Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

The Community Chest of Port Washington Ny Inc

The primary purpose of the Community Chest is to raise funds to be disbursed as grants to other carefully screened not for profit organizations that provide a wide range of services to the residents of Port Washington.

$602k
Granted FY2024still arriving
20
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$48k
Largest
01What you fund
01

What you funded, over time

By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).

A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 87% of THE COMMUNITY CHEST OF PORT WASHINGTON NY INC’s grantee dollars fall outside its nine largest cause areas, whether because the recipient carries no IRS cause code or because its cause sits in the long tail. A chart would be mostly one residual band and misrepresent the portfolio.

02FY2024 · 20 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 20 grants below total $329,250 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $601,620 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $272,370 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k8 grants · $60k
  • $10k–50k12 grants · $270k
$10,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$1.5M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
PORT WASH CHILDRENS CTR$47,500
LITTIG HOUSE$32,000
PW YOUTH COUNCIL$30,000
COMMUNITY SCHLARSHIP FUND$30,000
PARENT RESOURCE CENTER$26,000
PORT COUNSELING CENTER$25,000
NICHOLAS CENTER$20,000
PLANT A ROW FOR THE HUNGRY$16,500
SCIENCE MUSEUM OF LI$12,500
PW ADULT ACTIVITIES CENTER$10,000
LI ALZHEIMERS FOUNDATION$10,000
EOCCOMMUNITY ACTION COUNCIL$10,000
Individual grant recipient$8,500
REWILD LONG ISLAND$8,250
NORTH SHORE CHILD & FAMILY$8,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–23, $111k) land where the poverty rate runs at 6%, against an area that typically sits at 4%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 4%PORT WASH SENIOR CITIZENS: $25k → 6%PORT WASH SENIOR CITIZENS: $23k → 6%PORT WASH SENIOR CITIZENS: $23k → 6%HELEN KELLER NATIONAL CENTER: $9k → 6%HELEN KELLER NATIONAL CENTER: $7k → 6%PORT WASHINGTON CHILDREN CTR: $6k → 6%HELEN KELLER NATIONAL CENTER: $6k → 6%HELEN KELLER NATIONAL CENTER: $6k → 6%HELEN KELLER NATIONAL CENTER: $6k → 6%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

95%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$2.3M · 25 repeat orgs$114k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +165% since the first grant, against +96% for the ones you funded once.

25 repeat relationships — 19 still active in FY2024, 6 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

25
6

Total granted

$2.3M
$108k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+165%
+96%

Still filing today

28%
33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 98% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $6k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesRecreation & SportsEmploymentArts & CulturePhilanthropyEnvironmentOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • PW
    PORT WASHINGTON ADULT ACTIVITIES CENTER INC
    3× · 2017–2019 · $71k · revenue +45%
  • NC
    NICHOLAS CENTER LTD
    6× · 2018–2024 · $67k · revenue +322%
  • PW
    PORT WASHINGTON SOCCER CLUB INC
    7× · 2017–2024 · $48k · revenue +165%

Funded once

  • OL
    OUR LADY OF FATIMA
    one grant, 2020 · $55k
  • SP
    ST PETER OF ALCANTARA
    one grant, 2020 · $16k
  • LI
    LONG ISLAND GAY AND LESBIAN YOUTH INC
    one grant, 2021 · $12k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Port Washington Parent Resource Ctr

The Parent Resource Center is a non-profit cooperative dedicated to providing affordable, quality educational and social opportunities to all of our community's families. Operating in an economic and culturally diverse area, PRC members…

2
Greater Port Washington Business Improvement District Association

The organization is a district management association established pursuant to General Municipal Law Sect. 980-M to carry out the activities of the business improvement district established by the Town of North Hempstead. The purpose of the…

Community Improvement
3
Friends of Port Washington Parks and Recreation Inc

Solicit, receive, maintain, use, apply and distribute general or restricted contributions, gifts, etc. to promote and support the health and welfare of the citizens of the City of Port Washington, through the use of public recreation…

Recreation & Sports
4
Port Angeles Waterfront Center Dba Field Arts & Events Hall

The port angeles waterfront center is a home for arts and events that brings people together and strengthens our community.

Arts & Culture
5
Port Washington Youth Council Inc

To provide education to the youth and members of the public

6
Port Washington Library Foundation Inc

It is the mission of the organization to raise funds to support the needs of the port washington public library not covered by taxes and to maintain its viability for future generations. our vision is to provide full and sustainable…

Education
7
Residents for a More Beautiful Port Washington Inc

Residents for a more beautiful port washington, founded in 1968, is a membershiporganization dedicated to sustainable growth by protecting the environment, enhancing the quality of life and increasing environmental awareness on the entire…

Environment
8
Port Townsend School of Wood- working

To inspire a lifelong passion for craftmanship through education in woodworking and traditional building trades.

Education
9
Portage Industries Inc

Adult day program serving individuals with developmental disabilities and to support people to experience living, working, friendships and contributing as citizens of their community.

Employment
10
Portsmouth Reads
Education
11
Port of Crow Wing County Inc

Port exists to provide hope, structure, stability, and consistency to youth and their communities. Port provides a safe and nurturing place where youth receive personalized services that prepare them for future success. We prepare and…

12
Childrens Maritime Museum at Port Jefferson dba Long Island Explorium

To be a leader in STEAM education, learning and innovation that will shape the intellect, social values and principles of current and future generations.The Explorium provides cutting edge, inquiry-based learning experiences for P-12…

Arts & Culture

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Port Washington Children's Center and the most unlike its peers is Rewild Long Island Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 32 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
8/9
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

PORT WASH CHILDRENS CTR — $390,500 · OtherPORT WASH CHILDRENS CTRLITTIG HOUSE — $278,500 · OtherLITTIG HOUSEPW YOUTH COUNCIL — $220,500 · OtherPW YOUTH COUNCILCOMMUNITY SCHLARSHIP FUND — $202,500 · OtherCOMMUNITY SCHLARSHIP FUNDPORT COUNSELING CENTER — $198,000 · OtherPORT COUNSELING CENTERPARENT RESOURCE CENTER — $193,000 · OtherPARENT RESOURCE CENTERPLANT A ROW FOR THE HUNGRY — $77,000 · OtherEOCCOMMUNITY ACTION COUNCIL — $74,500 · Other+15 more — $477,270 · Other+15 morePORT WASHINGTON ADULT ACTIVITIES CENTER INC — $71,000 · Human ServicesHelen Keller Services — $34,000 · Human ServicesPORT WASHINGTON CHILDREN'S CENTER — $6,453 · Human ServicesNICHOLAS CENTER LTD — $67,000 · PhilanthropyPORT WASHINGTON SOCCER CLUB INC — $48,000 · Recreation & SportsFRIENDS OF PORT ROWING — $18,000 · Recreation & SportsRewild Long Island Inc — $32,250 · EnvironmentSPECTRUM DESIGNS FOUNDATION LTD — $22,500 · EmploymentLANDMARK ON MAIN STREET INC — $8,900 · Arts & Culture
Other$2,111,770Human Services$111,453Philanthropy$67,000Recreation & Sports$66,000Environment$32,250Employment$22,500Arts & Culture$8,900

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetPORT WASHINGTON ADULT ACTIVITIES CENTER INC — $71,000 over 3y, 15% of budgetNICHOLAS CENTER LTD — $67,000 over 6y, 0.4% of budgetPORT WASHINGTON SOCCER CLUB INC — $48,000 over 7y, 1.6% of budgetHelen Keller Services — $34,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetRewild Long Island Inc — $32,250 over 3y, 21% of budgetSPECTRUM DESIGNS FOUNDATION LTD — $22,500 over 3y, 0.7% of budgetFRIENDS OF PORT ROWING — $18,000 over 3y, 1.0% of budgetLANDMARK ON MAIN STREET INC — $8,900 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetPORT WASHINGTON CHILDREN'S CENTER — $6,453 over 1y, 0.2% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds PORT WASHINGTON ADULT ACTIVITIES CENTER INC
  • Who funds NICHOLAS CENTER LTD
  • Who funds PORT WASHINGTON SOCCER CLUB INC
  • Who funds Helen Keller Services
  • Who funds Rewild Long Island Inc
  • Who funds SPECTRUM DESIGNS FOUNDATION LTD
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF PORT ROWING
  • Who funds LANDMARK ON MAIN STREET INC
  • Who funds PORT WASHINGTON CHILDREN'S CENTER

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Peter & Jeri Dejana FoundationNY26.3× affinity10 shared granteesties to 7 of 7Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Peter & Jeri Dejana Foundation · Manhasset Community Fund Inc · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · Network for Good · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The Community Chest of Port Washington Ny Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%2%6%14%25%your share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 32 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph