Skip to content
The Daniel Cayre Foundation Inc at a glance

· Private foundation

The Daniel Cayre Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$7k
Granted FY2025still arriving
8
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$4k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
0196% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Religion$50kCivil Rights$6kEducation$5kEnvironment$4kHealth$4kArts & Culture$4kFood & Nutrition$2kPhilanthropy$2kOther$0
02FY2025 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$480
Median grant
2
States reached
$288k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CONGREGATION MAGEN DAVID OF MANHATT$4,155
EDUCATIONAL ALLIANCE$545
STARDUST FERTILITY FOUNDATION$510
NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL$480
STONEWALL COMMUNITY FOUNDATION$433
AMERICAN SEPHARDI FEDERATION$207
FRIENDS OF KAREN$106
ESHEL$103
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–24, $1k) land where the poverty rate runs at 20%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%SEPHARDIC BIKUR HOLIM: $1k → 20%ATIME: $101 → 20%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
NY
PA
NJ
RI
CA
CO
DC
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

82%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$90k · 31 repeat orgs$19k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +29% since the first grant, against +9% for those funded once.

31 repeat relationships: 5 still active in FY2025, 26 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

31
17

Total granted

$90k
$19k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+29%
+9%

Still filing today

68%
65%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 90% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $616 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’21’22’23’24’25
EducationEnvironmentCivil RightsRecreation & SportsReligionPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • BH
    BROWN HILLEL FOUNDATION
    3× · 2021–2024 · $25k · revenue +68%
  • LL
    LAMBDA LEGAL DEFENSE & EDUCATION FUND INC
    3× · 2022–2024 · $3k · revenue +127%
  • HR
    HUMAN RIGHTS CAMPAIGN INC
    3× · 2021–2023 · $2k · revenue +8%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2023 · $10k
  • GA
    GABRIELLE'S ANGEL FOUNDATION FOR CANCER RESEARCH INC
    one grant, 2024 · $3k · revenue 0%
  • TV
    TORAH VEAHAVA
    one grant, 2021 · $2k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Jewish Agency for Israel

The jewish agency binds jews across ideologies and civilizations together in a worldwide jewish family with israel at its center. it provides the global framework for aliyah, ensures global jewish safety, strengthens jewish identity and…

—
2
Foundation for Jewish Philanthropies Inc

See schedule othe organization is a not-for-profit, public charity established in 1911 to provide for the quality and continuity of jewish life in western new york and around the world through private philanthropy. the foundation seeks,…

Philanthropy
3
The Israel Innovation Fund Inc

Our vision is to reignite the zionist spirit and meet the needs of jewish civilization in the twenty-first century by connecting people around the world through the vibrancy and creativity of contemporary israeli culture.

Arts & Culture
4
Jewish Federation Council of Greater La

Based on jewish values, the jewish federation of greater los angeles convenes and leads the community and leverages its resources to assure the continuity of the jewish people, support a secure state of israel, care for jews in need here…

Philanthropy
5
The Jewish Museum

The mission of the jewish museum is to collect, preserve, exhibit and interpret art and jewish culture. see schedule o for more information.

Arts & Culture
6
American Jewish Committee

AJC's mission is to enhance the wellbeing of the Jewish people and Israel, and to advance human rights and democratic values in the United States and around the world. In pursuit of this mission, AJC advances democratic principles, fights…

Civil Rights
7
Network of Jewish Human Service Agencies Inc

The network is an international membership association of more than 170 non profit human service agencies in the united states, canada and israel. its members provide a full range of human services for the jewish community and beyond,…

Human Services
8
Minneapolis Jewish Federation

Minneapolis jewish federation is a nonprofit organization that promotes a culture of philanthropy, leverages resources to meet local and global jewish needs, and facilitates community planning to ensure a thriving and secure future.

Philanthropy
9
Metropolitan Jewish Health System Inc

Mjhs health system is a charitable not-for-profit established to support the activities of affiliated organizations. mjhs is built on the core values of compassion, dignity and respect, first established by the four brooklyn ladies in…

Health
10
Weizmann Institute of Science

The weizmann institute of science, located in rehovot, israel, is one of the worlds top-ranking, multidisciplinary research institutions. at any one time, several thousand scientists, staff and students are involved in hundreds of research…

Science & Tech
11
American Friends of Hebrew University Inc

Support the hebrew univ. of jerusalem, israel's foremost center of higher edu. & research.

International
12
National Council of Jewish Women Incorporated

The national council of jewish women is a grassroots nonpartisan organization of volunteers and advocates who strive for social justice by improving the quality of life for women, children and families.

Community Improvement
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Brown Hillel Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Natural Resources Defense Council Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

37 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 37 of the 54 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
37/37
Grantees still filing
27/37
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

BROWN HILLEL FOUNDATION: $25,000 · OtherBROWN HILLEL FOUNDATIONKANISSE: $20,072 · OtherKANISSEIndividual grant recipient: $10,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient+31 more: $21,113 · Other+31 moreCONGREGATION MAGEN DAVID OF MANHATTAN: $16,931 · ReligionCONGREGATION MAGEN…ESHEL: $804 · ReligionTHE YOUNG MEN'S AND YOUNG WOMEN'S HEBREW ASSOCIATION: $650 · ReligionLAMBDA LEGAL DEFENSE & EDUCATION FUND INC: $3,050 · Civil RightsHUMAN RIGHTS CAMPAIGN INC: $1,787 · Civil RightsSTONEWALL COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $1,335 · Civil Rights+1 more: $180 · Civil RightsGABRIELLE'S ANGEL FOUNDATION FOR CANCER RESEARCH INC: $2,500 · PhilanthropyGOFUNDMEORG: $1,050 · PhilanthropyASIAN PACIFIC FUND: $520 · PhilanthropyUNITED JEWISH APPEAL-FEDERATION OF JEWISH PHILANTHROPIES OF NEW YORK INC: $500 · PhilanthropyNATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL INC: $3,520 · EnvironmentENVIRONMENTAL WORKING GROUP: $378 · EnvironmentENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE FUND INCORPORATED: $312 · EnvironmentBROWN UNIVERSITY: $2,000 · Community ImprovementHOUSING WORKS INC: $870 · Community ImprovementOPEN STAGE PROJECT INC: $1,542 · EducationSEFARIA INC: $492 · EducationWIKIMEDIA FOUNDATION INC: $412 · EducationAMERICAN INDIAN COLLEGE FUND: $225 · Education
Other$76,185Religion$18,385Civil Rights$6,352Philanthropy$4,570Environment$4,210Community Improvement$2,870Education$2,671

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetBROWN HILLEL FOUNDATION: $25,000 over 3y, 0.7% of budgetCONGREGATION MAGEN DAVID OF MANHATTAN: $16,931 over 6y, 0.9% of budgetNATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL INC: $3,520 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetLAMBDA LEGAL DEFENSE & EDUCATION FUND INC: $3,050 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetGABRIELLE'S ANGEL FOUNDATION FOR CANCER RESEARCH INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBROWN UNIVERSITY: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetHUMAN RIGHTS CAMPAIGN INC: $1,787 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetJEWISH NATIONAL FUND (KEREN KAYEMETH LEISRAEL) INC: $1,750 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetOPEN STAGE PROJECT INC: $1,542 over 2y, 1.4% of budgetSTONEWALL COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $1,335 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetNUTRITIONAL RESEARCH FOUNDATION INC: $1,301 over 3y, 1.4% of budgetGOFUNDMEORG: $1,050 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSBH COMMUNITY SERVICE NETWORK INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDS OF HUDSON RIVER PARK INC: $913 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetHOUSING WORKS INC: $870 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetTHE EDUCATIONAL ALLIANCE INC: $853 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetESHEL: $804 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetAMERICAN SEPHARDI FEDERATION: $673 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetTHE YOUNG MEN'S AND YOUNG WOMEN'S HEBREW ASSOCIATION: $650 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE JEWISH PUBLICATION SOCIETY: $580 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetASIAN PACIFIC FUND: $520 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBOFFO INC: $512 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED JEWISH APPEAL-FEDERATION OF JEWISH PHILANTHROPIES OF NEW YORK INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSEFARIA INC: $492 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetWIKIMEDIA FOUNDATION INC: $412 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetENVIRONMENTAL WORKING GROUP: $378 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE FUND INCORPORATED: $312 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE NON-GMO PROJECT: $300 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN INDIAN COLLEGE FUND: $225 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetThe Neighborhood An Urban Center for Jewish Life: $180 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTRAINING FOR CHANGE: $180 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHAI LIFELINE INC: $180 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetALI FORNEY CENTER INC: $157 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetYOUTH TENNIS ADVANTAGE: $110 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDS OF KAREN INC: $106 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $104 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetA Torah Infertilty Medium Exchange: $101 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Jewish Communal FundJewish Community Fede…United Jewish Appeal-…Tides FoundationNational Philanthropi…Vanguard Charitable E…American Endowment Fo…Donor Advised Charita…The Bank of America C…American Online Givin…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
Jewish Communal FundNY19.9× affinity10 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Jewish Communal Fund · Jewish Community Federation of San Francisco the Peninsula Marin & Sonoma · United Jewish Appeal-Federation of Jewish Philanthropies of New York Inc · Tides Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Endowment Foundation · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Daniel Cayre Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Daniel Cayre Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 54 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Daniel Cayre’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home