Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Conway Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$16k
Granted FY2025still arriving
3
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$6k
Largest
01What it funds
0195% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Education$331kReligion$126kHuman Services$109kFood & Nutrition$51kCommunity Improvement$20kArts & Culture$18kEmployment$7kHealth$6kOther$0
02FY2025 · 3 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$5,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$495k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
URBAN COMMUNITY SCHOOL$5,500
RE-SOURCE CLEVELAND$5,000
ST MALACHI PARISH$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $49k) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 14%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 14%RE-SOURCE CLEVELAND: $5k → 17%EDNA HOUSE: $2k → 17%EDNA HOUSE: $2k → 17%EDNA HOUSE: $1k → 17%EDNA HOUSE: $1k → 17%REFUGEE RESPONSE: $10k → 17%REFUGEE RESPONSE: $3k → 17%REFUGEE RESPONSE: $3k → 17%THE CENTERS FOR FAMILIES & CHILDREN: $9k → 17%THE CENTERS FOR FAMILIES & CHILDREN: $8k → 17%THE CENTERS FOR FAMILIES & CHILDREN: $3k → 17%YMCA OF GREATER CLEVELAND: $2k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 93% of The Conway Family Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 89% of the giving stays in OH; by stated purpose, 7%.

The Conway Family Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

93%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$658k · 18 repeat orgs$51k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +24% since the first grant, against +17% for those funded once.

18 repeat relationships: 3 still active in FY2025, 15 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

18
13

Total granted

$658k
$51k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+24%
+17%

Still filing today

50%
62%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesEducationArts & CultureCommunity ImprovementReligionEmploymentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • UC
    URBAN COMMUNITY SCHOOL
    9× · 2017–2025 · $62k · revenue +140%
  • RC
    RESOURCE CLEVELAND
    4× · 2018–2025 · $22k · revenue +488%
  • FC
    FOREST CITY FOOD COLLECTIVE
    2× · 2023–2024 · $17k · revenue +24%

Funded once

  • LC
    LAKE COUNTY COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $20k · revenue +107%
  • TC
    THE CLEVELAND INSTITUTE OF ARTgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $10k · revenue +32%
  • NC
    NORTH COAST URBAN FARMS LLC
    one grant, 2020 · $5k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Literary Cleveland

Literary Cleveland assists writers and readers at all stages of development, promotes new and existing literature of the highest quality, and advances Northeast Ohio as a vital center of diverse voices and visions.

Education
2
Cleveland Social Venture Partners

Collaborate Cleveland invests in local changemakers serving women and advancing gender justice in Cleveland while advocating for the long-term change of policies and practices that have historically disadvantaged women.

Philanthropy
3
Cleveland Public Market Corporation

Cleveland public market corporations mission is to preserve the city's public market tradition while making the local food system more accessible, equitable, and diverse.

Community Improvement
4
Digitalc

Empower the people of greater cleveland to achieve success through technology, innovation and connected community.

Community Improvement
5
Cleveland Development Foundation

Developing and improving Cleveland Ohio's civic visions.

Community Improvement
6
College for Creative Studies

The college for creative studies nurtures the creativity that is vital to the enrichment of modern culture. the college educates visual artists and designers, knowledgeable in varied fields, who will be leaders in creative professions that…

Education
7
Cleveland Public Theatre Inc

To raise consciousness and nurture compassion through ground-breaking performances and life-changing educational programs

Arts & Culture
8
Global Cleveland

Global cleveland is dedicated to growing northeast ohio's economy by welcoming and connecting international people to opportunities and fostering a more inviting community for those seeking a place to call home.

Human Services
9
The Land Cle

The Land is a local news startup that reports on Clevelands neighborhoods and inner ring suburbs. We deliver in-depth stories that foster accountability, inform the community, and inspire people to take action.

Arts & Culture
10
Cincinnati Waldorf School

The Cincinnati Waldorf School educates the unfolding capacities of children by engaging the creative imagination of the mind, the spirit of the heart, and the skillful use of the hands. The community actively participates in creating an…

—
11
Cleveland Mediation Center

Our mission is to promote a just and peaceful community by honoring all people, building their capacity to act, and facilitating opportunities for them to engage in conflict constructively. We continue to fulfill our mission by…

Crime & Legal
12
Engage Cleveland Inc

Our mission is to attract, engage and retain emerging diverse talent to Greater Cleveland.

Community Improvement
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Urban Community School; the most unlike its peers is Brite Cleveland. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

17 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 17 of the 31 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
17/17
Grantees still filing
9/17
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

MAGNIFICAT HIGH SCHOOL: $145,644 · OtherMAGNIFICAT HIGH SCHOOLSOCIETY OF ST VINCENT DE PAUL: $71,000 · OtherSOCIETY OF ST VINCENT DE PAULURBAN COMMUNITY SCHOOL: $62,000 · OtherURBAN COMMUNITY SCHOOLTHE LITTLE BROTHERS AND SISTERS OF THE EUCHARIST: $51,000 · OtherTHE LITTLE BROTHERS AND SISTERS OF THE EUCHARISTPARTNERSHIP SCHOOLS - NEW YORK: $38,300 · OtherPARTNERSHIP SCHOOLS - NEW YORKIndividual grant recipient: $29,850 · OtherIndividual grant recipientST MALACHI PARISH: $27,000 · OtherST MALACHI PARISHJESUIT RETREAT HOUSE OF CLEVELAND JESUIT RETREAT: $26,500 · OtherJESUIT RETREAT HOUSE OF CLEVELAND JESUIT RETREATIndividual grant recipient: $17,500 · Other+7 more: $25,320 · OtherSaint Martin de Porres High School: $84,900 · EducationSaint Martin de…THE CLEVELAND INSTITUTE OF ART: $10,000 · EducationTHE CLEVELAND I…+1 more: $1,000 · EducationRESOURCE CLEVELAND: $21,600 · Human ServicesThe Centers for Families and Children: $19,800 · Human ServicesEDNA HOUSE FOR WOMEN INC: $6,000 · Human ServicesYOUNG MENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF CLEVELAND: $2,000 · Human ServicesLAKE COUNTY COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORP: $20,000 · Community ImprovementFOREST CITY FOOD COLLECTIVE: $17,093 · Community ImprovementCOMMON WEALTH INC: $5,000 · Community ImprovementSlow Money Institute Inc: $12,500 · ReligionTalespinner Childrens Theatre Inc: $7,000 · Arts & CultureCENTER FOR ACTION AND CONTEMPLATION: $500 · Arts & CultureBrite Cleveland: $500 · Arts & CultureESPERANZA THREADS INC: $7,000 · Employment
Other$494,114Education$95,900Human Services$49,400Community Improvement$42,093Religion$12,500Arts & Culture$8,000Employment$7,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSaint Martin de Porres High School: $84,900 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetURBAN COMMUNITY SCHOOL: $62,000 over 9y, 0.2% of budgetRESOURCE CLEVELAND: $21,600 over 4y, 0.8% of budgetLAKE COUNTY COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORP: $20,000 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetThe Centers for Families and Children: $19,800 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetFOREST CITY FOOD COLLECTIVE: $17,093 over 2y, 2.5% of budgetSlow Money Institute Inc: $12,500 over 2y, 1.5% of budgetTHE CLEVELAND INSTITUTE OF ART: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTalespinner Childrens Theatre Inc: $7,000 over 4y, 2.1% of budgetESPERANZA THREADS INC: $7,000 over 5y, 1.3% of budgetEDNA HOUSE FOR WOMEN INC: $6,000 over 4y, 0.7% of budgetCOMMON WEALTH INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetYOUNG MENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF CLEVELAND: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNOTRE DAME COLLEGE: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCENTER FOR ACTION AND CONTEMPLATION: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBrite Cleveland: $500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetPUBLIC COMMUNICATORS INC: $320 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Saint Martin de Porres High School ↗
  • Who funds URBAN COMMUNITY SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds RESOURCE CLEVELAND ↗
  • Who funds LAKE COUNTY COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORP ↗
  • Who funds The Centers for Families and Children ↗
  • Who funds FOREST CITY FOOD COLLECTIVE ↗
  • Who funds Slow Money Institute Inc ↗
  • Who funds THE CLEVELAND INSTITUTE OF ART ↗
  • Who funds Talespinner Childrens Theatre Inc ↗
  • Who funds ESPERANZA THREADS INC ↗
  • Who funds EDNA HOUSE FOR WOMEN INC ↗
  • Who funds COMMON WEALTH INC ↗
  • Who funds YOUNG MENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF CLEVELAND ↗
  • Who funds NOTRE DAME COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds CENTER FOR ACTION AND CONTEMPLATION ↗
  • Who funds Brite Cleveland ↗
  • Who funds PUBLIC COMMUNICATORS INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Cleveland FoundationOH20.8× affinity8 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Cleveland Foundation · The Char and Chuck Fowler Family Foundation · The George Gund Foundation · Samuel H & Maria Miller Foundation · Giant Eagle Foundation · Community West Foundation · The Lozick Family Foundation · Charities Aid Foundation America · The Laub Foundation · Three Arches Foundation · E S Prentiss Foundation-Ir · The Helen F & Louis Stolier Family Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Conway Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Conway Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    9report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to The Conway Family Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to The Conway Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 31 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Conway Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph