Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Deepak Raghavan Family Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$803k
Granted FY2025still arriving
19
Grants FY2025still arriving
8
States reached
$284k
Largest
01What it funds
0198% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2025.

Education$2.0MAnimals$468kInternational$203kHealth$202kPhilanthropy$113kPublic Safety & Disaster$65kArts & Culture$58kReligion$50kOther$0
02FY2025 · 19 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k5 grants · $15k
  • $10k–50k10 grants · $190k
  • $50k–250k3 grants · $315k
  • $250k+1 grant · $284k
$15,000
Median grant
8
States reached
$10M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
IIT FOUNDATION$284,000
Individual grant recipient$150,000
GEORGIA STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION$90,000
ZOO ATLANTA$74,650
FERNBANK INC$40,000
CHINMAYA EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC$25,000
CHILDREN'S HEALTHCARE OF ATLANTA$25,000
WOODWARD ACADEMY$25,000
SAVE THE GOLDEN LION TAMARIN$17,500
DIAN FOSSEY GORILLA FUND$15,000
OGLETHORPE UNIVERSITY$12,000
SRI AHOBILA MUTH INC$10,000
VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY$10,000
SARARA FOUNDATION$10,000
AROGYA WORLD$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–25, $45k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%SRI AHOBILA MUTH INC: $35k → 13%SRI AHOBILA MUTH INC: $10k → 13%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MI
NY
MA
PA
NJ
CA
CO
MD
TN
SC
DC
GA
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

77%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.4M · 25 repeat orgs$737k to everyone else

25 repeat relationships: 14 still active in FY2025, 11 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

25
14

Total granted

$2.4M
$396k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+25%
+29%

Still filing today

52%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 57% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $342k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationEmploymentPhilanthropyInternationalAnimalsHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • GS
    Georgia State University Foundation Inc
    6× · 2018–2025 · $627k · revenue +10%
  • WA
    WOODWARD ACADEMY INC
    8× · 2018–2025 · $310k · revenue +50%
  • AS
    APF SUPPORT INC
    3× · 2021–2023 · $65k · revenue +213%

Funded once

  • GF
    GSU FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2020 · $169k
  • MS
    MORGAN STANLEY DONOR ADVISED FUND
    one grant, 2024 · $100k
  • SI
    Sewa International Inc
    one grant, 2021 · $50k · revenue -83%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Iisc Foundation

The specific purpose, mission, and activity of the corporation is to secure funding for promoting education, research, technology development, startup incubation, acceleration, and translational research at the indian institute of science…

Education
2
Sankara Eye Foundation Usa

To work towards eradicating curable blindness all over india. our key program is vision 20/20 - with the goal of performing 500,000 free surgeries per year throughout india. we have been primarily partnering with sankara eye foundation in…

Health
3
Keralink International Inc

Keralink international works to end avoidable blindness by developing, delivering, and scaling affordable solutions for all, powered by innovative technology and partnerships.

Health
4
Georgia Tech Global Inc

To engage in charitable, scientific, literary, and educational purposes and to receive, hold, invest, and administer property and to make expenditures to or for the benefit of georgia institute of technology (git) and to support its…

Education
5
Research Triangle Institute

Research Triangle Institute is one of the world's leading research institutes, dedicated to improving the human condition by turning knowledge into practice. Our staff of more than 5,300 provides research and technical (continued on…

Science & Tech
6
Friends of Aravind Inc Dba Aravind Eye Foundation Inc

The purpose of the corporation is to engage in such activity as may be necessary, appropriate or otherwise helpful to support, provide assistance to or perform functions of aravind eye hospital and postgraduate institute of ophthamology…

Health
7
Ucsf Foundation Investment Company

The organization provides professional investment management services for endowed gifts and financial assets entrusted to the ucsf foundation.

Education
8
Trustafrica

Promote peace, democracy and economic prosperity in Africa.

International
9
MRIGlobal

To improve the lives of people through innovative scientific and engineering research.

Science & Tech
10
Georgia Advanced Technology Ventures Inc

The corporation is organized and shall be operated exclusively as a supporting organization to and for the benefit of the georgia institute of technology to foster and support education and scientific research and economic development…

Education
11
Accion International

Our mission is to create a fair and inclusive economy where underserved people have quality financial choices and opportunities to improve their economic well-being. we find and help build innovative companies with the potential to reach…

International
12
Asha Partners

To eliminate poverty through the creation of sustainable and effective community development projects, and to create holistic transformation by bringing hope, empowerment, and healing to those with the greatest need.

Religion
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Georgia State University Foundation Inc; the most unlike its peers is Project Prakash Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

25 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 25 of the 44 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
8
Early backer (in before they grew)
24/25
Grantees still filing
20/25
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Individual grant recipient: $510,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientZOO ATLANTA: $363,350 · OtherZOO ATLANTAIIT FOUNDATION: $284,000 · OtherIIT FOUNDATIONGSU FOUNDATION: $169,163 · OtherGSU FOUNDATIONCHILDRENS HEALTHCARE OF ATLANTA INC: $125,000 · OtherCHILDRENS HEALTHCARE OF ATLANTA INCMORGAN STANLEY DONOR ADVISED FUND: $100,000 · OtherMORGAN STANLEY DONOR ADVISED FUND+23 more: $219,814 · Other+23 moreGeorgia State University Foundation Inc: $626,682 · EducationGeorgia State University Foundation IncWOODWARD ACADEMY INC: $310,000 · EducationWOODWARD ACADEMY INCCHINMAYA EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC: $100,000 · EducationCHINMAYA EDUCATION FOUNDATION INCVanderbilt University: $50,000 · Education+3 more: $29,650 · EducationSewa International Inc: $50,000 · Human ServicesSRI AHOBILA MUTH INC: $45,000 · Human ServicesAPF SUPPORT INC: $65,410 · Housing & ShelterSAVE THE GOLDEN LION TAMARIN: $35,000 · AnimalsJANE GOODALL INSTITUTE FOR WILDLIFE RESEARCH EDUCATION AND CONSERVATION: $25,000 · AnimalsFernbank Inc: $40,000 · Arts & CultureCORD USA INC: $25,000 · InternationalAROGYA INC DBA AROGYA WORLD: $5,000 · International
Other$1,771,327Education$1,116,332Human Services$95,000Housing & Shelter$65,410Animals$60,000Arts & Culture$40,000International$30,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetGeorgia State University Foundation Inc: $626,682 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetWOODWARD ACADEMY INC: $310,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetCHINMAYA EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC: $100,000 over 4y, 2.3% of budgetAPF SUPPORT INC: $65,410 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetVanderbilt University: $50,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetSewa International Inc: $50,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSRI AHOBILA MUTH INC: $45,000 over 2y, 9.2% of budgetSAVE THE GOLDEN LION TAMARIN: $35,000 over 2y, 11% of budgetDian Fossey Gorilla Fund International Inc: $35,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetJANE GOODALL INSTITUTE FOR WILDLIFE RESEARCH EDUCATION AND CONSERVATION: $25,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCORD USA INC: $25,000 over 1y, 4.4% of budgetOGLETHORPE UNIVERSITY INC: $24,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSHEPHERD CENTER INC: $22,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCharitable Foundation of the Rotary Club of Atlanta Inc: $9,000 over 2y, 1.4% of budgetCLEMSON UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetATLANTA TRACK CLUB INC: $3,930 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetFirst Step Staffing Inc: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTIE-Atlanta Inc: $2,250 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetPROJECT PRAKASH FOUNDATION INC: $2,000 over 1y, 1.7% of budgetSankara Nethralaya OM Trust Inc: $650 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetHANDS UNITED INC: $250 over 1y, 1.3% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Georgia State University Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds WOODWARD ACADEMY INC ↗
  • Who funds CHINMAYA EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds APF SUPPORT INC ↗
  • Who funds Vanderbilt University ↗
  • Who funds Sewa International Inc ↗
  • Who funds SRI AHOBILA MUTH INC ↗
  • Who funds Fernbank Inc ↗
  • Who funds SAVE THE GOLDEN LION TAMARIN ↗
  • Who funds Dian Fossey Gorilla Fund International Inc ↗
  • Who funds JANE GOODALL INSTITUTE FOR WILDLIFE RESEARCH EDUCATION AND CONSERVATION ↗
  • Who funds CORD USA INC ↗
  • Who funds OGLETHORPE UNIVERSITY INC ↗
  • Who funds SHEPHERD CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds SARARA INSTITUTE ↗
  • Who funds Charitable Foundation of the Rotary Club of Atlanta Inc ↗
  • Who funds CLEMSON UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds AROGYA INC DBA AROGYA WORLD ↗
  • Who funds ATLANTA TRACK CLUB INC ↗
  • Who funds First Step Staffing Inc ↗
  • Who funds Synergies Work Inc ↗
  • Who funds TIE-Atlanta Inc ↗
  • Who funds PROJECT PRAKASH FOUNDATION INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Community Foundation for Greater Atlanta IncGA16.2× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Community Foundation for Greater Atlanta Inc · Shell USA Company Foundation · Verizon Foundation · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Charities Aid Foundation America · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · Network for Good · National Philanthropic Trust · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · American Endowment Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Deepak Raghavan Family Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Deepak Raghavan Family Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 30%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%8%15%22%30%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    3get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–30%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 44 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Deepak Raghavan Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph