Skip to content
Plinth

· Community foundation

Community Fdtn of Jackson County

To promote philanthropy in jackson county by being a community-focused organization dedicated to providing funds to enhance the quality of life across jackson county.

$975k
Granted FY2024still arriving
29
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$139k
Largest
01What you fund
01

What you funded, over time

By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).

A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 74% of COMMUNITY FDTN OF JACKSON COUNTY’s grantee dollars fall outside its nine largest cause areas, whether because the recipient carries no IRS cause code or because its cause sits in the long tail. A chart would be mostly one residual band and misrepresent the portfolio.

02FY2024 · 29 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 29 grants below total $638,708 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $974,612 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $335,904 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k11 grants · $80k
  • $10k–50k15 grants · $245k
  • $50k–250k3 grants · $314k
$11,811
Median grant
2
States reached
$26M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CHILD CARE NETWORK INC$138,765
Individual grant recipient$123,429
BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF SEYMOUR$51,507
SCHNECK MEDICAL CENTER$29,000
ANCHOR HOUSE INC$20,904
GIRLS INC OF JACKSON COUNTY$20,425
COLOMBUS LEARNING CENTER MANAGEMENT CORP$20,000
TRINITY LUTHERAN HIGH SCHOOL$17,595
JACKSON COUNTY UNITED WAY$17,245
TRINITY LUTHERAN CHURCH$16,776
Individual grant recipient$15,000
IMMANUEL LUTHERAN CHURCH$15,000
FIRST PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH$14,747
JACKSON COUNTY EDUCATIONAL COALITION$14,714
COMMUNITY PROVISIONS INC$11,811
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY19–24, $479k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 7%LEADER DOGS FOR THE BLIND: $8k → 8%DEVELOPMENTAL SERVICES INC: $20k → 13%LEADER DOGS FOR THE BLIND: $8k → 8%LEADER DOGS FOR THE BLIND: $8k → 8%LEADER DOGS FOR THE BLIND: $7k → 8%LEADER DOGS FOR THE BLIND: $7k → 8%LEADER DOGS FOR THE BLIND: $6k → 8%CHILD CARE NETWORK INC: $154k → 11%CHILD CARE NETWORK INC: $139k → 11%CHILD CARE NETWORK INC: $62k → 11%CHILD CARE NETWORK INC: $37k → 11%THE ARC OF JACKSON COUNTY: $15k → 11%CHILD CARE NETWORK INC: $6k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

56%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$2.1M · 36 repeat orgs$1.6M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +49% since the first grant, against 0% for the ones you funded once.

36 repeat relationships — 18 still active in FY2024, 18 since wound down; 11 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

36
40

Total granted

$2.1M
$1.4M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+49%
0%

Still filing today

42%
23%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 60% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $255k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesEducationPhilanthropyPublic Safety & DisasterYouth DevelopmentCommunity ImprovementOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CC
    CHILD CARE NETWORK INC
    5× · 2020–2024 · $399k · revenue +95%
  • BG
    BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF SEYMOUR INC
    6× · 2019–2024 · $272k · revenue +190%
  • AH
    Anchor House Inc
    5× · 2020–2024 · $128k · revenue +49%

Funded once

  • RC
    ROYALTY COMPANIES OF INDIANA INC
    one grant, 2021 · $753k
  • RC
    ROYALTY COMPANIES OF INDIANA INC
    one grant, 2022 · $180k
  • SJ
    SAINT JOHNS LUTHERAN CHURCH
    one grant, 2023 · $67k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Jay County Development Corporation

Encourage business to originate, expand current facilities, or relocate to areas within jay county, indiana, in order to expand job opportunities of the residents of jay county, indiana

2
Jackson County Chamber of Commerce

To be a leading driver and advocate for community and economic development in jackson county.

3
Leadership Indianapolis Inc

Educate, Inspire, Connect and Mobilize Community Leaders to serve and strengthen greater Indianapolis.

Public Benefit
4
Indiana Statewide Independent Living Council Inc

To empower its peers with disabilities to lead and control their own lives.

Human Services
5
Independent Insurance Agents of Indiana

To enhance the competitive position and fulfill business requirements of independent agents and brokers, advocating buyer interest, and continually striving to be the premier trade association.

6
Indiana Agribusiness Council Inc

An agribusiness network advocate, representing members' interests within all levels of government and keeping members informed of the latest industry trends and news.

7
Indiana University Health Jay Inc

Lead the transformation of healthcare through quality, innovation & education, and make Indiana one of the nation's healthiest states.

Health
8
Jackson Community Ambulance

The mission of jackson community ambulance is to provide high-quality out-of-hospital care and transportation services to the communities we serve.

Public Safety & Disaster
9
Girls Inc of Jackson Co Indiana Inc

Provide educational and recreational programs for youth of jackson county

10
Perry County Development Corp

Promote development in Perry County, Indiana

11
Johnson County Community Foundation Inc

To enhance the quality of life for all citizens of johnson county, indiana, now and for generations to come by building community endowments, addressing needs through grantmaking, including scholarships, and providing leadership on key…

Philanthropy
12
Jackson County Community Services Consortium

Enhance delivery of quality, integrated, accessible services

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Community Fdtn of Jackson County and the most unlike its peers is Mental Health America of Jackson Co. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyIndependent K-12 SchoolsWomen & Girls Leadership De…Christian Missionary Organi…Domestic Violence ServicesCommunity FoundationsAnimal Rescue and ShelterUnited Way AffiliatesFood Banks and PantriesCommunity FoundationsYouth Development Centers
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 41 years old; the field is 24. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number17%5%<5yr10%5%5–10yr20%10%10–20yr14%18%20–35yr16%28%35–55yr23%35%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value17%1%<5yr10%2%5–10yr20%3%10–20yr14%6%20–35yr16%45%35–55yr23%44%55yr+

The field is 17% startups (under 5 years old) — 5% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 4% lost their exemption, against 9% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
4%2/56
the rest of the field
9%
58/659

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

29 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 29 of the 88 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
28/29
Grantees still filing
16/29
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

ROYALTY COMPANIES OF INDIANA INC — $752,671 · OtherROYALTY COMPANIES OF INDIANA INCBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF SEYMOUR INC — $271,525 · OtherBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF SEYMOUR INCROYALTY COMPANIES OF INDIANA INC — $180,230 · OtherROYALTY COMPANIES OF INDIANA INCJACKSON COUNTY AUDITOR — $171,400 · OtherJACKSON COUNTY AUDITORAnchor House Inc — $127,523 · OtherIndividual grant recipient — $123,429 · Other+66 more — $1,274,025 · Other+66 moreCHILD CARE NETWORK INC — $398,836 · Human ServicesCHILD CARE NET…LEADER DOGS FOR THE BLIND FOUNDATION — $23,053 · Human ServicesLEADER DOGS FOR THE BLIND — $21,360 · Human ServicesDEVELOPMENTAL SERVICES INC — $20,332 · Human Services+1 more — $15,000 · Human ServicesTHE JACKSON COUNTY UNITED WAY INC — $104,603 · PhilanthropyCOMMUNITY FDTN OF JACKSON COUNTY — $86,615 · Philanthropy+1 more — $6,001 · PhilanthropySOUTH CENTRAL LUTHERAN ASSOCIATION FOR SECONDARY EDUCATION INC — $50,151 · EducationIndiana University Foundation — $39,262 · EducationDePauw University — $26,381 · EducationCOLUMBUS LEARNING CENTER MANAGEMENT CORP D/B/A COMMUNITY EDUCATION COALITION — $20,000 · EducationJACKSON COUNTY EDUCATION COALITION — $14,714 · EducationGIRLS INCORPORATED OF GREATER INDIANAPOLIS — $62,229 · Youth DevelopmentSCHNECK MEDICAL CENTER GUILD — $29,000 · HealthJACKSON COUNTY INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION — $22,220 · Community Improvement
Other$2,900,803Human Services$478,581Philanthropy$197,219Education$150,508Youth Development$62,229Health$29,000Community Improvement$22,220

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetCHILD CARE NETWORK INC — $398,836 over 5y, 12% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF SEYMOUR INC — $271,525 over 6y, 5.6% of budgetAnchor House Inc — $127,523 over 5y, 3.1% of budgetTHE JACKSON COUNTY UNITED WAY INC — $104,603 over 5y, 3.8% of budgetCOMMUNITY FDTN OF JACKSON COUNTY — $86,615 over 2y, 3.2% of budgetHUMAN SERVICES INC — $84,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetTHE IMMANUEL LUTHERAN CHURCH FOUNDATION OF SEYMOUR INDIANA INC — $72,457 over 3y, 10% of budgetGIRLS INCORPORATED OF GREATER INDIANAPOLIS — $62,229 over 4y, 1.2% of budgetSOUTH CENTRAL LUTHERAN ASSOCIATION FOR SECONDARY EDUCATION INC — $50,151 over 3y, 0.8% of budgetIndiana University Foundation — $39,262 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetGLEANERS FOOD BANK OF INDIANA INC — $32,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetSCHNECK MEDICAL CENTER GUILD — $29,000 over 1y, 31% of budgetDePauw University — $26,381 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetLEADER DOGS FOR THE BLIND FOUNDATION — $23,053 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetJACKSON COUNTY INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION — $22,220 over 3y, 1.3% of budgetLEADER DOGS FOR THE BLIND — $21,360 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCOLUMBUS LEARNING CENTER MANAGEMENT CORP D/B/A COMMUNITY EDUCATION COALITION — $20,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetCommunity Provisions of Jackson County — $18,748 over 2y, 13% of budgetTHE ARC OF JACKSON COUNTY INC — $15,000 over 1y, 14% of budgetJACKSON COUNTY EDUCATION COALITION — $14,714 over 1y, 2.4% of budgetSouthern Indiana Center for the Arts Inc — $13,469 over 1y, 18% of budgetFORT VALLONIA DAYS ASSOCCIATION INC — $10,244 over 1y, 4.8% of budgetPASTORAL LEADERSHIP INSTITUTE — $10,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetCOMMUNITY AGENCY BUILDING CORP INC — $6,001 over 1y, 7.4% of budgetHamilton Township Volunteer Fire Department — $6,000 over 1y, 2.1% of budgetCOLUMBUS REGIONAL SHELTER FOR VICTIMS OF DOMESTIC VIOLENCE — $5,500 over 1y, 0.2% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds CHILD CARE NETWORK INC
  • Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF SEYMOUR INC
  • Who funds Anchor House Inc
  • Who funds THE JACKSON COUNTY UNITED WAY INC
  • Who funds COMMUNITY FDTN OF JACKSON COUNTY
  • Who funds HUMAN SERVICES INC
  • Who funds THE IMMANUEL LUTHERAN CHURCH FOUNDATION OF SEYMOUR INDIANA INC
  • Who funds GIRLS INCORPORATED OF GREATER INDIANAPOLIS
  • Who funds SOUTH CENTRAL LUTHERAN ASSOCIATION FOR SECONDARY EDUCATION INC
  • Who funds Indiana University Foundation
  • Who funds GLEANERS FOOD BANK OF INDIANA INC
  • Who funds SCHNECK MEDICAL CENTER GUILD
  • Who funds DePauw University
  • Who funds LEADER DOGS FOR THE BLIND FOUNDATION
  • Who funds JACKSON COUNTY INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION
  • Who funds LEADER DOGS FOR THE BLIND
  • Who funds DEVELOPMENTAL SERVICES INC
  • Who funds COLUMBUS LEARNING CENTER MANAGEMENT CORP D/B/A COMMUNITY EDUCATION COALITION
  • Who funds Community Provisions of Jackson County

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Jackson County United Way IncIN17.9× affinity6 shared granteesties to 10 of 10Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Jackson County United Way Inc · United Way of Bartholomew County Inc · Centra Foundation Inc · Central Indiana Community Foundation Inc · Land O'Lakes Foundation · Round Room Gives Inc · Early Learning Indiana Inc · Duke Energy Foundation · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Community Fdtn of Jackson County funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%3%10%23%40%your share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    10report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Community Fdtn of Jackson County?

    Find your warmest path to Community Fdtn of Jackson County through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 88 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph