Skip to content
The Deloache Family Foundation at a glance

· Private foundation

The Deloache Family Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$478k
Granted FY2024still arriving
18
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$60k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
0195% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Health$813kHousing & Shelter$629kYouth Development$513kEducation$510kReligion$425kRecreation & Sports$267kHuman Services$197kInternational$60kOther$0
02FY2024 · 18 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k2 grants · $10k
  • $10k–50k12 grants · $245k
  • $50k–250k4 grants · $223k
$25,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$7.5M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CHARLESTON BILINGUAL ACADEMY$60,000
CAMP HAPPY DAYS$56,750
DOORS TO DREAM$56,000
CENTRAL HABITAT OF HUMANITY$50,000
PATTISON'S ACADEMY$40,000
CHARLESTON HOPE$30,000
OLIVER GOSPEL MISSION$30,000
CAMP RISE ABOVE$25,000
CHILDREN'S CANCER PARTNERS OF THE CAROLINAS INC$25,000
YOUNG LIFE CAPERNAUM$25,000
HARMONY CHRISTIAN COMMUNITY$15,000
Individual grant recipient$15,000
EZEKIEL MINISTRIES$10,000
CHILDREN IN CRISIS IN DORCHESTER COUNTY$10,000
HOME WORKS OF AMERICA$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–24, $127k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%CHILDREN IN CRISIS IN DORCHESTER COUNTY: $10k → 11%EMMANUWHEEL: $5k → 11%HOME WORKS OF AMERICA: $10k → 16%HOME WORKS OF AMERICA: $10k → 16%CHARLESTON ORPHAN HOUSE DBACAROLINA YOUTH DEVELOPMENT CENTER: $25k → 12%CHARLESTON ORPHAN HOUSE DBACAROLINA YOUTH DEVELOPMENT CENTER: $22k → 12%CAROLINA YOUTH DEVELOPMENT CENTER: $20k → 12%CHARLESTON ORPHAN HOUSE DBACAROLINA YOUTH DEVELOPMENT CENTER: $20k → 12%CHILDREN'S TRUST OF SOUTH CAROLINA: $5k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

89%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$3.1M · 28 repeat orgs$401k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +69% since the first grant, against +32% for those funded once.

28 repeat relationships: 15 still active in FY2024, 13 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

28
16

Total granted

$3.1M
$351k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+69%
+32%

Still filing today

61%
56%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 90% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $50k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesEducationYouth DevelopmentReligionHousing & ShelterRecreation & SportsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • DT
    DOORS TO DREAM
    8× · 2017–2024 · $476k · revenue +90% · 92% of their budget
  • CS
    CENTRAL SC HABITAT FOR HUMANITY
    8× · 2017–2024 · $462k · revenue +79%
  • CH
    CAMP HAPPY DAYS INC
    7× · 2018–2024 · $404k · revenue +76%

Funded once

  • JA
    Jubilee Academy Incgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $120k · revenue +803%
  • HN
    Homeless No More Incgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $50k · revenue +110%
  • R
    REMEMBERgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $50k · revenue +32%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Carolina Childrens Home

The mission of Carolina Children's Home is to meet the under-served mental and physical health needs of children, young adults, and their families

Human Services
2
Carolina Teen Center

Carolina Teen Center is a prevention and education year-round after-school and summer program that services youth and their families. Literacy programs, tutoring, life skills, mentoring, positive peer groups, conflict resolution skills,…

Health
3
South Carolina Network of Children's Advocacy Centers

Empowering south carolina communities and children's advocacy centers to deliver a best practice response to child abuse

Youth Development
4
Developmental Disabilities Management Assistance Inc

Carolina hill provides safe and caring emergency shelter and supportive services to homeless families focusing efforts to achieve rapid re-housing and developing skills and resources to maintain it.

Human Services
5
Carolina Children's Charity Inc

To provide support to lowcountry children with birth defects and/or childhood diseases.

Health
6
Hope Academy of Charlotte Inc

Christ-centered, college preparatory, academic program.

Education
7
Carolina Adoption Services Inc

Carolina adoption services provides international and domestic adoption services, foster care, home studies, and post adoption support for children, youth and adoptive families.

Human Services
8
Church of God Children's Home of North Carolina Inc

To provide a positive and safe living environment for hurting, abused, neglected and at-risk children placed privately and by the north carolina department of social services

Human Services
9
Carolina Community Care Inc

The mission of hospice & community care is to give hope, comfort, and compassion to those that need it most. hospice & community care is a nonprofit healthcare organization providing hospice and palliative care to residents of york,…

—
10
Waccamaw Youth Center Inc

The waccamaw youth center is committed to providing the at-risk youth of south carolina with a safe and comforting place to call home.

—
11
Epworth Children's Home

Child and family well-being through residential group home, independent living, family care services and foster care services.

Human Services
12
Crossroads Hope Academy Inc

Crossroads Hope Academy Inc. (CHA) has been established to provide residential group care services to male adolescents ages 12-17 years old. CHA provides 24-hour a day care, supervision, room and board, and tends to their educational needs.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Pattison's Academy; the most unlike its peers is Landmarks for Families Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

30 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 30 of the 47 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
14
Early backer (in before they grew)
28/30
Grantees still filing
23/30
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CENTRAL SC HABITAT FOR HUMANITY: $461,500 · OtherCENTRAL SC HABITAT FOR HUMANITYCAMP HAPPY DAYS INC: $404,300 · OtherCAMP HAPPY DAYS INCCHARLESTON BILINGUAL ACADEMY: $200,000 · OtherCHARLESTON BILINGUAL ACADEMYCAMP COLE: $150,000 · OtherCAMP COLEYOUNG LIFE CAPERNAUM: $130,000 · OtherYOUNG LIFE CAPERNAUMCLEMSON FOUNDATION: $100,000 · OtherTHE SALVATION ARMY OF CHARLESTON: $65,000 · Other+21 more: $418,300 · Other+21 moreDOORS TO DREAM: $476,150 · PhilanthropyDOORS TO DREAMPATTISON'S ACADEMY: $218,500 · EducationPATTISON'S A…CHARLESTON HOPE: $100,000 · EducationCHARLESTON H…EZEKIEL MINISTRIES INC: $40,000 · EducationEZEKIEL MINI…ENGAGING CREATIVE MINDS: $25,000 · EducationENGAGING CRE…+2 more: $20,000 · EducationJubilee Academy Inc: $120,000 · Human ServicesLandmarks for Families Inc: $87,000 · Human ServicesHOME WORKS OF AMERICA INC: $20,000 · Human ServicesEMMANUWHEEL: $10,000 · Human ServicesKAY PHILLIPS CHILD ADVOCACY CENTER INC: $10,000 · Human Services+1 more: $5,000 · Human ServicesOliver Gospel Mission: $200,000 · ReligionREMEMBER: $50,000 · ReligionCAMP RISE ABOVE INC: $105,000 · Recreation & SportsGOING PLACES: $12,000 · Recreation & SportsHomeless No More Inc: $50,000 · Housing & ShelterHARMONY CHRISTIAN COMMUNITY: $40,000 · Housing & Shelter
Other$1,929,100Philanthropy$476,150Education$403,500Human Services$252,000Religion$250,000Recreation & Sports$117,000Housing & Shelter$90,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetDOORS TO DREAM: $476,150 over 8y, 92% of budgetCENTRAL SC HABITAT FOR HUMANITY: $461,500 over 8y, 3.5% of budgetCAMP HAPPY DAYS INC: $404,300 over 7y, 5.7% of budgetPATTISON'S ACADEMY: $218,500 over 6y, 3.1% of budgetOliver Gospel Mission: $200,000 over 7y, 0.8% of budgetJubilee Academy Inc: $120,000 over 1y, 25% of budgetCAMP RISE ABOVE INC: $105,000 over 5y, 7.1% of budgetCHARLESTON HOPE: $100,000 over 7y, 5.3% of budgetLandmarks for Families Inc: $87,000 over 4y, 0.6% of budgetREMEMBER: $50,000 over 1y, 22% of budgetEZEKIEL MINISTRIES INC: $40,000 over 3y, 2.8% of budgetHARMONY CHRISTIAN COMMUNITY: $40,000 over 2y, 43% of budgetYESCAROLINA: $30,300 over 3y, 12% of budgetDICKERSON CHILDRENS ADVOCACY CENTER INC: $30,000 over 3y, 1.0% of budgetCHILDREN'S CANCER PARTNERS OF THE CAROLINAS INC: $25,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetENGAGING CREATIVE MINDS: $25,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetCHARLESTON AREA THERAPEUTIC RIDING INC: $20,000 over 4y, 0.7% of budgetHOME WORKS OF AMERICA INC: $20,000 over 2y, 1.0% of budgetCOASTAL EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION: $15,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetGOING PLACES: $12,000 over 2y, 4.3% of budgetHOPECAM INC: $10,000 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetTeach for America Inc: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHELPING HANDS OF GEORGETOWN INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetHeart Math Tutoring Inc: $10,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetEMMANUWHEEL: $10,000 over 2y, 5.2% of budgetKAY PHILLIPS CHILD ADVOCACY CENTER INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetFRESHSTART VISIONS: $8,000 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetCHILDREN'S TRUST OF SOUTH CAROLINA: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds DOORS TO DREAM ↗
  • Who funds CENTRAL SC HABITAT FOR HUMANITY ↗
  • Who funds CAMP HAPPY DAYS INC ↗
  • Who funds PATTISON'S ACADEMY ↗
  • Who funds Oliver Gospel Mission ↗
  • Who funds Jubilee Academy Inc ↗
  • Who funds CAMP RISE ABOVE INC ↗
  • Who funds CHARLESTON HOPE ↗
  • Who funds Landmarks for Families Inc ↗
  • Who funds Homeless No More Inc ↗
  • Who funds REMEMBER ↗
  • Who funds EZEKIEL MINISTRIES INC ↗
  • Who funds HARMONY CHRISTIAN COMMUNITY ↗
  • Who funds YESCAROLINA ↗
  • Who funds DICKERSON CHILDRENS ADVOCACY CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds CHILDREN'S CANCER PARTNERS OF THE CAROLINAS INC ↗
  • Who funds ENGAGING CREATIVE MINDS ↗
  • Who funds CHARLESTON AREA THERAPEUTIC RIDING INC ↗
  • Who funds HOME WORKS OF AMERICA INC ↗
  • Who funds COASTAL EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds GOING PLACES ↗
  • Who funds HOPECAM INC ↗
  • Who funds Teach for America Inc ↗
  • Who funds HELPING HANDS OF GEORGETOWN INC ↗
  • Who funds Heart Math Tutoring Inc ↗
  • Who funds EMMANUWHEEL ↗
  • Who funds KAY PHILLIPS CHILD ADVOCACY CENTER INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Dominion Energy Chari…Coastal Community Fou…Central Carolina Comm…The Joanna FoundationThe Mark Elliott Motl…Henry & Sylvia Yaschi…Td Charitable Foundat…Lipscomb Family Found…Sisters of Charity Fo…Truist Foundation IncThe Parrish Family Fo…Post and Courier Foun…
Dominion Energy Charitable FoundationVA38.1× affinity18 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Dominion Energy Charitable Foundation · Coastal Community Foundation of South Carolina Inc · Central Carolina Community Foundation · The Joanna Foundation · The Mark Elliott Motley Foundation Inc · Henry & Sylvia Yaschik Foundation Inc · Td Charitable Foundation · Lipscomb Family Foundation · Sisters of Charity Foundation of South Carolina · Truist Foundation Inc · The Parrish Family Foundation · Post and Courier Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Deloache Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Deloache Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%5%19%42%75%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    9report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to The Deloache Family Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to The Deloache Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 47 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Deloache Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home