· Private foundation
The David O and Martha G Campbell Family Foundation Inc
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).
A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 69% of THE DAVID O AND MARTHA G CAMPBELL FAMILY FOUNDATION INC’s grantee dollars fall outside its nine largest cause areas, whether because the recipient carries no IRS cause code or because its cause sits in the long tail. A chart would be mostly one residual band and misrepresent the portfolio.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k45 grants · $81k
- $10k–50k2 grants · $35k
- $250k+1 grant · $400k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| BIG DOG RUN FOUNDATION | $400,000 |
| STELLA ADLER ACADEMY | $25,000 |
| SEEC | $10,000 |
| AMERICAN RED CROSS | $5,000 |
| PROVIDENCE CENTER | $5,000 |
| SPCA ANNE ARUNDEL ANIMAL CONTROL | $5,000 |
| BREAST CANCER RESEARCH FOUNDATION | $5,000 |
| DOGS PLAYING FOR LIFE | $5,000 |
| HUMANE SOCIETY OF CHARLES COUNTY | $5,000 |
| HUMANE SOCIETY OF CALVERT COUNTY | $5,000 |
| SATCHEL'S LAST RESORT | $5,000 |
| SURGEON'S FOR SMILES | $5,000 |
| SUGAR'S GIFT | $1,000 |
| TENDER HEART CHARATIES | $1,000 |
| HOPE FOR PAWS | $1,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $40k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 88% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
48 repeat relationships — 39 still active in FY2025, 9 since wound down; 9 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 19% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $420k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- SSEEC6× · 2017–2025 · $55k · revenue +107%
- ANAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches6× · 2017–2025 · $30k · revenue +46%
THE BREAST CANCER RESEARCH FOUNDATION INC6× · 2017–2025 · $30k · revenue +40%
Funded once
- CBCompanion Bridge Incgraduatedone grant, 2023 · $5k · revenue +39% · 36% of their budget
- GGGENTLE GIANTSone grant, 2023 · $1k
- TATHE ARC CENTRAL CHESAPEAKE REGIONone grant, 2023 · $1k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To help injured, abandoned and unwanted animals. We provide food, vet care that includes heartworm prevention and spay or neuter services, shelter and anything else needed.
The Organization's mission is to rescue dogs from high-kill animal shelters and place them in loving forever homes. All dogs rescued are given necessary medical care prior to adoption, including required vaccinations. Dogs are placed in…
Dog rescue and care nurturing finding a home
An animal rescue/adoption Agency. Rescued animals are from kill shelters or owner surrenders facing hardship then rehabbed/medical completed while in foster care then adopted into loving homes.
Rescue abused & abandoned dogs, urgent at risk of euthanasia dogs, medical needs & hospice dogs to provide veterinary care, rehabilitation, and find homes for dogs that become adoptable. Sanctuary til end of life is provided for those not…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Big Dog Ranch Rescue Inc and the most unlike its peers is Curepsp Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 19 years old; the field is 14. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 5% of your grantees by number, and just 57% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 14% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
40 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 40 of the 63 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds SEEC ↗
- Who funds American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches ↗
- Who funds THE BREAST CANCER RESEARCH FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds PROVIDENCE OF MARYLAND INC ↗
- Who funds SURGEONS FOR SMILES INC ↗
- Who funds Fallston Animal Rescue Movement Inc ↗
- Who funds SATCHELS LAST RESORT ↗
- Who funds CUREPSP INC ↗
- Who funds TARAS HOUSE ANIMAL RESCUE INC ↗
- Who funds RURAL DOG RESCUE ↗
- Who funds Humane Society of Sarasota County Inc ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY ACCESS TO THE ARTS INC ↗
- Who funds WASHINGTON HUMANE SOCIETY ↗
- Who funds WHITMAN-WALKER FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds LUCKY DOG ANIMAL RESCUE ↗
- Who funds Companion Bridge Inc ↗
- Who funds Humane Society of Charles County ↗
- Who funds HUMANE SOCIETY OF CALVERT COUNTY INC ↗
- Who funds HONOR SANCTUARY INC ↗
- Who funds Wildlife Inc ↗
- Who funds ROAD DOGS & RESCUE ↗
- Who funds ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC ↗
- Who funds Love4Paws Inc ↗
- Who funds Animal Rescue Coalition Inc ↗
- Who funds DEFENDERS OF ANIMAL RIGHTS INC ↗
- Who funds BARDET BIEDL SYNDROME FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds THE SENIOR DOG SANCTUARY ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Community Foundation of Sarasota Co Inc · Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals of Manatee County Inc · Animal Network Inc · Give Back Foundation · The Duffield Family Foundation Dba Maddie's Fund · Manatee Community Foundation Inc · Pedigree Foundation · Petco Love · Petsmart Charities Inc · The Louis and Gloria Flanzer Philanthropic Trust · Gulf Coast Community Foundation Inc · The Pfizer Foundation Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization The David O and Martha G Campbell Family Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Community Access to the Arts Inc — 2% of income from government
- Big Dog Ranch Rescue Inc — 0% of income from government
- Animal Rescue Coalition Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.