Skip to content
The Concepcion Family Foundation at a glance

· Private foundation

The Concepcion Family Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$8k
Granted FY2024still arriving
2
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$5k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2024.

Health$16kPublic Safety & Disaster$16kPhilanthropy$15kInternational$14kFood & Nutrition$14kArts & Culture$10kHuman Services$5kYouth Development$4kOther$0
02FY2024 · 2 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$5,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$219k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
AMERICAN NATIONAL RED CROSS$5,000
CLAY ART CENTER INC$2,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–24, $9k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 41% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

area typical 9%AMERICAN NATIONAL RED CROSS: $5k → 8%FRIENDS OF THE WORLD FOOD PROGRAM INC: $2k → 14%PORT CHESTER CARVER CENTER INC: $2k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
IL
NY
KY
VA
MD
NC
DC
HI
LA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 6% of The Concepcion Family Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address.

The Concepcion Family Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 4.3% directed abroad (not shown)
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

44%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$40k · 5 repeat orgs$49k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +64% since the first grant, against +8% for those funded once.

5 repeat relationships: 1 still active in FY2024, 4 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

5
21

Total granted

$40k
$44k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+64%
+8%

Still filing today

100%
76%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 33% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $5k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24
InternationalPhilanthropyHuman ServicesHealthPublic Safety & DisasterYouth DevelopmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • EF
    ENDOMETRIOSIS FOUNDATION OF AMERICA INC
    4× · 2020–2023 · $15k · revenue +79%
  • CA
    CLAY ART CENTER INC
    4× · 2021–2024 · $10k · revenue +44%
  • UNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF
    3× · 2021–2023 · $9k · revenue +64%

Funded once

  • FA
    FOOD ALLERGY RESEARCH & EDUCATION INC
    one grant, 2023 · $7k · revenue -4%
  • MU
    MAUI UNITED WAYgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $5k · revenue +188%
  • CF
    CENTER FOR DISASTER PHILANTHROPY INC
    one grant, 2020 · $5k · revenue -22%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Project Drawdown

Project drawdown's mission is to drive meaningful climate action by advancing science-based solutions and strategies. project drawdown's work is focused on three pillars: science - advancing science-based climate solutions and strategies;…

Education
2
Global Alliance for Improved Nutrition

The mission of the global alliance for improved nutrition (gain) is to improve the consumption of healthier diets for all, especially the most vulnerable, by improving the availability, affordability, desirability, and sustainability of…

Food & Nutrition
3
United States Pharmacopeial Convention

Usp's mission is to improve global health through public standards and related programs that help ensure the quality, safety, and benefit of medicines and foods.

Health
4
Sustainable Fisheries Partnership Foundation

To engage and catalyze global seafood supply chains in rebuilding depleted fish stocks and reducing the environmental impacts of fishing and fish farming.

Animals
5
Management Sciences for Health Inc

(msh) saves lives and improves the health of the world's poorest (see schedule o) and most vulnerable people by closing the gap between knowledge and action in public health.

International
6
United Way Worldwide

To improve lives by mobilizing caring power of communities around the world to advance common good.

Philanthropy
7
United Way of Greater Philadelphia and Southern New Jersey

United way's mission is to end intergenerational poverty in our region by harnessing, leveraging and strategically investing the collective power of donors, advocates and volunteers, to help individuals and families break the cycle of…

Philanthropy
8
Actionaid Usa

Actionaid is an international network building a just, equitable, and sustainable world in solidarity with communities on the frontlines of poverty and injustice. actionaid usa is the u.s. branch of actionaid international, which works in…

Social Science
9
West Side Center for Community Life

To pursue anti-hunger initiatives through the west side campaign against hunger (wscah) program whose mission is to alleviate hunger by ensuring that all new yorkers have access with dignity to a choice of healthy food and supportive…

Youth Development
10
The Union of Concerned Scientists Inc

The union of concerned scientists puts rigorous, independent science into action, developing solutions and advocating for a healthy, safe, and just future.

International
11
World Relief Corp of National Association of Evangelicals

To boldly engage the world's greatest crises in partnership with the church.

International
12
Childfund International Usa

Childfund's mission is to help deprived, excluded and vulnerable children have the capacity to become young adults, parents and leaders who bring lasting and positive change to their communities, and to promote societies whose individuals…

International
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Friends of the World Food Program Inc; the most unlike its peers is Clay Art Center Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

23 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 23 of the 28 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
23/23
Grantees still filing
17/23
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ENDOMETRIOSIS FOUNDATION OF AMERICA INC: $14,500 · PhilanthropyENDOMETRIOSIS FOUNDATION OF …MAUI UNITED WAY: $5,000 · PhilanthropyMAUI UNITED WAYUNITED WAY OF KENTUCKY INC: $2,500 · PhilanthropyUNITED WAY OF KENTUCKY INCUNITED WAY OF SOUTHEAST LOUISIANA: $2,000 · PhilanthropyUNITED WAY OF SOUTHEAST LOUI…COLLIER COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC: $5,000 · OtherCOLLIER COMMUNITY FOUNDATION I…FEEDING WESTCHESTER INC: $3,000 · OtherFEEDING WESTCHESTER INCAMERICAN RED CROSS: $2,500 · OtherAMERICAN RED CROSSCARITAS OF AUSTIN: $2,000 · OtherCARITAS OF AUSTINAMERICAN RED CROSS - SOUTHEAST LOUISIANA CHAPTER: $1,500 · OtherAMERICAN RED CROSS - SOUTHEAST…MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC - DOCTORS WITHOUT: $1,500 · OtherMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA I…THE SALVATION ARMY: $1,500 · OtherTHE SALVATION ARMYTHE SALVATION ARMY - PORT CHESTER CHAPTER: $1,000 · OtherBOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF NEW ROCHELLE INC: $3,500 · OtherBOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF NEW ROC…FEEDING TEXAS: $2,000 · OtherFEEDING TEXASSOUL RYEDERS INC: $1,500 · OtherSOUL RYEDERS INC+2 more: $450 · OtherUNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF: $8,500 · InternationalUNITED STATES FU…MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $2,500 · InternationalMEDECINS SANS FR…PATH: $1,000 · InternationalPATHTHE HOPE FOUNDATION USA: $1,000 · InternationalTHE HOPE FOUNDAT…COOPERATIVE FOR ASSISTANCE AND RELIEF EVERYWHERE INC: $1,000 · InternationalCOOPERATIVE FOR …CLAY ART CENTER INC: $10,000 · Arts & CultureCLAY ART CEN…American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $5,000 · Human ServicesAmerican N…PORT CHESTER CARVER CENTER INC: $2,000 · Human ServicesPORT CHEST…FRIENDS OF THE WORLD FOOD PROGRAM INC: $1,500 · Human ServicesFRIENDS OF…FOOD ALLERGY RESEARCH & EDUCATION INC: $7,000 · Food & NutritionCENTER FOR DISASTER PHILANTHROPY INC: $5,000 · Public Safety & Disaster
Philanthropy$24,000Other$25,450International$14,000Arts & Culture$10,000Human Services$8,500Food & Nutrition$7,000Public Safety & Disaster$5,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetENDOMETRIOSIS FOUNDATION OF AMERICA INC: $14,500 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetCLAY ART CENTER INC: $10,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetUNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF: $8,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetFOOD ALLERGY RESEARCH & EDUCATION INC: $7,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCOLLIER COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMAUI UNITED WAY: $5,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetCENTER FOR DISASTER PHILANTHROPY INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF NEW ROCHELLE INC: $3,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetFEEDING WESTCHESTER INC: $3,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED WAY OF KENTUCKY INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPORT CHESTER CARVER CENTER INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetUNITED WAY OF SOUTHEAST LOUISIANA: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFEEDING TEXAS: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCARITAS OF AUSTIN: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE WORLD FOOD PROGRAM INC: $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPATH: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE HOPE FOUNDATION USA: $1,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetCOOPERATIVE FOR ASSISTANCE AND RELIEF EVERYWHERE INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Raymond James Charita…The Pfizer Foundation…The Bank of America C…Vanguard Charitable E…Network for GoodNational Philanthropi…American Online Givin…Donor Advised Charita…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
Raymond James Charitable Endowment FundFL11.4× affinity4 shared granteesties to 9 of 9Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Network for Good · National Philanthropic Trust · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Concepcion Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Concepcion Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%8%15%22%30%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–30%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 28 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Concepcion Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home