Skip to content

· Private foundation

The-Cord Of Three-Foundation Charitable Trust

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$50k
Granted FY2025still arriving
13
Grants FY2025still arriving
7
States reached
$24k
Largest
01What it funds
0198% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2025.

Religion$178kEducation$80kHuman Services$43kHealth$14kInternational$7kCivil Rights$1kOther$0
02FY2025 · 13 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k12 grants · $26k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $24k
$2,000
Median grant
7
States reached
$54k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Hopewell Church$24,000
Asbury College$5,000
Houghton College$5,000
Salvation Army$3,000
Cru-Family Life$2,040
Global Training Network$2,000
Chester County Connect Care$2,000
University of Richmond$2,000
Disciplemakers$2,000
Peacemaker's Center$1,000
World Vision$840
Gateway Church$500
Alzheimer's Assoc$500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–25, $11k) land where the poverty rate runs at 6%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%Chester County Connect Care: $3k → 6%Chester County Connect Care: $2k → 6%Chester County Women's Services: $2k → 6%Chester County Connect Care: $2k → 6%Chester County Women's Services: $1k → 6%Chester County Women's Services: $1k → 6%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
NY
PA
CA
KY
VA
AZ
AR
DC
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$314k · 17 repeat orgs$5k to everyone else

17 repeat relationships: 11 still active in FY2025, 6 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

17
5

Total granted

$314k
$5k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+15%
+50%

Still filing today

47%
20%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 99% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $500 went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationReligionHuman ServicesHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AC
    ASBURY COLLEGE
    7× · 2019–2025 · $35k · revenue +11%
  • HU
    HOUGHTON UNIVERSITY
    7× · 2019–2025 · $30k · revenue +12%
  • GLOBAL TRAINING NETWORK INC
    6× · 2019–2025 · $14k · revenue +71%

Funded once

  • BL
    BRICK LANE COMMUNITY CHURCH
    one grant, 2019 · $2k
  • TP
    The Peacemakers Center
    one grant, 2019 · $1k
  • EF
    EverlifeFoundation for Rare Diseases
    one grant, 2022 · $500
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Mid-Atlantic Christian University

Mid-atlantic christian university is an undergraduate institution of christian higher learning whose mission is to impact the world by transforming ordinary people into extraordinary christian leaders. students are taught to think…

Education
2
Greenville College

Greenville college d/b/a greenville university empowers students for lives of character and service through a transforming christ-centered education in the liberal arts, sciences, and professional studies.

Education
3
Dallas International University

As a christian university, we provide education and research opportunities preparing global leaders to partner with local communities.

Education
4
Houston Christian University

The mission of houston christian university is to provide a learning experience that instills in students a passion for academic, spiritual, and professional excellence as a result of our central confession, "jesus christ is lord."

—
5
George Fox University

George fox university, a christ centered community, prepares students spiritually, academically, and professionally to think with clarity, act with integrity, and serve with passion.

Education
6
Midwives College of Utah

Educate and train midwives to provide safe, professional, affordable and personal maternity and general health care.

Education
7
Westminster College

The mission of westminster college is to help students develop competencies, commitments, and characteristics which have distinguished human beings at their best. see continuation on schedule o.the liberal arts tradition is the foundation…

Education
8
Fielding Graduate University

We provide exemplary interdisciplinary programs for a community of scholar-practitioners within a distributed learning model grounded in student-driven inquiry and leading to enhanced knowledge.

—
9
Evangel University

Evangel is a comprehensive christian university that is committed to excellence in educating and equipping students to become spirit empowered servants of god who will impact the church and society globally.

Education
10
Geneva College

Geneva college is a christ-centered academic community that provides a comprehensive education to equip students for faithful and fruitful service to god and neighbor.

Education
11
Regent University

Regent University serves as a center of Christian thought and action to provide excellent education through a Biblical perspective and global context equipping Christian leaders to change the world.

—
12
Asbury Theological Seminary

Asbury Theological Seminary is a community called to prepare theologically educated, sanctified, Spirit-filled men and women to evangelize and to spread scriptural holiness throughout the world through the love of Jesus Christ, in the…

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is World Vision Inc; the most unlike its peers is Chester County Connect Care. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 24 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/10
Grantees still filing
10/10
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

MISSION COMMUNITY CHURCH: $75,450 · OtherMISSION COMMUNITY CHURCHHopewell Church: $72,000 · OtherHopewell ChurchSalvation Army: $21,000 · OtherSalvation ArmyHearts 4 Orphans: $11,320 · OtherDISCIPLE MAKERS INC: $8,000 · Other+12 more: $25,155 · Other+12 moreASBURY COLLEGE: $35,000 · EducationASBURY COLLEGEHOUGHTON UNIVERSITY: $30,000 · EducationHOUGHTON UNIVERSITYUNIVERSITY OF RICHMOND: $14,000 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF RICHMONDGLOBAL TRAINING NETWORK INC: $14,000 · ReligionCHESTER COUNTY CONNECT CARE: $10,500 · Human ServicesWORLD VISION INC: $6,720 · InternationalPEACEMAKER CENTER INC: $2,500 · Health
Other$212,925Education$79,000Religion$14,000Human Services$10,500International$6,720Health$2,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetASBURY COLLEGE: $35,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetHOUGHTON UNIVERSITY: $30,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetGLOBAL TRAINING NETWORK INC: $14,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF RICHMOND: $14,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetCHESTER COUNTY CONNECT CARE: $10,500 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetWORLD VISION INC: $6,720 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetDISCIPLEMAKERS INC: $5,800 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetPEACEMAKER CENTER INC: $2,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetBABY2BABY: $1,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMENTAL HEALTH AMERICA INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds ASBURY COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds HOUGHTON UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds GLOBAL TRAINING NETWORK INC ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF RICHMOND ↗
  • Who funds CHESTER COUNTY CONNECT CARE ↗
  • Who funds WORLD VISION INC ↗
  • Who funds DISCIPLEMAKERS INC ↗
  • Who funds PEACEMAKER CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds BABY2BABY ↗
  • Who funds MENTAL HEALTH AMERICA INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Natl Christian Charitable Fdn IncGA10.1× affinity6 shared granteesties to 6 of 6Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Endowment Foundation · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The-Cord Of Three-Foundation Charitable Trust funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The-Cord Of Three-Foundation Charitable Trust. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to The-Cord Of Three-Foundation Charitable Trust?

    Find your warmest path to The-Cord Of Three-Foundation Charitable Trust through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 24 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on The-Cord Of Three-Foundation’s filings →

    More from the funding graph