Skip to content
The Cooper Voccola Family Foundation Inc at a glance

· Private foundation

The Cooper Voccola Family Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$110k
Granted FY2025still arriving
3
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$50k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2021 to 2025.

Health$741kAnimals$593kHuman Services$235kEducation$50kRecreation & Sports$16kInternational$13kPhilanthropy$8kYouth Development$7kOther$0
02FY2025 · 3 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k1 grant · $10k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $100k
$50,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$1.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MOUNT SINAI$50,000
MCSPCA$50,000
HACKENSACK MERIDIAN HEALTH FOUNDATI$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–24, $46k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 43% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

area typical 11%ENCORE COMMUNITY SERVICES: $10k → 17%BLUE STAR SERVICE DOGS: $250 → 5%BAGS OF FAITH: $5k → 24%FREEDOM SERVICE DOGS: $250 → 8%ENCORE COMMUNITY SERVICES: $5k → 17%JASON'S DREAMS FOR KIDS: $10k → 6%JASON'S DREAMS KIDS: $5k → 6%JASON'S DREAMS FOR KIDS: $4k → 6%JASON'S DREAMS FOR KIDS: $3k → 6%JASON'S DREAMS KIDS: $3k → 6%JASON'S DREAMS FOR KIDS: $1k → 6%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MI
NY
OR
PA
NJ
CT
CA
CO
MO
VA
MD
DE
AZ
KS
TN
DC
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

64%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.1M · 10 repeat orgs$595k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +18% since the first grant, against +15% for those funded once.

10 repeat relationships: 1 still active in FY2025, 9 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

10
40

Total granted

$1.1M
$535k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+18%
+15%

Still filing today

70%
48%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 45% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $60k went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’21’22’23’24’25
AnimalsHuman ServicesHealthYouth DevelopmentEmploymentPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CR
    COVENTRY RESERVE
    2× · 2022–2023 · $200k · revenue +1%
  • MC
    MONMOUTH COUNTY SPCA
    3× · 2021–2023 · $117k · revenue +18%
  • PW
    Pets With Disabilities Inc
    3× · 2021–2024 · $45k · revenue +12%

Funded once

  • ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INCgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $100k · revenue +74%
  • SF
    SPCA FUR BALL DONATION
    one grant, 2022 · $100k
  • MS
    MT SINAI
    one grant, 2024 · $50k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The American Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals

The aspca's mission, as stated by founder henry bergh in 1866, is "to provide effective means for the prevention of cruelty to animals throughout the united states." the aspca was founded on the belief that animals are entitled to kind and…

Animals
2
Hope for China Dogs Rescue

At Hope for China Dogs, we are committed to combating the cruel and inhumane practice of the dog meat trade in China. We believe that every dog deserves to live a life free from pain and suffering, and we are dedicated to rescuing and…

Animals
3
Pet Rescue Miami Inc
Animals
4
Canine Estates Inc
Animals
5
Their Lives Matter

Dog rescue and care nurturing finding a home

Animals
6
Blue Waters Dog Rescue

We are a non-profit organization dedicated to helping animals in need. Our focus is on rescuing and rehabilitating animals. We provide the full curriculum of care for each dog rescued, This includes: shelter, food, spaying & neutering,…

Animals
7
Saving Great Animals

Saving Great Animals rescues, rehabilitates, and re-homes dogs with an ethical and respectful approach of care, regardless of breed, health, or behavior. We strive to provide an excellent experience for our fosters, volunteers, and…

Animals
8
Zions Mission Animal Rescue Inc

Zions Mission Animal Rescue is a NYC based 501c3 non-profit animal rescue specializing in dogs. Our mission is to rescue rehabilitate train and find loving homes for as many abused abandoned neglected and unwanted animals as possible. We…

Animals
9
Jet Wag Animal Rescue Inc

Our mission is to move adoptable dogs and cats primarily from heavily-burdened areas to loving homes. We work with trusted partners throughout the country and around the world and facilitate vet care, transport, and adoptions to help…

Animals
10
Tri County Humane Society

Tri-county animal rescue is a no-kill, nonprofit animal shelter working to prevent the killing of over 573,000 unwanted pets in broward, miami-dade, and palm beach counties. tri-county has no boundaries; we go all over the u.s. whenever we…

Animals
11
J-Lo's Animal Rescue & Sanctuary in

Animal care and rescue

Animals
12
Animal Dominion Rescue

Animal Dominion Rescue is a non-profit organization dedicated to rescuing cats and dogs worldwide, ensuring they find permanent, loving homes. The organization emphasizes direct support to rescuers on the ground, promoting animal welfare,…

Animals
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Hooves & Paws Animal Rescue Inc; the most unlike its peers is The Jillian Fund. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

26 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 26 of the 52 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
26/26
Grantees still filing
17/26
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

RIVERVIEW MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION: $430,000 · OtherRIVERVIEW MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATIONMCSPCA: $175,000 · OtherMCSPCASPCA FUR BALL DONATION: $100,000 · OtherSPCA FUR BALL DONATIONMT SINAI: $50,000 · OtherMOUNT SINAI: $50,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $50,000 · OtherMIAMI ANIMAL RESCUE HOSPITAL: $40,000 · OtherMSPCA: $35,000 · Other+23 more: $97,199 · Other+23 moreCOVENTRY RESERVE: $200,000 · EmploymentCOVENTRY RESE…MONMOUTH COUNTY SPCA: $117,000 · AnimalsMONMOUTH COU…Pets With Disabilities Inc: $45,000 · AnimalsPets With Di…MIAMI ANIMAL RESCUE INC: $12,725 · AnimalsMIAMI ANIMAL…+7 more: $7,000 · AnimalsST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $100,000 · HealthST JUDE CH…MOUNT SINAI MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION: $50,000 · HealthMOUNT SINA…+1 more: $250 · HealthAMERICA FIRST POLICY INSTITUTE INC: $50,000 · EducationJASONS DREAMS FOR KIDS INC: $25,600 · Human ServicesENCORE COMMUNITY SERVICES: $15,000 · Human ServicesBAGS OF FAITH INC: $5,000 · Human Services+2 more: $500 · Human ServicesFELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETES: $20,000 · Youth Development
Other$1,027,199Employment$200,000Animals$181,725Health$150,250Education$50,000Human Services$46,100Youth Development$20,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCOVENTRY RESERVE: $200,000 over 2y, 13% of budgetMONMOUTH COUNTY SPCA: $117,000 over 3y, 1.0% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $100,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICA FIRST POLICY INSTITUTE INC: $50,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMOUNT SINAI MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION: $50,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetPets With Disabilities Inc: $45,000 over 3y, 4.1% of budgetJASONS DREAMS FOR KIDS INC: $25,600 over 4y, 8.4% of budgetFELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETES: $20,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetENCORE COMMUNITY SERVICES: $15,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetMIAMI ANIMAL RESCUE INC: $12,725 over 2y, 2.1% of budgetTHE JILLIAN FUND: $10,000 over 1y, 3.0% of budgetVOLUNTEER FLORIDA FOUNDATION INC: $7,860 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetZOO MIAMI FOUNDATION INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBAGS OF FAITH INC: $5,000 over 1y, 3.0% of budgetSave The Children Federation Inc: $2,589 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMONMOUTH COUNCIL INC BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA: $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSaving the Survivors: $750 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetLITTLE LONGEARS MINI DONKEY RESCUE INC: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBABY RHINO RESCUE: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHumane World for Animals Inc: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLUNCH BREAK INC: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWHITE WOLF SANCTUARY: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHooves & Paws Animal Rescue Inc: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFREEDOM SERVICE DOGS INC: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe Susan G Komen Breast Cancer Foundation Inc: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBLUE STAR SERVICE DOGS INC: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds COVENTRY RESERVE ↗
  • Who funds MONMOUTH COUNTY SPCA ↗
  • Who funds ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC ↗
  • Who funds AMERICA FIRST POLICY INSTITUTE INC ↗
  • Who funds MOUNT SINAI MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Pets With Disabilities Inc ↗
  • Who funds JASONS DREAMS FOR KIDS INC ↗
  • Who funds FELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETES ↗
  • Who funds ENCORE COMMUNITY SERVICES ↗
  • Who funds MIAMI ANIMAL RESCUE INC ↗
  • Who funds THE JILLIAN FUND ↗
  • Who funds VOLUNTEER FLORIDA FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds ZOO MIAMI FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds BAGS OF FAITH INC ↗
  • Who funds Save The Children Federation Inc ↗
  • Who funds MONMOUTH COUNCIL INC BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA ↗
  • Who funds Saving the Survivors ↗
  • Who funds LITTLE LONGEARS MINI DONKEY RESCUE INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Surendra and Karen Gu…The Bank of America C…The Pfizer Foundation…Network for GoodPaypal Charitable Giv…American Endowment Fo…Morgan Stanley Global…National Philanthropi…Vanguard Charitable E…American Online Givin…Fidelity Investments …Donor Advised Charita…
Surendra and Karen Gupta Arc FoundationMO15.7× affinity5 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Surendra and Karen Gupta Arc Foundation · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · Network for Good · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund · American Endowment Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Cooper Voccola Family Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Cooper Voccola Family Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 70%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →median 4%
  • Save the Children Federation Inc: 30% of income from government
  • Lunch Break Inc: 4% of income from government
  • Volunteer Florida Foundation Inc: 2% of income from government
  • Zoo Miami Foundation Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
7get no government money at all
3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 52 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Cooper Voccola Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home