Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

The Cold Heading Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$1.3M
Granted FY2025still arriving
46
Grants FY2025still arriving
13
States reached
$360k
Largest
01What you fund
0196% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20202025.

Recreation & Sports$2.6MPhilanthropy$1.6MScience & Tech$675kReligion$460kPublic Safety & Disaster$409kHuman Services$397kEducation$288kHealth$255kOther$0
02FY2025 · 46 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k31 grants · $125k
  • $10k–50k8 grants · $145k
  • $50k–250k5 grants · $405k
  • $250k+2 grants · $610k
$5,000
Median grant
13
States reached
$22M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
WARRIORS BASEBALL CLUB OF MICHIGAN$360,000
UNLV FOOTBALL FOUNDATION$250,000
CHICAGO BLACKHAWKS FOUNDATION$100,000
VEGAS GOLDEN KNIGHTS FOUNDATION$100,000
CAMPUS FOR HOPE FOUNDATION$100,000
GROSSE POINTE CITY FOUNDATION$55,000
UNIVERSITY OF DAYTON ENGINEERING$50,000
MAYO FOUNDATION$25,000
BALLER DREAM FOUNDATION$25,000
FRIENDS OF THE NEVADA MANSION$25,000
ST PAUL CATHOLIC CHURCH OF GROSSE POINTE$20,000
OUR LADY OF LAS VEGAS CATHOLIC CHURCH$20,000
BAYVIEW YACHT CLUB JUNIOR SAILORS INC$10,000
CORWELL HEALTH FOUNDATION SOUTHEAST$10,000
ST JOAN OF ARC OF LAS VEGAS$10,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY20–25, $34k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 75% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%WINDWARD SAILS CHARITABLE FOUNDATION INC: $5k → 10%HEARTLIGHT MINISTRIES: $5k → 16%HEARTLIGHT MINISTRIES: $5k → 16%HEARTLIGHT MINISTRIES: $5k → 16%HEARTLIGHT MINISTRIES: $5k → 16%HEARTLIGHT MINISTRIES: $5k → 16%LIGHTHOUSE OF OAKLAND COUNTY: $2k → 8%LIGHTHOUSE OF OAKLAND COUNTY: $1k → 8%LIGHTHOUSE OF OAKLAND COUNTY: $1k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

MN
IL
MI
NY
MA
NV
IN
OH
PA
NJ
UT
MO
AZ
TN
DC
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

04

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 90% of The Cold Heading Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another. Read by recipient address, 58% of the giving stays in MI; read by stated purpose it is 3% — less of the work is directed home than the recipients' locations suggest.

The Cold Heading Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

86%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$5.9M · 48 repeat orgs$985k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +42% since the first grant, against 0% for the ones you funded once.

48 repeat relationships — 34 still active in FY2025, 14 since wound down; 12 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

48
44

Total granted

$5.9M
$475k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+42%
0%

Still filing today

35%
41%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 60% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $510k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
Recreation & SportsPhilanthropyHealthHuman ServicesEducationArts & CultureOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • WB
    WARRIORS BASEBALL CLUB OF MICHIGAN
    6× · 2020–2025 · $2.1M · revenue +29% · 54% of their budget
  • VG
    VEGAS GOLDEN KNIGHTS FOUNDATION INC
    6× · 2020–2025 · $600k · revenue +42%
  • ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC
    6× · 2020–2025 · $33k · revenue +78%

Funded once

  • FO
    FRIENDS OF LAS VEGAS METRO POLICE DEPT
    one grant, 2020 · $130k
  • UO
    University of Michigangraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $75k · revenue +96%
  • WL
    WISE LAS VEGAS
    one grant, 2022 · $25k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Mymichigan Health Foundation

The corporation is organized and shall be operated exclusively for charitable, educational and scientific purposes by conducting or supporting activites exclusively for the benefit of, to perform the functions of, or to carry out the…

Health
2
Business Leaders for Michigan Foundation

Business leaders for michigan is a nonprofit, nonpartisan statewide organization driven by ceos from the state's leading employers, all working toward a shared goal: making michigan a top 10 state for jobs, talent and a thriving economy.…

Community Improvement
3
Business Leaders for Michigan

Business leaders for michigan is a nonprofit, nonpartisan statewide organization driven by ceos from the state's leading employers, all working toward a shared goal: making michigan a top 10 state for jobs, talent and a thriving economy.…

4
Mgm Resorts Foundation

The mgm resorts foundation brings the best of our employee volunteer and charitable efforts together with greater impact and greater choice. the mgm resorts foundation focuses employee charitable contributions to non-profit agencies and…

Philanthropy
5
Michigan Sports Alliance

To encourage michigan residents of all ages and abilities to live active and healthy lifestyles

Recreation & Sports
6
Detroit Athletic Club

To create life-enriching experiences that build meaningful relations, foster personal and professional growth, and celebrate culture in the heart of detroit.

7
Sw Michigan Miracle League

Our mission is to provide opportunities for kids, regardless of their abilities, to compete and experience the joy and benefits that come from playing sports.

Recreation & Sports
8
The Jewish Fund

The jewish fund is organized and operates exclusively for charitable, educational, and religious purposes. the fund's primary activities are: supporting a jewish health care mission in the greater detroit area and michigan; promotion of…

Philanthropy
9
Calvary Hospital Inc

The mission of calvary hospital is to care for the medical, emotional and spiritual needs of our adult patients with advanced cancer and other life-limiting illnesses. it is the only fully accredited acute care hospital in the u.s. devoted…

Health
10
Detroit Regional Chamber

The chamber is the voice for business and works to power the economy for southeast michigan through public policy, advocacy and leading regional economic development and talent initiatives.

11
The Northern Michigan University Foundation

The nmu foundation will establish and foster relationships to generate resources that benefit the strategic goals of northern michigan university.

Education
12
Indiana University Health West Hospital Inc

Lead the transformation of healthcare through quality, innovation & education, and make Indiana one of the nation's healthiest states.

Health

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Chicago Cubs Charities and the most unlike its peers is Grosse Pointe Park Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyDevelopmental Disabilities …Affordable Housing Developm…Volunteer Fire & Ems Servic…Community FoundationsAnimal Rescue and ShelterFaith-Based Liberal Arts Co…Health Access Advocacy and …Youth Sports Programs
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 23 years old; the field is 17. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number20%11%<5yr13%9%5–10yr20%23%10–20yr15%17%20–35yr14%23%35–55yr18%17%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value20%5%<5yr13%18%5–10yr20%63%10–20yr15%5%20–35yr14%5%35–55yr18%4%55yr+

The field is 20% startups (under 5 years old) — 11% of your grantees by number, and just 5% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 12% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/57
the rest of the field
12%
6,511/53,799

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

05the grantee network

40 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 40 of the 104 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
8
Early backer (in before they grew)
40/40
Grantees still filing
20/40
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

GROSSE POINTE CITY FOUNDATION — $700,000 · OtherGROSSE POINTE CITY FOUNDATIONUNIVERSITY OF DAYTON ENGINEERING — $675,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF DAYTON ENGINEERINGLAS VEGAS METRO POLICE FOUNDATION — $256,500 · OtherLAS VEGAS METRO POLICE FOUNDATIONUNLV FOOTBALL FOUNDATION — $250,000 · OtherUNLV FOOTBALL FOUNDATIONCHILDREN'S CHARITY AT ADIOS — $243,000 · OtherCHILDREN'S CHARITY AT ADIOSMAYO FOUNDATION — $145,000 · OtherFRIENDS OF LAS VEGAS METRO POLICE DEPT — $130,000 · Other+74 more — $1,325,500 · Other+74 moreWARRIORS BASEBALL CLUB OF MICHIGAN — $2,140,000 · Recreation & SportsWARRIORS BASEBALL CLUB OF MICHIGAN+4 more — $88,500 · Recreation & SportsVEGAS GOLDEN KNIGHTS FOUNDATION INC — $600,000 · PhilanthropyVEGAS GOLDEN…Chicago Blackhawks Foundation — $100,000 · PhilanthropyChicago Blac…Jupiter Medical Center Foundation Inc — $30,000 · Philanthropy+2 more — $33,000 · PhilanthropyBALLER DREAM FOUNDATION — $50,000 · HealthST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC — $32,500 · HealthMARINERS INN — $5,000 · Health+2 more — $3,500 · HealthWISE LAS VEGAS — $25,000 · EducationSTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION — $15,000 · Education+1 more — $1,000 · EducationHEARTLIGHT MINISTRIES INC — $25,000 · Human ServicesUNITED STATES OF AMERICA CHESS FEDERATION — $5,000 · Human ServicesWINDWARD SAILS CHARITABLE FOUNDATION INC — $5,000 · Human ServicesLIGHTHOUSE OF OAKLAND COUNTY — $3,500 · Human ServicesSUMMERLIN SOUTH LITTLE LEAGUE — $31,000 · Youth Development
Other$3,725,000Recreation & Sports$2,228,500Philanthropy$763,000Health$91,000Education$41,000Human Services$38,500Youth Development$31,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetWARRIORS BASEBALL CLUB OF MICHIGAN — $2,140,000 over 6y, 54% of budgetVEGAS GOLDEN KNIGHTS FOUNDATION INC — $600,000 over 6y, 2.7% of budgetChicago Blackhawks Foundation — $100,000 over 1y, 2.3% of budgetUniversity of Michigan — $75,000 over 1y, 23% of budgetBAYVIEW YACHT CLUB FOUNDATION — $72,000 over 5y, 14% of budgetBALLER DREAM FOUNDATION — $50,000 over 2y, 1.8% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC — $32,500 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetLost Tree Village Charitable Foundation — $30,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetJupiter Medical Center Foundation Inc — $30,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetHEARTLIGHT MINISTRIES INC — $25,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetMAYOR'S FUND FOR LAS VEGAS LIFE — $25,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE NEVADA MANSION — $25,000 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetVEGAS GOLDEN KNIGHTS ALUMNI ASSOCIATION INC — $20,000 over 1y, 6.3% of budgetOPPORTUNITY VILLAGE — $20,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION — $15,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetGROSSE POINTE PARK FOUNDATION — $13,000 over 6y, 2.6% of budgetPOLICE UNITY TOUR INC — $12,500 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetANGELS OF HOPE A FAMILY CANCER FOUNDATION — $12,000 over 6y, 0.5% of budgetChicago Cubs Charities — $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetCOLUMBUS REGIONAL SHELTER FOR VICTIMS OF DOMESTIC VIOLENCE — $10,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetLittle Traverse Conservancy Inc — $7,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetGLEANERS COMMUNITY FOOD BANK OF SOUTHEASTERN MICHIGAN — $6,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetGILDA'S CLUB METRO DETROIT — $5,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetMARINERS INN — $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetUNITED STATES OF AMERICA CHESS FEDERATION — $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetVEGAS JUNIOR GOLDEN KNIGHTS FOUNDATION — $5,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetLIGHTHOUSE OF OAKLAND COUNTY — $3,500 over 3y, 1.8% of budgetBEST FRIENDS ANIMAL SOCIETY — $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget4 PAWS 1 HEART — $2,500 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetMUSCULAR DYSTROPHY ASSOCIATION INC — $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJAKE KIELBS HOCKEY FOUNDATION — $1,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetROOM AT THE INN — $1,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetAnn & Robert H Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago Foundation — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF DETROIT MERCY — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetINTERLOCHEN CENTER FOR THE ARTS — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds WARRIORS BASEBALL CLUB OF MICHIGAN
  • Who funds VEGAS GOLDEN KNIGHTS FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds Chicago Blackhawks Foundation
  • Who funds University of Michigan
  • Who funds BAYVIEW YACHT CLUB FOUNDATION
  • Who funds BALLER DREAM FOUNDATION
  • Who funds ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC
  • Who funds SUMMERLIN SOUTH LITTLE LEAGUE
  • Who funds Lost Tree Village Charitable Foundation
  • Who funds Jupiter Medical Center Foundation Inc
  • Who funds HEARTLIGHT MINISTRIES INC
  • Who funds WISE LAS VEGAS
  • Who funds MAYOR'S FUND FOR LAS VEGAS LIFE
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF THE NEVADA MANSION
  • Who funds VEGAS GOLDEN KNIGHTS ALUMNI ASSOCIATION INC

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Community Foundation for Southeast MichiganMI17.5× affinity7 shared granteesties to 10 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Community Foundation for Southeast Michigan · Miller Louise Tuller Trust Xxxxx8009 · Catholic Foundation of Michigan · NV Energy Charitable Foundation · United Way for Southeastern Michigan · The Ayco Charitable Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Arthur J Gallagher Foundation · Enterprise Holdings Foundation · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · American Endowment Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The Cold Heading Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 40%6%25%56%100%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    4get no government money at all
    6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to The Cold Heading Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to The Cold Heading Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 104 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph