Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Creighton Narada Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$1.2M
Granted FY2025still arriving
26
Grants FY2025still arriving
5
States reached
$115k
Largest
01What it funds
0190% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2024.

Environment$1.9MArts & Culture$755kYouth Development$535kScience & Tech$360kEducation$280kCrime & Legal$100kHuman Services$80kFood & Nutrition$50kOther$0
02FY2025 · 26 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k1 grant · $5k
  • $10k–50k16 grants · $378k
  • $50k–250k9 grants · $800k
$40,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$17M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Boys & Girls Club of Lynn$115,000
Manchester essex conservation Trust Inc$115,000
Essex County Greenbelt Association$115,000
Peabody Essex Museum Inc$100,000
Maine Coast Heritage Trust$90,000
Trustees of Reservations$85,000
Museum of Science$80,000
Trustees of Boston University$50,000
Maine Initiatives Inc$50,000
Massachusetts Audubon Society Inc$45,000
Museum of Fine Arts$45,000
Vinalhaven Land Trust Inc$45,000
Beverly Bootstraps Community Services Inc$40,000
Appalachian Mountain Club$40,000
Cape Ann Museum Inc$30,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–23, $10k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%NORTHAMPTON SURVIVAL CENTER: $3k → 12%NORTHAMPTON SURVIVAL CENTER: $3k → 12%NORTHAMPTON SURVIVAL CENTER: $3k → 12%NORTHAMPTON SURVIVAL CENTER: $3k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$5.3M · 35 repeat orgs$118k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +8% since the first grant, against 0% for those funded once.

35 repeat relationships: 18 still active in FY2025, 17 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

35
9

Total granted

$5.3M
$63k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+8%
0%

Still filing today

57%
67%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 95% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $55k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
EnvironmentArts & CultureHealthEducationYouth DevelopmentHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • BG
    BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF LYNN INC
    6× · 2020–2025 · $615k · revenue +491%
  • Maine Coast Heritage Trust
    6× · 2020–2025 · $500k · revenue +11%
  • MO
    MUSEUM OF SCIENCE
    6× · 2020–2025 · $430k · revenue +13%

Funded once

  • WH
    WHITE HORSE STEPSTONE
    one grant, 2024 · $25k
  • BH
    BEVERLY HOSPITAL
    one grant, 2020 · $5k
  • RT
    RANK THE VOTE INC
    one grant, 2024 · $5k · revenue 0%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Native Plant Trust Inc

The organization's mission is to conserve and promote new england's native plants to ensure healthy, biologically diverse landscapes.

Environment
2
Boston Architectural College

The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.

—
3
Massachusetts Outdoor Heritage Foundation Inc Attn Susan Sacco
—
4
Wildlands Trust Inc

The wildlands trust works throughout southeastern massachusetts to conserve and permanently protect native habitats, farmland, and lands of high ecologic and scenic value that serve to keep our communities healthy and our residents…

Environment
5
Nantucket Conservation Foundation Inc

The nantucket conservation foundation owns, protects, and stewards over 9,000 acres of land and coastal shoreline, conserves nantucket's rare and significant natural resources, and engages in impactful ecological research to inform…

Environment
6
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.

Education
7
Massachusetts Taxpayers Foundation Inc

Massachusetts taxpayers foundation provides public & private sector decision makers with accurate, timely, unbiased research & constructive solutions that drive public policy in order to strengthen the state's finances & position the…

Public Benefit
8
Sudbury Valley Trustees Inc

Sudbury valley trustees, inc. ("the organization") works to protect natural areas and farmland for wildlife and people in the 36 communities that surround the sudbury, assabet, and concord rivers. the organization cares for some of the…

Environment
9
Massachusetts Land Conservation Trust

Conservation and preservation of land.

Environment
10
Harvard Conservation Trust

To preserve the unique character and natural resources of harvard.

Environment
11
Maine Maritime Museum

To connect people to the past, present, and future of Maine's waterways and their global reach.

Arts & Culture
12
Maine Historical Society

Maine Historical Society, founded in 1822, is a private non-profit whose mission is to preserve and share Maine's story. Based in Portland, we work closely with communities and partners throughout the state, and serve a statewide and…

Arts & Culture
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Trustees of Reservations; the most unlike its peers is Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

33 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 33 of the 52 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
32/33
Grantees still filing
15/33
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Maine Coast Heritage Trust: $500,000 · EnvironmentMaine Coast Heritage TrustMANCHESTER ESSEX CONSERVATION TRUST: $370,000 · EnvironmentMANCHESTER ESSEX CONSERVATION TRUSTTHE TRUSTEES OF RESERVATIONS: $310,000 · EnvironmentTHE TRUSTEES OF RESERVATIONSESSEX COUNTY GREENBELT ASSOCIATION: $215,000 · EnvironmentESSEX COUNTY GREENBELT ASSOCIATIONVINALHAVEN LAND TRUST INC: $195,000 · EnvironmentVINALHAVEN LAND TRUST INCAppalachian Mountain Club: $85,000 · EnvironmentMASSACHUSETTS AUDUBON SOCIETY INC: $80,000 · Environment+3 more: $45,000 · EnvironmentESSEX COUNTY GREENBELT ASSO: $280,000 · OtherESSEX COUNTY GREENBELT ASSOMANCHESTER ESSEX CONSERVATION TRUST- GENERAL & WILDERNESS AREA: $220,000 · OtherMANCHESTER ESSEX CONSERVATION T…TRUSTEES OF RESERVATIONS- GENERAL & MORRAINE FARM: $200,000 · OtherTRUSTEES OF RESERVATIONS- GENER…Individual grant recipient: $155,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient: $105,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientWHEELOCK COLLEGE: $100,000 · OtherWHEELOCK COLLEGEWHEELOCK COLLEGETRUSTEES OF BOSTON UNIVERSITY: $100,000 · OtherWHEELOCK COLLEGETRUSTEES OF BOS…TRUSTEES OF BOSTON UNIVERSITY: $100,000 · OtherTRUSTEES OF BOSTON UNIVERSITY+21 more: $314,000 · Other+21 morePEABODY ESSEX MUSEUM INC: $500,000 · Arts & CulturePEABODY ESSEX MUSEUM INCMUSEUM OF SCIENCE: $430,000 · Arts & CultureMUSEUM OF SCIENCEMUSEUM OF FINE ARTS: $255,000 · Arts & CultureMUSEUM OF FINE ARTSCAPE ANN MUSEUM INC: $120,000 · Arts & CultureCAPE ANN MUSEUM INC+3 more: $67,500 · Arts & CultureBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF LYNN INC: $615,000 · Youth DevelopmentBOYS & GIRLS…MAINE INITIATIVESINC: $150,000 · Crime & LegalBEVERLY BOOTSTRAPS COMMUNITY SERVICES I: $75,000 · Community ImprovementCUTCHINS PROGRAMS FOR CHILDREN & FAMILIES INC: $21,000 · HealthBeverly Hospital Foundation: $10,000 · HealthDana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc: $5,000 · Health
Environment$1,800,000Other$1,574,000Arts & Culture$1,372,500Youth Development$615,000Crime & Legal$150,000Community Improvement$75,000Health$36,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF LYNN INC: $615,000 over 6y, 6.1% of budgetPEABODY ESSEX MUSEUM INC: $500,000 over 6y, 0.5% of budgetMaine Coast Heritage Trust: $500,000 over 6y, 0.4% of budgetMUSEUM OF SCIENCE: $430,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetMANCHESTER ESSEX CONSERVATION TRUST: $370,000 over 4y, 16% of budgetTHE TRUSTEES OF RESERVATIONS: $310,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetMUSEUM OF FINE ARTS: $255,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetESSEX COUNTY GREENBELT ASSOCIATION: $215,000 over 2y, 1.1% of budgetVINALHAVEN LAND TRUST INC: $195,000 over 6y, 7.6% of budgetMAINE INITIATIVESINC: $150,000 over 6y, 1.3% of budgetCAPE ANN MUSEUM INC: $120,000 over 5y, 2.5% of budgetTRUSTEES OF BOSTON UNIVERSITY: $100,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAppalachian Mountain Club: $85,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetMASSACHUSETTS AUDUBON SOCIETY INC: $80,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetBEVERLY BOOTSTRAPS COMMUNITY SERVICES I: $75,000 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetWGBH Educational Foundation: $32,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE OPEN DOOR CAPE ANN FOOD PANTRY INC: $30,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetGLOBAL GREENGRANTS FUND: $25,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetWHITE HORSE STEPSTONE: $25,000 over 1y, 2.6% of budgetCUTCHINS PROGRAMS FOR CHILDREN & FAMILIES INC: $21,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetMASSACHUSETTS FOUNDATION FOR THE HUMANITIES & PUBLIC POLICY INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetCATHLEEN STONE ISLAND OUTWARD BOUND SCHOOL INC: $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF WESTERN MASSACHUSETTS: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNORTHAMPTON SURVIVAL CENTER INC: $10,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetRANK THE VOTE INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetIsland Institute: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetDana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetINSTITUTE FOR POLICY STUDIES: $5,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCOMMUNITY INVOLVED IN SUSTAINING AGRICULTURE INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetCOMMUNITY ACTION PIONEER VALLEY: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF LYNN INC ↗
  • Who funds PEABODY ESSEX MUSEUM INC ↗
  • Who funds Maine Coast Heritage Trust ↗
  • Who funds MUSEUM OF SCIENCE ↗
  • Who funds MANCHESTER ESSEX CONSERVATION TRUST ↗
  • Who funds THE TRUSTEES OF RESERVATIONS ↗
  • Who funds MUSEUM OF FINE ARTS ↗
  • Who funds ESSEX COUNTY GREENBELT ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds VINALHAVEN LAND TRUST INC ↗
  • Who funds MAINE INITIATIVESINC ↗
  • Who funds CAPE ANN MUSEUM INC ↗
  • Who funds WHEELOCK COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds TRUSTEES OF BOSTON UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds Appalachian Mountain Club ↗
  • Who funds MASSACHUSETTS AUDUBON SOCIETY INC ↗
  • Who funds BEVERLY BOOTSTRAPS COMMUNITY SERVICES I ↗
  • Who funds WGBH Educational Foundation ↗
  • Who funds THE OPEN DOOR CAPE ANN FOOD PANTRY INC ↗
  • Who funds GLOBAL GREENGRANTS FUND ↗
  • Who funds WHITE HORSE STEPSTONE ↗
  • Who funds CUTCHINS PROGRAMS FOR CHILDREN & FAMILIES INC ↗
  • Who funds MASSACHUSETTS FOUNDATION FOR THE HUMANITIES & PUBLIC POLICY INC ↗
  • Who funds CLEAN WATER FUND ↗
  • Who funds CATHLEEN STONE ISLAND OUTWARD BOUND SCHOOL INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Boston Foundation IncMA18.3× affinity7 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Boston Foundation Inc · Easthampton Savings Bank Foundation Inc · Community Foundation of Western Massachusetts · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Creighton Narada Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Creighton Narada Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 50%1%5%11%20%funder's share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →median 3%
  • Community Action Pioneer Valley: 62% of income from government
  • Cape Ann Museum Inc: 38% of income from government
  • Community Involved in Sustaining Agriculture Inc: 35% of income from government
  • Trustees of Boston University: 12% of income from government
  • Essex County Greenbelt Association: 8% of income from government
  • Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc: 7% of income from government
  • Peabody Essex Museum Inc: 3% of income from government
  • Northampton Survival Center Inc: 3% of income from government
  • The Trustees of Reservations: 2% of income from government
  • Appalachian Mountain Club: 1% of income from government
  • Massachusetts Audubon Society Inc: 1% of income from government
  • Wgbh Educational Foundation: 1% of income from government
  • Boys & Girls Club of Lynn Inc: 0% of income from government
  • Museum of Science: 0% of income from government
  • Museum of Fine Arts: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
5get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Creighton Narada Foundation?

Find your warmest path to The Creighton Narada Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 52 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Creighton Narada’s filings →

More from the funding graph