Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Cohen Family Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$613k
Granted FY2024still arriving
19
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$250k
Largest
01What it funds
0193% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2022 to 2024.

Religion$935kPhilanthropy$160kEducation$135kArts & Culture$62kYouth Development$35kCrime & Legal$20kRecreation & Sports$15kAnimals$12kOther$0
02FY2024 · 19 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k9 grants · $29k
  • $10k–50k7 grants · $100k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $234k
  • $250k+1 grant · $250k
$10,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$3.2M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CHABAD OF CHARLESTON$250,000
Individual grant recipient$180,000
CHARLESTON JEWISH FEDERATION$54,000
UGA MAGILL FOUNDATION$40,000
DORCHESTER CHILDRENS ADVOCACY CENTE$10,000
ADDLESTONE HEBREW ACADEMY$10,000
KIDS ON POINT$10,000
CHARLESTON SOUTHERN UNIVERSITY$10,000
ASHLEY HALL FOUNDATION$10,000
CHABAD OF CHARLESTON$10,000
SYNAGOGUE EMANUEL$5,360
Individual grant recipient$5,000
SPECIAL OLYMPICS OF SOUTH CAROLINA$5,000
STRAY DOG SOCIETY$5,000
ALPHA EPSILON PI FOUNDATION$3,600
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY22–23, $6k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 66% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%GORDON JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER: $2k → 14%SIPES ORCHARD HOME: $1k → 12%SIPES ORCHARD HOME: $1k → 12%CAROLINA YOUTH DEVELOPMENT CENTER: $1k → 12%CAROLINA YOUTH DEVELOPMENT CENTER: $1k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

79%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.2M · 27 repeat orgs$310k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +6% since the first grant, against -5% for those funded once.

27 repeat relationships: 13 still active in FY2024, 14 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

27
16

Total granted

$1.2M
$120k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+6%
-5%

Still filing today

44%
31%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 66% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $190k went to new ones.

50%100%’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’22’23’24
EducationAnimalsHuman ServicesReligionRecreation & SportsArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AH
    ASHLEY HALL FOUNDATION
    3× · 2022–2024 · $40k · revenue +42%
  • KO
    KIDS ON POINT INC
    3× · 2022–2024 · $30k · revenue +30%
  • CS
    CHARLESTON SOUTHERN UNIVERSITY
    3× · 2022–2024 · $30k · revenue +6%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2023 · $72k
  • TU
    THE UNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA FOUNDATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $25k · revenue +36%
  • MO
    MADISON OGLETHORPE ANIMAL SHELTER
    one grant, 2022 · $5k · revenue -5%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Cambridge Academy Inc

Cambridge academy provides students with an academically excellent curriculum, while fostering physical, social, and spiritual wellness within a nurturing environment.

Education
2
San Diego Jewish Academy

San Diego Jewish Academy empowers each student to learn for life, guided by Jewish values and rooted in strength of community.

Education
3
Spartanburg Day School

The mission of the spartanburg day school is to provide a superior educational experience, in a community of trust, that prepares students for a life well lived. spartanburg day school is dually accredited by southern association of…

—
4
Charleston School of Law

The mission of the charleston school of law foundation inc is to encourage and assist the study, teaching, promoting and research of the rule of law in charleston, south carolina and all related subject areas as determined by the board of…

Education
5
Walnut Grove Christian School

We are a k-12 christian school founded under the following (4) pillars: academics: we provide an amazing accredited academic program utilizing 100% certified teachers. schedule: we provide our students and their families an opportunity on…

Education
6
Charles E Smith Jewish Day School of Greater Washington Inc

Cesjds is a pre k-12 grade independent day school that delivers an exemplary general and jewish education. our purpose is to ensure a vibrant jewish future by fostering the growth of confident, compassionate thinkers who engage the world…

Education
7
Kesher Ld Inc Kesher

To provide, and guide other schools in providing, an education in both jewish and secular studies that meet the needs of the invididual student, and which empowers each student to reach his/her highest level of independent and…

Education
8
Charlotte Country Day School

Through excellence in education, charlotte country day school develops the potential of each student by fostering intellectual curiosity, principled character, ethical leadership and a responsibility to serve. the key values and…

Education
9
Humane Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals

The primary mission of the humane society is to end animal cruelty, neglect and overpopulation in south carolina.

Animals
10
Chabad of Columbia University

To educate jewish students based on chabad chassidic philosophy, advance their understanding of jewish ideas and foster their jewishness.

—
11
Atlanta Jewish Academy Inc

Atlanta jewish academy is a college preparatory, co-educational, preschool-12th grade, independent jewish day school, guided by modern orthodox values and principles. we embody the ideals of community, tradition, individual development and…

Education
12
Shalom School

Shalom school's mission is to provide each child with an outstanding education in a nurturing environment that is academically excellent, inclusive, innovative, and inspired by jewish values and traditions.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Chabad of Charleston Inc; the most unlike its peers is Rambam Day School. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

20 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 20 of the 48 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
19/20
Grantees still filing
10/20
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CHABAD OF ATHENS INC: $268,000 · OtherCHABAD OF ATHENS INCIndividual grant recipient: $180,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient: $72,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientUGA MAGILL FOUNDATION: $60,000 · OtherUGA MAGILL FOUNDATIONCHABAD OF BUCKHEAD & BROOKHAVEN INC: $36,000 · OtherSYNAGOGUE EMANU-EL: $30,360 · Other+27 more: $81,410 · Other+27 moreCHABAD OF CHARLESTON INC: $588,000 · ReligionCHABAD OF CHARLESTON INCCharleston Jewish Federation Inc: $160,000 · PhilanthropyCharleston …ASHLEY HALL FOUNDATION: $40,000 · EducationCHARLESTON SOUTHERN UNIVERSITY: $30,000 · EducationTHE UNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA FOUNDATION: $25,000 · EducationTHE STRAY DOG SOCIETY: $15,000 · EducationADDLESTONE HEBREW ACADEMY: $13,600 · Education+1 more: $1,625 · EducationKIDS ON POINT INC: $30,000 · Recreation & SportsMADISON OGLETHORPE ANIMAL SHELTER: $5,000 · AnimalsPET HELPERS INC: $3,000 · AnimalsCHARLESTON ANIMAL SOCIETY: $3,000 · AnimalsLandmarks for Families Inc: $2,000 · Human ServicesSIPES ORCHARD HOME: $2,000 · Human ServicesJEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER OF NASHVILLE: $1,800 · Human Services
Other$727,770Religion$588,000Philanthropy$160,000Education$125,225Recreation & Sports$30,000Animals$11,000Human Services$5,800

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCharleston Jewish Federation Inc: $160,000 over 3y, 3.8% of budgetASHLEY HALL FOUNDATION: $40,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetKIDS ON POINT INC: $30,000 over 3y, 0.9% of budgetCHARLESTON SOUTHERN UNIVERSITY: $30,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE UNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA FOUNDATION: $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE STRAY DOG SOCIETY: $15,000 over 3y, 1.4% of budgetADDLESTONE HEBREW ACADEMY: $13,600 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetMADISON OGLETHORPE ANIMAL SHELTER: $5,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetSPECIAL OLYMPICS SOUTH CAROLINA: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCOASTAL CAROLINA COUNCIL BSA: $4,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetPET HELPERS INC: $3,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetCHARLESTON ANIMAL SOCIETY: $3,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTRIDENT LITERACY ASSOCIATION INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetLandmarks for Families Inc: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSIPES ORCHARD HOME: $2,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetJEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER OF NASHVILLE: $1,800 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetRAMBAM DAY SCHOOL: $1,625 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSIMON WIESENTHAL CENTER INC: $1,150 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBREAKTHROUGH T1D: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds CHABAD OF CHARLESTON INC ↗
  • Who funds Charleston Jewish Federation Inc ↗
  • Who funds ASHLEY HALL FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds KIDS ON POINT INC ↗
  • Who funds CHARLESTON SOUTHERN UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds THE UNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds THE STRAY DOG SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds ADDLESTONE HEBREW ACADEMY ↗
  • Who funds MADISON OGLETHORPE ANIMAL SHELTER ↗
  • Who funds SPECIAL OLYMPICS SOUTH CAROLINA ↗
  • Who funds COASTAL CAROLINA COUNCIL BSA ↗
  • Who funds PET HELPERS INC ↗
  • Who funds CHARLESTON ANIMAL SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds TRIDENT LITERACY ASSOCIATION INC ↗
  • Who funds Landmarks for Families Inc ↗
  • Who funds SIPES ORCHARD HOME ↗
  • Who funds JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER OF NASHVILLE ↗
  • Who funds RAMBAM DAY SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds SIMON WIESENTHAL CENTER INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Coastal Community Foundation of South Carolina IncSC25.4× affinity10 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Coastal Community Foundation of South Carolina Inc · Henry & Sylvia Yaschik Foundation Inc · Nathan & Marlene Addlestone Foundation Inc · The Leon Levine Foundation · The Sherman Family Charitable Trust · Trident United Way · Sol and Celia Cohen Endowment Fund · Advanced Technology International · Jewish Federation of Greater Atlanta Inc · Central Carolina Community Foundation · Jewish Communal Fund · Bny Mellon Charitable Gift Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Cohen Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Cohen Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    11report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 48 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Cohen Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph