Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

The Dave H & Reba W Williams Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$179k
Granted FY2025still arriving
4
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$100k
Largest
01What you fund
0177% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY20172025.

Environment$369kArts & Culture$358kPhilanthropy$150kPublic Benefit$70kHuman Services$6kRecreation & Sports$5kHousing & Shelter$5kOther$285k
02FY2025 · 4 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k1 grant · $1k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $28k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $150k
$50,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$38k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
THE METROPOLITAN MUSEUM OF ART$100,000
GREENWICH TREE CONSERVANCY$50,000
GREENWICH HISTORICAL SOCIETY$27,500
LIBRARY OF AMERICA$1,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–18, $6k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 14%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 14%CT COALITION TO END HOMELESSNESS: $5k → 11%CT COALITION TO END HOMELESSNESS: $1k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

IL
NY
MA
IA
IN
CT
CA
NE
AZ
SC
DC
OK
MS
TX

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

85%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$1.1M · 19 repeat orgs$190k to everyone else

19 repeat relationships — 4 still active in FY2025, 15 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

19
33

Total granted

$1.1M
$190k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+19%
+34%

Still filing today

63%
21%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CultureEnvironmentPhilanthropyPublic BenefitHuman ServicesRecreation & SportsOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TG
    THE GREENWICH TREE CONSERVANCY INC
    8× · 2018–2025 · $204k · revenue +118%
  • MM
    METROPOLITAN MUSEUM OF ART
    2× · 2023–2025 · $150k · revenue +19%
  • NY
    NEW YORK BOTANICAL GARDEN
    4× · 2017–2020 · $136k · revenue +40%

Funded once

  • RH
    RED HEN PRESS INCgraduated
    one grant, 2024 · $25k · revenue +31%
  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF MISSISSIPPI
    one grant, 2023 · $25k
  • AF
    AMERICAN FRIENDS OF THE ART FUND
    one grant, 2018 · $18k · revenue -84%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
American Museum of Natural History

The museum's mission statement is: "to discover, interpret, and disseminate - through scientific research and education - knowledge about human cultures, the natural world, and the universe."

Arts & Culture
2
The Pierpont Morgan Library

The Morgan Library & Museum celebrates and shares the history and process of human creativity from antiquity to the present day through the preservation, study, and interpretation of a dynamic and growing collection.

Education
3
Isabella Stewart Gardner Museum Inc

Organization's mission statement true to the ambitious vision of its founder and her spirit of creative risk-taking, the mission of the isabella stewart gardner museum is: - to bring to life and preserve the rich historic collection; - to…

Arts & Culture
4
The Brooklyn Institute of Arts and Sciences

The mission of the brooklyn institute of arts and sciences, d/b/a brooklyn museum (the "museum") is to bring people together through art and experiences that inspire celebration, compassion, courage, and the will to act. (see schedule o).

Arts & Culture
5
Bruce Museum Inc

The bruce cultivates discovery and wonder, engaging a broad audience through the power of art & science.

Arts & Culture
6
The Jewish Museum

The mission of the jewish museum is to collect, preserve, exhibit and interpret art and jewish culture. see schedule o for more information.

Arts & Culture
7
Henry E Huntington Library and Art Gallery

The huntington library, art museum, and botanical gardens shares its world-renowned collections to support scholarship, foster learning, inspire creativity, and offer transformative experiences for diverse audiences.

Arts & Culture
8
The Newark Museum Association

Nmoa mission statement is: we welcome everyone with inclusive experiences that spark curiosity and foster community.

Arts & Culture
9
Clyfford Still Museum

Home to the art and legacy of the american painter clyfford still, we invite all to explore the potential of individual creative endeavor.

Arts & Culture
10
The Neue Galerie New York
Arts & Culture
11
Museum of Modern Art

The Museum of Modern Art is a private, non-profit institution chartered by the State of New York Department of Education in 1929 to foster public awareness of modern and contemporary art. (Continued in Schedule O)

Arts & Culture
12
The Phillips Collection

The phillips collection is the oldest museum of modern and contemporary art in the u.s. in addition to presentation of works from the permanent collection and special exhibitions, the museum maintains active educational, academic,…

Arts & Culture

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Frick Collection and the most unlike its peers is Lcu Fund for Women's Education Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

19 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 19 of the 52 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
19/19
Grantees still filing
12/19
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

THE GREENWICH TREE CONSERVANCY INC — $203,768 · EnvironmentTHE GREENWICH TREE CONSERVANCY IN…NEW YORK BOTANICAL GARDEN — $136,000 · EnvironmentNEW YORK BOTANICAL GARDENDENISON PEQUOTSEPOS NATURE CENTER — $16,000 · Environment+2 more — $13,000 · EnvironmentGREENWICH HISTORICAL SOCIETY INC — $155,000 · Arts & CultureGREENWICH HISTORICAL SOCIETY INCMETROPOLITAN MUSEUM OF ART — $150,000 · Arts & CultureMETROPOLITAN MUSEUM OF ARTRED HEN PRESS INC — $25,000 · Arts & CultureRED HEN PRESS INCAMERICAN FRIENDS OF THE ART FUND — $17,752 · Arts & Culture+4 more — $9,750 · Arts & CultureDELTA TAU DELTA EDUCATION — $51,000 · OtherDELTA TAU DELTA EDUCATIONIndividual grant recipient — $50,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipien…UM FOUNDATION — $30,000 · OtherUM FOUNDATIONUNIVERSITY OF MISSISSIPPI — $25,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF MISSISSIPPICONNECTICUT INSTITUTE OF ART — $15,000 · OtherTHE LIBRARY OF AMERICA — $12,000 · OtherAMERICAN FRIENDS OF THE BRITISH — $11,356 · OtherFIVE POINTS CENTER FOR VISUAL ARTS — $10,500 · OtherGLIMMERGLASS FESTIVAL — $10,000 · OtherGLOBAL GIVING FOR UKRAINE — $10,000 · OtherAMERICAN ASSOC OF THE NAT'L THEATRE — $10,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF TEXAS — $10,000 · Other+22 more — $39,850 · Other+22 moreNew Philadelphia Association Inc — $150,000 · PhilanthropyNew Philadelp…MANHATTAN INSTITUTE FOR POLICY RESEARCH INC — $70,000 · Public BenefitCONNECTICUT COALITION TO END HOMELESSNESS INC — $6,000 · Human ServicesCENTRAL PARK CONSERVANCY INC — $5,000 · Recreation & SportsLCU FUND FOR WOMEN'S EDUCATION INC — $5,000 · Housing & Shelter
Environment$368,768Arts & Culture$357,502Other$284,706Philanthropy$150,000Public Benefit$70,000Human Services$6,000Recreation & Sports$5,000Housing & Shelter$5,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetTHE GREENWICH TREE CONSERVANCY INC — $203,768 over 8y, 19% of budgetGREENWICH HISTORICAL SOCIETY INC — $155,000 over 6y, 3.3% of budgetNew Philadelphia Association Inc — $150,000 over 3y, 98% of budgetMETROPOLITAN MUSEUM OF ART — $150,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetNEW YORK BOTANICAL GARDEN — $136,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetMANHATTAN INSTITUTE FOR POLICY RESEARCH INC — $70,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetRED HEN PRESS INC — $25,000 over 1y, 2.7% of budgetDENISON PEQUOTSEPOS NATURE CENTER — $16,000 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetLIVING DESERT THE — $12,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetCONNECTICUT COALITION TO END HOMELESSNESS INC — $6,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetROUNDABOUT THEATRE COMPANY INC — $5,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCENTRAL PARK CONSERVANCY INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLCU FUND FOR WOMEN'S EDUCATION INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetPALM SPRINGS ART MUSEUM — $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFLORENCE GRISWOLD MUSEUM INC — $1,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetThe Frick Collection — $1,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetGREENWICH ARTS COUNCIL INC — $1,250 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetNATIONAL ARBOR DAY FOUNDATION — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE GREENWICH TREE CONSERVANCY INC
  • Who funds GREENWICH HISTORICAL SOCIETY INC
  • Who funds New Philadelphia Association Inc
  • Who funds METROPOLITAN MUSEUM OF ART
  • Who funds NEW YORK BOTANICAL GARDEN
  • Who funds MANHATTAN INSTITUTE FOR POLICY RESEARCH INC
  • Who funds RED HEN PRESS INC
  • Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF THE ART FUND
  • Who funds DENISON PEQUOTSEPOS NATURE CENTER
  • Who funds LIVING DESERT THE
  • Who funds CONNECTICUT COALITION TO END HOMELESSNESS INC
  • Who funds ROUNDABOUT THEATRE COMPANY INC
  • Who funds CENTRAL PARK CONSERVANCY INC
  • Who funds LCU FUND FOR WOMEN'S EDUCATION INC
  • Who funds PALM SPRINGS ART MUSEUM
  • Who funds FLORENCE GRISWOLD MUSEUM INC
  • Who funds The Frick Collection
  • Who funds GREENWICH ARTS COUNCIL INC

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Connecticut Humanities Council IncCT13.4× affinity4 shared granteesties to 6 of 6Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Connecticut Humanities Council Inc · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The Dave H & Reba W Williams Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 10%6%25%56%100%your share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 2%
  • Connecticut Coalition to End Homelessness Inc54% of income from government
  • Florence Griswold Museum Inc2% of income from government
  • Greenwich Arts Council Inc1% of income from government
  • Denison Pequotsepos Nature Center0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Dave H & Reba W Williams Foundation?

Find your warmest path to The Dave H & Reba W Williams Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 52 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph