· Private foundation
The Deepak Raghavan Family Foundation Inc
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2018–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k5 grants · $15k
- $10k–50k10 grants · $190k
- $50k–250k3 grants · $315k
- $250k+1 grant · $284k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| IIT FOUNDATION | $284,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $150,000 |
| GEORGIA STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION | $90,000 |
| ZOO ATLANTA | $74,650 |
| FERNBANK INC | $40,000 |
| CHILDREN'S HEALTHCARE OF ATLANTA | $25,000 |
| CHINMAYA EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC | $25,000 |
| WOODWARD ACADEMY | $25,000 |
| SAVE THE GOLDEN LION TAMARIN | $17,500 |
| DIAN FOSSEY GORILLA FUND | $15,000 |
| OGLETHORPE UNIVERSITY | $12,000 |
| SARARA FOUNDATION | $10,000 |
| SRI AHOBILA MUTH INC | $10,000 |
| VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY | $10,000 |
| AROGYA WORLD | $5,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY21–25, $45k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
25 repeat relationships — 14 still active in FY2025, 11 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 57% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $342k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- GSGeorgia State University Foundation Inc6× · 2018–2025 · $627k · revenue +10%
- WAWOODWARD ACADEMY INC8× · 2018–2025 · $310k · revenue +50%
- ASAPF SUPPORT INC3× · 2021–2023 · $65k · revenue +213%
Funded once
- GFGSU FOUNDATIONone grant, 2020 · $169k
- MSMORGAN STANLEY DONOR ADVISED FUNDone grant, 2024 · $100k
- SISewa International Incone grant, 2021 · $50k · revenue -83%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The specific purpose, mission, and activity of the corporation is to secure funding for promoting education, research, technology development, startup incubation, acceleration, and translational research at the indian institute of science…
To work towards eradicating curable blindness all over india. our key program is vision 20/20 - with the goal of performing 500,000 free surgeries per year throughout india. we have been primarily partnering with sankara eye foundation in…
Keralink international works to end avoidable blindness by developing, delivering, and scaling affordable solutions for all, powered by innovative technology and partnerships.
To engage in charitable, scientific, literary, and educational purposes and to receive, hold, invest, and administer property and to make expenditures to or for the benefit of georgia institute of technology (git) and to support its…
Research Triangle Institute is one of the world's leading research institutes, dedicated to improving the human condition by turning knowledge into practice. Our staff of more than 5,300 provides research and technical (continued on…
The purpose of the corporation is to engage in such activity as may be necessary, appropriate or otherwise helpful to support, provide assistance to or perform functions of aravind eye hospital and postgraduate institute of ophthamology…
The organization provides professional investment management services for endowed gifts and financial assets entrusted to the ucsf foundation.
Promote peace, democracy and economic prosperity in Africa.
To improve the lives of people through innovative scientific and engineering research.
The corporation is organized and shall be operated exclusively as a supporting organization to and for the benefit of the georgia institute of technology to foster and support education and scientific research and economic development…
Our mission is to create a fair and inclusive economy where underserved people have quality financial choices and opportunities to improve their economic well-being. we find and help build innovative companies with the potential to reach…
To eliminate poverty through the creation of sustainable and effective community development projects, and to create holistic transformation by bringing hope, empowerment, and healing to those with the greatest need.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Georgia State University Foundation Inc and the most unlike its peers is Project Prakash Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 22 years old; the field is 11. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 28% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 19% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
25 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 25 of the 44 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds Georgia State University Foundation Inc ↗
- Who funds WOODWARD ACADEMY INC ↗
- Who funds CHINMAYA EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds APF SUPPORT INC ↗
- Who funds Sewa International Inc ↗
- Who funds Vanderbilt University ↗
- Who funds SRI AHOBILA MUTH INC ↗
- Who funds Fernbank Inc ↗
- Who funds SAVE THE GOLDEN LION TAMARIN ↗
- Who funds Dian Fossey Gorilla Fund International Inc ↗
- Who funds CORD USA INC ↗
- Who funds JANE GOODALL INSTITUTE FOR WILDLIFE RESEARCH EDUCATION AND CONSERVATION ↗
- Who funds OGLETHORPE UNIVERSITY INC ↗
- Who funds SHEPHERD CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds SARARA INSTITUTE ↗
- Who funds Charitable Foundation of the Rotary Club of Atlanta Inc ↗
- Who funds CLEMSON UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds AROGYA INC DBA AROGYA WORLD ↗
- Who funds ATLANTA TRACK CLUB INC ↗
- Who funds Synergies Work Inc ↗
- Who funds First Step Staffing Inc ↗
- Who funds TIE-Atlanta Inc ↗
- Who funds PROJECT PRAKASH FOUNDATION INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Community Foundation for Greater Atlanta Inc · Shell USA Company Foundation · Verizon Foundation · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Charities Aid Foundation America · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · Network for Good · National Philanthropic Trust · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · American Endowment Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization The Deepak Raghavan Family Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.