Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

The Coto Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$699k
Granted FY2025still arriving
7
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$500k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Animals$858kHealth$720kScience & Tech$563kEducation$499kInternational$105kHuman Services$59kPublic Safety & Disaster$32kRecreation & Sports$28kOther$0
02FY2025 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k1 grant · $8k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $111k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $80k
  • $250k+1 grant · $500k
$35,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
LIFESAVERS INC$500,000
NORTHRIDGE HOSPITAL FOUNDATION$80,000
DISCOVERY SCIENCE CENTER OF LOS ANGELES$45,000
SHELTER HOPE ENTERPRISES INC$35,000
FULFILLMENT FUND$17,000
DISCOVERY SCIENCE CENTER OF ORANGE COUNTY$14,000
SHELTER HOPE ENTERPRISES INC$8,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $130k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%CHALLENGED ATHLETES FOUNDATION: $1k → 11%FULFILLMENT FUND: $34k → 14%FULFILLMENT FUND: $25k → 14%FULFILLMENT FUND: $20k → 14%FULFILLMENT FUND: $17k → 14%FULFILLMENT FUND: $15k → 14%FULFILLMENT FUND: $10k → 14%FULFILLMENT FUND: $8k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

92%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$2.7M · 14 repeat orgs$220k to everyone else

14 repeat relationships — 6 still active in FY2025, 8 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

14
13

Total granted

$2.7M
$220k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+12%
+27%

Still filing today

71%
85%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CultureAnimalsHealthEducationPhilanthropyHuman ServicesOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • LI
    LIFESAVERS INC
    8× · 2017–2025 · $735k · revenue +7%
  • NH
    NORTHRIDGE HOSPITAL FOUNDATION
    8× · 2017–2025 · $535k · revenue +2%
  • DS
    DISCOVERY SCIENCE CENTER OF LOS ANGELES
    9× · 2017–2025 · $532k · revenue +109%

Funded once

  • AF
    ANIMAL FRIENDS OF THE VALLEYS INC
    one grant, 2024 · $50k · revenue +19%
  • CS
    CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY NORTHRIDGE FOUNDATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $50k · revenue +130%
  • SM
    ST MARYS HEALTH WAGON INC
    one grant, 2023 · $47k · revenue 0%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Los Angeles Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals

Spcala is dedicated to the prevention of cruelty to animals through education, law enforcement, intervention and advocacy.

Animals
2
Animal Care Sanctuary

Animal care sanctuary's lifesaving mission as a no kill organization envisions a community that promotes turning compassion into action for companion animals by: 1.) adopting healthy pet companions into loving homes. 2.) promoting the…

Animals
3
Pet Orphans of Southern California

In addition to rescue and adoption, pet orphans provides a wide range of services including education, medical/financial, spay/neuter, and training assistance.

Animals
4
Humane Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals

The primary mission of the humane society is to end animal cruelty, neglect and overpopulation in south carolina.

Animals
5
Community Animal Medicine Project Inc

To substantially reduce animal shelter euthanasia and intake by providing high quality, low cost veterinary services to underserved communities in the los angeles area.

Animals
6
Rancho Coastal Humane Society

See schedule orancho coastal is dedicated to the rescue and shelter of abandoned companion animals. it encourages adoptions into loving homes and provides educational and community outreach programs designed to enhance the human-animal…

Animals
7
Association of California School Administrators

The association serves its members by creating resources that enable california school administrators to develop and apply creative leadership and management skills and in turn, improve the educational process for all students.

8
Santa Barbara Humane Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals

Santa barbara humane operates two campuses located in santa barbara and santa maria providing care for community-owned and homeless animals. both campuses offer affordable high quality veterinary care, compassionate behavior training…

Animals
9
South Central Family Health Center

To improve the quality of life for the diverse communities we serve providing affordable and comprehensive healthcare and education in a welcoming multi-cultural environment.

Health
10
Marin Humane Society

Marin humane transforms lives through exceptional animal care, humane education, and advocacy. every day, marin humane inspires compassion and positive relationships between people and animals.

Animals
11
The California Wildlife Center

The california wildlife center (cwc) takes responsibility for the protection of all native wildlife through rehabilitiation, education and conservation. as the los angeles area's premier wildlife medical care and rehabilitation facility,…

Health
12
Health Care Without Harm

The mission of health care without harm (hcwh) is to transform health care worldwide so that it reduces its environmental footprint, becomes a community anchor for sustainability and a leader in the global movement for environmental health…

Environment

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Antelope Valley Partners for Health and the most unlike its peers is Red Bucket Equine Rescue. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

Your grantees are a median of 22 years old; the field is 14. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number24%0%<5yr15%5%5–10yr20%33%10–20yr17%38%20–35yr11%14%35–55yr13%10%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value24%0%<5yr15%0%5–10yr20%29%10–20yr17%36%20–35yr11%28%35–55yr13%6%55yr+

The field is 24% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 5% lost their exemption, against 14% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
5%
1/22
the rest of the field
14%
26,002/186,956

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

22 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 22 of the 27 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
21/22
Grantees still filing
17/22
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

LIFESAVERS INC — $735,000 · AnimalsLIFESAVERS INC+2 more — $17,000 · AnimalsDISCOVERY SCIENCE CENTER OF LOS ANGELES — $531,800 · Arts & CultureDISCOVERY SCIENCE CENT…DISCOVERY SCIENCE CENTER OF ORANGE COUNTY — $31,000 · Arts & Culture+2 more — $22,500 · Arts & CultureNORTHRIDGE HOSPITAL FOUNDATION — $535,000 · PhilanthropyNORTHRIDGE HOSPITAL F…+1 more — $10,000 · PhilanthropyLOMA LINDA UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION — $290,000 · OtherLOMA LINDA UNIVERSITY …K9 COACH RESCUE REHAB & PLACEMENT — $59,000 · OtherK9 COACH RESCUE REHAB …ANIMAL FRIENDS OF THE VALLEYS INC — $50,000 · OtherANIMAL FRIENDS OF THE …CALIFORNIA STATE HORSEMAN'S ASSOCIATION — $27,272 · OtherCALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY NORTHRIDGE FOUNDATION — $50,000 · OtherCALIFORNIA STATE UNIVE…SHELTER HOPE ENTERPRISES INC D/B/A SHELTER HOPE PET SHOP — $48,000 · OtherSHELTER HOPE ENTERPRIS…+6 more — $43,000 · Other+6 moreChildren's Hospital Los Angeles — $135,000 · HealthST MARYS HEALTH WAGON INC — $47,440 · HealthNATIONAL DISASTER SEARCH DOG FOUNDATION — $30,000 · HealthFULFILLMENT FUND — $129,000 · Human Services+1 more — $1,000 · Human ServicesFINDING FREEDOM THROUGH FRIENDSHIP INC — $105,000 · International
Animals$752,000Arts & Culture$585,300Philanthropy$545,000Other$567,272Health$212,440Human Services$130,000International$105,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetLIFESAVERS INC — $735,000 over 8y, 21% of budgetNORTHRIDGE HOSPITAL FOUNDATION — $535,000 over 8y, 2.0% of budgetDISCOVERY SCIENCE CENTER OF LOS ANGELES — $531,800 over 9y, 2.6% of budgetChildren's Hospital Los Angeles — $135,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetFULFILLMENT FUND — $129,000 over 6y, 1.0% of budgetFINDING FREEDOM THROUGH FRIENDSHIP INC — $105,000 over 7y, 20% of budgetANIMAL FRIENDS OF THE VALLEYS INC — $50,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetCALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY NORTHRIDGE FOUNDATION — $50,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetSHELTER HOPE ENTERPRISES INC D/B/A SHELTER HOPE PET SHOP — $48,000 over 2y, 8.5% of budgetST MARYS HEALTH WAGON INC — $47,440 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetDISCOVERY SCIENCE CENTER OF ORANGE COUNTY — $31,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetNATIONAL DISASTER SEARCH DOG FOUNDATION — $30,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetVILLAGE CHARTER ACADEMY — $15,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetSOL-LA MUSIC ACADEMY INC — $12,500 over 2y, 2.3% of budgetINTERLOCHEN CENTER FOR THE ARTS — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetRED BUCKET EQUINE RESCUE — $10,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetNEW VILLAGE CHARTER SCHOOL INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetTHRIVE GLOBAL PROJECT INC — $10,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetTHE RESCUE ME PET FOUNDATION — $8,000 over 2y, 54% of budgetSANTA PAULA ANIMAL RESCUE CENTER INC — $7,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetANTELOPE VALLEY PARTNERS FOR HEALTH — $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHALLENGED ATHLETES INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Ralph M Parsons FoundationCA13.3× affinity4 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Ralph M Parsons Foundation · Greater Good Charities · Conrad N Hilton Foundation · Sempra Foundation · Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Charities Aid Foundation America · Network for Good · National Philanthropic Trust · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The Coto Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%3%13%28%50%your share of their income ↑0%8%15%22%30%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    9report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–30%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 27 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph