Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

The Collective Blueprint

Our mission is to increase socioeconomic mobility by building pathways to thriving careers.

$280k
Granted FY2025still arriving
8
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$75k
Largest
01What you fund
01FY2025 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k6 grants · $150k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $130k
$25,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$3.0M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SLINGSHOT MEMPHIS$75,000
MEMPHIS MEDICAL DISTRICT COLLABORATIVE$55,000
THE WORKS INC$25,000
CODECREW$25,000
GOODWILL EXCEL CENTERS MIDSOUTH INC$25,000
AGAPE CHILD & FAMILY SERVICES INC$25,000
MOORE TECH$25,000
TECH901$25,000
02The need
02

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY25–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 19%. 0% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 19%SLINGSHOT MEMPHIS: $75k → 17%TECH901: $25k → 17%MOORE TECH: $25k → 17%AGAPE CHILD & FAMILY SERVICES INC: $25k → 17%MEMPHIS MEDICAL DISTRICT COLLABORATIVE: $55k → 17%CODECREW: $25k → 17%GOODWILL EXCEL CENTERS MIDSOUTH INC: $25k → 17%THE WORKS INC: $25k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Mayor's Institute for Excellence in Government Inc

Develop and implement programs to meet major urban challenges that exist for memphis, tennessee

Public Benefit
2
Memphis Academy of Science and Engineeri

To produce lifelong learners, critical thinkers, effective communicators, and productive members of the global community

Education
3
The Collective Blueprint

Our mission is to increase socioeconomic mobility by building pathways to thriving careers.

Employment
4
Mississippi Coding Academies

Our charter is to offer a nontraditional path to create new and diverse software professionals and offer improved economic opportunity for mississippians, particularly the disadvantaged and underserved communities.

Science & Tech
5
Tennessee Career Academy

To be the top-rated provider of world-ready graduates in the south by combining high-performance core curriculum with career-focused training and experiences.

Education
6
Memphis Urban League Inc

To enable and empower african-americans and other minorities in underserved communities to achieve their highest human potential and secure economic self-reliance, parity, power and civil rights.

Human Services
7
My City Rides

My city rides makes reliable transportation affordable and ownership possible for those in the workforce with limited means but unlimited potential, increasing opportunity for everyone.

Employment
8
Philadelphia Works Inc

Philadelphia works, inc. develops and manages smart workforce solutions that respond to business needs and increases economic opportunity for all philadelphia residents.

Employment
9
Creative Works

Creative works is organized to accelerate cultural and economic change by focusing on connecting, inspiring and educating the memphis creative community.

10
Theatre Memphis

To produce plays and encourage the arts by performance and educational programs.

Arts & Culture
11
Memphis Area Chamber of Commerce

To serve our members and partners by improving the quality of life through regional economic prosperity.

12
City Leadership

City leadership's mission is to recruit, develop, and catalyze leaders for the benefit of the city of memphis. the organization was founded in order to maximize the leadership capital and potential of memphis. city leadership strives to…

Public Benefit

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Goodwill Excel Center Midsouth Inc and the most unlike its peers is Mdcdc Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

03the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
4/8
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

GOODWILL EXCEL CENTER MIDSOUTH INC — $25,000 · EducationGOODWILL EXCEL CENTER MIDSOUTH INCWILLIAM R MOORE COLLEGE OF TECHNOLOGY — $25,000 · EducationWILLIAM R MOORE COLLEGE OF TECHNOLOGYCODECREW — $25,000 · EducationCODECREWTECH901 — $25,000 · EducationTECH901SLINGSHOT MEMPHIS INC — $75,000 · PhilanthropySLINGSHOT MEMPHIS INCMDCDC INC — $55,000 · Community ImprovementMDCDC INCThe Works Inc — $25,000 · Housing & ShelterThe Works …AGAPE CHILD AND FAMILY SERVICES INC — $25,000 · OtherAGAPE CHIL…
Education$100,000Philanthropy$75,000Community Improvement$55,000Housing & Shelter$25,000Other$25,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%grantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetGOODWILL EXCEL CENTER MIDSOUTH INC — $25,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetCODECREW — $25,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetTECH901 — $25,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Community Foundation of Greater Memphis IncTN21.4× affinity8 shared granteesties to 8 of 8Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Community Foundation of Greater Memphis Inc · The Kemmons Wilson Family Foundation · Slingshot Memphis Inc · The Urban Child Institute · Jr Hyde III Family Foundation · Christian Community Foundation of Memphis · Network for Good · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The Collective Blueprint funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 8 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph