Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Dale and Max Berger Family Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$1.0M
Granted FY2024still arriving
23
Grants FY2024still arriving
5
States reached
$500k
Largest
01What it funds
0194% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Education$5.9MPhilanthropy$730kHuman Services$535kPublic Benefit$410kCrime & Legal$283kCivil Rights$280kArts & Culture$123kReligion$86kOther$0
02FY2024 · 23 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k8 grants · $35k
  • $10k–50k9 grants · $150k
  • $50k–250k5 grants · $325k
  • $250k+1 grant · $500k
$10,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$19M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
COLUMBIA LAW SCHOOL$500,000
UNITED JEWISH APPEAL$100,000
THE ANDREW GOODMAN FOUNDATION INC$75,000
BARUCH COLLEGE$50,000
ANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE FOUNDATION$50,000
FILMMAKERS COLLABORIATIVE$50,000
MEDIA MATTERS FOR AMERICA$25,000
SKIDMORE COLLEGE$25,000
HER JUSTICE$25,000
THE AMERICAN INDEPENDENT FOUNDATION$20,000
NEW ALTERNATIVES FOR CHILDREN$15,000
Individual grant recipient$10,000
BRENNAN CENTER FOR JUSTICE$10,000
UNITED STATES HOLOCAUST MEMORIAL MUSEUM$10,000
PARK AVENUE SYNAGOGUE$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY23–24, $10k) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%GOODFOUNDATION: $5k → 17%GOODFOUNDATION: $5k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$8.4M · 25 repeat orgs$139k to everyone else

25 repeat relationships: 18 still active in FY2024, 7 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

25
4

Total granted

$8.4M
$57k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+10%
+65%

Still filing today

68%
25%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 92% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $82k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’20’21’22’23’24
EducationArts & CultureCrime & LegalCivil RightsPhilanthropyHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • UJ
    UNITED JEWISH APPEAL-FEDERATION OF JEWISH PHILANTHROPIES OF NEW YORK INC
    4× · 2017–2022 · $405k · revenue +39%
  • HJ
    HER JUSTICE INC
    6× · 2017–2024 · $225k · revenue +48%
  • MM
    MEDIA MATTERS FOR AMERICA
    6× · 2017–2024 · $135k · revenue +90%

Funded once

  • EB RESEARCH PARTNERSHIP INCgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $30k · revenue +65%
  • A
    ADL
    one grant, 2017 · $20k
  • TL
    THE LONE SOLDIER CENTER
    one grant, 2017 · $5k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
American Civil Liberties Union Fund of the District of Columbia

Preservation of civil liberties through litigation and public education.

—
2
American Law Institute

The institute's mission, as set out in its certificate of incorporation, is to promote the clarification and simplification of the law and its better adaptation to social needs, to secure the better administration of justice, and to…

Crime & Legal
3
American Jewish Committee

AJC's mission is to enhance the wellbeing of the Jewish people and Israel, and to advance human rights and democratic values in the United States and around the world. In pursuit of this mission, AJC advances democratic principles, fights…

Civil Rights
4
Anti-Defamation League

Anti-defamation league (the "league") is a leading anti-hate organization that was founded in 1913 in response to an escalating climate of antisemitism and bigotry. (continued in sch. o)its timeless mission is to stop the defamation of the…

Civil Rights
5
Open Markets Institute

The open markets institute works to help people relearn how to use competition policy to build stronger democracies, more just and equitable societies, more innovative and sustainable economies, and a more secure and peaceful world.

Education
6
American Arbitration Association Inc

The american arbitration association ("aaa") is dedicated to effective, efficient and economical methods of dispute resolution through education, technology and solutions-oriented service.

Crime & Legal
7
American Civil Liberties Union Inc

As noted in its articles of incorporation, the mission of the aclu is "to maintain and advance civil liberties, including, without limitation, the freedoms of association, press, religion and speech, and the rights to the franchise, to due…

—
8
American Civil Liberties Union of the District of Columbia

Preservation of civil liberties through advocacy and lobbying.

—
9
Aclu Foundation of Massachusetts Inc

Aclu foundation of ma was established to defend freedoms guaranteed in the constitution and bill of rights through public education and litigation.

Civil Rights
10
American Enterprise Institute for Public Policy Research

The american enterprise institute is a community of scholars and supporters committed to expanding liberty, increasing individual opportunity, and strengthening free enterprise. aei pursues these ideals through independent thinking and the…

Social Science
11
Association of Legal Administrators

Ala is the catalyst for growth by providing: diverse educational experiences, engaged peer communities, strategic solutions, dynamic resources, and trusted networks.

—
12
Federation for American Immigration Reform

The federation for american immigration reform's (fair) mission is to educate the public about the economic, sociological, environmental, demographic and other effects of mass immigration to the united states.

International
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Her Justice Inc; the most unlike its peers is The Andrew Goodman Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

22 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 22 of the 34 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
22/22
Grantees still filing
11/22
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

COLUMBIA LAW SCHOOL: $4,005,000 · OtherCOLUMBIA LAW SCHOOLBARUCH COLLEGE: $1,641,425 · OtherBARUCH COLLEGEWOMEN FOR WOMEN: $475,000 · OtherWOMEN FOR WOMENTHE ANDREW GOODMAN FOUNDATION INC: $410,000 · OtherTHE ANDREW GOODMAN FOUNDATION INCUNITED JEWISH APPEAL: $250,000 · Other+14 more: $374,800 · OtherHER JUSTICE INC: $225,000 · EducationMEDIA MATTERS FOR AMERICA: $135,000 · EducationSKIDMORE COLLEGE: $125,000 · EducationWILLIAM J BRENNAN CENTER FOR JUSTICE INC: $35,000 · Education+1 more: $7,500 · EducationUNITED JEWISH APPEAL-FEDERATION OF JEWISH PHILANTHROPIES OF NEW YORK INC: $405,000 · PhilanthropyANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE FOUNDATION: $237,500 · Civil RightsEQUAL JUSTICE INITIATIVE: $20,000 · Civil RightsFILMMAKERS COLLABORATIVE: $50,000 · Arts & CultureThe United States Holocaust Memorial Museum: $35,750 · Arts & CultureFRIENDS OF UNITED HATZALAH INC: $15,000 · Arts & CultureSOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER INC: $35,000 · Crime & LegalGETTING OUT AND STAYING OUT INC: $25,000 · Crime & LegalEAST BAY COMMUNITY LAW CENTER: $12,500 · Crime & LegalEB RESEARCH PARTNERSHIP INC: $30,000 · Health
Other$7,156,225Education$527,500Philanthropy$405,000Civil Rights$257,500Arts & Culture$100,750Crime & Legal$72,500Health$30,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE ANDREW GOODMAN FOUNDATION INC: $410,000 over 5y, 6.3% of budgetUNITED JEWISH APPEAL-FEDERATION OF JEWISH PHILANTHROPIES OF NEW YORK INC: $405,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE FOUNDATION: $237,500 over 5y, 0.6% of budgetHER JUSTICE INC: $225,000 over 6y, 1.1% of budgetMEDIA MATTERS FOR AMERICA: $135,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetSKIDMORE COLLEGE: $125,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetNEW ALTERNATIVES FOR CHILDREN INC: $95,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetFILMMAKERS COLLABORATIVE: $50,000 over 1y, 3.6% of budgetThe United States Holocaust Memorial Museum: $35,750 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetWILLIAM J BRENNAN CENTER FOR JUSTICE INC: $35,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetSOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER INC: $35,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetEB RESEARCH PARTNERSHIP INC: $30,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetGETTING OUT AND STAYING OUT INC: $25,000 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetTHE AMERICAN INDEPENDENT FOUNDATION: $20,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetEQUAL JUSTICE INITIATIVE: $20,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetEARTHJUSTICE: $20,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDS OF UNITED HATZALAH INC: $15,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetEAST BAY COMMUNITY LAW CENTER: $12,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetGOOD PLUS FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN CONSTITUTION SOCIETY FOR LAW & POLICY: $7,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetHILLEL AT BARUCH INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOM: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE ANDREW GOODMAN FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds UNITED JEWISH APPEAL-FEDERATION OF JEWISH PHILANTHROPIES OF NEW YORK INC ↗
  • Who funds ANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds HER JUSTICE INC ↗
  • Who funds MEDIA MATTERS FOR AMERICA ↗
  • Who funds SKIDMORE COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds NEW ALTERNATIVES FOR CHILDREN INC ↗
  • Who funds FILMMAKERS COLLABORATIVE ↗
  • Who funds The United States Holocaust Memorial Museum ↗
  • Who funds WILLIAM J BRENNAN CENTER FOR JUSTICE INC ↗
  • Who funds SOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds EB RESEARCH PARTNERSHIP INC ↗
  • Who funds GETTING OUT AND STAYING OUT INC ↗
  • Who funds THE AMERICAN INDEPENDENT FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds EQUAL JUSTICE INITIATIVE ↗
  • Who funds EARTHJUSTICE ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF UNITED HATZALAH INC ↗
  • Who funds EAST BAY COMMUNITY LAW CENTER ↗
  • Who funds GOOD PLUS FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN CONSTITUTION SOCIETY FOR LAW & POLICY ↗
  • Who funds HILLEL AT BARUCH INC ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOM ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The San Francisco FoundationCA13.1× affinity4 shared granteesties to 7 of 7Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The San Francisco Foundation · Jewish Communal Fund · National Philanthropic Trust · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Endowment Foundation · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Dale and Max Berger Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Dale and Max Berger Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to The Dale and Max Berger Family Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to The Dale and Max Berger Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 34 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Dale and Max Berger Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph