Skip to content

Nevada · Private foundation

The David Lebuhn Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$11k
Granted FY2024(still arriving)
9
Grants FY2024
11
Organizations funded FY2023
27%
First-time grantees FY2023
Read the full brief
Median grant, FY2024
$1,000
Largest grant, FY2024
$2,000
Organizations funded a year
10 to 15
FY2017 to FY2023
States reached, FY2024
4
Total assets, FY2024
$143k
Applications
Preselected organizations only
Per its most recent filing; check its own site

How open it is to new grantees

In FY2023, 27% of the organizations The David Lebuhn Foundation funded were first-time grantees, receiving 27% of its grant dollars.

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2023, 73% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $3k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23
Arts & CultureRecreation & SportsEducationInternationalEnvironmentHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
The numbers by year
Fiscal yearOrganizations fundedTo those organizationsFirst-time grantees
FY2024still arriving9$11k11%
FY202311$9k27%
FY202212$8k0%
FY202115$10k20%
FY202014$10k36%
FY201910$7k20%
FY201811$8k18%
FY201710$6kn/a
100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Arts & Culture$24kEnvironment$13kFood & Nutrition$9kEducation$7kCommunity Improvement$4kRecreation & Sports$3kPublic Safety & Disaster$2kMembership Benefit$2kOther$0

Top grantees

Largest recipients by total granted, FY2017 to FY2024, and the share of each one’s budget the grants supplied at peak.

Show all 20 grantees
All grantees of The David Lebuhn Foundation by total granted
GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
San Francisco Playhouse$7,60060%
Kqed Inc$7,40080%
Naturebridge$6,62080%
Oakdale Memorial Gardens Inc$5,60070%
Channel 5 Public Broadcasting Inc$3,70070%
League to Save Lake Tahoe$3,35070%
Capital Public Radio Fdba Kxpr/Kxjz Inc$3,30070%
San Francisco Food Bank$3,00030%
Youth Tennis Advantage$2,50020%
Glenbrook Historical Society Inc$2,00021%
World Central Kitchen Inc$2,00020%
Reed Schools Foundation$1,80030%
Drew School$1,60030%
Redwood High School Foundation$1,60030%
Saint Anthonys Inc$1,10021%
Partners Hope Foundation$1,00010%
Tam High Foundation$50010%
St Anthonys$2001n/a
Fort Mason Center$20010%
Music on the Hill Inc$20010%

What it could do for these grantees

Plus 6 recipients with no EIN on record ($12k), not named here.

Where it is load-bearing

Each grantee by its size and the share of its budget The David Lebuhn Foundation supplied at peak.

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSan Francisco Playhouse: $7,600 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetKqed Inc: $7,400 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetNaturebridge: $6,620 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetOakdale Memorial Gardens Inc: $5,600 over 7y, 0.3% of budgetChannel 5 Public Broadcasting Inc: $3,700 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetLeague to Save Lake Tahoe: $3,350 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetCapital Public Radio Fdba Kxpr/Kxjz Inc: $3,300 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetSan Francisco Food Bank: $3,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetYouth Tennis Advantage: $2,500 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetGlenbrook Historical Society Inc: $2,000 over 2y, 1.2% of budgetWorld Central Kitchen Inc: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetReed Schools Foundation: $1,800 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetDrew School: $1,600 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetRedwood High School Foundation: $1,600 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSaint Anthonys Inc: $1,100 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetPartners Hope Foundation: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTam High Foundation: $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetFort Mason Center: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMusic on the Hill Inc: $200 over 1y, 0.5% of budget

Tap a dot to name the grantee.

How this is measured
Share of budget is the funder’s grant in a year over the grantee’s total revenue that year, at its highest across the years we hold; revenue is from all sources. Only grantees confirmed against their own filings, whose grants do not exceed their revenue, are plotted: the largest 19.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Jewish Community Federation of San Francisco the Peninsula Marin & SonomaCA18.9× affinity7 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Jewish Community Federation of San Francisco the Peninsula Marin & Sonoma · Marin Community Foundation · Williams-Sonoma Inc Foundation · Gordon E and Betty I Moore Foundation · The San Francisco Foundation · United Way Worldwide · American Endowment Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Compare The David Lebuhn Foundation with peer funders

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The David Lebuhn Foundation?

Find your warmest path to The David Lebuhn Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

About The David Lebuhn Foundation

How much does The David Lebuhn Foundation give?
The David Lebuhn Foundation reported 9 grants totaling $10,650 in its FY2024 IRS filing. It funded between 10 and 15 organizations a year over FY2017 to FY2023.
What does The David Lebuhn Foundation fund?
By grant dollars over FY2017 to FY2024, its largest causes are Arts & Culture (36%), Environment (20%), Food & Nutrition (13%).
Who are The David Lebuhn Foundation's largest grantees?
By total granted over FY2017 to FY2024: San Francisco Playhouse ($8k), Kqed Inc ($7k), Naturebridge ($7k).
Does The David Lebuhn Foundation fund new organizations?
In FY2023, 27% of the organizations it funded were first-time grantees.
Does The David Lebuhn Foundation accept unsolicited applications?
Its most recent filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and does not take unsolicited requests. Check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
Which funders back the same organizations as The David Lebuhn Foundation?
Its strongest co-funders, measured against what their size predicts, include Jewish Community Federation of San Francisco the Peninsula Marin & Sonoma, Marin Community Foundation, Williams-Sonoma Inc Foundation.
Where is The David Lebuhn Foundation based?
The David Lebuhn Foundation is based in NV.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 27 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on David Lebuhn’s filings →

More from the funding graph