Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Dees Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$20k
Granted FY2025still arriving
3
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What it funds
0179% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$205kReligion$48kPhilanthropy$14kHealth$11kArts & Culture$6kCommunity Improvement$1kOther$0
02FY2025 · 3 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k2 grants · $10k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $10k
$8,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$306k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
PEACHTREE ROAD UNITED METHODIST CHU$10,000
Individual grant recipient$8,000
COMMUNITY FOUNDATION FOR NE GA$2,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%COLUMBIA UNIVERISTY: $200 → 17%MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF SC: $100 → 12%WOFFORD COLLEGE: $121k → 15%WESLEY THEOLOGICAL SEMINARY: $250 → 14%ART SANDY SPRINGS: $500 → 8%PEACHTREE ROAD UNITED METHODIST CHU: $10k → 13%RIBBONS OF HOPE: $8k → 14%AMERICAN DIABETES ASSOCIATION: $200 → 7%KAPPA ALPHA EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION: $1k → 12%JDFR: $500 → 17%ST ANDREWS PARISH UINTED CHURCH: $200 → 12%WOFFORD COLLEGE: $80k → 15%ART SANDY SPRINGS: $500 → 8%COMMUNITY FOUNDATION FOR NE GA: $10k → 13%RIBBONS OF HOPE: $2k → 14%KAPPA ALPHA ORDER EDUCATION FOUNDAT: $1k → 12%PEACHTREE ROAD UNITED METHODIST CHU: $10k → 13%RIBBONS OF HOPE: $2k → 14%KAPPA ALPHA ORDER EDUCATION FOUNDAT: $1k → 12%PEACHTREE ROAD UNITED METHODIST CHU: $10k → 13%RIBBONS OF HOPE: $2k → 14%KAPPA ALPHA ORDER EDUCATION FOUNDAT: $1k → 12%PEACHTREE ROAD UNITED METHODIST CHU: $6k → 13%PEACHTREE ROAD UMC: $6k → 13%BREAKTHROUGH T1D GEORGIA CHAPTER: $5k → 13%JDRF: $5k → 13%PEACHTREE ROAD UNITED METHODIST CHU: $4k → 13%PEACHTREE ROAD UNITED METHODIST CHU: $4k → 13%PEACHTREE ROAD UNITED METHODIST CHU: $4k → 13%COMMUNITY FOUNDATION FOR NE GA: $2k → 13%CITY SPRINGS THEATRE COMPANY: $5k → 13%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

91%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$270k · 7 repeat orgs$27k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +106% since the first grant, against +35% for those funded once.

7 repeat relationships: 2 still active in FY2025, 5 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

7
13

Total granted

$270k
$27k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+106%
+35%

Still filing today

71%
31%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthArts & CultureEducationPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • WOFFORD COLLEGE
    2× · 2017–2018 · $201k · revenue +52%
  • KA
    KAPPA ALPHA ORDER EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION
    3× · 2017–2019 · $3k · revenue +215%
  • IA
    IMPACT100 ATLANTA INC
    2× · 2023–2024 · $2k · revenue +113%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2022 · $6k
  • CS
    City Springs Theatregraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $5k · revenue ×14
  • BT
    BREAKTHROUGH T1Dgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $5k · revenue +35%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Susan G Komen Breast Cancer Fdn Group

Susan g. komen 's mission is to save lives by meeting the most critical needs in our communities & investing in breakthrough research to prevent & cure breast cancer.

—
2
Target Als Foundation Inc

Our mission is to break down barriers to als research to find effective treatments. by uniting academia, the pharma and biotech industry, government, venture capital, related nonprofits, and the als community, we aim to overcome the…

Education
3
The Susan G Komen Breast Cancer Foundation Inc

Susan g. komen has an unmatched, comprehensive 360-degree approach to fighting breast cancer across all fronts and supporting millions of people in the u.s. and in countries worldwide. we advocate for policies to protect patients, drive…

Health
4
Diabetes Technology Society

To facilitate research into the treatment, monitoring, diagnosis and prevention of diabetes.

Health
5
The Translational Genomics Research Institute

Please see schedule o

Health
6
PACS1 Syndrome Research Foundation
Health
7
The Sandridge Foundation
—
8
CSNK2A1 Foundation

Focus on finding a cure for okur-chung neurodevelopmental syndrome and ensuring individuals have the opportunities and support necessary for happy and full lives.

Health
9
Breakthrough Prize in Life Sciences Foundation
Philanthropy
10
Sanford Burnham Prebys Medical Discovery Institute

Sanford burnham prebys medical discovery institute's mission is to advance the biomedical sciences by cultivating the next generation of scientific leaders, providing meaningful opportunities for researchers of all backgrounds to learn,…

Health
11
Critical Path Institute

The critical path institute is a catalyst in the development of new approaches that advance medical innovation and regulatory science. this is achieved by leading teams that share data, knowledge and expertise resulting in sound, consensus…

Health
12
Savannah College of Art and DesignInc

Scad prepares talented students for creative professions through engaged teaching and learning in a positively oriented university environment.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is IMPACT100 Atlanta Inc; the most unlike its peers is American Diabetes Association. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 21 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/10
Grantees still filing
8/10
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

WOFFORD COLLEGE: $201,278 · OtherWOFFORD COLLEGEPEACHTREE ROAD UNITED METHODIST CHU: $47,760 · OtherPEACHTREE ROAD UNITED METHODIST CHUIndividual grant recipient: $14,000 · Other+10 more: $17,450 · Other+10 moreCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION FOR NORTHEAST GEORGIA: $12,000 · PhilanthropyIMPACT100 ATLANTA INC: $2,000 · PhilanthropyBREAKTHROUGH T1D: $5,000 · HealthTHE ISAKSON INITIATIVE INC: $1,000 · Health+1 more: $200 · HealthCity Springs Theatre: $5,000 · Arts & CultureART SANDY SPRINGS INC: $1,000 · Arts & CultureKAPPA ALPHA ORDER EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION: $3,000 · Education
Other$280,488Philanthropy$14,000Health$6,200Arts & Culture$6,000Education$3,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetWOFFORD COLLEGE: $201,278 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION FOR NORTHEAST GEORGIA: $12,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetBREAKTHROUGH T1D: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetKAPPA ALPHA ORDER EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION: $3,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetIMPACT100 ATLANTA INC: $2,000 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetTHE SANDY SPRINGS SOCIETY INC: $1,200 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetTHE ISAKSON INITIATIVE INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetAmerican Diabetes Association: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds WOFFORD COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY FOUNDATION FOR NORTHEAST GEORGIA ↗
  • Who funds City Springs Theatre ↗
  • Who funds BREAKTHROUGH T1D ↗
  • Who funds KAPPA ALPHA ORDER EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds IMPACT100 ATLANTA INC ↗
  • Who funds THE SANDY SPRINGS SOCIETY INC ↗
  • Who funds ART SANDY SPRINGS INC ↗
  • Who funds THE ISAKSON INITIATIVE INC ↗
  • Who funds American Diabetes Association ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Natl Christian Charitable Fdn IncGA8.1× affinity4 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Dees Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Dees Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 21 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Dees Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph