Loading…
· Private foundation
THE CLEE AND OLIVIA ELLIOTT
This foundation accepts unsolicited grant applications.
$25k
Granted FY2024
11
Grants
3
Communities
$3k
Largest
01What you fund
01
What you funded, over time
By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).
A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 78% of THE CLEE AND OLIVIA ELLIOTT’s grantee dollars go to organizations outside the IRS cause taxonomy (common for large international and research funders), so a chart would be mostly “unclassified” and misrepresent the portfolio.
02beneath the categories
Past the labels — and the year it shifted
Beneath the NTEE codes, this is what the grant descriptions actually say.
…and in their own words, year by year
2018
care children
2019
care children
2020
care children
2021
care children
2022
care children
2023
salvation armycare children
2024
unresticted
Words distinctive to each year’s grant purposes (TF-IDF) · event-driven terms in cyan.
03FY2024 · 11 grants
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
$2,500
Median grant
3
States reached
$459k
Total assets
Largest grants
- FIRST CHRISTIAN CHURCH$3,000
- COMMUNITY PARTNERS OF DALLAS$3,000
- COMMUNITY ASSISTANCE CENTER$2,500
- SHRINERS HOSPITAL FOR CHILDREN$2,500
- TEXAS SCOTTISH RITE FOR CHILDREN$2,500
- HOPE SUPPLY CO$2,500
- YES (YOUTH EQUIPPED TO SUCCEED)$2,500
- GIRLS INC$2,500
- BSA CIRCLE OF TEN$2,500
- SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS$1,000
- READERS 2 LEADERS$750
02The need
04
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
show:
Your human-services grants (FY22–24, $13k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14% — the area typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
03Your edge
repeat funding
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
82%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$163k · 12 repeat orgs$36k to everyone else
12 repeat relationships — 7 still active in FY2024, 5 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Re-uppedFunded once
Organizations
12
6
Total granted
$163k
$27k
Still filing today
42%
0%
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 66% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $9k went to new ones.
RenewedFirst-time
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
Youth DevelopmentHuman ServicesArts & CultureHealthOther
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- CACOMMUNITY ASSISTANCE CENTER8× · 2017–2024 · $19k · revenue +48%
- R2READERS 2 LEADERS5× · 2020–2024 · $13k · revenue +178%
- HSHOPE SUPPLY CO3× · 2022–2024 · $13k · revenue +45%
Funded once
- NHNEVADA HANDone grant, 2018 · $11k
- SASALVATION ARMYone grant, 2023 · $10k
- SOSOCIETY OF ST VINCENT DEPAULone grant, 2020 · $3k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
04Your field
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
1
Child Crisis Center of El Paso Inc
The mission of the Child Crisis Center is to protect children, newborn through thirteen years of age, from abuse/neglect by providing temporary short-term emergency shelter and family support services.
Human Services
2
Central Texas Spca
Rescue neglected, unwanted homeless dogs and cats nurture and provide shelter until they are placed with a forever family strive to reduce animal overpopulation prevent cruelty to animals teach responsible pet ownership through an outreach…
Animals
3
Respite Care of San Antonio Inc
Respite Care of San Antonio is dedicated to providing specialized care for children with disabilities and complex medical conditions through an emergency shelter, childcare, and offering community programs for children with special needs,…
Human Services
4
Texans Care for Children Inc
Texas Care for Children shapes public policies and brings Texans together to make children a statewide priority. We work so kids can have what they need to be healthy, secure, and thriving and so every Texan can have the best start to life.
Crime & Legal
5
Spca of Texas
Founded in 1938, the spca of texas is an independent nonprofit that rescues, cares for, and finds homes for animals. we support pets and their people, strengthening the connection they share.
Animals
6
Children's Aid Society of West Tx Inc
The children's aid society of west texas operates a custodial child care and teen runaway shelter. its mission is to provide shelter, supervision, and counseling for children in crisis; to cooperate with other agencies in order to resolve…
Human Services
7
Caritas of Austin
Caritas of austin's mission is to prevent and end homelessness in greater austin.
—
8
Humane Society of Harris County
Humane Society of Harris County's mission remains steadfast: to provide high-quality adoption, transport, foster, Trap, neuter, release, and pet food pantry services to our community. Yet, with a fresh perspective and a renewed passion,…
—
9
Child Advocates San Antonio
Court appointed volunteers serve as advocates for children in state protective custody.
Civil Rights
10
Htx Hope Haven
We are moving people from crisis to lifelong self-sufficiency. We help the homeless and marginalized people in our community navigate through the services available to become self-supporting contributing members of our community.
Human Services
11
Street Child Us
Street Child's mission is for every child to be safe, in school and learning.
International
12
San Antonio Foster Care and Adoption and Services
San antonio foster care and adoption services inc. is a licensed child placement agency in the state of texas. the organization cares for children placed in foster care by the state of texas.
Human Services
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Boys & Girls Club of San Antonio and the most unlike its peers is Trinity River Mission Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network
8 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2024.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.
0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
7/8
Grantees still filing
5/8
Grew since you first funded
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Other$156,295Youth Development$21,000Human Services$12,500Arts & Culture$7,000Health$2,500
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds COMMUNITY ASSISTANCE CENTER ↗
- Who funds TRINITY RIVER MISSION ↗
- Who funds READERS 2 LEADERS ↗
- Who funds HOPE SUPPLY CO ↗
- Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF SAN ANTONIO ↗
- Who funds FREEDOM SHIELD FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds SHRINERS HOSPITAL FOR CHILDREN ↗
- Who funds SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
The Dallas FoundationTX15.4× affinity5 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →
Open a dossier: The Dallas Foundation · Celanese Foundation · United Way Worldwide · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organisation THE CLEE AND OLIVIA ELLIOTT funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
2024
’20’21’22’23’24
- The Shriners' Hospital for Children — 6% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
typical government reliance, FY20–24
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
05Through Plinth
Through Plinth
Your grantmaking, live and operational
This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: FREEDOM SHIELD FOUNDATION.
Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk
Financial management
insufficient risk
Limited financial data in public filings.
Track record & reputation
medium risk
4 years of Form 990 filings, still active; revenue up 2.6× since.
Legal standing
low risk
US 501(c)(3); EIN 843632862 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.
Governance
Live in Plinth
Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.
Compliance & sanctions
Live in Plinth
OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.
Program capacity
Live in Plinth
Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.
Live · Plinth’s real DD engine
Run the actual assessment on FREEDOM SHIELD FOUNDATION, cold from public data.
Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.
Post-award monitoring · continuous checks
- Awaiting reportFinancial stability— Runway not derivable from filings.
- On trackSustained operations— Filing through 2023; revenue grew over the period.
- On trackReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 0% of their budget — diversified.
- Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.
What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.
Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing
Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro
How do I get to The Clee and Olivia Elliott?
Find your warmest path to The Clee and Olivia Elliott through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.
Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.
More from the funding graph
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars pass through an intermediary
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
Strange bedfellows
the named clusters of US funding
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home
State money flows
the interactive map of money crossing state lines