Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

The Dennis Lee Carter and Janice Lea Carter Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$48k
Granted FY2025still arriving
3
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$25k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20182025.

Arts & Culture$215kReligion$149kEducation$80kScience & Tech$20kHuman Services$10kInternational$10kHousing & Shelter$8kFood & Nutrition$1k
02FY2025 · 3 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k1 grant · $5k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $43k
$18,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$1.4M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
GUALALA ARTS$25,000
SHEPHERD BY THE SEA EPISCOPAL-LUTHERAN MISSION$18,000
EPISCOPAL COMMUNITY SERVICES OF SAN FRANCISCO$5,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY18–25, $18k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%EPISCOPAL COMMUNITY SERVICES: $5k → 10%EPISCOPAL COMMUNITY SERVICES: $5k → 10%EPISCOPAL COMMUNITY SERVICES OF SAN FRANCISCO: $5k → 10%EPISCOPAL COMMUNITY SERVICES OF SAN FRANCISCO: $3k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

89%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$437k · 11 repeat orgs$56k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +52% since the first grant, against +5% for the ones you funded once.

11 repeat relationships — 3 still active in FY2025, 8 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

11
10

Total granted

$437k
$56k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+52%
+5%

Still filing today

45%
60%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CultureReligionHuman ServicesEducationOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • GA
    Gualala Arts Inc
    8× · 2018–2025 · $154k · revenue +34%
  • RI
    Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology
    3× · 2018–2024 · $80k · revenue +65%
  • DA
    DAILY AUDIO BIBLE
    3× · 2018–2020 · $15k · revenue +77%

Funded once

  • Purdue Research Foundation
    one grant, 2021 · $10k · revenue -4%
  • GI
    GIDEONS INTERNATIONAL
    one grant, 2019 · $10k
  • PR
    PURDUE RESEARCH FOUNDATION - PURDUE UNIVERSITY
    one grant, 2018 · $10k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
California Institute for BioMedical Research

Our mission is to build a unique institute that bridges basic research and drug discovery, and that attracts the best and brightest scientists, physicians and students to work together synergistically to find cures for neglected human…

2
Ucsf Foundation Investment Company

The organization provides professional investment management services for endowed gifts and financial assets entrusted to the ucsf foundation.

Education
3
Bibleproject

Bibleproject's mission is to help people experience the bible as a unified story that leads to jesus. this is achieved by creating biblical videos to be regularly released on a newly-created youtube channel. (continued on schedule o.)each…

Religion
4
Claremont Graduate University

Claremont Graduate University prepares individuals to be leaders for positive change in the world. Unique in its transdisciplinary approach, the University is dedicated to the creation, dissemination, and application of new knowledge and…

Education
5
National Public Radio Inc

National public radio, inc. ("npr") works collaboratively with member public radio station licensees ("member stations") to create a more informed public, one that is challenged and invigorated by a deeper understanding and appreciation of…

Arts & Culture
6
President-Board of Trustees Santa Clara College

Scu is a catholic and jesuit institution that makes student learning its central focus, promotes faculty and staff learning in its various forms, and exhibits organizational learning.

Education
7
Opera Santa Barbara

See schedule 0founded in 1994, opera santa barbara is the signature provider of professional opera on the california central coast. we aspire to be a cultural leader in the santa barbara region, voicing and advancing our community's spirit…

Arts & Culture
8
Southern California Seminary Inc

The mission of southern california seminary (scs) is to bring glory to god by assisting local churches to equip believers of various cultures and languages to live and minister biblically based on the inerrant word of god.

9
Evangel University

Evangel is a comprehensive christian university that is committed to excellence in educating and equipping students to become spirit empowered servants of god who will impact the church and society globally.

Education
10
The California Channel

To distribute public affairs and other educational information in order to create an electronic bridge between californians and their public officials, and, in the process educate a new generation of voting citizens and civic leaders who…

11
University of the Sciences in Philadelphia

University of the sciences prepares students to become leaders, innovators, and skilled practitioners in the sciences, the health professions, and related disciplines. we deliver excellence in teaching, research, and service through a safe…

12
Saint Mary's College of California

Saint mary's college of california invites you to passionately embrace knowledge, the challenges of scholarship, and the capacity to make lasting change in the world. the foundation for this is our mission. to probe deeply the mystery of…

Education

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Truth for Life and the most unlike its peers is San Francisco Opera Association. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 21 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/11
Grantees still filing
8/11
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology — $80,000 · OtherRose-Hulman Institute of TechnologySHEPHERD BY THE SEA EPISCOPAL-LUTHERAN MISSION — $79,000 · OtherSHEPHERD BY THE SEA EPISCOPAL-LUTHERAN MISSIONGUALALA ARTS (GENERAL FUND) — $50,000 · OtherGUALALA ARTS (GENERAL FUND)MENLO CHURCH — $12,500 · OtherSHEPERD BY THE SEA EPISCOPAL LUTHERAN MISSION — $12,500 · OtherGIDEONS INTERNATIONAL — $10,000 · OtherST JOHNS EPISCOPAL CHURCH — $10,000 · OtherPURDUE RESEARCH FOUNDATION - PURDUE UNIVERSITY — $10,000 · Other+4 more — $19,500 · Other+4 moreGualala Arts Inc — $153,500 · Arts & CultureGualala Arts Inc+2 more — $5,500 · Arts & CultureDAILY AUDIO BIBLE — $15,000 · ReligionGLOBAL MEDIA OUTREACH — $5,000 · ReligionTRUTH FOR LIFE — $2,000 · ReligionEpiscopal Community Services — $10,000 · Human ServicesEPISCOPAL COMMUNITY SERVICES OF SAN FRANCISCO — $8,000 · Human ServicesPurdue Research Foundation — $10,000 · Education
Other$283,500Arts & Culture$159,000Religion$22,000Human Services$18,000Education$10,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetGualala Arts Inc — $153,500 over 8y, 4.0% of budgetRose-Hulman Institute of Technology — $80,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetDAILY AUDIO BIBLE — $15,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetPurdue Research Foundation — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetEpiscopal Community Services — $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetEPISCOPAL COMMUNITY SERVICES OF SAN FRANCISCO — $8,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetGLOBAL MEDIA OUTREACH — $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSAN FRANCISCO OPERA ASSOCIATION — $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetIMAGINE CHILDREN'S MUSEUM — $2,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTRUTH FOR LIFE — $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCOASTAL SENIORS INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Gualala Arts Inc
  • Who funds Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology
  • Who funds DAILY AUDIO BIBLE
  • Who funds Purdue Research Foundation
  • Who funds Episcopal Community Services
  • Who funds EPISCOPAL COMMUNITY SERVICES OF SAN FRANCISCO
  • Who funds GLOBAL MEDIA OUTREACH
  • Who funds SAN FRANCISCO OPERA ASSOCIATION
  • Who funds IMAGINE CHILDREN'S MUSEUM
  • Who funds TRUTH FOR LIFE
  • Who funds COASTAL SENIORS INC

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Vanguard Charitable Endowment ProgramPA11.1× affinity8 shared granteesties to 6 of 6Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · National Philanthropic Trust · American Endowment Foundation · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The Dennis Lee Carter and Janice Lea Carter Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 21 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph