Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Curry Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$50k
Granted FY2025still arriving
20
Grants FY2025still arriving
8
States reached
$6k
Largest
01What it funds
0197% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$71kHealth$63kCrime & Legal$61kArts & Culture$34kHuman Services$24kCivil Rights$19kFood & Nutrition$17kPhilanthropy$16kOther$0
02FY2025 · 20 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$2,000
Median grant
8
States reached
$1.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
KANSAS STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION$6,000
CENTER FOR REPRODUCTIVE RIGHTS$5,000
HUNGER FREE OKLAHOMA$5,000
RESONANCE CENTER FOR WOMEN$5,000
PORTLAND FIRE FIGHTERS ASSOCIATION LOCAL 43$4,000
TULSA CARES$3,000
PUBLIC RADIO OF TULSA$2,500
KANSAS STATE ALUMNI ASSOCIATION$2,500
KSU FOUNDATION$2,500
DOCTORS WITHOUT BORDERS$2,000
YOUTH SERVICES OF TULSA$2,000
NATIONAL ALLIANCE TO END HOMELESSNESS$2,000
SEWARD COUNTY COMMUNITY COLLEGE$2,000
LINDSEY HOUSE$1,500
CITY YEAR$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $66k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%FAMILY AND CHILDRENS SERVICES: $1k → 15%RESONANCE CENTER FOR WOMEN: $5k → 15%RESONANCE CENTER FOR WOMEN: $5k → 15%RESONANCE CENTER FOR WOMEN: $5k → 15%RESONANCE CENTER FOR WOMEN: $5k → 15%RESONANCE CENTER FOR WOMEN: $5k → 15%RESONANCE CENTER FOR WOMEN: $5k → 15%RESONANCE CENTER FOR WOMEN: $3k → 15%RESONANCE CENTER FOR WOMEN: $3k → 15%Resonance Center For Women I: $3k → 15%YWCA TULSA: $1k → 15%DOMESTIC VIOLENCE INTERVENTION SERVICES: $2k → 15%DOMESTIC VIOLENCE INTERVENTION SERVICES: $2k → 15%DOMESTIC VIOLENCE INTERVENTION SERVICES: $2k → 15%DOMESTIC VIOLENCE INTERVENTION SERVICES: $2k → 15%ASSISTANCE LEAGUE OF TULSA: $3k → 15%ASSISTANCE LEAGUE OF TULSA: $3k → 15%YOUTH SERVICES OF TULSA: $2k → 15%YOUTH SERVICES OF TULSA: $2k → 15%YOUTH SERVICES OF TULSA: $2k → 15%YOUTH SERVICES OF TULSA: $2k → 15%YOUTH SERVICES OF TULSA: $1k → 15%YOUTH SERVICES OF TULSA: $1k → 15%FAMILY & CHILDREN'S SERVICES: $1k → 15%FAMILY & CHILDREN'S SERVICES: $1k → 15%YOUTH SERVICES OF TULSA: $1k → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
NY
MA
OR
OH
PA
CA
CO
KY
KS
AR
NC
DC
OK
AL
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

87%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$324k · 42 repeat orgs$49k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +42% since the first grant, against +14% for those funded once.

42 repeat relationships: 12 still active in FY2025, 30 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

42
42

Total granted

$324k
$41k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+42%
+14%

Still filing today

62%
36%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 85% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $7k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesEducationHealthHousing & ShelterReligionInternationalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • KS
    KANSAS STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION
    8× · 2018–2025 · $41k · revenue +78%
  • RC
    Resonance Center for Women Inc
    9× · 2017–2025 · $38k · revenue +118%
  • HUNGER FREE OKLAHOMA INC
    4× · 2019–2025 · $17k · revenue ×12

Funded once

  • HO
    HEALTH OUTREACH PREVENTION EDUCATION
    one grant, 2024 · $3k
  • J
    JUSTHOPEORG
    one grant, 2019 · $3k
  • HO
    Health Outreach Prevention Education Inc
    one grant, 2023 · $3k · revenue +14%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Tulsa Area United Way

The tulsa area united way unites people and resources to improve lives and strengthen our communities.

—
2
Tulsa Regional Chamber (Fka Metropolitan Tulsa Chamber of Commerce)

The tulsa regional chamber transforms the tulsa region by attracting and retaining employers, talent and tourism for long-term prosperity.

—
3
Goodwill Industries of Tulsa Inc

Goodwill empowers people to reach their full potential through work opportunities, training, and support services.

Employment
4
Oklahoma Council of Public Affairs Inc

To promote the flourishing of the people of oklahoma by advancing principles and policies that support free enterprise, limited government, personal responsibility, and individual initiative.

Public Safety & Disaster
5
United Way of Central Oklahoma Inc

United way of central oklahoma is committed to connecting people and resources to improve the well being of those in our community.

Philanthropy
6
Oklahoma State Chamber of Commerce and Industry Inc

The State Chamber is a statewide membership organization. Our purpose is to be the unified voice of business and the most effective advocacy organization at the State Capitol.

—
7
Oklahoma Hall of Fame

The oklahoma hall of fame preserves oklahomas unique history while promoting pride in our great state through each of its programs and the gaylord-pickens museum. the association honors our states rich tradition by telling oklahomas story…

Arts & Culture
8
Leadership Oklahoma Inc

Leadership oklahoma was organized to create, inspire, and support a dynamic network of leaders whose increased awareness and commitement to service will energize oklahomans to shape oklahoma's future.

Public Benefit
9
Tulsa Zoo Management Inc

Connecting, caring, advocating for wildlife, people, and wild places.

Animals
10
Tulsa Advocates for the Protection of Children

To improve the lives of children and youth in oklahoma's child welfare system by providing resources and building community.

Crime & Legal
11
Tulsa Casa Inc

Tulsa casa is organized to speak for the best interests of abused and neglected children in court. we promote and support volunteer representation for the children in an effort to provide each child a safe, permanent, nurturing home.

Civil Rights
12
Oklahoma Association of Realtors

The oklahoma association of realtors connects real estate professionals across the state by providing comprehensive professional resources, maintaining the highest ethical standards and giving realtors a unified voice in shaping oklahoma…

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Colorado Gives Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Mayo Demonstration School Pta. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

49 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 49 of the 93 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
13
Early backer (in before they grew)
47/49
Grantees still filing
34/49
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

PUBLIC RADIO OF TULSA: $32,000 · OtherPUBLIC RADIO OF TULSAPLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION: $17,500 · OtherPLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATIONSEWARD COUNTY COMMUNITY COLLEGE: $12,000 · OtherSEWARD COUNTY COMMUNITY COLLEGEPLANNED PARENTHOOD GREAT PLAINS: $11,500 · OtherPLANNED PARENTHOOD GREAT PLAINSPORTLAND FIRE FIGHTERS ASSOCIATION LOCAL 43: $10,500 · OtherPORTLAND FIRE FIGHTERS ASSOCIATION LOCAL 43THE CENTER FOR REPRODUCTIVE RIGHTS INC: $10,000 · OtherMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $13,500 · OtherMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC+63 more: $87,175 · Other+63 moreResonance Center for Women Inc: $37,500 · Human ServicesResonance Center fo…YOUTH SERVICES OF TULSA INC: $11,000 · Human ServicesYOUTH SERVICES OF T…DOMESTIC VIOLENCE INTERVENTION SERVICES: $8,000 · Human ServicesDOMESTIC VIOLENCE I…ASSISTANCE LEAGUE OF TULSA INC: $5,000 · Human ServicesASSISTANCE LEAGUE O…Family & Childrens Services Inc: $3,000 · Human Services+1 more: $1,000 · Human ServicesKANSAS STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $41,000 · EducationKANSAS STATE U…ALUMNI ASSOCIATION OF KANSAS STATE UNIVERSITY: $5,000 · EducationALUMNI ASSOCIA…PHILLIPS THEOLOGICAL SEMINARY CORPORATION: $2,500 · Education+2 more: $1,625 · EducationHIV Resource Consortium Inc dba Tulsa CARES: $16,000 · HealthTALL TALES RANCH: $5,500 · HealthHealth Outreach Prevention Education Inc: $2,500 · HealthBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC: $2,000 · HealthALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC: $1,000 · HealthLEGAL AID SERVICES OF OKLAHOMA INC: $9,500 · Crime & LegalSOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER INC: $7,500 · Crime & Legal+1 more: $450 · Crime & LegalHUNGER FREE OKLAHOMA INC: $17,000 · Food & NutritionTULSA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $13,315 · PhilanthropyCOLORADO GIVES FOUNDATION: $2,040 · PhilanthropyBORN THIS WAY FOUNDATION: $1,500 · Philanthropy
Other$194,175Human Services$65,500Education$50,125Health$27,000Crime & Legal$17,450Food & Nutrition$17,000Philanthropy$16,855

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetKANSAS STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $41,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetResonance Center for Women Inc: $37,500 over 9y, 0.3% of budgetHUNGER FREE OKLAHOMA INC: $17,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetHIV Resource Consortium Inc dba Tulsa CARES: $16,000 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $13,500 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetTULSA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $13,315 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetYOUTH SERVICES OF TULSA INC: $11,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetTHE CENTER FOR REPRODUCTIVE RIGHTS INC: $10,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetLEGAL AID SERVICES OF OKLAHOMA INC: $9,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetDOMESTIC VIOLENCE INTERVENTION SERVICES: $8,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetSOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER INC: $7,500 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetTALL TALES RANCH: $5,500 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetNATIONAL PARKS CONSERVATION ASSOCIATION: $5,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetALUMNI ASSOCIATION OF KANSAS STATE UNIVERSITY: $5,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetASSISTANCE LEAGUE OF TULSA INC: $5,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetOKLAHOMA POLICY INC: $4,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetFamily & Childrens Services Inc: $3,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetHealth Outreach Prevention Education Inc: $2,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetPHILLIPS THEOLOGICAL SEMINARY CORPORATION: $2,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCOLORADO GIVES FOUNDATION: $2,040 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTULSA DAY CENTER INC: $2,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC: $2,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetTulsa Lawyers for Children Inc: $2,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetNATIONAL CLEARINGHOUSE FOR THE DEFENSE OF BATTERED WOMEN: $2,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetPRESBYTERIAN CHURCH CAMP AND CONFERENCE ASSOCIATION: $1,500 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetBORN THIS WAY FOUNDATION: $1,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetOKLAHOMA CENTER FOR COMMUNITY AND JUSTICE: $1,500 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetBRIDGES TO PROSPERITY INC: $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetEX-STUDENTS' ASSOCIATION OF UT: $1,125 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE PARENT CHILD CTR OF TULSA INC: $1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetNEW HOPE OKLAHOMA INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE CENTER FOR HOUSING SOLUTIONS INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetYWCA TULSA INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCITY YEAR INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetRonald McDonald House Charities of Tulsa: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetAMERICAN INSTITUTE OF MATHEMATICS: $750 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE INTERFAITH ALLIANCE FOUNDATION INC: $750 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTULSA HABITAT FOR HUMANITY INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN ASSOCIATION FOR THE ADVANCEMENT OF SCIENCE: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMEDICAL BENEVOLENCE FOUNDATION: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe Foundation for Tulsa Schools: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMayo Demonstration School PTA: $500 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetOKLAHOMA ACCESS TO JUSTICE FOUNDATION: $450 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetVOCAL PRIDE FOUNDATION DBA THE COUNCIL OAK MENS CHORALE: $300 over 1y, 1.6% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds KANSAS STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Resonance Center for Women Inc ↗
  • Who funds HUNGER FREE OKLAHOMA INC ↗
  • Who funds HIV Resource Consortium Inc dba Tulsa CARES ↗
  • Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC ↗
  • Who funds TULSA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds YOUTH SERVICES OF TULSA INC ↗
  • Who funds THE CENTER FOR REPRODUCTIVE RIGHTS INC ↗
  • Who funds LEGAL AID SERVICES OF OKLAHOMA INC ↗
  • Who funds DOMESTIC VIOLENCE INTERVENTION SERVICES ↗
  • Who funds SOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds TALL TALES RANCH ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL PARKS CONSERVATION ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds ALUMNI ASSOCIATION OF KANSAS STATE UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds ASSISTANCE LEAGUE OF TULSA INC ↗
  • Who funds OKLAHOMA POLICY INC ↗
  • Who funds Family & Childrens Services Inc ↗
  • Who funds Health Outreach Prevention Education Inc ↗
  • Who funds PHILLIPS THEOLOGICAL SEMINARY CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds COLORADO GIVES FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds TULSA DAY CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds BLOOD CANCER UNITED INC ↗
  • Who funds Tulsa Lawyers for Children Inc ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL ALLIANCE TO END HOMELESSNESS ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Anne and Henry Zarrow FoundationOK44× affinity19 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Anne and Henry Zarrow Foundation · One Gas Foundation Inc · George Kaiser Family Foundation · Coretz Family Foundation · Tulsa Community Foundation · Sanford P & Irene F Burnstein Foundation Irene F Burnstein Co-Trustee · Morningcrest Healthcare Foundation · The Sharna and Irvin Frank Foundation · Charles and Lynn Schusterman Family Foundation · Mervin Bovaird Foundation · The Gelvin Foundation · Sarkeys Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Curry Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Curry Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 100%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 11%
  • Hunger Free Oklahoma Inc: 100% of income from government
  • The Center for Housing Solutions Inc: 34% of income from government
  • Domestic Violence Intervention Services: 15% of income from government
  • Legal Aid Services of Oklahoma Inc: 13% of income from government
  • Tulsa Community Foundation: 11% of income from government
  • City Year Inc: 11% of income from government
  • Tulsa Day Center Inc: 9% of income from government
  • Youth Services of Tulsa Inc: 8% of income from government
  • Ywca Tulsa Inc: 3% of income from government
  • Family & Childrens Services Inc: 1% of income from government
  • Tulsa Habitat for Humanity Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
10get no government money at all
8report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 93 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Curry Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph