗
  • Who funds Humane World for Animals Inc ↗
  • Who funds MARTIN LUTHER KING JR MEMORIAL SCHOLARSHIP COMMITTEE ↗
  • Who funds Delaware Valley Science Fairs Inc ↗
  • Who funds COOPERATIVE FOR ASSISTANCE AND RELIEF EVERYWHERE INC ↗
  • Who funds WOMEN'S HUMANE SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS INC ↗
  • Who funds Domestic Abuse Project of Delaware County Inc ↗
  • Who funds UTAH FILM CENTER ↗
  • Who funds THE SCIENCE AND CONSERVATION CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds PHILADELPHIA FIRE DEPARTMENT HISTORICAL CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds THE STARFISH FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds Northwestern University ↗
  • Who funds HEIGHTS PHILADELPHIA ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Philadelphia FoundationPA12.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Philadelphia Foundation · Ge Aerospace Foundation · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · Renaissance Charitable Foundation Inc · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund · Network for Good · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Charities Aid Foundation America · American Endowment Foundation · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Dietrich W Botstiber Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Dietrich W Botstiber Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 30%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government →median 6%
  • The Center for Independent Documentary Inc: 6% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
3get no government money at all
8report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 159 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Dietrich W Botstiber’s filings →

More from the funding graph