Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

The Coss Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$6k
Granted FY2025still arriving
10
Grants FY2025still arriving
6
States reached
$587
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Food & Nutrition$18kAnimals$15kHousing & Shelter$10kCrime & Legal$8kReligion$5kEducation$3kPublic Safety & Disaster$3kHuman Services$2kOther$0
02FY2025 · 10 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$587
Median grant
6
States reached
$99k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CATHOLIC CHARITIES USA$587
NEIGHBORHOOD HOUSE SHELF$587
SECOND HARVEST HEARTLAND$587
SMITHSONIAN NATIONAL ZOOLOGICAL PARK$587
UNIVERSITY OF MN FOUNDATION$587
SAINT THOMAS ACADEMY$587
PEPIN COUNTY FOOD PANTRY$587
CHILDRENS THEATRE COMPANY$587
BULLIS SCHOOL$587
HERBERGER THEATRE$586
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY18–24, $6k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 75% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 7%NEIGHBORS INC: $550 → 6%CANNON FALLS FOOD SHELF: $300 → 9%NEIGHBORS INC: $500 → 6%NEIGHBORS INC: $500 → 6%LISTENING HOUSE OF ST PAUL INC: $1k → 14%LISTENING HOUSE OF ST PAUL INC: $600 → 14%LISTENING HOUSE OF ST PAUL INC: $550 → 14%RIVER FALLS SUNSHINE FUND: $243 → 9%LISTENING HOUSE OF ST PAUL INC: $525 → 14%LISTENING HOUSE OF ST PAUL INC: $500 → 14%LISTENING HOUSE OF ST PAUL INC: $500 → 14%LISTENING HOUSE OF ST PAUL INC: $500 → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

ND
MN
WI
MA
VA
MD
AZ
SC

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

79%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$52k · 20 repeat orgs$14k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +58% since the first grant, against +25% for the ones you funded once.

20 repeat relationships — 3 still active in FY2025, 17 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

20
7

Total granted

$52k
$10k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+58%
+25%

Still filing today

55%
43%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 30% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $4k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesFood & NutritionAnimalsEducationRecreation & SportsHousing & ShelterOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • UG
    UNION GOSPEL MISSION INC
    7× · 2018–2024 · $4k · revenue +220%
  • RF
    River Falls Community Food Pantry
    7× · 2018–2024 · $4k · revenue +77%
  • LH
    LISTENING HOUSE OF ST PAUL INC
    7× · 2018–2024 · $4k · revenue +663%

Funded once

  • SC
    ST CROIX COUNTY SHERIFF
    one grant, 2017 · $7k
  • WO
    WOMEN OF NATIONS SHELTER
    one grant, 2020 · $500
  • RA
    RED APPLE CENTER INC
    one grant, 2020 · $500 · revenue +25%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Feeding Furry Friends

Our mission is to bring in donated pet food and pet supplies and hand them out to other nonprofits including: animal rescues, animal sanctuaries, other animal efforts, and food shelves. We take in donations from all over the USA and unload…

Animals
2
Lonsdale Area Food Shelf Inc

Provide emergency food relief for the families in the Lonsdale MN region .

Food & Nutrition
3
Mercy House Minneapolis
Human Services
4
Second Harvest Northland

End hunger together in NE Minnesota and NW Wisconsin.

5
Heavens Table Food Shelf

Provide food for hungry individuals in martin county, mn

Food & Nutrition
6
Community Emergency Service Inc

Community emergency service (ces) is one of the largest food distribution nonprofits serving one of the poorest communities in the twin cities. our mission is to turn hunger into hope through three principal programs: (i) food market, (ii)…

Human Services
7
Noahs Hope Animal Rescue Inc

Noahs Hope Animal Rescue accepts unwanted and street animals; restores health and then places the animals in homes around the metro Siouxland area.

Animals
8
North Scott Food Pantry

The North Scott Food Pantry provides food for people in need. Clients receive enough food for about one week and are allowed to get food every 28 days. There were 721 visits to our food pantry in 2025.

Food & Nutrition
9
Hubbard County Food Shelf

Receive and dispense food to needy clients

10
Hilltop Regional Kitchen

Serve fresh and frozen meals to seniors, disabled and homebound individuals in central MN. Over 60,000 meals served annually to over 400 individuals.

Food & Nutrition
11
A Touch of the Father's Love Inc

The mission of a touch of the fathers love food pantry and ministry is to: ~alleviate food insecurity in the twin counties area through the distribution of healthy and nutritious food while instilling hope. ~treat all staff, partner…

Human Services
12
Headwaters Animal Shelter

Our Mission: To improve the quality of life for companion animals. We are dedicated to accomplishing our mission by: Aiding in the return of lost or stolen companion animals to their rightful owners, and securing suitable homes for…

Animals

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Listening House of St Paul Inc and the most unlike its peers is Children's Theatre Company and School. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

19 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 19 of the 35 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
7
Early backer (in before they grew)
18/19
Grantees still filing
12/19
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

ST CROIX COUNTY SHERIFF — $7,260 · OtherST CROIX COUNTY SHERIFFUNION GOSPEL MISSION INC — $4,375 · OtherUNION GOSPEL MISSION INCNEIGHBORHOOD HOUSE SHELF — $3,162 · OtherNEIGHBORHOOD HOUSE SHELFIndividual grant recipient — $2,800 · OtherIndividual grant recipientSOCIETY OF ST VINCENT DE PAUL — $2,575 · OtherSOCIETY OF ST VINCENT DE PAULDOROTHY DAY CENTER — $2,200 · OtherDOROTHY DAY CENTERIndividual grant recipient — $1,700 · OtherIndividual grant recipient — $1,550 · OtherLUCKY PAWS MIDWEST INC — $1,306 · OtherGREGORY'S GIFTS OF HOPE — $1,300 · Other+10 more — $6,259 · Other+10 moreNo Dog Left Behind — $3,722 · AnimalsNo Dog Left BehindLAST HOPE INC — $3,675 · AnimalsLAST HOPE INCDunn County Humane Society Inc — $3,675 · AnimalsDunn County Humane …River Falls Community Food Pantry — $4,325 · Food & NutritionRiver Falls Comm…SECOND HARVEST HEARTLAND — $3,162 · Food & NutritionSECOND HARVEST H…PEPIN COUNTY FOOD PANTRY INC — $2,162 · Food & NutritionPEPIN COUNTY FOO…LISTENING HOUSE OF ST PAUL INC — $4,175 · Human ServicesLISTENING …NEIGHBORS INC — $1,550 · Human ServicesNEIGHBORS …CANNON FALLS FOOD SHELF INC — $300 · Human ServicesRIVER FALLS SUNSHINE FUND INC — $243 · Human ServicesOUR NEIGHBORS PLACE INC — $2,306 · Housing & ShelterBULLIS SCHOOL — $587 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA FOUNDATION — $587 · EducationRED APPLE CENTER INC — $500 · HealthMAYO CLINIC — $500 · Health
Other$34,487Animals$11,072Food & Nutrition$9,649Human Services$6,268Housing & Shelter$2,306Education$1,174Health$1,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetUNION GOSPEL MISSION INC — $4,375 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetRiver Falls Community Food Pantry — $4,325 over 7y, 0.3% of budgetLISTENING HOUSE OF ST PAUL INC — $4,175 over 7y, 0.2% of budgetNo Dog Left Behind — $3,722 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetLAST HOPE INC — $3,675 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetDunn County Humane Society Inc — $3,675 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetSECOND HARVEST HEARTLAND — $3,162 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetOUR NEIGHBORS PLACE INC — $2,306 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetPEPIN COUNTY FOOD PANTRY INC — $2,162 over 4y, 0.9% of budgetNEIGHBORS INC — $1,550 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetRIVER FALLS YOUTH HOCKEY ASSOCIATION INC — $800 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetBULLIS SCHOOL — $587 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetChildren's Theatre Company and School — $587 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA FOUNDATION — $587 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetRED APPLE CENTER INC — $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMAYO CLINIC — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCANNON FALLS FOOD SHELF INC — $300 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetRIVER FALLS SUNSHINE FUND INC — $243 over 1y, 0.4% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds UNION GOSPEL MISSION INC
  • Who funds River Falls Community Food Pantry
  • Who funds LISTENING HOUSE OF ST PAUL INC
  • Who funds No Dog Left Behind
  • Who funds LAST HOPE INC
  • Who funds Dunn County Humane Society Inc
  • Who funds SECOND HARVEST HEARTLAND
  • Who funds OUR NEIGHBORS PLACE INC
  • Who funds PEPIN COUNTY FOOD PANTRY INC
  • Who funds NEIGHBORS INC
  • Who funds LUCKY PAWS MIDWEST INC
  • Who funds RIVER FALLS YOUTH HOCKEY ASSOCIATION INC
  • Who funds BULLIS SCHOOL
  • Who funds Children's Theatre Company and School
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA FOUNDATION
  • Who funds RED APPLE CENTER INC
  • Who funds MAYO CLINIC
  • Who funds CANNON FALLS FOOD SHELF INC
  • Who funds RIVER FALLS SUNSHINE FUND INC

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Xcel Energy FoundationMN18.2× affinity7 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Xcel Energy Foundation · Mightycause Charitable Foundation · Fred C and Katherine B Andersen Foundation · Charities Aid Foundation America · Otto Bremer Trust · Land O'Lakes Foundation · The Richard M Schulze Family Foundation · Edward Jones Foundation · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · American Endowment Foundation · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The Coss Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 35 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph