Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Cuvelier Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$105k
Granted FY2025still arriving
9
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$18k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2025.

Health$541kEnvironment$70kEducation$60kReligion$51kInternational$24k
02FY2025 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k3 grants · $19k
  • $10k–50k6 grants · $85k
$13,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$2.0M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
JUVENILE DIABETES RESEARCH FOUNDATION ROCHESTER CHAPTER$18,125
EMPOWERING PEOPLE'S INDEPENDENCE$16,125
UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER MEDICAL CENTER (WILMOT CANCER CENTER)$15,000
PINES OF PEACE$13,125
HUGS FOUNDATION$13,000
THE GREEN ANGELS$10,000
OPEN DOOR MISSION$8,063
MEDICAL DEBT RESOLUTION INC DBA RIP MEDICAL DEBT$8,062
THE BUONICONTI FUND (MIAMI PROJECT) TO CURE PARALYSIS$3,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–25, $186k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 7%MEDICAL DEBT RESOLUTION INC DBA RIP MEDICAL DEBT: $10k → 9%PINES OF PEACE: $18k → 11%MEDICAL DEBT RESOLUTION INC DBA RIP MEDICAL DEBT: $10k → 9%PINES OF PEACE: $18k → 11%MEDICAL DEBT RESOLUTION INC DBA RIP MEDICAL DEBT: $10k → 9%PINES OF PEACE: $17k → 11%MEDICAL DEBT RESOLUTION INC DBA RIP MEDICAL DEBT: $10k → 9%PINES OF PEACE: $14k → 11%MEDICAL DEBT RESOLUTION INC DBA RIP MEDICAL DEBT: $10k → 9%PINES OF PEACE: $13k → 11%MEDICAL DEBT RESOLUTION INC DBA RIP MEDICAL DEBT: $8k → 9%PINES OF PEACE: $13k → 11%MEDICAL DEBT RESOLUTION INC DBA RIP MEDICAL DEBT: $7k → 9%PINES OF PEACE: $12k → 11%EMPOWERING PEOPLE'S INDEPENDENCE: $16k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

97%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$721k · 11 repeat orgs$26k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +56% since the first grant, against -4% for those funded once.

11 repeat relationships: 8 still active in FY2025, 3 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

11
1

Total granted

$721k
$10k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+56%
-4%

Still filing today

45%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 85% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $16k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesInternationalRecreation & SportsEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • PINES OF PEACE INC
    7× · 2019–2025 · $105k · revenue +56%
  • HF
    HUGS FOUNDATION INC
    7× · 2019–2025 · $82k · revenue +60%
  • MEDICAL DEBT RESOLUTION INC
    7× · 2019–2025 · $65k · revenue +521%

Funded once

  • CG
    CAMP GOOD DAYS AND SPECIAL TIMES INC
    one grant, 2019 · $10k · revenue -4%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field
04the grantee network

7 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 7 of the 13 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
7/7
Grantees still filing
5/7
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

JUVENILE DIABETES RESEARCH FOUNDATION ROCHESTER CHAPTER: $166,275 · OtherJUVENILE DIABETES RESEARCH FOUNDATION ROCHESTER CHAPTERGREEN ANGELS: $70,000 · OtherGREEN ANGELSFRIENDS OF FATHER NTAIYIA JUBILEE SCHOOL: $60,000 · OtherFRIENDS OF FATHER NTAIYIA JUBILEE SCHOOLOPEN DOOR MISSION INC: $51,221 · OtherOPEN DOOR MISSION INCUNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER MEDICAL CENTER (WILMOT CANCER CENTER): $33,250 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER MEDICAL CENTER (WILMOT CANCER CENTER)THE BUONICONTI FUND (MIAMI PROJECT) TO CURE PARALYSIS: $22,922 · OtherTHE BUONICONTI FUND (MIAMI PROJECT) TO CURE PARALYSISPINES OF PEACE INC: $104,828 · Human ServicesPINES OF PEACE INCMEDICAL DEBT RESOLUTION INC: $65,437 · Human ServicesMEDICAL DEBT RESOLUTION INCEPILEPSY-PRALID INC: $16,125 · Human ServicesEPILEPSY-PRALID INCHUGS FOUNDATION INC: $81,830 · InternationalHUGS FOUNDATION …Project Chacocente USA Inc: $24,000 · InternationalProject Chacocen…UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER: $40,753 · EducationCAMP GOOD DAYS AND SPECIAL TIMES INC: $10,000 · Recreation & Sports
Other$403,668Human Services$186,390International$105,830Education$40,753Recreation & Sports$10,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetPINES OF PEACE INC: $104,828 over 7y, 10% of budgetHUGS FOUNDATION INC: $81,830 over 7y, 2.5% of budgetMEDICAL DEBT RESOLUTION INC: $65,437 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER: $40,753 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetProject Chacocente USA Inc: $24,000 over 2y, 4.6% of budgetCAMP GOOD DAYS AND SPECIAL TIMES INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds PINES OF PEACE INC ↗
  • Who funds HUGS FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds MEDICAL DEBT RESOLUTION INC ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER ↗
  • Who funds Project Chacocente USA Inc ↗
  • Who funds EPILEPSY-PRALID INC ↗
  • Who funds CAMP GOOD DAYS AND SPECIAL TIMES INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Rochester Area Community FoundationNY15.4× affinity5 shared granteesties to 5 of 5Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Rochester Area Community Foundation · United Way of Greater Rochester and the Finger Lakes Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Cuvelier Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Cuvelier Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 13 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Cuvelier Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph