Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Cobos Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$51k
Granted FY2025still arriving
14
Grants FY2025still arriving
7
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Religion$133kHuman Services$75kEducation$64kFood & Nutrition$43kArts & Culture$41kHousing & Shelter$32kEmployment$19kHealth$14kOther$0
02FY2025 · 14 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k13 grants · $41k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $10k
$3,700
Median grant
7
States reached
$783k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
THREE SQUARE$10,000
THE HANOVER IMPROVEMENT SOCIETY$5,000
CATHOLIC CHARITIES SOUTHERN NEVADA$5,000
ALL GOD'S CHILDREN$5,000
SHADE TREE$4,200
NY TIMES COMMUNITY FUND$4,000
FORDHAM OF LONG ISLAND$3,700
SARASOTA OPERA HOUSE$3,000
ABOVE AND BEYOND FOUNDATION$3,000
LAS VEGAS RESCUE MISSION$2,500
HARLEM CHILDRENS ZONE$2,500
SAINT JOSEPH HUSBAND OF MARY CATHOLIC CHURCH$1,500
VAIL HEALTH SERVICES FOUNDATION$1,000
Individual grant recipient$500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $16k) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%WOMENS FOUNDATION OF COLORADO: $300 → 12%LAS VEGAS RESCUE MISSION: $3k → 13%HARLEM CHILDRENS ZONE: $10k → 17%HARLEM CHILDRENS ZONE: $3k → 17%CHARITY WATER: $900 → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

NH
WA
IL
NY
NV
CA
UT
CO
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

95%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$425k · 24 repeat orgs$24k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +38% since the first grant, against +13% for those funded once.

24 repeat relationships: 11 still active in FY2025, 13 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

24
16

Total granted

$425k
$15k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+38%
+13%

Still filing today

46%
38%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 82% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $9k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesInternationalRecreation & SportsEducationHealthCommunity ImprovementOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AG
    ALL GOD'S CHILDREN INTERNATIONAL
    8× · 2017–2025 · $45k · revenue +38%
  • PB
    PALM BEACH ATLANTIC UNIVERSITY INC
    3× · 2017–2019 · $30k · revenue +51%
  • CC
    Catholic Charities of Northern Nevada
    3× · 2020–2023 · $16k · revenue +48%

Funded once

  • MM
    MAMMOTH MOUNTAIN SKI PATROL
    one grant, 2021 · $2k
  • VF
    VVMC FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2017 · $1k
  • BV
    BRAVO VAIL
    one grant, 2017 · $1k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Vail Valley Foundation

Vail valley foundation was created to enhance the quality of life in the vail valley and showcase our community to a global audience through arts, athletics, and education.

Community Improvement
2
Project Drawdown

Project drawdown's mission is to drive meaningful climate action by advancing science-based solutions and strategies. project drawdown's work is focused on three pillars: science - advancing science-based climate solutions and strategies;…

Education
3
Vail International Pro Am
Recreation & Sports
4
Healthy Nevada
Health
5
Vail Clinic Inc % Vhh Accounting Department

Elevating health across our mountain communities.

Health
6
Food Bank of the Rockies

Food bank of the rockies ignites the power of community to nourish people facing food insecurity.

Food & Nutrition
7
Children's Hospital Colorado

To improve the health of children through the provision of high-quality, coordinated programs of patient care, education, research and advocacy.

Health
8
Aerial Recovery

Aerial recovery's mission is to save lives and stop evil. through the creation and deployment of humanitarian special operators, aerial recovery brings together selected veterans, first responders, and mission-qualified civilians who,…

—
9
Colorado Gives Foundation

We connect people, ideas, and nonprofits to make good happen. our vision is that all of jeffco is thriving.

Philanthropy
10
Park City Community Foundation

We bring together caring donors, expert nonprofits, and community leaders to contribute financial resources and innovative ideas to benefit all the people of park city - now and into the future. we care for and invest in the people, place,…

Philanthropy
11
Hunger Free Vermont Inc

To end the injustice of hunger for everyone and prioritize the people most affected by hunger to make a permanent systemic change.

Crime & Legal
12
Public Health Institute

Public health institute generates and promotes research, leadership and partnerships to build capacity for strong public health policy, programs, systems and practices.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Vail Health Services Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Fairweather Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

21 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 21 of the 44 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
20/21
Grantees still filing
12/21
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Individual grant recipient: $52,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientCATHOLIC CHARITIES SOUTHERN NEVADA: $45,500 · OtherCATHOLIC CHARITIES SOUTHERN NEVADAHARLEM CHILDREN ZONE: $30,000 · OtherHARLEM CHILDREN ZONETHE SHADE TREE INC: $29,700 · OtherTHE SHADE TREE INCNY TIMES NEEDIEST CASES: $20,000 · OtherNY TIMES NEEDIEST CASESNY TIMES COMMUNITY FUND: $14,000 · OtherFORDHAM OF LONG ISLAND: $12,000 · OtherSHERPA FOUNDATION: $11,500 · OtherVAIL HEALTH SERVICES FOUNDATION: $9,550 · Other+22 more: $40,506 · Other+22 moreALL GOD'S CHILDREN INTERNATIONAL: $44,500 · InternationalALL GOD'S C…+1 more: $1,000 · InternationalTHREE SQUARE: $42,500 · Food & NutritionTHREE SQUA…Catholic Charities of Northern Nevada: $15,500 · Human ServicesHARLEM CHILDREN'S ZONE INC: $12,500 · Human ServicesLAS VEGAS RESCUE MISSION: $2,500 · Human Services+3 more: $2,200 · Human ServicesPALM BEACH ATLANTIC UNIVERSITY INC: $30,000 · EducationTHE ABOVE AND BEYOND FOUNDATION: $18,500 · PhilanthropyROUNDUP RIVER RANCH: $10,000 · Recreation & SportsHANOVER IMPROVEMENT SOCIETY CORPORATION: $5,000 · Recreation & Sports
Other$264,756International$45,500Food & Nutrition$42,500Human Services$32,700Education$30,000Philanthropy$18,500Recreation & Sports$15,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetALL GOD'S CHILDREN INTERNATIONAL: $44,500 over 8y, 0.2% of budgetTHREE SQUARE: $42,500 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetPALM BEACH ATLANTIC UNIVERSITY INC: $30,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE SHADE TREE INC: $29,700 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetTHE ABOVE AND BEYOND FOUNDATION: $18,500 over 5y, 2.0% of budgetCatholic Charities of Northern Nevada: $15,500 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetHARLEM CHILDREN'S ZONE INC: $12,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetROUNDUP RIVER RANCH: $10,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetVAIL HEALTH SERVICES FOUNDATION: $9,550 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetHANOVER IMPROVEMENT SOCIETY CORPORATION: $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetTHE LITERACY PROJECT: $3,970 over 2y, 1.1% of budgetLAS VEGAS RESCUE MISSION: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetROCKY MOUNTAIN PUBLIC MEDIA INC: $1,300 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSPECIAL OLYMPICS NEW YORK INC: $1,036 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSMALL CHAMPIONS INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetDAVIS PHINNEY FOUNDATION: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetEAGLE VALLEY LAND TRUST: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds ALL GOD'S CHILDREN INTERNATIONAL ↗
  • Who funds THREE SQUARE ↗
  • Who funds PALM BEACH ATLANTIC UNIVERSITY INC ↗
  • Who funds THE SHADE TREE INC ↗
  • Who funds THE ABOVE AND BEYOND FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Catholic Charities of Northern Nevada ↗
  • Who funds HARLEM CHILDREN'S ZONE INC ↗
  • Who funds ROUNDUP RIVER RANCH ↗
  • Who funds VAIL HEALTH SERVICES FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds HANOVER IMPROVEMENT SOCIETY CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds THE LITERACY PROJECT ↗
  • Who funds LAS VEGAS RESCUE MISSION ↗
  • Who funds ROCKY MOUNTAIN PUBLIC MEDIA INC ↗
  • Who funds SPECIAL OLYMPICS NEW YORK INC ↗
  • Who funds SMALL CHAMPIONS INC ↗
  • Who funds DAVIS PHINNEY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC ↗
  • Who funds FAIRWEATHER FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds CHARITY GLOBAL INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

National Philanthropic TrustPA9.9× affinity6 shared granteesties to 7 of 7Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: National Philanthropic Trust · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Cobos Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Cobos Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Palm Beach Atlantic University Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
8report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Cobos Foundation?

Find your warmest path to The Cobos Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 44 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Cobos’ filings →

More from the funding graph