Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Clements Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$908k
Granted FY2025still arriving
9
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$450k
Largest
01What it funds
0197% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Youth Development$2.3MEducation$1.3MReligion$1.1MFood & Nutrition$685kInternational$210kCrime & Legal$107kHuman Services$81kRecreation & Sports$26kOther$0
02FY2025 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k1 grant · $5k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $43k
  • $50k–250k5 grants · $410k
  • $250k+1 grant · $450k
$50,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$16M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
THE MENTORING ALLIANCE$450,000
LOS CABOS MISSIONS$120,000
UT Tyler$100,000
International Community Foundation$90,000
EAST TEXAS FOOD BANK$50,000
Brook Hill School$50,000
THE SDA HEALTH$25,000
NEW CREATION FOUNDATION$17,500
THE FIRST TEE OF GREATER TYLER$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $11k) land where the poverty rate runs at 5%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 9% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%HARBOR OF HOPE: $10k → 5%AMERICAN LEGION: $1k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$5.6M · 17 repeat orgs$130k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +72% since the first grant, against 0% for those funded once.

17 repeat relationships: 7 still active in FY2025, 10 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

17
10

Total granted

$5.6M
$105k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+72%
0%

Still filing today

35%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 97% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $25k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesYouth DevelopmentEducationCrime & LegalPublic BenefitAnimalsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MA
    MENTORING ALLIANCE
    9× · 2017–2025 · $2.3M · revenue +287%
  • TB
    THE BROOK HILL SCHOOL INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $454k · revenue +72%
  • FT
    Feeding the Gulf Coast
    2× · 2020–2022 · $215k · revenue +11%

Funded once

  • BM
    BOATHOUSE MINISTRYgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $50k · revenue +63%
  • LC
    LIBERTY CHURCH BLUE ANGEL CAMPUS
    one grant, 2018 · $25k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2022 · $10k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Still Water Camps Inc

Still Water Camps shares the life-changing truth of Jesus Christ through evangelistic and discipleship-focused initiatives in partnership with the local body of Christ. We seek to serve the community through overnight camp, day camps, and…

Recreation & Sports
2
Camp Eagle

Camp eagle (the "camp") was incorporated on march 8, 1999, under the texas non-profit corporation act; organized exclusively for christian religious purposes, and more specifically the advancement of religion and operation of a christian…

Recreation & Sports
3
Fort Bend Christian Academy

Fort Bend Christian Academy exists to glorify God through excellence in college preparatory Christian education. FBCA strives to equip students with the ability to thrive spiritually, academically, socially, and physically.

Education
4
Children's Bible Ministries of Nc Inc

New life camp exists to love, accept, and introduce children and their families to jesus christ, and to equip them to live lives that glorify god.

—
5
Kids Across America

Christian sports camp to teach biblical principles and life skills to urban youth and their mentors.

Religion
6
The Woodlands Christian Academy

TWCA is an independent, Christ-centered college preparatory school that integrates learning with biblical faith and challenges our students to reach their highest potential - intellectually, creatively, physically, and socially - for the…

—
7
Fond Du Lac Christian School Inc

To serve the christian home and church by disciplining students academically and spiritually; helping each student attain a biblical worldview and their full potential as unique and beloved creations of a sovereign god.

Education
8
Youthfront Inc

Interdenomination ministry dedicated to bringing youth into a growing relationship with jesus christ.

—
9
Foster College

The mission of Foster College is to equip students to live, serve, and lead with Godly influence and impact in their communities and throughout the world.

Education
10
Feeding Texas

To lead a unified effort for a hunger-free texas.

Community Improvement
11
Tyndale Christian School

Tyndale christian school provides a distinctively christian education devoted to cultivating academic excellence and love for all that is gods.

Religion
12
Camp Allen Camp & Conference Center

Camp Allen honors God and enriches lives by being a year-round gathering place for all ages, offering Christian hospitality amidst 1,100 forested acres, and striving for excellence in facilities, service, and programs.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Boathouse Ministry; the most unlike its peers is Sportyler. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 29 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
12/12
Grantees still filing
8/12
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT TYLER: $860,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT TYLERPERDIDO BAY METHODIST CHURCH: $550,000 · OtherPERDIDO BAY METHODIST CHURCHEAST TEXAS FOOD BANK: $470,000 · OtherEAST TEXAS FOOD BANKROSE HEIGHTS CHURCH: $246,000 · OtherROSE HEIGHTS CHURCHLOS CABOS MISSIONS: $210,000 · OtherLOS CABOS MISSIONS+18 more: $295,263 · Other+18 moreMENTORING ALLIANCE: $2,320,000 · Youth DevelopmentMENTORING ALLIANCETHE BROOK HILL SCHOOL INC: $453,580 · EducationFeeding the Gulf Coast: $215,000 · Food & NutritionINTERNATIONAL COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $210,000 · PhilanthropyFor the Silent: $107,000 · Crime & LegalBOATHOUSE MINISTRY: $50,000 · Religion
Other$2,631,263Youth Development$2,320,000Education$453,580Food & Nutrition$215,000Philanthropy$210,000Crime & Legal$107,000Religion$50,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetMENTORING ALLIANCE: $2,320,000 over 9y, 9.4% of budgetTHE BROOK HILL SCHOOL INC: $453,580 over 9y, 0.5% of budgetFeeding the Gulf Coast: $215,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetINTERNATIONAL COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $210,000 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetFor the Silent: $107,000 over 5y, 6.9% of budgetBOATHOUSE MINISTRY: $50,000 over 1y, 19% of budgetSPORTYLER: $25,000 over 5y, 7.4% of budgetNEW CREATION FOUNDATION INC: $20,000 over 2y, 2.9% of budgetHARBOR OF HOPE INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetAMERICAN LEGION 12 FAVRE BALDWIN: $1,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds MENTORING ALLIANCE ↗
  • Who funds THE BROOK HILL SCHOOL INC ↗
  • Who funds Feeding the Gulf Coast ↗
  • Who funds INTERNATIONAL COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds For the Silent ↗
  • Who funds BOATHOUSE MINISTRY ↗
  • Who funds SPORTYLER ↗
  • Who funds NEW CREATION FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds HARBOR OF HOPE INC ↗
  • Who funds OPERATION KINDNESS ↗
  • Who funds CAMP TYLER FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN LEGION 12 FAVRE BALDWIN ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

East Texas Communities FoundationTX24× affinity9 shared granteesties to 6 of 6Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: East Texas Communities Foundation · A S Genecov Foundation · American Endowment Foundation · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Clements Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Clements Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%5%11%20%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 29 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Clements Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph