Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Collier Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$306k
Granted FY2025still arriving
16
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$127k
Largest
01What it funds
0198% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Religion$1.3MInternational$103kEducation$61kHuman Services$47kFood & Nutrition$7kEmployment$5kArts & Culture$500Other$0
02FY2025 · 16 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k8 grants · $23k
  • $10k–50k6 grants · $106k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $177k
$10,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$4.7M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SUNSET INTERNATIONAL BIBLE INSTITUTION$127,197
LUBBOCK CHRISTIAN UNIVERSITY$50,000
KWO MINISTRIES$40,000
SUNSET CHURCH OF CHRIST$20,500
GREENLAWN CHURCH OF CHRIST$13,125
HOME MISSION$12,000
NEW MEXICO CHRISTIAN CHILDREN'S HOME$10,000
IN SEARCH OF THE LORD'S WAY$10,000
MOUNTAIN VIEW CHURCH OF CHRIST$7,700
WORLD BIBLE SCHOOL$5,000
DENTON CHURCH OF CHRIST$5,000
MELONIE PARK CHURCH$2,500
HILLSIDE CHRISTAIN CHURCH$1,000
MEALS ON WHEELS$1,000
Individual grant recipient$500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–25, $43k) land where the poverty rate runs at 18%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%NEW MEXICO CHRISTIAN CHILDREN'S HOME: $10k → 18%NEW MEXICO CHRISTIAN CHILDRENS HOME: $10k → 18%NEW MEXICO CHRISTIAN CHILDRENS HOME: $10k → 18%NEW MEXICO CHRISTIN CHILDREN'S HOME: $10k → 18%NEW MEXICO CHRISTIAN CHILDRENS HOME: $1k → 18%MEALS ON WHEELS: $1k → 17%MEALS ON WHEELS: $1k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 51% of The Collier Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 81% of the giving stays in TX; by stated purpose, 84%.

The Collier Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

96%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.5M · 18 repeat orgs$55k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +17% since the first grant, against 0% for those funded once.

18 repeat relationships: 12 still active in FY2025, 6 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

18
12

Total granted

$1.5M
$51k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+17%
0%

Still filing today

44%
8%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 99% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $4k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesReligionInternationalEducationFood & NutritionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • KM
    KWO MINISTRIES
    6× · 2020–2025 · $103k · revenue +17%
  • LC
    LUBBOCK CHRISTIAN UNIVERSITY
    3× · 2022–2025 · $61k · revenue +18%
  • H
    HomeMission
    3× · 2021–2025 · $32k · revenue +69%

Funded once

  • MR
    MISSION ROAD CHURCH OF CHRIST
    one grant, 2023 · $20k
  • HM
    HOME MINISTRIES
    one grant, 2020 · $11k
  • BO
    Bread of Life Corporation
    one grant, 2021 · $5k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Christ Outreach Oklahoma Inc

Evangelistic preaching the good news of the Gospel of Jesus Christ. Missionary and support of missionaries at home and abroad. Praying and counseling with Gods people both at home and in the field. Benevolence to needy.

Religion
2
Prepare the Way Ministry

Education, Humanitarian, Community outreach and evangelism ministry. Provide Orphan Care, Train Youth in Career Paths, Train Pastors and Others in Bible School, Prison Ministry, Provide Elementary School for about 300 Children

International
3
Likewise Ministries

To provide a hot meal to families struggling to feed their children

Food & Nutrition
4
Rock of Living Water Ministries

Supporting and encouraging families worldwide to serve and share Jesus through work, worship, and the Word.

Human Services
5
Worldcast Ministries

Publishing, writing, sales & distribution of Christian Books; speaking throughout the US and foreign countries on Christian subjects. Attending orphanages, Christian schools and Bible colleges in the US and foreign countries assisting in…

Religion
6
Loaves & Fishes the Church Without Walls

Community outreach and church services

Religion
7
Our Daily Bread Christian Food Ministry Inc

The purpose of this company is to provide food to homeless and indigent families in our area.

Human Services
8
The Wordsower Company Inc

To proclaim the gospel of Jesus Christ throughout the world. Taking His love to the orphans, widows and children being trafficked by providing homes, feeding, education, clothing and care.

International
9
World of Opportunity

World of Opportunity is an evangelical ministry that supports missionaries in the United States and around the world as they bring the Word of the Lord into peoples lives. The missionaries supported by World of Opportunity share the Gospel…

Human Services
10
Lifehouse Church Missions Inc

The promotion of the gospel of Jesus christ through international evangelism through the establishment of churches, support organizations, and missionaries.

Religion
11
Hal Lindsey Website Ministries

Teaching and Spreading the Gospel of Jesus Christ.

Religion
12
Reaching Out to the Nations Inc

Reaching Out To The Nations' mission is to both preach and demonstrate the love of Go through its projects and programs which include preaching, food distribution, widow and orphan assistance and leadership training.

Religion
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is New Mexico Christian Childrens Home; the most unlike its peers is Meals On Wheels. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 34 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
7/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

SUNSET INTERNATIONAL BIBLE INSTITUTION: $439,397 · OtherSUNSET INTERNATIONAL BIBLE INSTITUTIONSUNSET INTERNATIONAL BIBLE INSTITUTE INC: $337,900 · OtherSUNSET INTERNATIONAL BIBLE INSTITUTE INCMOUNTAIN VIEW CHURCH OF CHRIST INC: $200,877 · OtherMOUNTAIN VIEW CHURCH OF CHRIST INCSUNSET CHURCH OF CHRIST: $53,000 · OtherGREEN LAWN CHURCH OF CHRIST INC: $51,883 · Other+20 more: $140,600 · Other+20 moreKWO MINISTRIES: $103,000 · InternationalHomeMission: $32,250 · ReligionWORLD BIBLE SCHOOL INC: $27,397 · ReligionIN SEARCH OF THE LORD'S WAY INC: $26,000 · ReligionLUBBOCK CHRISTIAN UNIVERSITY: $61,000 · EducationNEW MEXICO CHRISTIAN CHILDRENS HOME: $41,000 · Human ServicesCHILDREN'S HOME OF LUBBOCK AND FAMILY SERVICE AGENCY INC: $4,000 · Human ServicesMEALS ON WHEELS: $2,000 · Human ServicesBread of Life Corporation: $5,000 · Food & Nutrition
Other$1,223,657International$103,000Religion$85,647Education$61,000Human Services$47,000Food & Nutrition$5,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetKWO MINISTRIES: $103,000 over 6y, 2.7% of budgetLUBBOCK CHRISTIAN UNIVERSITY: $61,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetNEW MEXICO CHRISTIAN CHILDRENS HOME: $41,000 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetHomeMission: $32,250 over 3y, 2.5% of budgetWORLD BIBLE SCHOOL INC: $27,397 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetIN SEARCH OF THE LORD'S WAY INC: $26,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetCHILDREN'S HOME OF LUBBOCK AND FAMILY SERVICE AGENCY INC: $4,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetMEALS ON WHEELS: $2,000 over 2y, 0.7% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds KWO MINISTRIES ↗
  • Who funds LUBBOCK CHRISTIAN UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds NEW MEXICO CHRISTIAN CHILDRENS HOME ↗
  • Who funds HomeMission ↗
  • Who funds WORLD BIBLE SCHOOL INC ↗
  • Who funds IN SEARCH OF THE LORD'S WAY INC ↗
  • Who funds Bread of Life Corporation ↗
  • Who funds CHILDREN'S HOME OF LUBBOCK AND FAMILY SERVICE AGENCY INC ↗
  • Who funds MEALS ON WHEELS ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

National Philanthropic TrustPA6.4× affinity4 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: National Philanthropic Trust · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Collier Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Collier Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 34 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Collier’s filings →

    More from the funding graph