Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

The Costley Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$72k
Granted FY2025still arriving
7
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$15k
Largest
01What you fund
0197% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Human Services$414kYouth Development$186kEducation$48kHousing & Shelter$21kOther$0
02FY2025 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k3 grants · $15k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $57k
$12,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$2.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE$15,000
BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF METRO ATLANTA$15,000
THE WOMENS CENTER OF SOUTHEASTERN MICHIGAN$15,000
JRLA OPERATION GRADUATION$12,000
PEACE NEIGHBORHOOD CENTER$5,000
OZONE HOUSE$5,000
KATE'S CLUB$5,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $330k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 52% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

area typical 13%GUADALUPE CENTER OF IMMOKALEE: $25k → 10%BEARINGS BIKE SHOP: $10k → 13%GUADALUPE CENTER OF IMMOKALEE: $25k → 10%BEARINGS BIKE SHOP: $5k → 13%GUADALUPE CENTER OF IMMOKALEE: $25k → 10%BEARINGS BIKE SHOP: $3k → 13%KATE'S CLUB: $5k → 14%GUADALUPE CENTER OF IMMOKALEE: $20k → 10%KATE'S CLUB: $5k → 14%GUADALUPE CENTER OF IMMOKALEE: $17k → 10%KATE'S CLUB: $5k → 14%GUADALUPE CENTER OF IMMOKALEE: $15k → 10%KATE'S CLUB INC: $5k → 14%GUADALUPE CENTER OF IMMOKALEE: $10k → 10%KATE'S CLUB: $5k → 14%GUADALUPE CENTER OF IMMOKALEE: $5k → 10%OZONE HOUSE: $5k → 14%OZONE HOUSE: $5k → 14%OZONE HOUSE: $3k → 14%OZONE HOUSE: $3k → 14%OZONE HOUSE: $3k → 14%OZONE HOUSE: $2k → 14%OZONE HOUSE: $1k → 14%THE WOMENS CENTER OF SOUTHEASTERN MICHIGAN: $15k → 14%THE WOMENS CENTER OF SOUTHEASTERN MICHIGAN: $13k → 14%THE WOMENS CENTER OF SOUTHEASTERN MICHIGAN: $12k → 14%THE WOMENS CENTER OF SOUTHEASTERN MICHIGAN: $11k → 14%THE WOMENS CENTER OF SOUTHEASTERN MICHIGAN: $10k → 14%THE WOMENS CENTER OF SOUTHEASTERN MICHIGAN: $10k → 14%THE WOMENS CENTER OF SOUTHEASTERN MICHIGAN: $10k → 14%THE WOMENS CENTER OF SOUTHEASTERN MICHIGAN: $8k → 14%PEACE NEIGHBORHOOD CENTER: $5k → 14%PEACE NEIGHBORHOOD CENTER: $5k → 14%THE WOMENS CENTER OF SOUTHEASTERN MICHIGAN: $5k → 14%PEACE NEIGHBORHOOD CENTER: $5k → 14%PEACE NEIGHBORHOOD CENTER: $5k → 14%PEACE NEIGHBORHOOD CENTER: $3k → 14%PEACE NEIGHBORHOOD CENTER: $3k → 14%PEACE NEIGHBORHOOD CENTER: $3k → 14%PEACE NEIGHBORHOOD CENTER: $3k → 14%PEACE NEIGHBORHOOD CENTER: $3k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$687k · 12 repeat orgs$18k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +230% since the first grant, against +0% for the ones you funded once.

12 repeat relationships — 7 still active in FY2025, 5 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

12
2

Total granted

$687k
$18k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+230%
+0%

Still filing today

67%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesEducationYouth DevelopmentOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • GC
    Guadalupe Center Inc
    8× · 2017–2024 · $142k · revenue +145%
  • TW
    THE WOMEN'S CENTER OF SOUTHEASTERN MICHIGAN
    9× · 2017–2025 · $93k · revenue +230%
  • TB
    THE BOYCE L ANSLEY SCHOOL INC
    3× · 2019–2024 · $48k · revenue +693%

Funded once

  • OG
    OPERATION GRADUATION
    one grant, 2017 · $15k · revenue +0%
  • GIRLS GROUP
    one grant, 2024 · $3k · revenue 0%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Boys & Girls Clubs of Boston Inc

Boys & girls clubs of boston (bgcb) stands as a transformative force in boston and chelsea, where high expectations unlock greatness. we believe that every young person who walks through our doors carries limitless potential. through our…

Youth Development
2
King Street Center Inc

King street center empowers youth to explore their talents and find their voice through learning, play, and opportunity.

Human Services
3
Boys and Girls Clubs of Silicon Valley

To inspire and empower all young people, especially those who need us most, to realize their full potential as productive, responsible and caring adults.

Youth Development
4
Ywca South Florida Inc

Provide services and programs for women, teens, children, and families of miami-dade county in focusing our mission of eliminating racism, empowering women, and promoting peace, justice, freedom and dignity for all.

Human Services
5
Boys and Girls Clubs of Metro Denver Inc

To provide club members with a safe, supportive, fun, and enriching environment that inspires and empowers them to achieve their greatest potential. bgcmd accomplishes this mission with a foundational social- emotional learning approach…

6
Youthbuild Dc Public Charter School Inc

Youthbuild pcs seeks to transform the lives of disconnected youth by offering a program, in english and spanish, that combines rigorous academic instruction with vocational training, life and employability skills- building, and community…

Education
7
Grenville Baker Boys and Girls Club Inc

See schedule oto inspire and enable all young people to realize their potential as productive, responsible and caring citizens and community leaders of tomorrow. the club has been at the forefront of youth development, working with young…

Youth Development
8
Boys & Girls Clubs of Miami Inc

To provide services and programs for children.

Youth Development
9
Boys & Girls Clubs of Lee County

To enable all young people, especially those who need us the most, to reach their full potential as productive, caring, responsible citizens.

Youth Development
10
Girls Incorporated of Greater Indianapolis

Girls inc.'s mission is to inspire all girls to be strong, smart, and bold. in partnership with schools and community organizations, we focus on the development of the whole girl. she learns to value herself, take risks, and discover and…

Youth Development
11
Ywca Tri-County Area

Ywca tri-county area is dedicated to eliminating racism, empowering women and promoting peace, justice, freedom and dignity for all.

Human Services
12
The Young Men's Christian Association of Birmingham Inc

The young men's christian association of birmingham, inc. is a charitable organization that opens its doors to all women, men, families, teenagers, and children regardless of their ability to pay. the mission of the ymca is to put…

Human Services

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Kate's Club Inc and the most unlike its peers is Bearings Bike Shop Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 14 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/10
Grantees still filing
7/10
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Guadalupe Center Inc — $141,500 · Human ServicesGuadalupe Center IncTHE WOMEN'S CENTER OF SOUTHEASTERN MICHIGAN — $93,000 · Human ServicesTHE WOMEN'S CENTER OF SOUTHEASTERN MICHIGANPeace Neighborhood Center — $32,500 · Human ServicesPeace Neighborhood CenterKATE'S CLUB INC — $25,000 · Human ServicesKATE'S CLUB INCOZONE HOUSE INC — $20,500 · Human ServicesOZONE HOUSE INCBEARINGS BIKE SHOP INC — $17,500 · Human ServicesRONALD MCDONALD HOUSE — $121,500 · OtherRONALD MCDONALD HOUSEJRLA OPERATION GRADUATION — $59,500 · OtherJRLA OPERATION GRADUATIONIndividual grant recipient — $37,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF ATLANTA — $31,000 · OtherBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF ATLANTABoys & Girls Clubs of Metro Atlanta Inc — $60,000 · Youth DevelopmentBoys & Gir…GIRLS GROUP — $2,500 · Youth DevelopmentTHE BOYCE L ANSLEY SCHOOL INC — $47,500 · EducationTHE BOYCE …OPERATION GRADUATION — $15,000 · EducationOPERATION …
Human Services$330,000Other$249,000Youth Development$62,500Education$62,500

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetGuadalupe Center Inc — $141,500 over 8y, 0.3% of budgetTHE WOMEN'S CENTER OF SOUTHEASTERN MICHIGAN — $93,000 over 9y, 1.3% of budgetBoys & Girls Clubs of Metro Atlanta Inc — $60,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetTHE BOYCE L ANSLEY SCHOOL INC — $47,500 over 3y, 5.2% of budgetPeace Neighborhood Center — $32,500 over 9y, 0.8% of budgetKATE'S CLUB INC — $25,000 over 5y, 0.8% of budgetOZONE HOUSE INC — $20,500 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetBEARINGS BIKE SHOP INC — $17,500 over 3y, 2.1% of budgetOPERATION GRADUATION — $15,000 over 1y, 3.4% of budgetGIRLS GROUP — $2,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Guadalupe Center Inc
  • Who funds THE WOMEN'S CENTER OF SOUTHEASTERN MICHIGAN
  • Who funds Boys & Girls Clubs of Metro Atlanta Inc
  • Who funds THE BOYCE L ANSLEY SCHOOL INC
  • Who funds Peace Neighborhood Center
  • Who funds KATE'S CLUB INC
  • Who funds OZONE HOUSE INC
  • Who funds BEARINGS BIKE SHOP INC
  • Who funds OPERATION GRADUATION
  • Who funds GIRLS GROUP

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Jenkins FoundationMI13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Jenkins Foundation · Thrift Shop Association of Ann Arbor · James a and Faith Knight Foundation · Kiwanis Club of Ann Arbor Foundation Inc · United Way of Washtenaw County · Ann Arbor Area Community Foundation · Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund · National Philanthropic Trust · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The Costley Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%8%15%22%30%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 0%
  • Guadalupe Center Inc0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–30%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Costley Family Foundation?

Find your warmest path to The Costley Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 14 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph