Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

The Darby Foundation Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$22k
Granted FY2024still arriving
11
Grants FY2024still arriving
4
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What you fund
0199% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172024.

Education$228kAnimals$44kInternational$26kHealth$23kPublic Safety & Disaster$22kHuman Services$19kReligion$6kPublic Benefit$5kOther$0
02FY2024 · 11 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k10 grants · $12k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $10k
$1,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$218k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
TOCCOA FALLS COLLEGE$10,000
DOGS INC$3,000
Individual grant recipient$2,000
FELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETES-GA$1,200
LOVE HIM LOVE THEM MINISTRIES$1,200
FIRST METHODIST CHURCH$1,000
SAMARITAN'S PURSE$1,000
OPEN ARMS CLINIC$1,000
CHURCH OF CHRIST DISASTER RESPONSE$1,000
FOOD BANK OF NORTHEAST GEORGIA$500
TOCCOA-STEPHENS COUNTY HUMANE SHELT$100
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY18–24, $34k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%SOUTHEASTERN GUIDE DOGS: $8k → 10%SOUTHEASTERN GUIDE DOGS: $5k → 10%GEORGIA SHERIFFS' YOUTH HOMES: $25 → 8%SOUTHEASTERN GUIDE DOGS: $5k → 10%SOUTHEASTERN GUIDE DOGS: $5k → 10%SOUTHEASTERN GUIDE DOGS: $5k → 10%DOGS INC: $3k → 10%SOUTHEASTERN GUIDE DOGS: $3k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

NY
OH
CT
AZ
TN
NC
GA
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

04

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 6% of The Darby Foundation Inc’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another.

The Darby Foundation Inclessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 5.6% directed abroad (not shown)

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

89%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$342k · 13 repeat orgs$43k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +80% since the first grant, against +0% for the ones you funded once.

13 repeat relationships — 8 still active in FY2024, 5 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

13
23

Total granted

$342k
$39k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+80%
+0%

Still filing today

46%
13%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 83% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $4k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesEducationInternationalHealthPublic BenefitAnimalsOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TF
    Toccoa Falls College Inc
    7× · 2017–2024 · $205k · revenue +28%
  • SG
    Southeastern Guide Dogs Inc
    7× · 2018–2024 · $34k · revenue +80%
  • OA
    OPEN ARMS CLINIC INC
    4× · 2018–2024 · $22k · revenue +168%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2017 · $15k
  • VH
    Vets Helping Heroes Inc
    one grant, 2018 · $5k · revenue +0%
  • VR
    VETERINARY REFERRAL SURGICAL PRACTI
    one grant, 2019 · $4k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Saving Georgia Dogs Inc

The organization retrieves dogs from kill shelters and transports them to non kill shelters in the northern part of the united states. the dogs are then adopted. the adoption rate for the southern states is considerably lower than the…

Animals
2
Operational K9 Medical Team of Wisconsin
Animals
3
Forsyth Humane Society

Our mission is to promote and provide for the humane treatment of cats and dogs in Forsyth County. In support of its mission, the Forsyth Humane Society FHS is committed to achieving a save rate of 90 percent for shelter animals in our…

Animals
4
Hero Dogs Inc

Hero Dogs improves the quality of life of our nations heroes and enhances the services of community organizations by placing assistance dogs with customized training & lifetime support.

Human Services
5
Animal Samaritans

At Animal Samaritans we champion compassion and respect for all living creatures, with a primary focus on dogs, cats, and the people who love them. We view pets not merely as animals, but as members of our families. As their guardians and…

Animals
6
Angels Among Us Pet Rescue Inc

Angels among us pet rescue, inc. is a 501(c)(3) charity dedicated to rescuing dogs and cats from shelters and other at-risk situations across georgia. they operate through a network of foster homes in the metro atlanta area and hold pet…

Animals
7
Atlanta Humane Society & Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Inc

The mission of the Atlanta Humane Society is to improve animal welfare in the southeastern United States by providing quality animal services including preventative initiatives, education, advocacy and adoption of animals into permanent…

Animals
8
Wet Noses Animal Rescue Inc

We save dogs in need and provide them with food, shelter and housing, vet care before finding them new loving homes. Our group accepts owner surrenders as well as dogs from county animal control facilities in Georgia.

Animals
9
Athenspets Inc

Athenspets is an all-volunteer 501(c)(3) organization dedicated to helping the most vulnerable animals in the Athens (GA) area and the people who love them.

Animals
10
Humane Society of Southern Arizona

To compassionately serve pets and the people who love them.

Animals
11
Southern Comfort Animal Rescue Inc

Southern Comfort Animal Rescue, Inc. is 501(c)(3) not-for-profit organization that rescues and rehomes abused, unwanted and abandoned companion animals.Southern Comfort was founded in 2001 in Savannah, Georgia, to provide shelter and find…

Animals
12
Helping Paws of North Georgia Inc

The organization is comprised of volunteers who seek to assist animals in need and promote spay and neuter to reduce the overwhelming number of unwanted liters. Georgias pet overpopulation has reached crisis levels dispite the efforts of…

Animals

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Toccoa Stephens County Humane Shelter Inc and the most unlike its peers is Samaritan's Purse. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

05the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 39 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/10
Grantees still filing
7/10
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Toccoa Falls College Inc — $205,000 · EducationToccoa Falls College IncCHURCH OF CHRIST DISASTER RESPONSE — $21,000 · OtherCHURCH OF CHRIST DISASTER…Individual grant recipient — $14,722 · OtherIndividual grant recipien…Individual grant recipient — $7,633 · OtherIndividual grant recipien…Individual grant recipient — $7,400 · OtherIndividual grant recipien…VETERINARY REFERRAL SURGICAL PRACTI — $4,160 · OtherIndividual grant recipient — $4,000 · OtherACREE DAVIS FUNERAL HOME — $3,300 · OtherLOVE HIM LOVE THEM MINISTRIES — $3,200 · OtherSAMARITAN'S PURSE — $4,000 · Other+23 more — $18,412 · Other+23 moreSoutheastern Guide Dogs Inc — $33,500 · Human ServicesSoutheast…+1 more — $25 · Human ServicesAMERICARES FOUNDATION INC — $22,000 · InternationalOPEN ARMS CLINIC INC — $22,000 · HealthTOCCOA STEPHENS COUNTY HUMANE SHELTER INC — $9,145 · AnimalsVets Helping Heroes Inc — $5,000 · Public Benefit
Education$205,000Other$87,827Human Services$33,525International$22,000Health$22,000Animals$9,145Public Benefit$5,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetToccoa Falls College Inc — $205,000 over 7y, 0.3% of budgetSoutheastern Guide Dogs Inc — $33,500 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICARES FOUNDATION INC — $22,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetOPEN ARMS CLINIC INC — $22,000 over 4y, 4.2% of budgetTOCCOA STEPHENS COUNTY HUMANE SHELTER INC — $9,145 over 5y, 1.3% of budgetVets Helping Heroes Inc — $5,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetSAMARITAN'S PURSE — $4,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetFOOD BANK OF NORTHEAST GEORGIA INC — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGEORGIA SHERIFFS' ASSOCIATION INC — $75 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGEORGIA SHERIFFS' YOUTH HOMES INC — $25 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Toccoa Falls College Inc
  • Who funds Southeastern Guide Dogs Inc
  • Who funds AMERICARES FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds OPEN ARMS CLINIC INC
  • Who funds TOCCOA STEPHENS COUNTY HUMANE SHELTER INC
  • Who funds Vets Helping Heroes Inc
  • Who funds SAMARITAN'S PURSE
  • Who funds FOOD BANK OF NORTHEAST GEORGIA INC
  • Who funds GEORGIA SHERIFFS' ASSOCIATION INC
  • Who funds GEORGIA SHERIFFS' YOUTH HOMES INC

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Natl Christian Charitable Fdn IncGA8.1× affinity4 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The Darby Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2025
202122232425
no gov · 20%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    2get no government money at all
    5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 39 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph