Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

The Collier Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$306k
Granted FY2025still arriving
16
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$127k
Largest
01What you fund
0198% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20202025.

Religion$1.3MInternational$103kEducation$61kHuman Services$47kFood & Nutrition$7kEmployment$5kArts & Culture$500Other$0
02FY2025 · 16 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k8 grants · $23k
  • $10k–50k6 grants · $106k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $177k
$10,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$4.7M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SUNSET INTERNATIONAL BIBLE INSTITUTION$127,197
LUBBOCK CHRISTIAN UNIVERSITY$50,000
KWO MINISTRIES$40,000
SUNSET CHURCH OF CHRIST$20,500
GREENLAWN CHURCH OF CHRIST$13,125
HOME MISSION$12,000
NEW MEXICO CHRISTIAN CHILDREN'S HOME$10,000
IN SEARCH OF THE LORD'S WAY$10,000
MOUNTAIN VIEW CHURCH OF CHRIST$7,700
DENTON CHURCH OF CHRIST$5,000
WORLD BIBLE SCHOOL$5,000
MELONIE PARK CHURCH$2,500
MEALS ON WHEELS$1,000
HILLSIDE CHRISTAIN CHURCH$1,000
Individual grant recipient$500
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY20–25, $43k) land where the poverty rate runs at 18%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%NEW MEXICO CHRISTIAN CHILDREN'S HOME: $10k → 18%NEW MEXICO CHRISTIAN CHILDRENS HOME: $10k → 18%NEW MEXICO CHRISTIAN CHILDRENS HOME: $10k → 18%NEW MEXICO CHRISTIN CHILDREN'S HOME: $10k → 18%NEW MEXICO CHRISTIAN CHILDRENS HOME: $1k → 18%MEALS ON WHEELS: $1k → 17%MEALS ON WHEELS: $1k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

04

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 51% of The Collier Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another. Read by recipient address, 81% of the giving stays in TX; read by stated purpose it is 84% — more of the work is directed home than the recipients' locations suggest.

The Collier Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

96%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$1.5M · 18 repeat orgs$55k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +17% since the first grant, against 0% for the ones you funded once.

18 repeat relationships — 12 still active in FY2025, 6 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

18
12

Total granted

$1.5M
$51k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+17%
0%

Still filing today

44%
8%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 99% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $4k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesReligionInternationalEducationFood & NutritionOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • KM
    KWO MINISTRIES
    6× · 2020–2025 · $103k · revenue +17%
  • LC
    LUBBOCK CHRISTIAN UNIVERSITY
    3× · 2022–2025 · $61k · revenue +18%
  • H
    HomeMission
    3× · 2021–2025 · $32k · revenue +69%

Funded once

  • MR
    MISSION ROAD CHURCH OF CHRIST
    one grant, 2023 · $20k
  • HM
    HOME MINISTRIES
    one grant, 2020 · $11k
  • PC
    PAYDAY co GARY ASHBY
    one grant, 2021 · $5k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Christ Outreach Oklahoma Inc

Evangelistic preaching the good news of the Gospel of Jesus Christ. Missionary and support of missionaries at home and abroad. Praying and counseling with Gods people both at home and in the field. Benevolence to needy.

Religion
2
Prepare the Way Ministry

Education, Humanitarian, Community outreach and evangelism ministry. Provide Orphan Care, Train Youth in Career Paths, Train Pastors and Others in Bible School, Prison Ministry, Provide Elementary School for about 300 Children

International
3
Likewise Ministries

To provide a hot meal to families struggling to feed their children

Food & Nutrition
4
Rock of Living Water Ministries

Supporting and encouraging families worldwide to serve and share Jesus through work, worship, and the Word.

Human Services
5
Worldcast Ministries

Publishing, writing, sales & distribution of Christian Books; speaking throughout the US and foreign countries on Christian subjects. Attending orphanages, Christian schools and Bible colleges in the US and foreign countries assisting in…

Religion
6
Loaves & Fishes the Church Without Walls

Community outreach and church services

Religion
7
Our Daily Bread Christian Food Ministry Inc

The purpose of this company is to provide food to homeless and indigent families in our area.

Human Services
8
The Wordsower Company Inc

To proclaim the gospel of Jesus Christ throughout the world. Taking His love to the orphans, widows and children being trafficked by providing homes, feeding, education, clothing and care.

International
9
World of Opportunity

World of Opportunity is an evangelical ministry that supports missionaries in the United States and around the world as they bring the Word of the Lord into peoples lives. The missionaries supported by World of Opportunity share the Gospel…

Human Services
10
Lifehouse Church Missions Inc

The promotion of the gospel of Jesus christ through international evangelism through the establishment of churches, support organizations, and missionaries.

Religion
11
Hal Lindsey Website Ministries

Teaching and Spreading the Gospel of Jesus Christ.

Religion
12
Reaching Out to the Nations Inc

Reaching Out To The Nations' mission is to both preach and demonstrate the love of Go through its projects and programs which include preaching, food distribution, widow and orphan assistance and leadership training.

Religion

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is New Mexico Christian Childrens Home and the most unlike its peers is Meals On Wheels. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

05the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 34 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
7/9
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

SUNSET INTERNATIONAL BIBLE INSTITUTION — $439,397 · OtherSUNSET INTERNATIONAL BIBLE INSTITUTIONSUNSET INTERNATIONAL BIBLE INSTITUTE INC — $337,900 · OtherSUNSET INTERNATIONAL BIBLE INSTITUTE INCMOUNTAIN VIEW CHURCH OF CHRIST INC — $200,877 · OtherMOUNTAIN VIEW CHURCH OF CHRIST INCSUNSET CHURCH OF CHRIST — $53,000 · OtherGREEN LAWN CHURCH OF CHRIST INC — $51,883 · Other+20 more — $140,600 · Other+20 moreKWO MINISTRIES — $103,000 · InternationalHomeMission — $32,250 · ReligionWORLD BIBLE SCHOOL INC — $27,397 · ReligionIN SEARCH OF THE LORD'S WAY INC — $26,000 · ReligionLUBBOCK CHRISTIAN UNIVERSITY — $61,000 · EducationNEW MEXICO CHRISTIAN CHILDRENS HOME — $41,000 · Human ServicesCHILDREN'S HOME OF LUBBOCK AND FAMILY SERVICE AGENCY INC — $4,000 · Human ServicesMEALS ON WHEELS — $2,000 · Human ServicesBread of Life Corporation — $5,000 · Food & Nutrition
Other$1,223,657International$103,000Religion$85,647Education$61,000Human Services$47,000Food & Nutrition$5,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetKWO MINISTRIES — $103,000 over 6y, 2.7% of budgetLUBBOCK CHRISTIAN UNIVERSITY — $61,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetNEW MEXICO CHRISTIAN CHILDRENS HOME — $41,000 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetHomeMission — $32,250 over 3y, 2.5% of budgetWORLD BIBLE SCHOOL INC — $27,397 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetIN SEARCH OF THE LORD'S WAY INC — $26,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetCHILDREN'S HOME OF LUBBOCK AND FAMILY SERVICE AGENCY INC — $4,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetMEALS ON WHEELS — $2,000 over 2y, 0.7% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds KWO MINISTRIES
  • Who funds LUBBOCK CHRISTIAN UNIVERSITY
  • Who funds NEW MEXICO CHRISTIAN CHILDRENS HOME
  • Who funds HomeMission
  • Who funds WORLD BIBLE SCHOOL INC
  • Who funds IN SEARCH OF THE LORD'S WAY INC
  • Who funds Bread of Life Corporation
  • Who funds CHILDREN'S HOME OF LUBBOCK AND FAMILY SERVICE AGENCY INC
  • Who funds MEALS ON WHEELS

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

National Philanthropic TrustPA6.4× affinity4 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: National Philanthropic Trust · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The Collier Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 34 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph