Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Dennis Lee Carter and Janice Lea Carter Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$48k
Granted FY2025still arriving
3
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$25k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2025.

Arts & Culture$215kReligion$149kEducation$80kScience & Tech$20kHuman Services$10kInternational$10kHousing & Shelter$8kFood & Nutrition$1k
02FY2025 · 3 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k1 grant · $5k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $43k
$18,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$1.4M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
GUALALA ARTS$25,000
SHEPHERD BY THE SEA EPISCOPAL-LUTHERAN MISSION$18,000
EPISCOPAL COMMUNITY SERVICES OF SAN FRANCISCO$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–25, $18k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%EPISCOPAL COMMUNITY SERVICES: $5k → 10%EPISCOPAL COMMUNITY SERVICES: $5k → 10%EPISCOPAL COMMUNITY SERVICES OF SAN FRANCISCO: $5k → 10%EPISCOPAL COMMUNITY SERVICES OF SAN FRANCISCO: $3k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

89%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$437k · 11 repeat orgs$56k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +52% since the first grant, against +5% for those funded once.

11 repeat relationships: 3 still active in FY2025, 8 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

11
10

Total granted

$437k
$56k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+52%
+5%

Still filing today

45%
60%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CultureReligionHuman ServicesEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • GA
    Gualala Arts Inc
    8× · 2018–2025 · $154k · revenue +34%
  • RI
    Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology
    3× · 2018–2024 · $80k · revenue +65%
  • DA
    DAILY AUDIO BIBLE
    3× · 2018–2020 · $15k · revenue +77%

Funded once

  • Purdue Research Foundation
    one grant, 2021 · $10k · revenue -4%
  • GI
    GIDEONS INTERNATIONAL
    one grant, 2019 · $10k
  • PR
    PURDUE RESEARCH FOUNDATION - PURDUE UNIVERSITY
    one grant, 2018 · $10k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
California Institute for BioMedical Research

Our mission is to build a unique institute that bridges basic research and drug discovery, and that attracts the best and brightest scientists, physicians and students to work together synergistically to find cures for neglected human…

—
2
Ucsf Foundation Investment Company

The organization provides professional investment management services for endowed gifts and financial assets entrusted to the ucsf foundation.

Education
3
Bibleproject

Bibleproject's mission is to help people experience the bible as a unified story that leads to jesus. this is achieved by creating biblical videos to be regularly released on a newly-created youtube channel. (continued on schedule o.)each…

Religion
4
Claremont Graduate University

Claremont Graduate University prepares individuals to be leaders for positive change in the world. Unique in its transdisciplinary approach, the University is dedicated to the creation, dissemination, and application of new knowledge and…

Education
5
National Public Radio Inc

National public radio, inc. ("npr") works collaboratively with member public radio station licensees ("member stations") to create a more informed public, one that is challenged and invigorated by a deeper understanding and appreciation of…

Arts & Culture
6
President-Board of Trustees Santa Clara College

Scu is a catholic and jesuit institution that makes student learning its central focus, promotes faculty and staff learning in its various forms, and exhibits organizational learning.

Education
7
Opera Santa Barbara

See schedule 0founded in 1994, opera santa barbara is the signature provider of professional opera on the california central coast. we aspire to be a cultural leader in the santa barbara region, voicing and advancing our community's spirit…

Arts & Culture
8
Southern California Seminary Inc

The mission of southern california seminary (scs) is to bring glory to god by assisting local churches to equip believers of various cultures and languages to live and minister biblically based on the inerrant word of god.

—
9
Evangel University

Evangel is a comprehensive christian university that is committed to excellence in educating and equipping students to become spirit empowered servants of god who will impact the church and society globally.

Education
10
The California Channel

To distribute public affairs and other educational information in order to create an electronic bridge between californians and their public officials, and, in the process educate a new generation of voting citizens and civic leaders who…

—
11
University of the Sciences in Philadelphia

University of the sciences prepares students to become leaders, innovators, and skilled practitioners in the sciences, the health professions, and related disciplines. we deliver excellence in teaching, research, and service through a safe…

—
12
Saint Mary's College of California

Saint mary's college of california invites you to passionately embrace knowledge, the challenges of scholarship, and the capacity to make lasting change in the world. the foundation for this is our mission. to probe deeply the mystery of…

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Truth for Life; the most unlike its peers is San Francisco Opera Association. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 21 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/11
Grantees still filing
8/11
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology: $80,000 · OtherRose-Hulman Institute of TechnologySHEPHERD BY THE SEA EPISCOPAL-LUTHERAN MISSION: $79,000 · OtherSHEPHERD BY THE SEA EPISCOPAL-LUTHERAN MISSIONGUALALA ARTS (GENERAL FUND): $50,000 · OtherGUALALA ARTS (GENERAL FUND)MENLO CHURCH: $12,500 · OtherSHEPERD BY THE SEA EPISCOPAL LUTHERAN MISSION: $12,500 · OtherGIDEONS INTERNATIONAL: $10,000 · OtherST JOHNS EPISCOPAL CHURCH: $10,000 · OtherPURDUE RESEARCH FOUNDATION - PURDUE UNIVERSITY: $10,000 · Other+4 more: $19,500 · Other+4 moreGualala Arts Inc: $153,500 · Arts & CultureGualala Arts Inc+2 more: $5,500 · Arts & CultureDAILY AUDIO BIBLE: $15,000 · ReligionGLOBAL MEDIA OUTREACH: $5,000 · ReligionTRUTH FOR LIFE: $2,000 · ReligionEpiscopal Community Services: $10,000 · Human ServicesEPISCOPAL COMMUNITY SERVICES OF SAN FRANCISCO: $8,000 · Human ServicesPurdue Research Foundation: $10,000 · Education
Other$283,500Arts & Culture$159,000Religion$22,000Human Services$18,000Education$10,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetGualala Arts Inc: $153,500 over 8y, 4.0% of budgetRose-Hulman Institute of Technology: $80,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetDAILY AUDIO BIBLE: $15,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetPurdue Research Foundation: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetEpiscopal Community Services: $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetEPISCOPAL COMMUNITY SERVICES OF SAN FRANCISCO: $8,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetGLOBAL MEDIA OUTREACH: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSAN FRANCISCO OPERA ASSOCIATION: $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetIMAGINE CHILDREN'S MUSEUM: $2,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTRUTH FOR LIFE: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCOASTAL SENIORS INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Gualala Arts Inc ↗
  • Who funds Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology ↗
  • Who funds DAILY AUDIO BIBLE ↗
  • Who funds Purdue Research Foundation ↗
  • Who funds Episcopal Community Services ↗
  • Who funds EPISCOPAL COMMUNITY SERVICES OF SAN FRANCISCO ↗
  • Who funds GLOBAL MEDIA OUTREACH ↗
  • Who funds SAN FRANCISCO OPERA ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds IMAGINE CHILDREN'S MUSEUM ↗
  • Who funds TRUTH FOR LIFE ↗
  • Who funds COASTAL SENIORS INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Vanguard Charitable Endowment ProgramPA11.1× affinity8 shared granteesties to 6 of 6Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · National Philanthropic Trust · American Endowment Foundation · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Dennis Lee Carter and Janice Lea Carter Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Dennis Lee Carter and Janice Lea Carter Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 21 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Dennis Lee Carter and Janice Lea Carter Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph