Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Crawford Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$545k
Granted FY2025still arriving
49
Grants FY2025still arriving
15
States reached
$250k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$429kInternational$306kReligion$288kRecreation & Sports$55kCommunity Improvement$53kPublic Benefit$46kCivil Rights$44kHuman Services$28kOther$0
02FY2025 · 49 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k43 grants · $60k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $85k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $150k
  • $250k+1 grant · $250k
$1,000
Median grant
15
States reached
$2.3M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
WILLIAM JESSUP UNIVERSITY$250,000
WILLIAM JESSUP UNIVERSITY$150,000
GLOBAL MEDIA OUTREACH$40,000
WILLIAM JESSUP UNIVERSITY$25,000
TEAM EXPANSION MINISTRIES INC$10,000
LIVING WATER INTERNATIONAL$10,000
WORLD VISION$9,000
WYCLIFFE ASSOCIATES INC$6,000
ALLEGRO ORGANIZATIONAL SOLUTIONS INC$5,200
WYCLIFFE BIBLE TRANSLATORS INC$3,000
TRUE THE VOTE INC$2,500
AMYOTROPHIC LATERAL SCLEROSIS ASSN$2,000
NATIONAL CENTER FOR PUBLIC POLICY RESEARCH INC$2,000
PACIFIC JUSTICE INSTITUTE$2,000
NATIONAL RIGHT TO WORK LEGAL DEFENSE & EDUCATION F$2,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $51k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%LIVING WATER INTERNATIONAL: $10k → 8%CHARITY NAVIGATOR: $50 → 7%LIVING WATER INTERNATIONAL: $10k → 8%CHARITY NAVIGATOR: $50 → 7%LIVING WATER INTERNATIONAL: $10k → 8%CHARITY NAVIGATOR: $50 → 7%LIVING WATER INTERNATIONAL: $10k → 8%CHARITY NAVIGATOR: $50 → 7%LIVING WATER INTERNATIONAL: $1k → 8%ADVENT GROUP MINISTRIES INC: $5k → 8%ADVENT GROUP MINISTRIES INC: $5k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

ME
WA
IL
NY
IA
IN
PA
NJ
CA
CO
KY
VA
AZ
TN
DC
HI
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

64%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$838k · 56 repeat orgs$468k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +64% since the first grant, against +18% for those funded once.

56 repeat relationships: 41 still active in FY2025, 15 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

56
11

Total granted

$838k
$39k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+64%
+18%

Still filing today

73%
64%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 20% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $429k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Public BenefitCivil RightsHuman ServicesReligionInternationalArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • GM
    GLOBAL MEDIA OUTREACH
    9× · 2017–2025 · $155k · revenue +24%
  • Mercy Ships International
    5× · 2019–2024 · $125k · revenue +136%
  • CM
    CITYTEAM MINISTRIES
    8× · 2017–2025 · $74k · revenue +50%

Funded once

  • OI
    OMF INTERNATIONAL INC
    one grant, 2022 · $10k
  • BI
    BIGLIFE INTERNATIONAL INCgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $8k · revenue +141%
  • New Jersey Audubon Societygraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $5k · revenue +36%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
American Civil Liberties Union Fund of the District of Columbia

Preservation of civil liberties through litigation and public education.

—
2
Liberty Justice Center

To advance economic and social liberties and a free enterprise society through strategic litigation, training, communication, activism and research. in addition, the center will train law students, lawyers and policy activists in the…

Crime & Legal
3
Open Markets Institute

The open markets institute works to help people relearn how to use competition policy to build stronger democracies, more just and equitable societies, more innovative and sustainable economies, and a more secure and peaceful world.

Education
4
United States Naval Institute

Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.

—
5
American Civil Liberties Union Foundation of Iowa

The foundation works to defend and promote the constitution of the united states, focusing especially on the first, fourth, fifth, sixth, eighth, and 14th amendments. the foundation also works to defend and promote the constitution of the…

Civil Rights
6
American Gas Association

American gas association's (the association) mission is to develop and advocate for informed, innovative, and durable policy that fulfills our nation's energy needs, environmental aspirations and economic potential. we are committed to…

—
7
American Enterprise Institute for Public Policy Research

The american enterprise institute is a community of scholars and supporters committed to expanding liberty, increasing individual opportunity, and strengthening free enterprise. aei pursues these ideals through independent thinking and the…

Social Science
8
Pro Publica Inc

Pro publica is an independent, non-profit, pulitzer prize-winning newsroom that produces investigative journalism in the public interest. our work focuses exclusively on truly important stories. [see continuation on schedule o] we produce…

Arts & Culture
9
International Aids Vaccine Initiative Inc

A nonprofit scientific research organization that develops vaccines and antibodies for hiv, tuberculosis, and emerging infectious diseases.

International
10
Npr Foundation

The npr foundation ("foundation") is organized and operated exclusively for the benefit of its sole supported organization, national public radio, inc. ("npr inc."). the foundation supports npr inc. through various activities such as…

—
11
Atlantic University Inc

Provide post-secondary education of excellence.

Education
12
American Arbitration Association Inc

The american arbitration association ("aaa") is dedicated to effective, efficient and economical methods of dispute resolution through education, technology and solutions-oriented service.

Crime & Legal
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Heritage Foundation; the most unlike its peers is X Boys Preparatory School Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

54 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 54 of the 72 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
10
Early backer (in before they grew)
53/54
Grantees still filing
42/54
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

WILLIAM JESSUP UNIVERSITY: $425,000 · OtherWILLIAM JESSUP UNIVERSITYTEAM EXPANSION MINISTRIES INC: $55,216 · OtherTEAM EXPANSION MINISTRIES INCWYCLIFFE ASSOCIATES INC: $46,000 · OtherWYCLIFFE ASSOCIATES INC+41 more: $198,896 · Other+41 moreGLOBAL MEDIA OUTREACH: $155,000 · ReligionGLOBAL MEDIA OUTREAC…CITYTEAM MINISTRIES: $74,000 · ReligionCITYTEAM MINISTRIESBARNABAS FACTOR: $14,000 · ReligionBARNABAS FACTORNEW GENERATIONS: $9,000 · ReligionMercy Ships International: $125,000 · InternationalMercy Ships Internat…WORLD VISION INC: $60,000 · InternationalWORLD VISION INCALLEGRO ORGANIZATIONAL SOLUTIONS INC: $48,161 · InternationalALLEGRO ORGANIZATION…INTERNATIONAL JUSTICE MISSION: $8,500 · InternationalLiving Water International: $41,000 · Human ServicesADVENT GROUP MINISTRIES INC: $10,000 · Human Services+2 more: $1,600 · Human ServicesTRUE THE VOTE INC: $19,000 · Civil RightsPacific Justice Institute: $15,700 · Civil RightsALLIANCE DEFENDING FREEDOM: $4,700 · Civil RightsINSTITUTE FOR JUSTICE: $4,500 · Civil RightsSOUTHEASTERN LEGAL FOUNDATION INC: $2,400 · Civil Rights+1 more: $1,250 · Civil RightsJUDICIAL WATCH INC: $11,750 · Public BenefitCATO INSTITUTE: $6,000 · Public BenefitTHE HERITAGE FOUNDATION: $4,500 · Public BenefitTAX FOUNDATION: $4,500 · Public BenefitUNITED SERVICE ORGANIZATIONS INC: $1,800 · Public BenefitAMERICAN LEGISLATIVE EXCHANGE COUNCIL: $1,000 · Public Benefit+1 more: $250 · Public BenefitNATIONAL RIGHT TO WORK LEGAL DEFENSE AND EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC: $12,000 · Crime & LegalPacific Legal Foundation: $3,900 · Crime & LegalTHE CENTER FOR AMERICAN LIBERTY: $1,000 · Crime & Legal
Other$725,112Religion$252,000International$241,661Human Services$52,600Civil Rights$47,550Public Benefit$29,800Crime & Legal$16,900

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetWILLIAM JESSUP UNIVERSITY: $425,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetGLOBAL MEDIA OUTREACH: $155,000 over 9y, 0.4% of budgetMercy Ships International: $125,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetCITYTEAM MINISTRIES: $74,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetWORLD VISION INC: $60,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetALLEGRO ORGANIZATIONAL SOLUTIONS INC: $48,161 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetLiving Water International: $41,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetTRUE THE VOTE INC: $19,000 over 9y, 0.3% of budgetPacific Justice Institute: $15,700 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetNATIONAL CENTER FOR PUBLIC POLICY RESEARCH: $15,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetBARNABAS FACTOR: $14,000 over 9y, 2.3% of budgetAgape International Missions: $13,750 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL RIGHT TO WORK LEGAL DEFENSE AND EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC: $12,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetJUDICIAL WATCH INC: $11,750 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetADVENT GROUP MINISTRIES INC: $10,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetCOMPUTER HISTORY MUSEUM: $9,216 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetRAILS TO TRAILS CONSERVANCY: $9,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetNEW GENERATIONS: $9,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetEVERGREEN FREEDOM FOUNDATION: $9,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetINTERNATIONAL JUSTICE MISSION: $8,500 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetKIDS CLUB CONSULTANTS INC: $6,000 over 3y, 1.7% of budgetCATO INSTITUTE: $6,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetCITIZENS AGAINST GOVERNMENT WASTE: $5,750 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetNew Jersey Audubon Society: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetRURAL DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetALLIANCE DEFENDING FREEDOM: $4,700 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetINSTITUTE FOR JUSTICE: $4,500 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetPROJECT VERITAS: $4,500 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetTHE HERITAGE FOUNDATION: $4,500 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetTAX FOUNDATION: $4,500 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetMERCY MULTIPLIED AMERICA INC: $4,400 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetCAPITAL RESEARCH CENTER: $4,200 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetOKIZU FOUNDATION: $4,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetPacific Legal Foundation: $3,900 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetTHE REASON FOUNDATION: $3,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetPRAGER UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $2,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetSOUTHEASTERN LEGAL FOUNDATION INC: $2,400 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetCOMPETITIVE ENTERPRISE INSTITUTE: $2,250 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetKQED INC: $2,190 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetMVW RELIEF FUND INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetEDUCATIONAL MEDIA FOUNDATION: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetALS UNITED MID-ATLANTIC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMYOTROPHIC LATERAL SCLEROSIS ASSN: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED SERVICE ORGANIZATIONS INC: $1,800 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetALPHA CHI RHO EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION INC: $1,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetSTATE POLICY NETWORK: $1,250 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE CENTER FOR AMERICAN LIBERTY: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCharity Navigator: $600 over 9y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds WILLIAM JESSUP UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds GLOBAL MEDIA OUTREACH ↗
  • Who funds Mercy Ships International ↗
  • Who funds CITYTEAM MINISTRIES ↗
  • Who funds WORLD VISION INC ↗
  • Who funds ALLEGRO ORGANIZATIONAL SOLUTIONS INC ↗
  • Who funds Living Water International ↗
  • Who funds TRUE THE VOTE INC ↗
  • Who funds Pacific Justice Institute ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL CENTER FOR PUBLIC POLICY RESEARCH ↗
  • Who funds BARNABAS FACTOR ↗
  • Who funds Agape International Missions ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL RIGHT TO WORK LEGAL DEFENSE AND EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds JUDICIAL WATCH INC ↗
  • Who funds ADVENT GROUP MINISTRIES INC ↗
  • Who funds COMPUTER HISTORY MUSEUM ↗
  • Who funds RAILS TO TRAILS CONSERVANCY ↗
  • Who funds NEW GENERATIONS ↗
  • Who funds EVERGREEN FREEDOM FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds INTERNATIONAL JUSTICE MISSION ↗
  • Who funds BIGLIFE INTERNATIONAL INC ↗
  • Who funds KIDS CLUB CONSULTANTS INC ↗
  • Who funds CATO INSTITUTE ↗
  • Who funds CITIZENS AGAINST GOVERNMENT WASTE ↗
  • Who funds New Jersey Audubon Society ↗
  • Who funds RURAL DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION INC ↗
  • Who funds ALLIANCE DEFENDING FREEDOM ↗
  • Who funds INSTITUTE FOR JUSTICE ↗
  • Who funds PROJECT VERITAS ↗
  • Who funds THE HERITAGE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds TAX FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds MERCY MULTIPLIED AMERICA INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Servant FoundationKS22.2× affinity11 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Servant Foundation · Donors Trust Inc · Bradley Impact Fund Inc · Christian Community Foundation Inc · The Sandra & Lawrence Post Family Foundation · The Snider Foundation · Ge Aerospace Foundation · Renaissance Charitable Foundation Inc · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Shell USA Company Foundation · Eric Javits Family Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Crawford Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Crawford Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 30%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 46%
  • Rural Development Corporation Inc: 46% of income from government
  • New Jersey Audubon Society: 1% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
3get no government money at all
4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Crawford Family Foundation?

Find your warmest path to The Crawford Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 72 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Crawford Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph