Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

The Jackson County United Way Inc

Jackson county united way assesses needs, secures resources and strategically invests those resources to create lasting, measurable change in the areas of education, health and financial stability for all people in jackson county.

$305k
Granted FY2024still arriving
6
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$80k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172024.

Youth Development$1.6MPublic Safety & Disaster$722kHuman Services$656kFood & Nutrition$136kHealth$58kPublic Benefit$52kEducation$49k
02FY2024 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 6 grants below total $284,000 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $304,936 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $20,936 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k1 grant · $7k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $72k
  • $50k–250k3 grants · $205k
$55,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$1.2M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ANCHOR HOUSE$80,000
GIRLS INC$70,000
CHILD CARE NETWORK$55,000
BOYS & GIRLS CLUB$40,000
TURNING POINT DOMESTIC VIOLENCE SERVICES$32,000
THE ARC OF JACKSON COUNTY$7,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $550k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 31% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $89k → 14%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $33k → 14%SU CASA: $13k → 13%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $27k → 14%SU CASA: $8k → 13%CHILD CARE NETWORK: $85k → 11%CHILD CARE NETWORK: $55k → 11%CHILD CARE NETWORK: $55k → 11%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $53k → 11%CHILD CARE NETWORK: $45k → 11%CHILD CARE NETWORK: $34k → 11%CHILD CARE NETWORK: $15k → 11%CHILD CARE NETWORK: $13k → 11%THE ARC OF JACKSON COUNTY: $10k → 11%THE ARC OF JACKSON COUNTY: $8k → 11%THE ARC OF JACKSON COUNTY: $7k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

95%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$3.1M · 15 repeat orgs$156k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +60% since the first grant, against +20% for the ones you funded once.

15 repeat relationships — 6 still active in FY2024, 9 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

15
10

Total granted

$3.1M
$156k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+60%
+20%

Still filing today

93%
10%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesYouth DevelopmentEducationOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • BG
    BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF SEYMOUR INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $538k · revenue +211%
  • AH
    Anchor House Inc
    8× · 2017–2024 · $410k · revenue +80%
  • CC
    CHILD CARE NETWORK INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $303k · revenue +176%

Funded once

  • AR
    AMERICAN RED CROSS
    one grant, 2019 · $56k
  • HS
    HEAD START
    one grant, 2023 · $28k
  • RJ
    READ JACKSON COUNTY
    one grant, 2019 · $16k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Jackson County United Way Inc

Jackson county united way assesses needs, secures resources and strategically invests those resources to create lasting, measurable change in the areas of education, health and financial stability for all people in jackson county.

Philanthropy
2
Boys & Girls Club of Jackson Co

Youth services

Youth Development
3
Boys and Girls Clubs of Columbus Inc

To enable young people to reach their full potential

Youth Development
4
Girl Scouts Heart of Michigan

Girl scouting builds girls of courage, confidence and character, who make the world a better place

Youth Development
5
Boy Scouts of America 571 Circle Ten Council

The purpose of circle ten council is to promote and extend scouting in northeast texas and southeast oklahoma. our goal is to provide all youth and adults with programs, training, and awards that build character, teach participatory…

Youth Development
6
Boys and Girls Clubs of Indianapolis Inc

Bgci believes that every young person deserves to live a life filled with hope and opportunity. because we care about our young people, we provide a safe, educational, and positive atmosphere where they can prosper and reach their full…

7
Girl Scouts Heart of the South

Girl scouting builds girls of courage, confidence, and character, who make the world a better place.

Youth Development
8
Boys & Girls Clubs of Harrison County Inc

To enable all young people, especially those who need us most, to reach their full potential as productive, caring, and responsible citizens.

Youth Development
9
Girls Incorporated of Jefferson Co

To provide various programs and activities for jefferson county, indiana, girls.

Youth Development
10
Jackson County Community Children's Services Fund

Children's services fund ('csf') is an innovative way to support child well-being projects. while we are funded by a jackson county sales tax, we are a stand-alone organization led by an independent board. (continued on schedule o)we are…

Human Services
11
Boys & Girls Club of Jackson County Inc

Our mission is to give all young people, especially those who need us most, the opportunities and skills they need to become productive, caring and responsible adults.

Youth Development
12
Jackson County Casa

Casa is a unique non-profit helping abused and neglected children in the jackson county family court system. our team of trained volunteers,staff case supervisors, and staff attorneys allow each child to be represented in a court of law…

Civil Rights

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Boys & Girls Club of Seymour Inc and the most unlike its peers is Mental Health America of Jackson Co. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

15 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 15 of the 25 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
15/15
Grantees still filing
12/15
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

GIRLS INC OF JACKSON CO INDIANA INC — $743,403 · OtherGIRLS INC OF JACKSON CO INDIANA INCBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF SEYMOUR INC — $537,847 · OtherBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF SEYMOUR INCAnchor House Inc — $410,185 · OtherAnchor House IncCOLUMBUS REGIONAL SHELTER FOR VICTIMS OF DOMESTIC VIOLENCE — $284,170 · OtherCOLUMBUS REGIONAL SHELTER FOR VICTIMS OF DOMESTIC VIOLENCEHUMAN SERVICES INC — $143,196 · OtherHUMAN SERVICES INC+13 more — $317,296 · Other+13 moreCHILD CARE NETWORK INC — $302,583 · Human ServicesCHILD CARE NETWORK …American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches — $202,316 · Human ServicesAmerican National R…THE ARC OF JACKSON COUNTY INC — $25,164 · Human ServicesSU CASA COLUMBUS INC — $20,000 · Human ServicesBIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF SOUTHEAST INDIANA INC — $196,005 · Youth DevelopmentBOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA — $11,647 · Youth DevelopmentCOLUMBUS LEARNING CENTER MANAGEMENT CORP D/B/A COMMUNITY EDUCATION COALITION — $50,000 · Education
Other$2,436,097Human Services$550,063Youth Development$207,652Education$50,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetGIRLS INC OF JACKSON CO INDIANA INC — $743,403 over 8y, 32% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF SEYMOUR INC — $537,847 over 8y, 16% of budgetAnchor House Inc — $410,185 over 8y, 11% of budgetCHILD CARE NETWORK INC — $302,583 over 8y, 9.5% of budgetCOLUMBUS REGIONAL SHELTER FOR VICTIMS OF DOMESTIC VIOLENCE — $284,170 over 8y, 2.1% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches — $202,316 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetBIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF SOUTHEAST INDIANA INC — $196,005 over 7y, 38% of budgetHUMAN SERVICES INC — $143,196 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetGIRL SCOUTS OF KENTUCKIANA INC — $53,734 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetCOLUMBUS LEARNING CENTER MANAGEMENT CORP D/B/A COMMUNITY EDUCATION COALITION — $50,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetHOOSIER TRAILS COUNCIL BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA — $28,376 over 3y, 0.9% of budgetTHE ARC OF JACKSON COUNTY INC — $25,164 over 4y, 18% of budgetSU CASA COLUMBUS INC — $20,000 over 2y, 5.7% of budgetBOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA — $11,647 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds GIRLS INC OF JACKSON CO INDIANA INC
  • Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF SEYMOUR INC
  • Who funds Anchor House Inc
  • Who funds CHILD CARE NETWORK INC
  • Who funds COLUMBUS REGIONAL SHELTER FOR VICTIMS OF DOMESTIC VIOLENCE
  • Who funds American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches
  • Who funds BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF SOUTHEAST INDIANA INC
  • Who funds HUMAN SERVICES INC
  • Who funds GIRL SCOUTS OF KENTUCKIANA INC
  • Who funds COLUMBUS LEARNING CENTER MANAGEMENT CORP D/B/A COMMUNITY EDUCATION COALITION
  • Who funds MENTAL HEALTH AMERICA OF JACKSON CO
  • Who funds HOOSIER TRAILS COUNCIL BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA
  • Who funds THE ARC OF JACKSON COUNTY INC
  • Who funds SU CASA COLUMBUS INC
  • Who funds BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Community Fdtn of Jackson CountyIN17.9× affinity6 shared granteesties to 9 of 9Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Community Fdtn of Jackson County · United Way of Bartholomew County Inc · Centra Foundation Inc · First Financial Foundation · Land O'Lakes Foundation · Duke Energy Foundation · Edward Jones Foundation · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The Jackson County United Way Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2023
202122232425
no gov · 00%3%10%23%40%your share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 25 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph